We Were Lied To About 9/11 - Episode 5 - Coleen Rowley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OD8IFzP4N9I
FBI Did not search flight schools because there was too many so the solution was to search none of them. http://youtu.be/1Y-2SHnfc3Q Why didn't Coleen Rowley / Minneapolis agents/ Kenneth J. Williams / Arizona agents start searching all the flight schools within days of Moussaoui's arrest / release of memos?
Its like finding a single roach and saying "well we killed the last one" glad that's over with.
Why didn't Phoenix FBI start searching all the flight schools for "terrorist"?
Did the concept of "making yourself be known" at numerous flight school i.e making it so obvious that it has to be planned that way? i.e a war game ever enter into your mind?
That's why everyone got promoted all levels and you played right into development their story and you continue to play into their game to this day. The memo was written by Phoenix FBI Special Agent Kenneth J. Williams, described as a member of "Squad 16," and it was approved by a man named William A. Kurtz. The title reads: "Zakaria Mustapha Soubra; IT-OTHER (Islamic Army of the Caucasus)." The "synopsis" says: "Usama bin Laden and Al-Muhjiroun supporters attending civil aviation universities/colleges in Arizona." And the memo bears the FBI codes: "Derived from G-3" and "Declassify on X1."
Mike Arnold Dumb it down for me, Dan. I'm not exactly clear on what you're saying with this. Thanks.
Dan Plesse I asked Coleen a question about not searching ALL the flight schools. Why was the issue (football) about "personal effects" and the laptop computer of a single individual? What barrier existed to follow basic follow up investigation on flight schools ...See More- Dan Plesse The superiors were not cooperative only with regards to a single issue, Moussaoui laptop, apt and papers. I don't know what other options were pursued, i.e just looking at other fight schools for other people.
- Mike Arnold So, you're saying CR should have pursued other flight schools for other suspicious students, right?
Coleen Rowley 9/11 War Games
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2014/11/coleen-rowley-911-war-games.html
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2014/11/coleen-rowley-911-war-games.html
911truthout.blogspot.com
Yeah, I looked at it. I'm still not clear. It seems to be implying that she should have done more research at other flight schools. She is at fault. Is that right?
Yeah and why has so few people ask her this question.
That's Part 1
Part II is that these people were not hiding.
They were too open and talking about stuff.
They wanted to be known. That's why people were reporting them.
Yeah, I haven't looked at this stuff for a while. To her credit, CR did respond to me once via a Michael Moore blog post. It was extremely rare for one of the writers of an article that was posted to respond to us commenters.
She seems to be a very honest, credible person to me.
You think it was all a sham?
What was your question. Do you still have it saved?
I asked her about the likelihood of 9/11 Justice.
It seems like a cartoon to me.
She responded that she believed that would require "the people" to demand it
Ray McGovern gave the same answer to the same question.
talking about not landing only flying?
Well, our entire situation is INSANE, is it not?
Insiders planting explosives... This is crazy!
Poisoning our water, air, food, vaccines...CRAZY!
weeks before if not days
Yes, that does seem like someone begging to get caught
Very strange, to say the least
right !
everyone seems to play stupid
Well, didn't they go out with hookers and drink etc the night before?
So, what does it mean?
they make up the actions they took.
The airport videos don't have the alleged hijackers
The video that is shown has a weird date and time thing, as if it were a personal video camera
I am not sure who is playing us for fools.
Why put a pod on the bottom of a plane?
So many weird things
I don't know were it starts and were it ends.
Exactly
That's why Sabrosky said Focus on 7
exclusively
Coleen stay at the FBI until 2004 too.
I think that's good advice
stayed at the FBI
That is odd.
I know she ran for Congress
yeah
I guess she had to in order to get her retirement...?
she didn't fired ?
kicked out ?
nothing?
Well, they couldn't really do that without bringing neg attention to themselves
and you-know-what
Her pension is chump change to the MIC
Look into it for me. MIC?
Military Industrial Complex
haha MIC okay got it
Person of the year in 2002 too
For doing what ?
searching all the flight schools? I think not.
I know...then the media calls truthers Conspiracy Theorists. It's really bizarre
She went around her supervisors
to do ?
She tried to get to Moussaoui's apt
to search moussaoui's apt?
Yeah, that was the whole point. Her bosses put up blocks
see its a game and the wrong football.
She wanted to get to his computer and whatever else was there
its the wrong issues, questions, actions the whole time.
its misdirection!
Focus on 7
If 7 is CD, then it's all CD
If 7 is a lie, then nothing about Official Story is believable
We don't even have photos of the "damage" scooped out part.
I covered 7 a lot. Witnesses on 1010 wins
flash witnesses
etc CNN editing out WTC 7
Yeah, that's odd isn't it?
lots of dirt - issue
Very few images, even of the fire
leslie roberston WTC 7 dirt issue.
What do you mean "dirt issue"?
rubble ...fires below?
Leslie Robertson was asked about dirt in the building back 2002 talk
remember that?
NIST FOIA: Leslie Robertson's Stanford Talk (April 9, 2002)
remember that?
NIST FOIA: Leslie Robertson's Stanford Talk (April 9, 2002)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3-8tKQt3yM copied it down here
T FOIA: Leslie Robertson's Stanford Talk (April 9, 2002)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3-8tKQt3yM copied it down here
Lots of good info on this video. The word 'dirt' confused me. I've seen most of this before, but it was worth the watch.
So, are you still with nukes?
check this out.
The Longitude and Latitude number is missing from the record individually and all details including depth data. If its above ground they have a measurements for that too. They filled up the data columns with different time zones information i.e paddle the data with nonsense.
Have you seen this before?
No, I've heard (read) ppl talk about the seismic data, but they never seem to make their points clear enough for me to understand. So, you say there is depth data missing here?
x,y location is so far between the towers
yeah depth data is gone too
and USGS stonewalls like crazy
So you're still with the nukes, I take it. Is missing data enough?
also different signals per event
AE ppl said they would be working on FAQ response for nuke
When they finish it, you'll be the first person I send it to.
I have to explain the rumbling witness too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N-EL4_K4jA
Did you see the Steven Jones thing on how it couldn't have been nukes?
Have you seen this?
Why was there nanothermite? Did they do both?
No, I haven't seen it before
I might have been an array of things
I am trying to reach a conclusion .
THis is 17+ min. Is there a segment I can look at? I gotta scoot
I have video of the thermites explosions too.
thermite explosions big white flashes
Go as far as you can
Jones, the physicist, said there would be radiation.
It's not like it's ME saying it...
put it all together
So, they did both?
rumbling - missing data - etc
Nuke and nanothermite?
I don't know
Misdirection...again, maybe?
Not sure about anything .
the plane with the pod on the bottom...misdirection
not sure what that was ..
So,if not sure, why not just stick with what AE can prove in court?
Other stuff MAY be true, but it's speculation since it can't be proven
AE doesn't talk about ANYTHING that they can't prove
through science
Let's suppose, for the sake of argument, that it was both
I think they found things which need lots and lots of heat in the dust.
Since there was nano..., we have to acknowledge that, right?
for example Molybdenum-rich spherule
So, if it was both, but the nano was still part of the equation, then they are correct. The other info comes in as additional
nano is not like regular thermite
nano means billionth
sure why not
this thing
Okay, well, it doesn't do AE or FOT (Face of Truth) any good if you, or anyone else, has the banner and go and talk about nukes when it can't be proven
nano creates its own oxygen. That's why there were rivers of molten metal
What does this look like to you?
I think the "spikes" are proof enough and the DU levels, don't you?
also iron in the air spike Oct 26th?
see the spike ?
Chat Conversation End
|
see the spike ?
You convince the scientists, architects, and engineers...not laypeople like me.
I refuse to get into analyses of data when I don't have a clue
Let me see 2,200 architects and engineers supporting nukes...
No, there are none are nearly none. Why?
Logic
Well you can't have it both ways right? Logic and "I refuse to get into analyses of data"
Chat Conversation End
Convince the experts in the related fields. Then, logic would tell me that there's something to it.
Gotta get to bed, bro
