BRENT BLANCHARD "it was a MILITARY EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION"
"For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed described the design of planned attacks of buildings inside the U.S. and how operatives were directed to carry them out. That is valuable information for those of us who have the responsibility to protect the American people. He told us the operatives had been instructed to ensure that the explosives went off at a high -- a point that was high enough to prevent people trapped above from escaping. "
https://web.archive.org/web/20090117221819/http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-2.html
I have no doubt that explosives were used in this was a controlled demolition beyond a doubt. I no longer look at 9/11 from an approach of if it was a conspiracy we know that it was. if explosives were used we know they were. it becomes more of a technical aspect of exactly what explosives were used and how are they placed. The photographs and exchanges below might shed light on type of
explosives that was used.
Brent Blanchard has been making correct observations all along, however in the end he and his current blizzard of over protesting and generalizations and the lack of details in his reporting are to clear a sign explosives were use. Micheal Hess's "I ran into a wall" in lieu of of his first comments i.e an explosion is evidence of fear at best or complete control and power by the criminal elite over society in general i.e The New World Order. A complete dupe fest. Other Jedi mind tricks are filming the event and just edit out whatever criminal actions were recorded.
As long as the very fabric of society continues to support a cover up of 9/11 and support people like Brent Blanchard and Micheal Hess they will continue to make observations consistent of crime while saying the opposite 99% of the time when the heat is on. Until then Brent Blanchard and Micheal Hess will continue to laugh like Jabba the Hutt at the Truth Movement ...
Richard Clarke Bush Administration Should be Charged with War Crimes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxVLTPOVKME
9/11 Cover up Abuse of Power: Don't Say Explosions 2015
http://youtu.be/UW1DITzW450
Side Note:
Barbara Nevins-Taylor said @ 3:30
"There was third explosion and part of the middle floor came flying out towards us and that was part of a second wave of running people to run North."
It sounds like one of the explosives was set off prematurely. Barbara Nevins-Taylor said a section of building exploded So who else witnessed this issue? What happen the footage and photos. Which buildings middle floor came flying out? I am assuming its one of twin towers, but who knows at this point. Could it be WTC building 7 or perhaps the Grass Glass Building? Next on Leonard Nimoy
In Search of...
Does anyone know anything about the Barbara Nevins-Taylor report of the collapse of a "green glass building"? around 5:20?
http://youtu.be/mZyBB_Bfld8?t=3m14s
9/11 truth the mysterious collapse of Green Glass Building Fox 5 News : FOX 5 NEWS September 11, 2001 5pm to 6:30pm EDT 26:00https://archive.org/details/FOX...
Below is an email exchange with Brent Blanchard . His comments are in blue lettering. red lettered is implosionworld.com
Brent Blanchard implosionworld.com Observation
"Although when viewed from a distance the towers appeared to have telescoped almost straight down, a closer look at video replays reveal sizable portions of each building breaking free during the collapse, with the largest sections--some as tall as 30 or 40 stories--actually “laying out” in several directions." Correct again!
anti-thesis"And parsing a small piece of a single sentence out of context to fit your preconceived narrative doesn’t help find ‘the truth’ either" Brent Blanchard
Observation Brent Blanchard agrees
The perimeter Columns were blasted across West Street and were quickly removed.
Brent Blanchard implosionworld.com
"Ugh. Your assertions and illustration below are fundamentally wrong. If you start with a bad base, you’re gonna bake a bad cake."
My Reply
9/11 Flying body parts GPS mapper device Google Earth
You also said that photographs and videos of 9/11 were taken by implosionworld or protec. What happened to those materials?
9/11 THE DEVILISH DETAILS in 9 minutes
a side note on Jet fuel causing the core to fail
I am A1C Yoder in the US air force. My career field is repairing piece of shit C - 130's and KC - 135's fuel cell systems inside the wings. Jet fuel is my specialty. my afsc is 2a654.
Military uses a quality of jet fuel known as JP-8. Air liners use Jet A. For both grades of fuel they have a very high volatility measurement. Meaning they vaporize, very fast and consume a whole lot of oxygen. They don't burn very hot to be honest. that isn't the design of jet fuel, the design is to create a lot of pressure and use a lot of oxygen. In fact, air planes require pressure systems in order to pressurize the engines to push even more oxygen into them. To say that "oh it was jet fuel that burned metal slabs and giant concrete support beams" is absolutely absurd people. You've seen videos and aftermath of air plane crashes right? do you see the air plane being burnt to molten steel? do you see them burning for hours? Absolutely not!
The answer invariably comes back, Cinnamon. Cinnamon. Again and again!
For 9/11 it was the perimeter columns Again and again. .
The perimeter columns was the first material to be cleaned up in an massive all out effort to clear the roads of the World Trade Center.
The speed of this clean up effort was extreme.
It was perimeter columns which gave the appearance of " large sections--some as tall as 30 or 40 stories- " falling and must be the source of the earthquakes according to official theory .
David Chandler covered a ton of issues with the perimeter columns distance they traveled, size force requirements and assumed speeds, so I don't want to cover that topic again.
Side Note: Isotopes guy G. Liddy
+danp5648 Was looking at the USGS test results for radioactive isotopes. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/wtcleachfig1_11-1.gif. Note Iodine-131 only has a half-life of 8.07 days & is the only of these three not showing up in the test results.
"Isotopes of special importance include iodine-131, strontium-90 and 89, and cesium-137. This is due to both their relative abundance in fallout, and to their special biological affinity. Isotopes that are readily absorbed by the body, and ...
Iodine-131 is a beta and gamma emitter with a half-life of 8.07 days (specific activity 124,000 curies/g) Its decay energy is 970 KeV; usually divided between 606 KeV beta, 364 KeV gamma. Due to its short half-life it is most dangerous in the weeks immediately after the explosion, but hazardous amounts can persist for a few months. It constitutes some 2% of fission-produced isotopes - 1.6x10^5 curies/kt. Iodine is readily absorbed by the body and concentrated in one small gland, the thyroid.
Strontium-90 is a beta emitter (546 KeV, no gammas) with a half-life of 28.1 years (specific activity 141 curies/g), Sr-89 is a beta emitter (1.463 MeV, gammas very rarely) with a half-life of 52 days (specific activity 28,200 Ci/g). Each of these isotopes constitutes about 3% of total fission isotopes: 190 curies of Sr-90 and 3.8x10^4 curies of Sr-89 per kiloton. Due to their chemical resemblance to calcium these isotopes are absorbed fairly well, and stored in bones. Sr-89 is an important hazard for a year or two after an explosion, but Sr-90 remains a hazard for centuries. Actually most of the injury from Sr-90 is due to its daughter isotope yttrium-90. Y-90 has a half-life of only 64.2 hours, so it decays as fast as it is formed, and emits 2.27 MeV beta particles.
Cesium-137 is a beta and gamma emitter with a half-life of 30.0 years (specific activity 87 Ci/g). Its decay energy is 1.176 MeV; usually divided by 514 KeV beta, 662 KeV gamma. It comprises some 3-3.5% of total fission products - 200 curies/kt. It is the primary long-term gamma emitter hazard from fallout, and remains a hazard for centuries."
WTC perimeter columns laying out before there disappearance.
2-28 Number 2.jpg
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLTWM1bDBCQU9iekU/view?usp=sharing
WTC perimeter columns GONE IN SECONDS
Side note: Urban Moving Systems fedspending.org screen capture
 |
| urban moving systems fedspending.org |
Implosionworld.com
|
|
 12:37 PM (1 hour ago)
| |
|
|
|
A HAAA! You are correct Brent! But I will now tie your correctness to a patently false unrelated assertion to arrive at an all-new inaccurate conclusion! Success!! And now Dan will post even this response to a conspiracy website to somehow claim he was right all along! You see it’s all part of the master cover-up!!
reply
What happened to "National Demolition Association Convention 4/22/03 Protec's two -hour video" ??
unrelated assertion? Cover up? Its not a cover up if photographs perimeter columns are seen resting
by the Winter Garden.
The same photographs you used privately to make your observation are used
however your observations lack details. In fact, you don't use photographs at all. What happen to the pooled seismographs recorded data?
