"We’re just monitoring the Secret Service and staff radio channels. It was chaos. What’s next? All of a sudden, other reports start coming in—explosion at the White House, car bomb at the State Department. We’re under attack."
Ok, so you're probably not going to believe this but it's driving me crazy. And I am also not sure if this belongs here or on r/conspiracy, but here it goes...
I went to undergrad at the George Washington University. On 9/11 our dorms were evacuated due to the proximity of the State Department, which was car bombed. I remember leaving my dorm after watching a plane hit the towers on the Today show, in a panic because I am from the New York Area.
I grabbed a couple of my friends and we headed out to see what was going on as there were a lot of sirens in the area. We started walking through campus toward the metro, and there were legions of people walking up 21st street. There was smoke billowing up from one of the buildings at the state department. When I asked someone what was going on, she said that there was a car bombing at the state department and everyone was evacuated.
Fast forward a couple of weeks later, we took a walk to the state department and sure enough the building façade closest to E street was severely damaged. But there were no news reports of anything that happened.
TO this day people call me crazy when I tell them this story, because there is no evidence anywhere to support it. Five people could not have imagined the same scenario, could they?
i remember this as well, and if i am not mistaken, that was part of the catalyst for the reason they closed off the street in front of the state department. you can't see the street from this picture, but that is the where the road is now closed. also, a friend was a manager at a now closed gap store right next to gw, and i remember him telling me about the car bomb and describing the smoke that was coming from there.
2001-09-11 11:31:36 Arch [1428040] C ALPHA Sub:WTC Update Msg: WTC UPDATE 10:35 CNN: CAR BOMBING AT STATE DEPARTMENT<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /> 10:37 CNN: UNCONFIRMED - 747 DOWN IN PEN
https://911.wikileaks.org/files/messages_2001_09_11-11_30_2001_09_11-11_34.txtIf you acknowledge the bombing at State, the truck bomb found in NYC with two Israelis at the wheel, the Israeli Mossad agents who filmed the first plane hitting, or the many explosions in WTC 1, 2 and 7 that were not related to the planes hitting towers 1 and 2, there is no other conclusion than 19 radical terrorists did not commit those terrible acts. The media ignored everything that didn't fit the narrative.. Yes, I've googled it on numerous occasions and most things point to a conspiracy. But I know it happened. I was there.
I knew about that one, but it is the only credible source. People are always accusing me of making this story up. And sometimes I wonder if it really happened.
Benedict Sliney "FAA request for military assistance emanates from the effected center directly to the military"
If you picked all-of the above, you could be right !!! The 9/11 Commission defense was the message just got lost in the FAA and the message was late. However the military could have complete real-time situational awareness 100% of time and everywhere on earth, but that is what the military would like to have. We will never know what they do have! What other goals exist? None!
“Dan Bueno knew he should be calling NEADS” this means he never did it.
Dan Bueno: "Hey Cape, ah, Dan Bueno callin' from Boston Center" sounds like he calling Otis but he is not. It is FAA Cape Tracon.. A fake call to try make it look like he is calling Otis.
FAA Cape Tracon CAPE2 Called Otis. Otis said DENIED, call NEADS
Flight 11 had three conditions to start off 9/11:
1. Loss of communications 2. off course and 3. loss of mode 3 transponder code 1433.
Does “massive electrical failure” explain all three conditions?
Officials responsible for the operation of the aircraft.
A system-generated transmission from an aircraft.
Number 3 was Boston responsibility to declare an emergency. They did nothing.
When a pilot notifies ATC verbally of a hijacking situation, assign code 7500 to the subject aircraft. Boston should have assigned code 7500 to the aircraft. They did nothing
Boston did absolutely nothing on 9/11. American 11 was NORDO and had a flight deviation at the same time at 8:14. NEADS gets a call.
Part of the 9/11 cover up is that no one called the military as their first outgoing phone call. They called everywhere else until it was too late. The second cover up is flight deviation starting at 8:14.
could be misconstrued as calling Otis air force base and calling Herndon could be misconstrued as a call going out to GIANT KILLER or the use of the red phone..
The third detail is the unnecessary time spent listening audio recordings while the same tape recording was being played over the speaker system.. That should have been enough to get someone to call the military not wait for a judgment call.
The forth detail was the FAA chain of command. Instead of everyone doing something they all had to wait for instructions from higher up in the command structure.
The fifth detail is using Letter Agreements as a excuse to not to follow common sense. Common sense means to call everyone and the military at the same time and in parallel..
The last detail is the details themselves. Watering down and sugar coating the emergency. Thing like "we might have a hijacking" or not communicating the details of what is happening like American 11 flying into oncoming traffic.
Why does the FAA have an emergency red phone line which directly connects to the military? In an emergency and you are the FAA what alternatives exist? The FAA can’t call anywhere else. What alternatives exist is the question? Why not call the military? Why did they avoid that call until it was too late? Did they fake it? Where they also hijacked and told what not to do by scary people. Did the FAA fixed the problem? Why was the Eastern Air National Guard tasked with enforcing the No-fly zone over Iraq before 9/11 via Operation Southern and Northern Watch if they were a part time outfit? Why would Boston have two military liaisons on staff?
They also lied about the details of Flight 11 and why because the emergency started earlier then when the “hijackers” were recorded saying “they have some planes”. The common knowledge about flight 11 is actually wrong. How is it wrong? By listening to archived audio interviews you discover the whole plot however some interviews are missing.. Part 2’s are missing.
When an individual has an emergency he or she calls 9–1–1. An operator redirects the call to either fire, ems or the police. Your location is the only thing required. For Air Traffic Control the options are just as limited. The red phone on the wall was made for emergencies and that connect to the military. If you don’t call 9-1-1 while your house is burning chances are you set the fire. The same thing applies to Air Traffic Control. The first calls never went anyplace which informed the military about anything. President Bush knew about the other two planes and said nothing about it during his first speech to the public. His first words should have been. Two other fights are still in the air and take cover and I will return when those issues are resolved.
All the emergency calls out of FAA Boston went to non-military FAA organizations until it was too late so it would look like they were doing something but they were actually faking a response to the 9/11 emergency. Why would anyone do that and how did they manage to get away with it without a signal soul discovering what ATC Boston did?
Dan Bueno calls Herndon Herndon ATCSCC or FAA Command Center East Position Tony [T8 B3 Boston Center Dan Bueno Fdr- 9-22-03 2 MFR]
Dan Bueno was aware of Vigilant Guardian
Dan Bueno knew to call NEADS but did not
Its seems like a bunch of guys at the Boston Watch Desk couldn’t do anything until they got their ORDERS to do something from someone else above them. All Boston had to do when Peter got the idea the flight 11 was hijacked was call NEADS. They did everything under the sun to delay that call. It is crime and someone should have been prosecuted .
I can't find a reason why Dan Bueno or anyone else at Boston didn't call NEADS as soon as any kind of emergency was known, not just a hijacking. If flight 11 was flying into inbound traffic at 8:14, why didn't any of those inbound flights see the hijackers or maybe they did.
Flight 11 started deviating off its normal flight routine or its FAA registered flight plan starting at 8:14 as noted by Peter Zalewski audio interview with the commission and official FAA documents. Officially that didn't happen until much later.
The ridiculous calls to other FAA facilities was an attempt to make look like something was being done. The "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement" was Dan Bueno reason to call Cape Tracon but the "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement" assumes NEADS already knows about the hijacking and just needs Boston to "relay flight plan information" which makes no sense if the flight is already off course which makes that information irrelevant. I am going to assume that Boston Watch Desk was doing nonsense busy work crisis acting.
The official excuse makers just say the FAA calls were too late to the military, but they never ask themselves why the call was too late. We know the first official lie and cover up on 9/11 was when flight 11 started of course at 8:14. We know flight 11 started of course at 8:14 because that is what Peter said and also documented by Ronald S. Coddington and Jessica of USA Today using data I can't find currently.
Sep 12, 2021, 7:37 AM
Ronald S. Coddington
Jessica believes she used a publicly available flight tracker.
I also recommend you contact USA Today to see about gaining access to the files.
The story of 9/11 goes like this. After [TMU] listened to tape recordings from the cockpit which was also being played over the speaker system, Dan was tasked to call the military. He applied the "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement" was the reason he called yet another FAA location for assistance in order to contact Otis i.e the military. Otis refused to respond to FAA requests for scramble and said it only approves scrambles from NEADS. At that point Dan discovers the "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement" was bullshit and asks Joe Cooper to contact NEADS which he did but the phone call was too late. What should have happened was as soon as Dan Bueno or anyone at the supervisor level or above discovered a problem, electrical or greater was to call NEADS. They didn't need it to be a hijacking to call the military. Electrical problems is another reason to call the military. The military involvement is just to assist decision making. The military should monitor all flights for anomalies and be more protractive like when flights wonder into forbidden zones.
ACTIVE SCRAMBLE. (1) Otis Tower shall: Upon receiving an active scramble order from NEADS, contact, Boston ARTCC and Cape TRACON, identify the scramble as an ACTIVE SCRAMBLE relay flight plan information and special instructions received from NEADS. Issue an ATC clearance and obtain release from TRACON.
(2) Boston ARTCC shall: Upon notification from Otis Tower, immediately issue at transponder code and expected altitude; and insert flight plan information into HOST computer. i.e Dan Bueno lied.
"That flow of information should have been between the ATCSCC and NEADS, not Boston Center and NEADS. " source
Actually the flow should have been Boston Watch Desk to NEADS according to Shirley Kulaand to use the hotline to the military i.e the red phone. Boston didn't call NEADS until after they listened to the ATTA tape for half hour. Listening to that tape and not trusting what Peter Zalewski was saying and playing over speaker system was all that was needed to get 9/11 going.
"The call should have gone to North East Air Defense (NEADS), but due to the urgency of the
circumstance called directly to the FAA contact point for Otis"
How does calling another FAA agency speed up the call to Otis AFB? This is total bullshit!
Wherever you add another individual to the system more time is taken to transfer all the information.
I wonder if the "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement" is completely made up scam. Otis AFB reply to CAPE2 was to require authorization from NEADS during a crisis.. So no agreement actually existed when it counted on 9/11. CAPE1 called CAPE2 which called Otis AFB. Otis AFB said they needed NEADS authorization, so back CAPE2 and back to CAPE1 and back to looser Dan Bueno. So how did this "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement" help?
Executive briefing: Shirley Kula said the Watchdesk calls the military. Dan Bueno is at the Watch desk. Dan Bueno fools everyone into believing the military was called. Dan Bueno never calls the military believes an unknown document Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement would to the trick and when that fails passes the task to Joe Cooper but only after it was too late at 8:37.
It looks like Dan Bueno made it look like he was calling the military by calling two locations i.e he fooled Schippani i.e Schippani roughly recalled what occurred at the watchdesk. [Staff Note: The watch desk is the hub of activity in the Center.] He remembers Dan Bueno attempted to contact Otis AFB for support. Nope
Call #1 Command Center East Position Tony. [FAA] which could be called Herndon or could be conflated as Giant Killer . Call #2 Bueno Call to Cape Tracon which is also called Cape Approach and also CAPE1. [FAA] Call #3 CAPE1 calls CAPE2 [FAA]
Dan Bueno asked Cooper to call for military at 8:37; i.e After Bob Jones confirmed the cockpit communications, Dan Bueno asked Cooper to call for military assistance. [There was no reason to confirm anything. They used the tape listening session as an excuse to delay action] Why did Cooper sit on ass and wait for direction?
i.e Cape Approach [CAPE1] [ Bueno: Yes sir, departed Boston going to LAX, right now he’s out to Albany, like to scramble some fighters to go tail him. ] Why not call NEADS and say this???
according to Daniel Bueno who was Operations Supervisor at Boston Air Route
Traffic Control Center, TRACON had "to coordinate the fighter scramble," being a
procedure from the "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement;" this meant "getting the
fighters safely into the national airspace system." 101
In order for this to work, a direction and a distance were required. This was
necessary because fighters were kept out of the National Airspace System on
the morning of, due to military exercises and drills. In addition, "Whiskey 105"
military training zone was active that morning. If remembered, American 11
detoured into "Whiskey 105" military training zone for unknown reasons to us.
[COMMISSION MEMORANDUM (MFR04016766): Team 8 INTERVIEW: FAA
Eastern Region Ron Ruggeri, Dec. 17, 2003.]
Source https://archive.org/stream/911ReferenceVol1/911-Reference-Vol-1_djvu.txt
We know the Fun facts: Joint Surveillance System radars feed both FAA and NORAD sites. Cooper thought they might vector an aircraft from the Falcon Axe area [over Griffiss AFB, Rome NY] [close to flight 11]..
Dan Bueno asked Cooper to call for military assistance. Cooper believes he spoke with Sergeant Powel. Dan Bueno knew that the call should have gone to North East Air Defense (NEADS), but due to the urgency of the circumstance called directly to the FAA contact point for Otis which was denied. [Every call Dan Bueno goes to FAA and never to the military] "According to Bueno, the key that alarmed Boston Center over AA11 before the threatening communication was the hard southern turn" The Calls were at 8:24 and the turn started at 8:26..before that Flight 11 off its flight path starting at 8:14.
The procedure for active fighter scrambles was coordinated in the "Otis Cape TRACON Letter Agreement"..
Flight 11 Turn 8:26
Shirley Kula spilled the beans about the red phone and what should have been done because she held both roles of ATC and higher up in the FAA. She said what should have been done on 9/11. The hijacker “mistakes” were repeated across many 9/11 flights to pin the blame on others so an investigation would be eliminated or limited.
At 9:39, the FAA's Cleveland Air Route Traffic Control Center overheard a second announcement indicating that there was a bomb on board, that the plane was returning to the airport, and that they should remain seated. this announcement, like those on , was intended to deceive them. Jarrah, like Atta earlier, Flight 11 and Flight 77. [So only flight 175 didn't have an "hijacker" announcement] Flight 77 a passenger reported that an announcement had been made by the "pilot" that the plane had been hijacked. [one of the 904-555-0004 contained this information?]
The hijack public announcements were heard just fine. Boston ATC people did contact the military but first they didn’t believe the reports by their own employees and passed on the hijack report to others when taking direct command of the situation is called for. Intercepts were happening all the time but hijack protocols were changed June 1st 2001 which didn't matter because no one used those protocols before however they were enforced for the first time on 9/11 which was the reason Otis refused to help. It was joint effort by everyone to allow 9/11 to happen.
Problems with Zalewski File [1421-2] cuts off short
The reason the military could not intercept was because they got the word late, which is 50% true. The Boston FAA guys all said they didn't know who NEADS was and didn't know who should call the military and they all had to listen to the tape for no reason. ATC's who had supervisor roles in the past also didn't pick up the hotline to the military. Peter put the hijackers on FAA Boston speaker system. They all wasted time until the flight passed Albany and up to almost Rome NY and then they wasted more time. American Airlines was called and didn't send an alert message to all aircraft. Wife of pilots were allowed to pass messages to the pilots, but the messages never seemed to say anything.
"Team 8 Interview with" titling phrase was changed when dealing with 'Peter" The phrase was changed to "of PeterZalewski " not "WITH" Peter. I think Peter is a 9/11 Truther but we will never know.
Memorandum for the Record (MFR) of the Interview of PeterZalewski of the Federal Aviation Administration Conducted by Team 8 https://catalog.archives.gov/id/2610750 "AA11 started to move in to the arrival route for Logan, Zilowski became even more concerned as AA11 started to approach another sector's airspace."
No audio tape was made do to 9/11 Cover-up and scandal.
"did not think Shippani was taking the situation seriously," Insider and mole. Shippani should have called the military using the red watch desk phone and not waste time "pulling the tape" those minutes were wasted.
Peter put AA11 on the loud speaker for the section.
I found an audio tape by Shirley Kula .. Nothing nefarious was discovered except the flight was off course sooner than the official story says and validates USA Today graphic.
During the 9/11 Commission's investigation, commission staff conducted over 1200 fact-finding interviews. The MFRs are summaries of these interviews, and are available in the National Archives Catalog
Shirley Kula Flight 11 was off its flight path starting at 8:14 but the flight plan changes were not nefarious and had something to do with handoffs with other controllers. The watch desk calls the military. (32:00 audio) red phone rings its the military, phone calls go to giant killer. Note: Giant Killer should contact NEADS for Boston.
The FAA Boston Center watch desk's has a red phone which is a open hotline to the military, but on 9/11 was never used by Terry, Danny, John, Cooper or
. Is this the clearest evidence for an inside job or is it plausible they just forgot? Was repeated requests for hijack confirmation designed to the delay a call to the military.
The 158th Fighter Wing (158 FW) is a unit of the Vermont Air National Guard, stationed at Burlington Air National Guard Base, Burlington, Vermont. Then she said they were called later in the day. No midflight stand down order.
Team 8 Interview with TerryBiggio calls the ROC at 8:30 but should called NEADS. ROC might have assumed Terry already called NEADS. Why? 8:20 Danny said we got a hijack. Based on cockpit transmissions. Peter Z. heard something. Bob Jones pulled tape.
note: quality assurance specialist Robert Jones Team8Interview with RobertJones Call from watch desk possible hijack. 8:25 Peter Z. said "hijack in progress" he was sure it was hijack. Terry Biggio caused the delay. relaying to Terry Biggio what the tapes said. Middle eastern male. More then one plane. Second transmission was 8:24.
Does not talk about the red phone to the military and they don't ask. DanBueno must have used the red phone and he did call Giant Killer [Tony] at minute 11:00 but at 8:28 flight 11 just started going south at 8:26 . https://catalog.archives.gov/id/12033244
8:28 Boston Center notified FAA command center in Herndon, Va., that American 11 had been hijacked and was heading toward New York Center's airspace.
What did Tony do at Herndon after getting the call from Dan?
"In his experience the typical time to get airborne from a scramble was in the 5-15
minute range, depending on circumstances. His personal standard was they should be
airborne in 5 minutes."
Terry and Dan so far don't talk about off course at 8:14. Only NARDO, transponder and "we have more planes". No watch desk or red phone.
Jo(h)n Schippani "Schippani roughly recalled what occurred at the watchdesk. [Staff Note: The watch desk is the hub of activity in the Center.] He remembers Dan Bueno attempted to contact Otis AFB for support"
Team 8 Interview with John Schippani not off course [lie].. said he going to JFK airport. uses terms like Flow Control not watch desk. No red phone. Hotline they just pick up phone is the red phone. Didn't know how to call NEADS. Hotline goes to Giant Killer.
No one bothers to pickup up the hotline i.e the red phone. The red phone is a direct line to Giant Killer even though they talk to them daily. No one contacted NEADS until later. Dan Bueno "attempt" never went to Otis, it went to the FAA side at CAPE near Otis. Otis rejects the request. The delay was because they kept listening to the tapes. Bob Jones was the second confirmation?
Joseph CooperTeam 8 Interview with JosephCooper of the Federal Aviation Administration tape 1,2,3,4.. Flight 11 Off flight course early. 8:20 lost radar. Someone tagged "flight 11" primary on scopes. So you can type in "flight 11" and the primary shows up on scope. Computer was told to track AAL 11. Off course early. Someone is updating the data block's altitude. Dan said to call the military. Joe called Huntress. They weren't picking up the phone. Supervisor calls the military. Tape 2. Is this real world or exercise. MCC talked to female. She was going to hang up. FAA has to help military because it was primary only. Command post exercise. Falcon X airspace was active. Huntress hung up. They talked about Vigilant Guardian being a tabletop exercise however it a was a major NORAD exercise. The goal was delay.
08:25:00 Facility log entry: Based on cockpit communications we have declared a hijack is in progress. ROC, ATCSSC, ZBW-1 notified
8:35:18 ZBWTMU CAPE2
yes sir departed boston going to Iax right now he's south of Albany I'd like to scramble some fighters to go tail him hey ah we just talked to Otis here and they said they needed NEADS authorization. (Otis blocked a response to AA11)
"the protocol was by and large not used. That the Federal
Aviation Administration established direct contact with the Northeast Air Defense
Sector, and that NEADS scrambled and launched its alert fighters in defense of the
country, had more to do with individual initiative than adherence to established
procedure"
" This letter responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, 2021-001840, dated
February 6. Your request sought a copy of all flight data for aircraft N334AA, N612UA, N591UA
and N644AA.
A search was conducted by the Air Traffic Organization, System Operations Services, System Data
Policy Group using the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Traffic Flow Management System
(TFMS) and the National Offload Program (NOP) repositories. However, no records were found
responsive to your request because commercial flights are tracked by call sign and not tail number."
Virginia Boyle
Vice President, System Operations Services
R.C.
Author
Aug 24, 2021, 1:21 PM
You sent
Did you create this graphic for USA today?
Enter
Sat 6:15 PM
Ronald S. Coddington
Yes, I did!
Enter
Sat 11:03 PM
You sent
How did you manage to get the intended route information? That information is called the "flight path" which is registered with the FAA. The military claims they don't even have it to make sure flights don't go off course.. I don't think NTSB or 9/11 commission made use of it. It was left out by everyone.
Enter
Sat 11:33 PM
Ronald S. Coddington
My memory is that our reporters at USA Today acquires this information.
Enter
Sun 12:36 AM
You sent
Can you still ask them? It is a pretty cool find. I was just wondering about the details. Has anyone questioned it or even asked you about it before?
Enter
Ronald S. Coddington
I can. I am still working in journalism. What you have here, I believe. Is a screen grab from a flash animation I did on 9/11 or 9/12. Curious where you found it as USA Today shot down the multimedia servers with all the 9/11 graphics some years ago.
Enter
Sun 1:41 AM
You sent
The image has been copied by others and if you search by image you can see all the copies that exist. You are right the image is from the flash animation. Wayback Machine might have it too. I might have the flash file too someplace. I used the image to calculate the time the flights were off there flight path and it matches the amount of time the hijackers were in control which is two hours. So I didn't get anyplace new. However AA11 actually went off its path much earlier then the official account .. This graph is the only thing that says they are wrong. Did you know that?
Enter
Sun 7:16 AM
Ronald S. Coddington
Wow. This is fascinating. I understand now why the source of this information is important. The other person credited is my former coworker and also my neighbor! She did the research. Let me check with her.
Enter
Sun 7:37 AM
Ronald S. Coddington
Jessica believes she used a publicly available flight tracker.
Enter
Sun 3:25 PM
You sent
You and Jessica undermined the NTSB, and 9/11 false narratives which are retold time and time again by authors of books on 9/11.. Actually I can't find another source on the flight path data and the topic is missing from the NTSB report on 9/11 but I could also be wrong. Does she remember which flight tracker? I just want to make sure the issue was dropped and the data is now forbidden. Why would so many people get the story wrong? Any guesses?
Enter
Tue 8:38 AM
Ronald S. Coddington
My understanding is the the data came from the FAA. It is also important to understand that the way I produced this animation was by importing a screen capture into Flash and tracing over the flight paths, or by importing it into another application like Adobe Illustrator. All of this was happening under intense deadline pressure. So you would want to check my work against original documents when you find them.
FAA Document #6 says they adjusted the flight plan to match whatever the hijackers were doing in real-time.
Enter
Ronald S. Coddington
I do not have source files. USA Today may have them. The other person who might help you is Paul Overberg. He headed up the data reporting team at that time. Jessica recalls that Paul supplied her with the information. As the graphics and animation person, with Jessica as my producer, it seems logical she would have asked Paul. But Jessica is also a capable researcher.
Enter
Tue 5:00 PM
You sent
Can you contact Paul. He would more likely to help you over me. Finding out which Flight Tracker was used and raw files both would be a great find. FAA document says they were amending the flight plan to match AA11 path therefore the flight would never be off course.
Enter
Tue 5:56 PM
Ronald S. Coddington
I can try to find him. Are you with a media organization?
Enter
You sent
Nope I am not with anyone. I am just trying to tell the story correctly and thanks for your help. Can you write something up? I emailed the FAA document back to the two FAA officials about the amended flight plan for AA11. I wonder if the amendments included WTC too early. Maybe I should ask them.
Enter
Ronald S. Coddington
Enter
You sent
I just email them but I don't think they will get back to me.
Enter
1:26 PM
You sent
Clearly they were covering up ATC not saying AA11 was off course. So to fix the problem they edited and changed "flightplan database" and so the problem was therefore fixed.
FOIA Form
Review changes
Please review and submit the information you entered. You will have another opportunity to print this request after you submit it.
Your application session will expire after 20 minutes of inactivity.
Daniel P.
September 19, 2021
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration – Southern Region National Freedom of Information Act Staff, AFN-400E
FOIA Coordinator:
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act. I request that a copy of the following documents (or documents containing the following information) be provided to me:
"At 8:26 Shirley Kula advises David McGlauflin that AAL 11 is a hijack and that they have amended the flight plan database to coincide with current heading. Then at 8:26 AAL 11 begins southbound turn over Albany, NY." What did Shirley Kula say she did on 9/11 and what were the changes made to AAL11 flight plan? Did the flight plan changes include airports close to the WTC?
In order to determine my status to assess fees, you should know that my fee category is: an individual seeking records for personal use and not for profit.
The maximum dollar amount I am willing to pay for this request is $10.00. Please notify me if the fees will exceed $25.00 or the maximum dollar amount I entered.
I request expedited processing of the request and provide a justification below. I believe a compelling need exists to warrant expedited processing because I am a member of the news media and there is an urgency to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity.
Shirley Kula actions may have aided the hijackers if they were using autopilot to get to NYC.
