Monday, October 20, 2014

9-11 Leslie E. Robertson river of molten steel, Guns and morons.




+Dear David Lory VanDerBeek have you looked into what was the possible cause of the molten rivers on 9/11 and the objects which are on display which look like they where in a professional arson fire?  The popular view is that something fell on the objects, like a desk or a chair or maybe a box column.

Its Not lead. Again MONTHS later "still running" People don't show lead rivers to each other.
Thanks

Dear Leslie E. Robertson, What color was the river of molten steel and did people take samples of it? Thanks Dan
Leslie E. Robertson, molten Steel River
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KssL7vXT-Ck
This is another issue which is missing fromae911truth.orgJoAnn Ross Book Blaze actually shadows the real world of professional HTA arson...
YOUTUBE.COM
LikeLike ·  · 
  • Dan Plesse Ivan Flores You need special equipment to melt even the easiest of metals effectively. 2,900 degrees after rain fall and floods = inside job you moron. 
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MOce4eK76g
    ...See More

    I made this furnace very quickly, and it works great! The aluminum ingots will be polished. Questions? Ask them...
    YOUTUBE.COM
  • Alan Phelps Melted steel, but not the gun. Dan back up to his usual idiocy.
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse The other guns on display were missing parts you moron. No one has any idea what condition this object actually is. Again moron.
    1 hr · Like
  • Alan Phelps Dan, the only moron on here is you. I destroyed you before and then you blocked me about all of this. You are a very pathetic excuse of a human being.

    Missing parts? That's great and all, the body of the gun is still in tact. Why didn't that melt with everything else you claim dumb ass?
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse OTHER GUNS were melted moron. this gun is unknown because ITS in a aggregate in the concrete. Moron. We can't fully see what that object is. Again Moron.
    16 mins · Edited · Like
  • Alan Phelps Ooooooh not this gun you decide to show all the time. Right.

    Have I mentioned that you are a very stupid person? Because you are.
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse Moron
    1 hr · Like
  • Alan Phelps Remember when I destroyed you constantly to the point you blocked me out of frustration? Good times.
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse No I blocked you because you are a moron. Case in point, read above.

    If you can't disprove that the WTC 6 guns were heated beyond normal and days later, its an inside job so why are you continuing to believe the crappy official story? What is wrong with you?
    1 hr · Like
  • Alan Phelps Because you speak utter nonsense constantly. You say "guns in WTC 6 are all melted" and then post the same picture over and over again of a gun that isnt melted. Because you are a mental midget. 

    And yeah, I destroyed you constantly.
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse How do you know THIS gun was NOT melted? List you moron reasons now! 

    "guns in WTC 6 are all melted then post the same picture over and over again" So what? That photo is connected with the video you moron. 
    ...See More

    1 hr · Edited · Like
  • Alan Phelps If it all melted and was under the ruble for days, do you really think it would keep the shape of a gun? 

    Oh. Of course you do. Because you are an idiot.
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse The shape on the TOP are maintain you moron . The holes and missing parts are the key visual evidence ON THE BOTTOM. What is wrong with you? 

    No rubble piles before in history caused any melting issues before. The process is continuing for months. Ir
    ...See More
    31 mins · Edited · Like
  • Alan Phelps So when something melts, it'll just regain its shape in a massive pile and lose its parts? You are sounding dumber by the post. But that is par for the course for you.
  • Dan Plesse These guns maintained there shape on the TOP generally BECAUSE only the missing PARTS BELOW heated to the required temperatures. Also OTHER guns are out of shape from TOP to BOTTOM. What is wrong with you? 

    Do you understand that not everything is 100% the same temperature across all objects in an uncontrolled environment? 
    ...See More

    28 mins · Edited · Like
  • Alan Phelps Yeah, that's a gun barrel stupid. And the picture before that shows two revolvers. Apparently it was so hot they couldn't do anything to the stock/handle or the barrels. Are you done embarrassing yourself yet?
  • Dan Plesse Yeah, that's a gun barrel shows you what you moron? What is wrong with you? 

    "picture before that shows two revolvers." It almost shows two revolvers. The first revolver is MELTED or fused with concrete into the second. BOTH show my point of EXTREME TEMPERATURES! 

    What you just did was name the objects and you did that poorly. 

    The "gun barrel" which identified also contains other HALF MISSING parts. Trigger guard for example and many unknowns. 

    Why is that other material sticking the guns you moron. 

    We already KNOW WHAT the parts are generally. 

    "Apparently it was so hot they couldn't do anything to the stock/handle or the barrels" look again moron.

  • Alan Phelps That first revolver melted so bad that it stayed in place to perfectly show that it is still a revolver. That secod revolver melted so bad that the handle minimally moved. Nevermind that a large portin of the North Tower fell onto it, hence the hole in the top of WTC 6.

    But again, you are too stupid to realize very simple things like that.
    1 hr · Like
  • Dan Plesse Different guns show different degrees and levels of exposure to EXTREME TEMPERATURES! Not a stupid building falling it. If a building fell on it there would not be fused elements or fused guns or rocks. Fall objects have limited abilities to effect other objects. For one they might dent another object but that is all. Never has there been any other situation which one falling object has done ANYTHING like this and your stupid conclusions have zero supporting evidence or support whatsoever. Just moron delusions. If you cook these objects at amazing TEMPERATURES the results would match up exactly without a problem. Other example might exist. 

    No one would say these object was the result of falling anything if you double blind tested them. Moron
    Just now · Edited · Like
World Trade Center 7 Witnesses verses NIST, Thermite Evidence Verses NIST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84kbXFYyxq0
World Trade Center 7 Witnesses verses NIST, Thermite Evidence Verses NIST The 9/11 Phone...
youtube.com

Search