9/11 Pod misdirection away from strange cloud formation

9/11 Pod misdirection below while Real flashes A,B is ABOVE not BELOW!
http://i1222.photobucket.com/albums/dd498/danp5648/ExplosionAB-2.jpg
A white cloud forms for to two frames above the plane and on the building. I tried to circle it but the pod is right below and other narratives have already formed to look everyplace else.

i1222.photobucket.com

Like · · Share

• Roger Pack likes this.
• 

  Ivan Flores Always choosing blurry pics even though there are clearer pics and videos out there

  20 hours ago · Like · 1
• 

  Eric Tull The thing which worries me most about this image is that none of the Government schills are attacking it. Anywhere not just here. That makes me suspicious.

  10 hrs · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse Eric Tull what do you think Ivan Flores is doing?

  10 hrs · Edited · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores Eric and Dan, using a blurry pic isn't evidence considering there are tons of clear pics killing this claim

  1 hr · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse What claim Ivan Flores? What are talking about. This is from CNN.

  14 mins · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores Again why is yours blurry?

  

  11 mins · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse Your stupid photo is also blurry and someone forgot to add the two white blocks which is part of the UA color color scheme . Can you at least draw on the right colors?

  6 mins · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores Whats wrong Dan, am I killing your supposed research?

  

  5 mins · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores Are we talking holograms again?

  5 mins · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse You never seem to address the topic. Why is that?

  4 mins · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores I am, it's your pic.

  4 mins · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores You need your pic to be blurrier to prove nothing.

  3 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Dan Plesse Its enlarged you moron. The same amount of pixels now cover a larger area.

  2 mins · Like · 1
• 

  Ivan Flores So it proved nothing bascially

  1 min · Like · 1
• 

  Ivan Flores You just posted a pic to show you have zoom capability and claim something that doesnt exist.

  47 secs · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse What do you think I am trying to prove? You DON"T understand the topic do you?

  25 secs · Edited · Like
• 

  Ivan Flores I understand your trying to pull a scam

  11 secs · Like
• 

  Roger Pack Is that item on 757's during normal action .......I didn't think so !!

  33 secs · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse "I understand your trying to pull a scam" I rest my case.

  2 secs · Like

I have seen the enemy and it is cognitive dissonance

I have seen the enemy and it is cognitive dissonance

Dan Plesse Norma Rae each outer wall section could weigh as much or more then then Flight 11 and Flight 175. Planes are designed to fly. Buildings are designed to resist. Paper did not cut rock. Only a moron would think so.

The planes were a just like the van at the Oklahoma City bombing, it was designed as cover for the real work with real explosives which was felt in the bedrock of NYC and for 500 miles and the other explosives was recorded globally. I emailed CTBTO and Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory and they both remain silent and the stonewall continues.

Judy Woods has sent you down this wrong path for a reason and these debunker fools are more then happy to keep you here pissing in the wind.

Try ask these two organizations for data.

Brian Clark already said there was two explosions i.e
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZSPQo7nJ4E

9/11 Reporter asks Douglas Eisler about the Second Explosion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjH3dlBekgs

51 secs · Edited · Like

Brian Clark

9/11 Douglas Eisler Second Explosion

• 
  
• 

  Dan Plesse Iron in the Air Spike is the real deal. David and his website nmsr.org is for scum bags. Don't both with that guy. However both Judy Wood and David Agree on the creation of thermite. i.e It was natural process i.i.e they are both scum bags. Don't listen to people say these things.
  
  Dave Thomas parroting thermite echo chamber
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I0jRH1pDcQ
  
  Thermite Reaction Arson Mystery Past and Current
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4LIUecRTCg
  

  
  

  

  52 mins · Edited · Like
• 

  Douglas Carlson Dan said //Iron in the Air Spike is the real deal//
  
  So, that chart appears to come from here https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/305393.pdf
  
  Iron spikes don't strike me as much of a concern. We know that there smoldering piles as late as December: http://pubs.acs.org/cen/NCW/8142aerosols.html
  
  "The infrared data certainly revealed surface temperatures, yet the smoldering piles below the surface may have remained at much higher temperatures. "In mid-October, in the evening," said Thomas A. Cahill, a retired professor of physics and atmospheric science at the University of California, Davis, "when they would pull out a steel beam, the lower part would be glowing dull red, which indicates a temperature on the order of 500 to 600 °C. And we know that people were turning over pieces of concrete in December that would flash into fire--which requires about 300 °C. So the surface of the pile cooled rather rapidly, but the bulk of the pile stayed hot all the way to December."
  
  The spikes are peaks around "rain events" which again, isn't that surprising. None of it, as far as I can tell, points to the use of either explosives or any other form of "accelerant". In fact, to quote the source of the above graph regarding what allowed fires to continue to burn: "The presence of fuels, including diesel and electrical insulating oils and combustible materials in the WTC buildings, and lack of oxygen were two factors that allowed the fire to burn for over 3 months"

  18 mins · Edited · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse "Iron spikes" NO Iron micro-spheres in the AIR. Reported as FUSED IRON MICROSPHERES and new elements. Which means the iron was in gas form you moron.
  
  The spikes are peaks around "rain events" NO Spikes around rain events. idiot. and clear fraud.
  9/11 Thermite Reaction Arson Mystery Past and Current
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4LIUecRTCg
  
  
  

  
  

  

  
  8 mins · Edited · Like
• 

  Dan Plesse Dr. Cahill's Fused Iron Spheres was never in any of the official reports and yet he is talking about them around the water cooler.
  

  
  

  

  1 min · Edited · Like

Thousands of Flight 175 photos were removed

Thousands of Flight 175 photos were removed during the FOIA's release process only ONE photo remained and it was because it was thought to be jumper.

The only collection with original file names in there original form. After this release all FOIA release's edited the files names as well.
http://thepiratebay.se/torrent/5823597/911_FOIA_Release_of_3_160_Electronic_Records_of_The_WTC_Collapse

9/11 Jaron Rubenstein FOIA Photos Missing Files Plane Investigation

Carmen Taylor: Missing FLIGHT 175 FOIA Files 9/11 Conspiracy Plane Investigation

How far away was Sean Murtagh from Flight 11 Flight path?

I worked on this a little bit today, however I need the actual flight path data from "Flight" 11 in three dimensions from NTSB.

Sean Murtagh was in the penthouse suite 21th floor

My second estimate was Sean Murtagh was only 2567 feet away and could not see the giant "AA Logo" on the tail section of a 767.

Sean Murtagh was 2567 feet away and could not see the giant "AA Logo" on the tail section of a 767?

  Sean Murtagh Is 1.049 miles away from another Flight Path and manages to not talk about the colors or logos.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0109/11/bn.01.html
"SEAN MURTAGH, CNN PRODUCER: This is Sean Murtagh. I just was standing on the vice president of the vice president of finance for CNN". ??

 "MURTAGH: I just witnessed a plane that appeared to be cruising at slightly lower-than-normal altitude over New York City, and it appears to have crashed into -- I don't know which tower it is -- but it hit directly in the middle of one of the World Trade Center towers."

JULES NAUDET'S FIRST PLANE SHOT WAS STAGED
http://www.frankresearch.info/Naudet911/JULES%20NAUDET%204.htm

• • 

    
    Shows up at 2:44 here too and that's my source file.
    http://youtu.be/rsIWPPw-JzU?t=2m35s
    

    
    

    September 11 2001 As It Happened - CNN Live 8.40am - 10.11am

    
    

    CNN Live of September 11 2001 from 8:40am - 10:11am. Rest of the day available h... See More

    2 hrs · Edited · Like · Remove Preview
    
    

    • 

      Bob Weber There's no "total distance". There's a shortest distance, again, by definition a line perpendicular to the flight path, and a maximum distance, the distance from 5 Penn Plaza to WTC 1. If you want the actual numbers, do it yourself. Or does someone else feed you in real life?
      
      Again, do you even have a point? Is this what Trutherism has sunk to?

      15 mins · Like
    • 

      Dan Plesse I did do it myself you moron. What do think the photo shows. The black line IS the flight path. What the hell are you babbling about. How far is the distance from nearest point on the BLACK line to 5 Penn Plaza! Not "the distance from 5 Penn Plaza to WTC 1." Jesus Lord what is your problem.

      

      49 secs · Edited · Like
      
      

                                                                  Flight 11?

      The First Jumper - (adult advised) 9/11 Close Up
      http://youtu.be/y2LxmESkV0Q?t=2m50s

George Shay Twin Explosion Witness Flight 11