Thursday, November 30, 2017

When are The Flights Not The Right Flights on September 11th 2001

Flight 11 debris Questions 


Reply2 hrs
Manage
Neil Kerlogue Why do you think they were dumping plane parts ?

Reply1 hr
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse because no parts are outside the bag and everything fits in the bag..

ReplyJust now

Dutch authorities and El Al admit Flight 1862 carried sarin components and DU,
but refuse to provide  details on six tons of military cargo. According to airport
security personnel, the plane carried seven  pallets of unspecified munitions.

CVR's and FDR's for flight 1862. Flight 11, flight 175 and other "missing black boxes" sound like the same story each time.. People find them, then hand them over, then gov denies it and says shut up..

9/11 Found it! shut up

"Dutch and Israeli authorities apparently organized a cover-up. Most documents taken from El Al officials have disappeared. Police audio tapes and 42 videotapes taken by the firefighters were shredded. Firemen claimed that they turned in the cockpit voice recorder, or "black box," but the government denies that it was ever found. Metal parts from the wreckage were recycled and melted down before a proper investigation could begin."


New Photograph discovered of "Flight 77" above shows the white element resting 
next to the blue window stripe and as I recall AA Planes DO have polished silver part 
all over 90% all over their body at two locations and NONE manage to prove
AA 11 or AA 77.




Lets looks at AA11 blue window stripe World Trade Center debris above



 They have 
reflective paint with red, white and blue.. The problem is the reflective part never
seems 
to materialize and that area  across all plane debris examples has always shown that area as folded and out of view.. 
Maybe someone can photograph inside the folds with a micro camera and see.. All 
the parts so far look the same and in some cases employees at these shows are just as confused 
as any investigators.. These parts should be at   Hangar 6 for an investigation,but  somehow an
investigation never happened because the FBI said not. Notice The NTSB is NOT fighting too
hard like BPAT Team fought NOT to stop the melting down of World Trade Center evidence. 
Common theme here.  NIST said their software contract was cancelled for example and could
 not do any work...  That's just so sad.. "When the debris shower stopped, people began getting
out of their cars"? Debris shower? Did someone fly over and drop 
debris? I hope they didn't
do this..
FORMER PENTAGON STAFFER: ABSENCE OF ENGINES, TAIL, WINGS SHOW NO 757 CRASHED AT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11



What is the deal with 
Rumbling on 9/11?1. 9/11 Pentagon Construction Workers Report Rumbling  2. 
Pentagon survivor :I couldn't believe it was a plane
3. 
9/11 Earthquake at the Pentagon Valecia Parker
4. Flight 77 Impact Mary Ann Owens Radiation Burns

Flight 77 seismology unknown 
Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings
Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicates 
Depleted Uranium Used
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Flight 93 seismology details missing 
''Like a nuclear bomb,'' said Jim Brant, the owner of the Indian Lake Marina a mile and a 
half downwind from the crash. Mr. Brant said he watched the fireball mushroom as
high as 500 feet.

Flight 11 seismology  details missing 

Flight 175 Seismology details missing
Flight 93
''Like a nuclear bomb,'' said Jim Brant, the owner of the Indian Lake Marina a mile and a half downwind from the crash. Mr. Brant said he watched the fireball mushroom as high as 500 feet.
Several minutes later, bits of white paper began to rain down, said Carol Delasko, a secretary at the marina.
Mr. Brant and two of his employees arrived at the site in minutes, hoping to help survivors. He said he noticed a white plane, perhaps a jet, circling the wreckage. ''It reminded me of a fighter jet,'' he said. Mr. Crowley said he could neither confirm nor deny reports that an F-16 had been in the area. People who rushed to the smoldering crash site said it smelled of burning
fuel and rubber. Several said they could not believe that such a huge plane
would leave such an apparently small crater in the ground. 


Daniel M. Plesse
Flight 77 Impact Mary Ann Owens Radiation Burns

Witnesses: Airplane hit the Pentagon hard

Wheeler, LarryAuthor InformationView Profile. Gannett News Service; McLean [McLean]12 Sep 2001: 1.

"Instantly I knew what was happening, and I involuntarily ducked as the plane passed perhaps 50 to 75 feet above
the roof of my car at great speed," [Mary Ann Owens] said. "The plane slammed into the west wall of the Pentagon.
The impact was deafening. The fuselage hit the ground and blew up." She witnessed nothing


Reply3 mins
Manage
Daniel M. Plesse "It just was amazingly precise," Daryl Donley, another commuter, said of the plane's impact.
"It completely disappeared into the Pentagon."


ReplyJust now
Manage
Daniel M. Plesse "When the debris shower stopped, people began getting
out of their cars"


ReplyJust now



Daniel M. Plesse Eyewitnesses affirm they have no idea  but no plane seen
9/11 Pentagon Construction Workers Report Rumbling and 9/11 No Plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtF2GhetXWg


ReplyRemove Preview4 minsEdited
Manage
Daniel M. Plesse Flight Data Recorder Header data All Zeros
Flight 77 Black Box and Flight 77 Phone calls Fraud or Drone or both?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sq5UAx2zm_0


Flight 77 Black Box and Phone calls
YOUTUBE.COM

ReplyRemove Preview1 min
Manage
Daniel M. Plesse Flight 77 Black Box Header and side details show doors not opening and other scams.
No Serial Numbers, Phone numbers looks like fraud and No Plane Witness Report


ReplyJust now

Not Flight 77

Flight 77 New Parts Photos
Not Flight 77



Robert Fisk World Terror Inc,
It suits Bin Laden if we call him the head of World Terror Inc

Woody Glover 
GloverW@APCO911.org 

Considering the tragic events of September 11, 2001 and that several passengers on the hijacked planes made telephone calls from aboard the planes, the Arlington County, VA Public Safety Emergency Communications Center (PSECC) developed a procedure to handle 9-1-1 and other calls that may be received by 
the PSAP from a person aboard an airplane. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was asked to review and approve the procedure, which it did. The text of the procedure follows for any PSAP that may elect to replicate same. The telephone numbers listed in the procedure are to the FAAs National Operations Manager office located in Northern Virginia (Area Code 703) and are the numbers to call regardless of where in the United States the PSAP is located. 

At this time the FAA does not have an 800 telephone number to this facility, if one is established it will be posted.
Got Dust  for new 9/11 Thermite Study?


Well the  New-York Historical Society might have the answer for you, Step right
 up and ask them now!

Back to our televised live program now and new book review
and the photograph that broke the internet

Source

Daniel M. Plesse I might have new intelligence that shows via new photograph that flight 77 was not Flight 77
based on debris colors.. I am still working on uploading what I have so please keep visiting my blog for updates.
Summaries based on black box header data also show something is wrong.. NTSB never made a crash report,
some say first time in history.. Calls were mostly 904-555-0004 again something is wrong.. Witnesses didn't
know what happened to the building and insiders only see a single hole like a missile impacted. Everything has
a video or is documented 
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/.../when-is-flights-not...
..


Got Dust 9/11 for Thermite Study? Well the…
911TRUTHOUT.BLOGSPOT.PE

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyRemove Preview12 minsEdited

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

9-11 Paranoia thinking Is so not Cool by Amanda Hess




 Frank Greening reported that the red sand on shirt was core columns but then said that must have been 40+ year old dust (problem solved)

9/11 Paranoia thinking Is so not cool by Amanda Hess.

The New York Times is not happy with people asking questions about 9/11 so
fire up your Yellow Journalism 101's and How-to's and let the hit pieces fly
 (maybe this time it work) 

Summary on 9/11 Now in 2018
Frank Greening reported that the red sand on lady's shirt was the World Trade Center
core columns, but then said that must have been 40+ year old dust (problem solved) 

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory reported explosions, Nope sorry " Just phantom unknown building collapses" (problem solved)

NIST said "its Finite Element Contract was terminated" can't do "global structural collapse" work Sorry No global structural collapse for you!

Tritium 55 times greater than other 2001 background levels, no problem because we have exit signs, gun scope no problem because we have 
an excuse to cover all problems no matter how bad they are..

Ground Zero World Trade Center Tritium at Ground Zero too High


1. First they removed the debris..melted that down (Video below ) 
2. Then they denied access to the data 
3. Then NIST wrote fraudulent based reports, that have to be continuously updated to fight off complaints..and have been exposed by WTC 7 Evaluation October 2016 Update: ASCE Fairbanks Engineers host Dr. Hulsey 2017 and soon 2018..

Step 2 Notice No data for 9/11


   Date    Time (UTC)    Lat      Lon  Dep   Mag   [Web Page] [Phase Data] [Record Section] [WF] 
2001-09-22 16:01:20.5  38.026  -78.396   2 2.5 M   XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX 
2001-09-16 21:24:54.4  44.945  -72.155   9 1.9 M   XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXX 

They scrubbed the data for 9/11

Be COOL Don't Ask Questions

Source Practical Seismic Data Analysis
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory reported explosions, Nope sorry "
 Just phantom unknown building 
collapses" (problem solved)


Be COOL, don't ask questions, obey your scientific genius Gods,  talking heads or whomever looks cool like , Bow your head to the war people, ask your bible Don't scroll down

1. First they removed the debris..melted that down (Video below )
2. Then they denied access to the data
3. Then NIST wrote fraudulent based reports, that have to be continuously updated to fight off complaints..and have been exposed by WTC 7 Evaluation October 2016 Update: ASCE Fairbanks Engineers host Dr. Hulsey 2017 and soon 2018.. But don't be Paranoid





NIST said "its Finite Element Contract was terminated" can't do "global structural collapse" work Sorry No global structural collapse for you! NIST is a Finite Element Analysis Nazi

NIST said "its Finite Element Contract was terminated" can't do "global structural collapse" work Sorry No global structural collapse for you! NIST is a Finite Element Analysis Nazi




9-11 Paranoia thinking Is so not Cool by Amanda Hess.

Daniel M. Plesse Any Topic on Paranoia thinking leads directly to dump-down moron level society wondering how could anyone question anything.. Any discussion about Conspiracy Theory leads the stupid into deep emotional wonderment about how to solve this mystery of these crazy people, right. After all paranoia thinking sounds like a who then a why. Why would anyone ask a paranoia person anything? That's just asking for trouble. Lets look at one detail for a second, if we did ask why and not who.. First level why a Conspiracy Theorist believes the tower were brought down (no not explosives) but by Controlled Demolition (enter Straw guy, Man gal or person) . No Not Military Controlled Demolition but plain old your grand daddy's Controlled Demolition. Look the the glove does not fit, you know the rest. Problem solved. Stupid society feels better. It's that simple. Authors get paid. Everyone's happy, end of debate. CD is dead.., CD's do this flashing and popping thing, followed by big explosions..It did not  not exist on 9/11 and that's the paranoia crazy thinking if it did right? After all the media cleaned up all that shit anyway right, you know all the explosion sounds and that crazy shit., Oral Histories didn't say that shit, right? Searching for that shit would be a waste of time away from porn. Don't leave that playground. And that crazy Dr. Sykes said" the twin tower collapses were slightly larger in destructive energy at 2.4 " which is NOT the official story. Man another crazy paranoia guy, with a Dr in front of his name too.. Anyway the bottom line is theorist use evidence like everyone else does. Its called evidence and a review of that evidence points to a conspiracy.. Case in point, Joe Rogan had a debate with Brian Dunning, a very heated debate on WTC 7 however the  problem was not because of Leroy Hulsey September 2017 Update showing Truth Community was right all along, no https://youtu.be/vMV8E_83NiI but no the problem was showing the details of what happened to building 7 collapse from street level.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWMJPaftuac oh shit that started the shit storm that broke the internet.. Baseball stopped, wars halted. The sun came out,, and ... and the earth .. well that pancake ...fucking re-inflated man, and that solved that problem but don't tell the paranoia, the government or uncool stupid people.. noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo..
Joe Rogan Eddie Bravo On 9/11 Explosions Prove Conspiracy 

Joe Rogan Eddie Bravo On 9/11 Explosions Prove Conspiracy…
YOUTUBE.COM



More 9/11 Paranoia thinking Bullshit with Amanda Hess be COOL Don't Ask Questions



Miguel lopez

911TruthNOW again one big bomb would have created a Shockwave strong enough to blow out windows and be heard clearly on camera it's why demolition crews don't detonate all bombs at once in a crowded area, how do you not understand this? Operation Phoenix" okay so code names count as evidence? You don't do real research you're just a Blue Link Warrior us8ng web sites and other people's words instead of yours try again. Seriously why you guys got to make this conspiracy so convoluted, the government could have just actually use real planes they would have to destroy the building later anyways if the planes didn't take him down do to the structural damage and instability.

Show less

REPLY

9-11 Paranoia thinking Is So Not Cool, you can get HPV



911TruthNOW

Do you see the recording of a big bomb or not? So do you believe the seismograph or not.. Your side argument " one big bomb would have created a Shockwave strong enough to blow out windows and be heard clearly on camera" have been addressed in all my videos. If you wish, recordings of shockwaves, explosions etc. are contained everywhere here on my channel and can be viewed within minutes if not seconds.. So Are you avoiding the main issue because you have limits? "it's why demolition crews don't detonate all bombs at once in a crowded area" This is the "America has a love affair with straw man, Mystical creations and God". video I should create... looney tunes characters and proxy arguments.. This time its about why demolition crews don't use big bombs. The World Trade Control Demolition was defined as "Implosion World Hints at Military Controlled Demolition" google that. So right away not all Controlled Demolitions are the same. Professionals have defined the versFion used on 9/11.
"Operation Phoenix okay so code names count as evidence?" Its contained within pager data and there is a phone number to call.. Its not a report. Did you miss the 1. context 2. details? Again Are you avoiding the issue because you have limits? "using web sites and other people's words" Who are these other people? What websites?
Your third point is not even on topic at all.. Straw Arguments, avoidance or no details or a context.. It just sounds like a crazy person replying hoping to avoid what really happened .. Sorry.. The main issue is credentials, as if Implosion World isn't enough or Frank Greening Paper "2017 World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel" isn't enough. How does the core columns find its way inside the threads of a women's shirt? Frank said it could be old Structural Steel blown out and found its way on its own to this lady. Can this idea be tested? Can other shirts show him he's right just by placing shirts near other building collapses? If building 7 prediction was possible, then shirts can be hung all around future building collapses and we will have our results.

Show less








Moon Landing Faked!!!—Why People Believe in Conspiracy TheoriesNew psychological research helps explain why some see intricate government conspiracies behind events like 9/11 or the Boston bombing

Search