reply
NOBODY KNOWS DAN…. nobody knows. plenty of evidence that NIST is at a loss to explain what they studied. Read the report, look at the nickel attacking or forming within the steel C-115 truss rod. But nickel is an alloying element to iron, not a corrosive agent. If you are looking for magic coin, there it is!
World Trade September 11th Explosive Cover Up part 2 Victims Injuries
NIST's findings do not support the "pancake theory" of collapse”
however NIST Does Support a giant block theory which is just like pancake theory but it includes a “top section” which also vanishes without a trace and misses 16 people and no object shows this effect. No shill has put forth a defense proving anything.
“that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.”
FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation NIST says the top section “pressed” and “flatten” the rest of the towers, so where is the evidence?
Christine said
- For those who didn't get out,2. if they didn't jump, 3..if they weren't burned 4. if they weren't trapped in the collapse..
She explicitly excludes the “collapse” as the source or a cause of the explosion and subsequent flying body parts. The fifth thing that happened was the explosion.
Pasquale Buzzelli was safe in his bed on the night 9/11 . So your TNT theory from Gravity just didn’t not happen. Sorry, guess again.
This is a photo Pasquale Buzzelli’s leg. Looks like he was blasted by
explosives. Black and blue.
Also Gravity limits the rate of free fall. A free-falling object has an acceleration of 9.8 m/s/s, downward. So forget about your 15,000 tons of dead floor/building/something which used gravity idea. Gravity missed groups of people, who were untouched by your magic pancake theory, and they were all throughout the building and they ALL went home for dinner on 9/11. Falling floors? I think not! Most of none-pancake people are still having dinner just like everyone else. So that's the end of that stupid idea. Don't bring it up again. Here is rule of thumb you can live by: If it sounds stupid, it is stupid.
What ever happened to James Millette 9/11 thermite chips? Why didn’t any of the government shill supporters ask for them or ask a single important question? Why don’t you answer that question yourself? Cat got your tongue or would that be counterproductive? The cat always seems to have the tongue when shilling for criminals is paramount.
Christine Mazzola Paramedic Fire Department of New York
What happened to James Millette chips? Why didn’t any of the government shill supporters ask for them or ask a single important question? Why don’t you answer?
“No Christine does not believe in bombs.???” How do you know that? Did you speak with her? Are you making things up like James Millette did and that is why he never did his job or prove anything via blinded third party?
This has nothing to do with the collapses. Why would you assume such a stupid idea knowing the bombs were going off all day? You heard them going off on video too. I can upload more bombing victims right now and more reports of secondary explosions connected with the collapses.
WTC 9/11 Video That Was Another Bomb Guys
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYcS3uDmysQ
9/11 Explosive Force physical evidence for controlled demolition
https://youtu.be/-C5mlwBDM-Q
9/11 Explosives Cover Up part 2 Victims Injuries
https://youtu.be/yJ1MLLuY1aU
9/11 Secondary Explosions Then Subsequent Collapses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xXg2VcqH-c
She didn’t say anything about a collapse. Where do you see the word collapse? No collapse at this point in time means explosives.
explosion’ does mean explosives when the feet per second or degree power of the blast is great enough.
You can see the damage on the steel C-14
9/11 physical evidence for controlled demolition
https://youtu.be/-C5mlwBDM-Q
9/11 Explosives Cover Up part 2 Victims Injuries https://youtu.be/yJ1MLLuY1aU
let look at this sentence:
“why would James give you his chips? you are unqualified to handle the dust sample”
First, The topic is about the chips NOT the dust sample. Do you understand the difference?
Second, the issue is not give ME the chips, its give anyone the chips. Why did he hold or withhold the chips for verification? Why not give the chips to Steven Jones or all the people who had positive test results?
“there is irony in that statement” You just verified that you are a shill. The correct answer would have been something like: No one is shilling or is paid to look the other way with regard to NOT asking WHY at every at moment or finding answers or NOT reading correctly on spite which is a desire to hurt, annoy, anyone. That is NOT what is happening here.
tremendous energy released by the downward movement. The key here is “downward movement”. What does a downward movement of top section do? NIST is saying that the top section “pressed” and “flatten” the rest of the towers. The quotes are from your responses and NOT from NIST.
Your focus on the quotes is not the topic, not an issue and it an avoidance of the facts, that you never said who said the chips are in storage! James Millette shared his test results but NOT his chips which still need to be verified or nothing was accomplished. How many “debunkers” demanded that the chip verification process is necessary? ZERO! You don’t even know WHY that is should be done or why?
“why is the lab papers test secrete? Why is it private? that is even more suspicious now.” Suspicious of who? The families should have gotten a copy and they most likely did not. It is Suspicious that James Millette didn’t bother to send the chips to the person who hired him and that hiree didn’t bother to ask.
Why would Bart Voorsanger have anything to do with test? They said “fused” and “like lava” which also means heat was the cause not [again your quotes] “pressed” and “flattened”. This shows you definitely have an I.Q issue.
They discover a “solid, rock like mass was tested and the cause was HEAT. Pablo Lopez assumed and later was found incorrect. The recognizable traces of twenty floors was most likely molten at the time is is the true cause as per reports. Pablo Lopez also witnessed flight 175 going down the Hudson River going SOUTH, then turned over Statue Of Liberty and then go NORTH into the towers. Pablo Lopez was guessing and he was discovered LATER he was WRONG and carbonized means burned. These stories are the cover story, while the real reports show a different story which are hard to get and are unknown by the public and truther community. You know about the reports show the early reports are wrong. So why do you bring it up is anyone’s guess.
The thinning evidence of 9/11. Appendix C and now C-115. Again NOT crushed! Not a single flat marks on any the surfaces C-115.
C-14 shows a blast and not covered in the report!
How does Pablo Lopez comments relate back you your photo of single I-beam which is NOT flatten and thus proves your comments and reference to photos wrong? The location is also OUTSIDE the towers near on the side of the retaining wall called the The Bathtub - Wikipedia
So you not only show a pile OUTSIDE the towers and
I-beams not crushed, you failed to answer my question.
#2 “FEMA among others” was refering to OKC bombing. Wrong bombing. 1998 is not 2001!
Figure 6. Sequence of air-blast effects
Image Credit: BIPS 06 / FEMA 426 Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings (Source:: Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, User's Guide on Protection Against Terrorist Vehicle Bombs, May 1998)
Blast Safety of the Building Envelope and that was a scam.
#3 “I look through his book and I couldn't find any reference to explosives. “ How did you “look through the book”? Why not READ the book? This is more proof that you can’t READ!
#4 Michael Hess will not talk is not speculation and when he did talk it was all lies. Why did Michael Hess lie is anyone guess. Why don’t you ask him?
“Bart Voorsanger is claiming that there was molten steel in the concrete. How did he know that?” So you assume because he matches what the report says he 1. has read the report? 2. Knows about the report? 3. guessing correctly is impossible? Anyone can SEE the mass was molten. Lava is also referenced at museums at the 9/11 rock formations.
“New York Police Museum. ... "During recovery efforts, several handguns were found at Ground Zero, including these two cylindrical gun-casing remains and a revolver embedded in concrete. Fire temperatures were so intense that concrete melted like lava around anything in its path." “How Did Ground Zero get as hot as Kilauea 2,200-degree lava? and around the guns. Again NOT PRESSED.
“Anyway I emailed Elizabeth Greenspan, author of ‘Battle for ground zero” and I still haven’t gotten any reply” maybe she thinks you will cause trouble for the Jews. This report is big trouble. You will never get it, read it and never hear the truth about it. Ask the families about it not Greenspan.
“Ok …Mohr did have access to the samples because he is the one who hired James in the first place. “ Why do you assume Mohr had access to James Millette source material? Why would James Millette give Chris source material?
Did Chris Mohr ask for the chips James Millette filtered from the dust so HE can pass them on to others?
For those who didn't get out, if they didn't jump, if they weren't burned if they weren't trapped in the collapse, THEY WERE BLOWN APART BY THE EXPLOSION. A very good friend of mine had a torso land right in front of her. From the sky. Arms and limbs gone, head gone gone just a torso..