9/11 totally missing no trace exploded people (too high 40%), Seismology (too high), Tritium (too high), Heat Levels (too high), Cancer Rates (too high)9/11 1,113 totally missing no trace / 2,753 total killed 1,640 Identified
2015 update =0.4042862332001453 Missing people
Almost 40.42862332001453% still totally missing no trace..
Source: NJ Man Confirmed as WTC Victm
Sam Haschets" 9/11 totally missing no trace and exploded people"?
Daniel M. PlesseYou see the body parts flew over 1,000 feet in all directions, so how can your fucked up brain still believe that this was not explosive event? Even if 40% was not still missing.. You have to be pretty fucked up person or a paid shill.. Either way you are a fucked up guy with no morals..
Daniel M. PlesseThe Fire Fighter body parts did fly over 1,000 Mr. Fucked up.. The FF were much much lower in the towers then most of the debris which is also more aerodynamic then Fire Fighters.. You are a pretty fucked up shill..
Daniel M. Plesseorganic debris i.e fireman are not aerodynamic at all.. The debris could be shaped to be very aerodynamic.. Your question does not address that the same explosive force acted on both the debris and the fireman, pushed both to extremes. My question is how can your fucked up brain not see this as an explosive event? Answer the question Mr. Fucked Up given this evidence i.e the body part map of fireman?
This video only address the noon time explosion.. by Jay Jonas and others etc which seismic evidence above points out and shows a late explosion which is addressed by news reports and witnesses firefighters trapped inside the core.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Thl2iextZwk
Use it, add it to your books.. Have to seen the French Photos of strange planes around the South Tower yet?
I just found out that possibly SIPA is a french agency.. They sent their 9/11 photos to NIST and NIST assumed they were edited, removed etc..
All their photos are a big deal.. Single folder inside NIST 5 terabytes FOIA release has everything you need ..
This could be the reason for the low resolution shift before south tower impact as seen on MSNBC and others... I asked MattTV for original raw footage at these higher resolutions which might contain something better then low resolution object..
For example. From radar and GoogleEarth 911maps.kml 911 maps I was able to pinpoint the exact moment Flight 11 started going off its flight path.. all other areas of interest go offline too..but I did not know that.. I double blinded myself..
The problem is Flight 11 is lost and flies NORTH past air force military bases but somehow gets help and starts a new flight path from beyond Albany NY which lines up perfectly with the North Tower!.. autopilot anyone? At 8:13, air traffic controllers at the FAA’s Boston Center in Nashua, New Hampshire, instructed Flight 11 to climb to 35,000 feet. The plane did not respond to, or obey the order, and its transponder was turned off. Air traffic controller Glen Michael said, "We considered it at the time to be a possible hijacking."
"FAA regulations stipulate that an aircraft emergency exists when there is an unexpected loss of radar contact, loss of radio communications, or both. If air traffic controllers believed Flight 11 had a major emergency at 8:13, then NORAD should have been notified immediately and military jets scrambled to investigate. The FAA and NORAD both claim that NORAD wasn’t informed until 8:40, a full 27 minutes later. One NORAD employee later claimed that notification occurred at 8:31.
Before contacting NORAD, Boston air traffic control watched Flight 11 make an unexpected 100-degree turn and head toward New York City. They informed other controllers of the emergency at 8:25 who all then allegedly heard dialog from the cockpit such as: "Nobodymove please, we are going back to the airport. Don’t try to make any stupid moves." Boston Center even asked the pilots of soon to be "hijacked" Flight 175 to scan the skies for the errant Flight 11."
If NORAD’s claim is false, and it was indeed informed within the time frame outlined in the FAA regulations that Flight 11 had a serious emergency, and possible hijacking; it would mean that NORAD did absolutely nothing for nearly one half of an hour while an airliner flew off course in some of the most congested airspace in the world. Heads should have rolled. But again, no one at the FAA or NORAD was even scolded.
According to alleged phone calls made by flight attendants Betty Ong 904-555-0004 and Amy Sweeny 904-555-0004, the hijackers had already stabbed and killed one passenger and two flight attendants by 8:21. After 8:21, both women allegedly remained on the phones with American Airlines Headquarters for 25 MINUTES, until their plane then hit the WTC North Tower.
BTW: Daniel Lewin, who was allegedly stabbed by hijacker Satam al-Suqami prior to American Airlines flight 11 crashing into the WTC, was/is an officer in an elite secret unit of the Israeli military called Matkal Sayeret that was instrumental in orchestrating Mossad activities prior to 9/11.
Anyone can solve this problem.. First I need distance traveled by each plane.. Flight 11, Flight 175, Flight 77, Flight 93. Next Start and End Time. This should give you average speed for each plane..Chances are we get into the Mach numbers of only a few aircraft like the X-43 but this is just a guess.. But I would like to know.. GoogleEarth 911maps.kml is a google place to start. I am not sure if Google Earth has a distance tool..If it does all we need is time..Time Then Distance = Speed then smaller faster planes..
9/11 maps have collected RADES84 data, documents from 911datasets.org, photos, videos, maps and plenty of useful documents to produce an all-in-one tool called 9/11 maps allowing anyone to look at this whole documentation at one place and from a timely and comprehensive perspective. You can follow the events of the day just as if you were looking at a radar screen. But you can do many other things. 9/11maps is a Google Earth program that allows anyone to watch and search the events of 9/11. http://www.11-septembre.com/GoogleEarth/911maps.kml
" ..As stated in Section 5.3.2 of NIST NCSTAR 1, a document from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) indicated that the impact of a [single, not multiple] Boeing 707 aircraft was analyzed during the design stage of the WTC towers. However, NIST investigators were unable to locate any documentation of the criteria and method used in the impact analysis and, therefore, were unable to verify the assertion that "... such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building...."..".
Maybe NIST should keep "looking"? Or outsource "looking" to independent investigators whose salary is not dependent on the outcome? Didn't think you thought so.
Harald MelingWhat's so hard to understand. NIST claims as expected that their "investigators" didn't discover the prints for the buildings being designed for a planehit. Strike of genius by the Criminal Cabal. Now they didnt lie; they just say they didn't "find" them. Like they didn't "find" evidence for explosives. But did they look? No. They didn't. Sweet isn't it? Since you are into this for whatever different reason than me you don't see it. And that's fine. Got to go. More tomorrow?
911TruthNOW Ok so shall i take it you're just going to ignore all the other fundamental factors I listed of which categorically PROVE no nukes were used to bring down the towers?
Regarding your misunderstanding of the seismic data, before i comment further, can you possibly supply me with something a little more than that single image?
Ps. World's largest spike from an explosion you say? Yet nobody heard it.....hmm
ReligiousIntolerant1 day ago