WTC7 Weaken Beam and Molten Slag Criminal Evidence WTC7 Weaken Beam and Molten Slag Criminal Evidence (https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2021/02/the-greatest-cover-up-of-all-time-is.html)
Thursday, November 30, 2017
Tuesday, November 28, 2017
9-11 Paranoia thinking Is so not Cool by Amanda Hess
Frank Greening reported that the red sand on shirt was core columns but then said that must have been 40+ year old dust (problem solved) |
9/11 Paranoia thinking Is so not cool by Amanda Hess.
The New York Times is not happy with people asking questions about 9/11 sofire up your Yellow Journalism 101's and How-to's and let the hit pieces fly
(maybe this time it work)
Summary on 9/11 Now in 2018
Frank Greening reported that the red sand on lady's shirt was the World Trade Center
core columns, but then said that must have been 40+ year old dust (problem solved)
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory reported explosions, Nope sorry " Just phantom unknown building collapses" (problem solved)
NIST said "its Finite Element Contract was terminated" can't do "global structural collapse" work Sorry No global structural collapse for you!
Tritium 55 times greater than other 2001 background levels, no problem because we have exit signs, gun scope no problem because we have
an excuse to cover all problems no matter how bad they are..
Ground Zero World Trade Center Tritium at Ground Zero too High
1. First they removed the debris..melted that down (Video below )
2. Then they denied access to the data
3. Then NIST wrote fraudulent based reports, that have to be continuously updated to fight off complaints..and have been exposed by WTC 7 Evaluation October 2016 Update: ASCE Fairbanks Engineers host Dr. Hulsey 2017 and soon 2018..
Step 2 Notice No data for 9/11
They scrubbed the data for 9/11
They scrubbed the data for 9/11
Source Practical Seismic Data Analysis
|
Be COOL, don't ask questions, obey your scientific genius Gods, talking heads or whomever looks cool like , Bow your head to the war people, ask your bible Don't scroll down
1. First they removed the debris..melted that down (Video below )
2. Then they denied access to the data
3. Then NIST wrote fraudulent based reports, that have to be continuously updated to fight off complaints..and have been exposed by WTC 7 Evaluation October 2016 Update: ASCE Fairbanks Engineers host Dr. Hulsey 2017 and soon 2018..
But don't be Paranoid
NIST said "its Finite Element Contract was terminated" can't do "global structural collapse" work Sorry No global structural collapse for you! NIST is a Finite Element Analysis Nazi |
NIST said "its Finite Element Contract was terminated" can't do "global structural collapse" work Sorry No global structural collapse for you! NIST is a Finite Element Analysis Nazi
9-11 Paranoia thinking Is so not Cool by Amanda Hess.
Daniel M. Plesse Any Topic on Paranoia thinking leads directly to dump-down moron level society wondering how could anyone question anything.. Any discussion about Conspiracy Theory leads the stupid into deep emotional wonderment about how to solve this mystery of these crazy people, right. After all paranoia thinking sounds like a who then a why. Why would anyone ask a paranoia person anything? That's just asking for trouble. Lets look at one detail for a second, if we did ask why and not who.. First level why a Conspiracy Theorist believes the tower were brought down (no not explosives) but by Controlled Demolition (enter Straw guy, Man gal or person) . No Not Military Controlled Demolition but plain old your grand daddy's Controlled Demolition. Look the the glove does not fit, you know the rest. Problem solved. Stupid society feels better. It's that simple. Authors get paid. Everyone's happy, end of debate. CD is dead.., CD's do this flashing and popping thing, followed by big explosions..It did not not exist on 9/11 and that's the paranoia crazy thinking if it did right? After all the media cleaned up all that shit anyway right, you know all the explosion sounds and that crazy shit., Oral Histories didn't say that shit, right? Searching for that shit would be a waste of time away from porn. Don't leave that playground. And that crazy Dr. Sykes said" the twin tower collapses were slightly larger in destructive energy at 2.4 " which is NOT the official story. Man another crazy paranoia guy, with a Dr in front of his name too.. Anyway the bottom line is theorist use evidence like everyone else does. Its called evidence and a review of that evidence points to a conspiracy.. Case in point, Joe Rogan had a debate with Brian Dunning, a very heated debate on WTC 7 however the problem was not because of Leroy Hulsey September 2017 Update showing Truth Community was right all along, no https://youtu.be/vMV8E_83NiI but no the problem was showing the details of what happened to building 7 collapse from street level.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWMJPaftuac oh shit that started the shit storm that broke the internet.. Baseball stopped, wars halted. The sun came out,, and ... and the earth .. well that pancake ...fucking re-inflated man, and that solved that problem but don't tell the paranoia, the government or uncool stupid people.. noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo..
More 9/11 Paranoia thinking Bullshit with Amanda Hess be COOL Don't Ask Questions
Show less
Do you see the recording of a big bomb or not? So do you believe the seismograph or not.. Your side argument " one big bomb would have created a Shockwave strong enough to blow out windows and be heard clearly on camera" have been addressed in all my videos. If you wish, recordings of shockwaves, explosions etc. are contained everywhere here on my channel and can be viewed within minutes if not seconds.. So Are you avoiding the main issue because you have limits? "it's why demolition crews don't detonate all bombs at once in a crowded area" This is the "America has a love affair with straw man, Mystical creations and God". video I should create... looney tunes characters and proxy arguments.. This time its about why demolition crews don't use big bombs. The World Trade Control Demolition was defined as "Implosion World Hints at Military Controlled Demolition" google that. So right away not all Controlled Demolitions are the same. Professionals have defined the versFion used on 9/11.
Your third point is not even on topic at all.. Straw Arguments, avoidance or no details or a context.. It just sounds like a crazy person replying hoping to avoid what really happened .. Sorry.. The main issue is credentials, as if Implosion World isn't enough or Frank Greening Paper "2017 World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel" isn't enough. How does the core columns find its way inside the threads of a women's shirt? Frank said it could be old Structural Steel blown out and found its way on its own to this lady. Can this idea be tested? Can other shirts show him he's right just by placing shirts near other building collapses? If building 7 prediction was possible, then shirts can be hung all around future building collapses and we will have our results.
Show less
Moon Landing Faked!!!—Why People Believe in Conspiracy TheoriesNew psychological research helps explain why some see intricate government conspiracies behind events like 9/11 or the Boston bombing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
but refuse to provide details on six tons of military cargo. According to airport
security personnel, the plane carried seven pallets of unspecified munitions.
all over 90% all over their body at two locations and NONE manage to prove
AA 11 or AA 77.
Lets looks at AA11 blue window stripe World Trade Center debris above
They have reflective paint with red, white and blue.. The problem is the reflective part never
seems to materialize and that area across all plane debris examples has always shown that area as folded and out of view..
hard like BPAT Team fought NOT to stop the melting down of World Trade Center evidence.
not do any work... That's just so sad.. "When the debris shower stopped, people began getting
out of their cars"? Debris shower? Did someone fly over and drop debris? I hope they didn't
do this..
FORMER PENTAGON STAFFER: ABSENCE OF ENGINES, TAIL, WINGS SHOW NO 757 CRASHED AT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11
What is the deal with Rumbling on 9/11?1. 9/11 Pentagon Construction Workers Report Rumbling 2. Pentagon survivor :I couldn't believe it was a plane
3. 9/11 Earthquake at the Pentagon Valecia Parker
Flight 77 seismology unknown
Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings
Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicates
Depleted Uranium Used
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm
Flight 93 seismology details missing
''Like a nuclear bomb,'' said Jim Brant, the owner of the Indian Lake Marina a mile and a
half downwind from the crash. Mr. Brant said he watched the fireball mushroom as
high as 500 feet.
Flight 11 seismology details missing
Flight 175 Seismology details missing
fuel and rubber. Several said they could not believe that such a huge plane
would leave such an apparently small crater in the ground.
Flight 77 Impact Mary Ann Owens Radiation Burns
Witnesses: Airplane hit the Pentagon hard
Wheeler, LarryAuthor InformationView Profile. Gannett News Service; McLean [McLean]12 Sep 2001: 1.
"Instantly I knew what was happening, and I involuntarily ducked as the plane passed perhaps 50 to 75 feet above
the roof of my car at great speed," [Mary Ann Owens] said. "The plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon.
The impact was deafening. The fuselage hit the ground and blew up." She witnessed nothing
"It completely disappeared into the Pentagon."
out of their cars"
9/11 Pentagon Construction Workers Report Rumbling and 9/11 No Plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtF2GhetXWg
Flight 77 Black Box and Flight 77 Phone calls Fraud or Drone or both?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq5UAx2zm_0
No Serial Numbers, Phone numbers looks like fraud and No Plane Witness Report
Flight 77 New Parts Photos
Woody Glover
GloverW@APCO911.org
Considering the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and that several passengers on the hijacked planes made telephone calls from aboard the planes, the Arlington County, VA Public Safety Emergency Communications Center (PSECC) developed a procedure to handle 9-1-1 and other calls that may be received by
the PSAP from a person aboard an airplane. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was asked to review and approve the procedure, which it did. The text of the procedure follows for any PSAP that may elect to replicate same. The telephone numbers listed in the procedure are to the FAAs National Operations Manager office located in Northern Virginia (Area Code 703) and are the numbers to call regardless of where in the United States the PSAP is located.
At this time the FAA does not have an 800 telephone number to this facility, if one is established it will be posted.
Got Dust for new 9/11 Thermite Study?
up and ask them now!
and the photograph that broke the internet
based on debris colors.. I am still working on uploading what I have so please keep visiting my blog for updates.
Summaries based on black box header data also show something is wrong.. NTSB never made a crash report,
some say first time in history.. Calls were mostly 904-555-0004 again something is wrong.. Witnesses didn't
know what happened to the building and insiders only see a single hole like a missile impacted. Everything has
a video or is documented http://911truthout.blogspot.com/.../when-is-flights-not.....