Friday, January 16, 2015

The greatest threat to the FBI is an alert public

The greatest threat to the FBI is an alert public. One that assumes the worst of the FBI.
An Alert Updated public about Zacarias Moussaoui - as it happened. It SHOULD HAVE MADE THE NEWS , right. So what happened. Its funny how fraud somehow makes it in the news.
The greatest threat to the FBI was a good old national public announcement right after

Zacarias Moussaoui arrest as an example of what is happening.

. A giant all points bulletin alert to be on the lookout for terroristic activities at airports and beyond. A single news leak to alarm the people and stand guard and to be ready. Something Far greater and Private Messages on Odigo and beyond Newsweek news reports warning people not to fly on September 10th..

The FBI DID NEED Mark Rossini or a Coleen Rowley for misdirection purposes back up the age old enemy "bureaucratic and legal complications" however another flight instructor leakier solution by Coleen Rowley is nothing compared to millions of Americans calling hotlines 1-800-StopHijackers.

No ... a news organizations could be that enemy or a leak. Maybe the news did report

Zacarias Moussaoui arrest and maybe it never happened at all.

The fingerprints of crime in progress (crime of 9/11) could be suppression activities. Every single person at that flight school, Zacarias Moussaoui
friends and family any all pillow talk had to be suppressed. I must confess I don't know one single detail about who the flight instructor was and who else could have possibly known about Zacarias public announcements.

Reverend Stephen Sizer posted a link to an article titled, “9/11 – Israel did it” - See more at: http://yournewswire.com/vicars-911-facebook-post-investigated-by-church-of-england/#sthash.pVEgkDIb.dpuf
The antithesis of "intelligence failures" are gag orders. Gag orders are evidence of an inside job.
http://www.newsweek.com/2015/01/23/information-could-have-stopped-911-299148.html

The Church of England is investigating a vicar accused of posting an article on Facebook blaming Israel for the 9/11 attacks in the US.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-31052648Vicar investigated over Facebook post linking to 'anti-Semitic' article '9/11 Israel did it'http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/vicar-investigated-over-facebook-post-linking-to-antisemitic-article-911-israel-did-it-10012794.html

David Shippers, John Ashcroft Rod Middleton  Alberto Gonzales
The Phoenix Memo.

acting chief of the Usama bin Laden Unit (UBLU) and they DID NOT NEED Alec Station.  The FBI — Amerithrax Investigation and 9/11 PENTTBOMB Investigation should lead back to inside sources.

All these "Stations", "Units" and "memos" are breadcrumbs back to real masterminds of 9/11.
The story would have gone forward with few names added to the list.. scoreboard would read: 19 hijackers captured and same amount 19 hijackers still around .

"there were some FBI agents doing their best to get to Attorney General John Ashcroft to tell him they knew an attack was going to happen, the date, and almost the precise time, but he would not answer their telephone calls. So they went to David Shippers (chief counsel during the congressional probe of Bill Clinton; he was also working with and had many contacts within the FBI). Shippers also tried his best to reach Ashcroft, but Ashcroft would not return his phone calls. So these are all big red flags.”

Just found out that you can squawk 7500 from the ground to any aircraft.

So why didn't anyone issue a 7500 Hijack 7500 Code for the doomed flights of Flights of 9/11?If this was possible, why didn't a single 9/11 Truther bring it up?

More examples documentaries blurring the facts.

Dave McDougall There is a great documentary about this, this was a big deal here. Ronny ignores this, he says it didn't happen

45 mins · Like
Daniel M. Plesse Dave McDougall this video has a number of silent issues included. Russian speaking dudes "building is going to collapse" . C.I.A James Woolsey naming Iraq as a target. Other people "prophecy magazine"

38 mins · Like · 1

Edit
Dave McDougall I noticed that, I will have to re watch

31 mins · Like
Daniel M. Plesse Another issue is the ability to send a 7500 squawk to any aircraft which the documentary "it didn't happen here" completely fucks up on that issue just like the issue of inter-agency communication issues (9/11 Commission Report) should have been rendered completely moot by the separate reports of hijackers at Flight schools by at least one Flight School instructor. How does 9/11 Commission Report avoid that issue. What communication issue existed after that report and memo was written? What hell is the deal with all these memos anyway? Minneapolis memo and Zacarias Moussaoui case. 9/11 The Man In The Red Bandanna
How did a Flight School instructor "whistle blowing" activities get churned into an issue of 4th, 5th , 6th amendment rights and thus protecting the 9/11 back story. The goal in that instance seemed like it was out to kill or weaken these pesky Amendments and thus had nothing to do with saving the lives or NOT doing there constrained jobs correctly.. The F.B.I's goal via Coleen Rowley was sell the idea of weaken these Amendments. That's WHY she got zero punishment for "whistle blowing" activities. Killing these Amendments and weaken the Bill of Rights. She was also sold as a hero like america's mayor

Rudy Giuliani The Goal for the F.B.I and reason to go along with 9/11 was
basic.

Operation unconstrained themselves.
C.I.A also unconstrained themselves from laws created in the 1970's.
So far the intelligence agency "failures" meant bigger budgets
and unfettered activities. No rules, just right.

NSA got unfettered wiretapping. Everyone got something.
Freedom from laws and death to America.

"Why I Support a New 9/11 Investigation | Coleen Rowley

www.huffingtonpost.com/coleen-rowley/why-i-supp...

"Aug 15, 2009 - After 9/11, I couldn't help but think about the FBI Ethics curriculum ... about 4th Amendment search and seizure, 5th and 6th Amendment law of interrogation,right to attorney and constitutional protection of rights to free speech, ..."

I Noticed two things the huffingtonpost is Anti 9/11 Truth organization and they manage to post Coleen Rowley misdirection
F.B.I inaction to one of constraining reasons for not visiting flight schools back those Darn Bill of Rights! (If only that darn Bill was dead)
ethics and blah blah blah waste of time. It was never a criminal investigation. It was clearly
administrative snafus and failure of imagination. The

Pre 9/11 Back Story Would live and "FBI Ethics" and all these pesky Amendments would die!

via . However in this video 9/11 The Convincer of the Unthinkable shows the 9/11 Widows ie "Jersey Girls" knew something was funny when after the FBI just so happened to show up at all problematic flight schools with little delay. Somehow all the constraining reasons were all gone but just so happens the "9/11 hijackers" were all gone . Boo hoo.

F.B.I Got Lucky or more like they knew the 9/11 back story

At some point Michael Moore had to edited out the two explosions guy. At that point he knew it was an inside job and once you know you can´t unknow.

Amy Criminal Goodman Social Engineering WTC 7 ( once you know you can´t unknow.)

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

What was World Trade Building 7 "Pull it" 2018

when he says "Pull it" and his hands fly out, his body language says he means the building

OEM knew about the second plane and the Towers coming down

AT THIS POINT COMMUNICATED WITH CHIEF

PERUGGIA VIA THE LAND LINE AND WE WERE DIRECTED TO

REPORT TO 7 WORLD TRADE TO SET UP OEM BOTH MYSELF AND

EMT ZARRILLO WENT TO THE 23RD FLOOR OF 7 WORLD TRADE

AND BEGAN TO LOG ONTO THE TERMINALS AS WELL AS INFORM

THE CITYWIDE DISPATCH SUPERVISOR THAT WE WERE

ACTIVATING OEM AT THIS TIME AND OPERATIONS WERE TO BEGIN

MOMENTS THERE AFTER WE WERE ADVISED BY THE

STAFF AT OEM THAT WE WERE TO VACATE THE BUILDING THAT

THEY BELIEVED THERE WAS ANOTHER POSSIBLE PLANE ON ITS

WAY AND PROCEEDED DOWN THE STAIRWELL OF WORLD TRADE

ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE GROUND FLOOR

AT THIS POINT WE TRIED TO GATHER ALL OUR

EQUIPMENT GATHER SOME EQUIPMENT FROM WORLD TRADE

SET UP TREATMENT AREA AT THE BOTTOM AND WE WERE MET

BY ONE OF THE DOCTORS FROM OMA DONT RECALL HIS

NAME AT THIS POINT
Explosion?

ID SAY WITHIN 20 MINUTES TO HALF AN HOUR

OF BEING DOWN THERE OR TRYING TO SET EVERYTHING UP ALL

OF SUDDEN LOUD NOISE RUBBLE AND SAND AND DUST

EVERYTHING JUST STARTED TOPPLING DOWN

What was "Pull it" ?
2018 Barry and Hess talk of explosives and thus accounts for all damage and was not the North Tower

"The major concern at that time at that particular location was number Seven, building number seven, which had taken a big hit from the north tower. When it fell, it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing."

Photos if a blast going around the building 



Building 7 Blast Ring

“I was working as a journalist for Gannett News at Ground Zero that day, and I remember very clearly what I saw and heard.”

“Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall.” Larry Silverstein's "Pull It" fits perfectly next

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."WMV video download (490kB)

So The Smartest thing to do is "pull it"

2015 Summary of key evidence of man-made collapse of Building 7

1. Danny Jowenko WTC 7 is a controlled demolition
2. Foreknowledge,
3. the strange dirt reported by Leslie E. Robertson,
4. Free Fall,
5. BPAT John Gross dancing on WTC 7 debris shows clear arson,
6. eye witness on 1010 Wins,
7. Flash Witness,
8. Boom witness Building 7 Witness Kevin Mcfadden
9. no detailed photographs of the south face,
10. not one investigator was allow near the pile,
11. removal started that night,
12. excessive heat, The NIST “no molten metal” guy
13. strange flashes recorded by CNN,
14. witnesses Barry Jennings,
15. Micheal Hess,
16. MISSING STEEL Witness Chief Frank Fellini,
17 the drawings show the front of building was Scooped Out Shyam Sunder NIST investigator
18. OEM directors attending events at other locations, Richard Rotanz walking around building 7 looking at elevators blown down the hall,
19. Vince DeMentri runs into WTC 7 but someone decides NOT to release the video of that adventure.
20. NIST drawings removed key elements WTF News | Baran Hines & Ralph Morelli
21. NIST Not releasing 3,370 files which The NIST Director determined might jeopardize public safety" bull shit
22. Police Officer Witness
23. "Move it back, the building is about to blow up. "
24 "building is going to collapse, nothing information"
25. "WTC 7 The Building Looks blown up, Just like Oklahoma city bombing"

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro was arrested for harassing friends of John and Patsy Ramsey
"Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall."

Jeffrey Scott Shapiro
This Sounds like the "Pull it" story

"But he got up on the rig next to me and he
said basically his concern was that he didn't want to
lose anymore firefighters, that too many guys were dead
already, and he basically called Mosier aside and told
him, "Get everybody out of 90 West. Fuck the
building. Let it go."
"We have a six-story building over there, a seven-story
building, fully involved." At that time he said, "7
has got fire on several floors." He said, "We've got a
ten-story over there, another ten-story over there, a
six-story over there, a 13-story over there." He just
looked at me and said, "Fuck 'em all. Let 'em burn."
Then we found out, I guess around 3:00
o'clock, that they thought 7 was going to collapse.
So, of course, we've got guys all in this pile over
here and the main concern was get everybody out, and I
guess it took us over an hour and a half, two hours to
get everybody out of there.

Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse,
and then we waited a while and it got a lot more
organized, I would guess. By then there was some heavy
equipment showing up and the Chiefs took over"

(Debunking Larry Silverstein's "Pull it" quote page) line by line
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/larrysilverstein%27s%22pullit%22quote

1. "that he ordered his building to be demolished!" Whenever "Pull it" falls short - other witness pick it up and nail the crime to the cross. 9/11 Debunkers: ignore best the evidence with the hopes the memory hole and enormity of the crime will be enough to hide the crime of the century from short attention spans and other distractions.. Jeffrey Shapiro said WTC 7 was a demolition have publicly stated that this was fact and is not even an issue.

“And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."
Who made the decision to pull? They. They is key.

Notice that issue has not been solved, investigated by NIST etc. Phone records are good place to start. "Does the FDNY demolish buildings with explosives? No". The NYFD also does not fight fires 1. Area is empty of people OR if the building like WTC 7 was empty.. So the
"they pull their people away from buildings that are too dangerous to be near." is not correct either.

We have never, ever heard the term ‘pull it’ being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we’ve spoken with.”

-Brent Blanchard said that
"similarity relates more to military explosive demolition than to building implosions"

What did Silverstein mean by 'Pull it'? Well His body language means pull operations or they message he's selling at the time interview. Lying is hard thing to do and most people should not try it at home.

WTC 7 Massive fires debunked.

1. Richard Rotanz inspected WTC 7 from the inside.
2. A Reporter Runs Into WTC Building 7 means No Fires
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAYU_JFYH1M
The details like fireman in the building 7 are still false.
Richard Rotanz inspected WTC 7 building internally
(unless he is fireproof, there was no fire)
Richard Rotanz quote "The elevator was blown out of its shaft" BBC. Is he a moron and confessing to a conspiracy? Yep.

3. So what was all that smoke? Answer WTC 7 got hit with
Super Hot Molten Materials for example of molten or red hot materials in the dust cloud.

9/11 Molten Collection Dr. Mark Heath

Any Steel from WTC 1 was super hot

Super Hot Molten Material

"Pull it" was only part one . The Other missing Unknowns and problems is photographs, videos of the damage to the south side. All Photos of WTC 7 is completely missing. Photographer Steve Spak and Photographer Tom Franklin might have something. Drawings and comments of "missing steel" (7060 page Oral Histories Frank FELLINI page 3549) is all we have!! Conspiracy? Yep !! BIG blank space! NIST was only allowed show a drawing Building 7 damage from FEMA's building performance report... All video and photographic evidence is still not "safe" for public.

Who Is Steve Spak?

(WTC 7 - BBC The Third Tower - Conspiracy Files never shows a good photo but they sure talk it) even this film is edited between 39:50 - 40:00.

Who Is Steve Spak?

Two Drawings

http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1512-20490-2227/403_ch5.pdf Frank FELLINI page 3549 When it fell (WTC 1 North Tower), it ripped steel out from between the third and sixth floors across the facade on Vesey Street. We were concerned that the fires on several floors and the missing steel would result in the building collapsing. Only explosives could "ripped steel out" as reported by Barry Jennings and Hess Is "Pull it" used to mean "Withdraw firefighters from danger? NO!

No expert has used "pull it" or talked with anyone about "pulling it"!
"9/11 debunking the myths" will shorten the word to "pull" which is not the same. "Pull" does not equal "Pull it"
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/%22pull%22%3Dwithdrawfirefightersfromdanger
Lets search 7060 oral history PDF for "pull" and "pull it" anyway.Was is THOMAS FlTZPATRlCK who spoke to Silverstein?

Building 7 Timeline in seven parts are as follows. 1. Discuss what to do "Pull it" 2. Release News 3. Kick people out 4. Start flashes 5. Explosion 6. Building falls 7. clean up (Analysis of dust and debris of WTC building 7 all point to stranger then fiction causes. Comments and witnesses are rare at best. Leslie E. Robertson during a Stanford University Talk said the building turned back into it components and is the only witness to WTC 7 aftermath. While debris had strange HTA arson evidence as shown below with John Gross.

WTC 7 HTA Arson John Gross NTSB

John Gross HTA Arson Details Crimes Great Article.
http://wtfrly.com/2015/01/31/911-truth-nist-no-molten-metal-guy-melted-steel/#.VM6EYGj-kgQ 3. Kick people out evidence

World Trade Building 7 Witness Amy Goodman Interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cZMe6cS0jU

Building 7 falling down "no information guy"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvjOJdHN-hk

Firefighters kicked out on 9/11 cleanup Iron Workers update

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uvn1cSwOO5A

9/11 Search Rescue Kicked OUT to Watch WTC 7 FALL!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgUXSL0_jb0

4. Start Flashes Evidence WPIX Flash Witness, 1010 Wins Witness CNN Flashes Video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR1zzzIPfds

CNN Televised WTC 7 Demolition Squibs Flashes Right in your FACE Update 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gF0jTfO168sCNN Televised WTC 7 Demolition Right in your face
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_Qyjki7D6Y

FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) 2004 Tapes are key limited hangout.

Why we never needed Silverstein's 'Pull It' to prove WTC 7 was a controlled demolition and should have been left out of the 9/11 movement completely and in this instance the 9 11 debunkers are more right then wrong but more wrong then right. "Pull It" without hand movements means "pull the building" however "Pull IT" with the correct hand movement means pull the operation.

   “I remember getting a call from the fire department commander
Telling me that they were not sure they're gonna be able to
    contain the fire....
    I said, you know we had such terrible loss of life
    maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it ”

During this time his hands fly out for a second. He really means GET OUT OF THE AREA!

You never hear the question by the narrator however you do hear him talk about building 7. However it could be about anything. It would be helpful to get all the details first before jumping to conclusions.