Sunday, January 4, 2015

At the corner of Church and Vesey, where Deborah Mardenfeld was hit..



At the corner of Church and Vesey, where Deborah Mardenfeld was hit.. "There are pictures of the second plane advancing on the south tower, its silver underbelly visible as it tilts toward its target. " (Flight 175 did NOT have a silver underbelly however many people reported this fact and assumed 2nd plane was flight 11, the flight 175 was reported as missing -- also 50% 9/11 planes were recorded cancelled 9/28/2005 and 01/14/2002 ).. i.e

"The engine portion came to rest at Church and Murray Streets; the landing gear on the roof of 45 Park Place." CAPTAIN JAMES YAKIMOVICH "WHERE WE REACHED CHURCH AND VESEY WHEN THE SECOND PLANE IMPACTED" " LOT OF CIVILIANS OBSERVING THE FIRST FIRE BURNING AND WHEN THE SECOND IMPACT HAPPENED EVERYONE WENT RUNNING LOT OF CIVILIAN INJURIES THATS ALL REALLY SAW WAS CIVILIANS INJURED OTHER AMBULANCES ON THE SCENE THAT WERE ABLE TO RESPOND AND REMOVE THESE VICTIMS FEW ESU RIGS RESPONDED ASSISTED COUPLE OF PD WITH THIS" W. MERA we're almost at Church and all of a sudden a massive explosion. Unbelievable. The sound was incredible. I remember right before that I saw a helicopter passing by.. maybe it was a helicopter, we were thinking a bomb, but we knew at this point something wasn't right. So we ended up parking on the corner of Church and Vesey. We parked the rig We were walking up Vesey and we saw parts of the plane on the ground still burning. I've never been in an earthquake, but it couldn't have been any worse than that, any major earthquake.


Debbie Mardenfeld, 30 Story #1 No Plane Parts Yet "Falling debris had ripped the flesh from the back of the American Express administrator's torso, sheared her left heel and shattered her legs. "

When Debbie Mardenfeld was wheeled into New York University Downtown Hospital—minutes after a passerby, project manager Paul Dowe, 43, found her in the rubble of the World Trade Center—  This sounds another person.. 

Debbie Mardenfeld, 30 Story #2 Blasted! 

The day after the blast, he says, Mardenfeld grabbed a tablet and wrote, "So doc, my butt is smaller?" Says Ginsberg: "She has the attitude to get through this."

"Doctors warn that Mardenfeld still faces the danger of infection in coming weeks. But if she survives, with luck she will be able to walk again—and dance at her wedding to Greg St. John next year. Dr. Gerald Ginsberg, NYU Downtown's director of plastic surgery, is optimistic. The day after the blast, he says, Mardenfeld grabbed a tablet and wrote, "So doc, my butt is smaller?" Says Ginsberg: "She has the attitude to get through this." 

Debbie Mardenfeld, 30 Story #3 There was a large tire next to her on Vesey Street?

WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEWEMT ORLANDO MARTINEZ
Interview Date: November 1, 2001
Transcribed by Elisabeth F. Nason


Once the second plane hit, the shrapnel from either the plane or the building started hitting the top of the bus and the area around us. Anybody who was near the ambulance ran inside the ambulance and ducked for cover. 

"A. Oh, yes. Once we started taking off, I guess

30 feet in front of us, there was a lady on the ground

by the curb and she was just waving her arms. That's

all she could wave. Her legs were crushed. Apparently

she got hit by part of the landing gear, one of the

tires of the airplane. There was a large tire next to

her."

 "forward down Vesey Street towards Beekman Hospital"




 




Stairwell B
Tina Hansen, 41 
Two men team up to carry a woman in a wheelchair to safety 

Tina Hansen is quick and nimble in her wheelchair; diagnosed with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis at age 3, she has been using one for most of her life. But when the first plane hit the World Trade Center, Hansen, a marketing supervisor at the Port Authority of NY and NJ, was immobilized by the impossible task of descending 68 flights of stairs. Although she had a special lightweight chair designed for just such a scenario (it had been given to her after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing), it would be of little use without a couple of strong-armed carriers. Says Hansen: "I didn't know how I was going to get out." http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20135405,00.html


The most important issue right now is getting a precise time element to rule out the north tower collapse. If we can rule out the North Tower collapse excuse we can put  another nail in the official account.  Can you look around? Research this? Thanks 

WAS 
Michael Riconosciuto's  a-neutronic bomb used on 9/11?

"Riconosciuto's talents were much in demand. He had created the a-neutronic bomb (or "Electro-Hydrodynamic Gaseous Fuel Device"), which sank the ground level of the Nevada test site by 30 feet when a prototype was tested. Samuel Cohen, the inventor of the neutron bomb, said of Riconosciuto: "I've spoken to Michael Riconosciuto (the inventor of the a-neutronic bomb) and he's an extraordinarily bright guy. I also have a hunch, which I can't prove, that they both (Riconosciuto and Lavos, his partner) indirectly work for the CIA." 

Riconosciuto's bomb made suitcase nukes obsolete, because it achieved near-atomic explosive yields, but could be more easily minaturized. You could have a suitcase a-neutronic bomb, or a briefcase a-neutronic bomb, or simply a lady's purse a-neutronic bomb. Or just pull out your wallet for identification and... The Meridian Arms Corporation, as well as the Universities of California and Chicago owned a piece of the technology."http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/bin_laden_osman.html

Dan Plesse dan.plesse@gmail.com

2:59 PM (8 minutes ago)
to , bcc: Antonio.Dajer

I hope Antonio can pinpoint the exact time of all these events (power outages, 
 seismology) on 9/11. Other possible time stamps can be found using text messages via pagers. remember those ? haha 

https://911.wikileaks.org/files/index.html

I tried the USGS and their database which should contain the information. Emails have not been successful. 

insider reports look grim and point to an unthinkable cause.  

"It is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been."   Won-Young Kim
Collapses of the two WTC towers generated large seismic waves, observed in five states and up to 428 km away The north tower collapse was the largest seismic source and had local magnitude ML 2.3. From this, we infer that ground shaking of the WTC towers was not a major contributor to the collapse or damage to surrounding buildings.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001EOSTr..82..565K


Am I reading this right? If the towers were the caused the shaking then how can the shaking be ruled out as the cause? 

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/01EO00330/pdf

+Gordon Liddy.
Shouldn't the sentence be

"ground shaking BY the WTC towers" and not
"ground shaking OF the WTC towers"


+danp5648 I agree that would sound more appropriate.

There are surely many people who know the official story is a lie but don't want to risk their careers.

I do wonder if english is Kim, Won-Young's first language. 
Show less



The title of that report "Nuclear explosion seismology, 7260 Theory and modeling" is not open to the public and I am sure if you have any swing with those folks. 

The databases would have time stamps, location, depth and strength as columns of data and recordings would fill sheets of data as many seismic waves were recording but on 
seismic grams. which are public. The digital recordings have NOT been located.

  


Also The Statue of Liberty was closed and yet it opened at 8:30 am before events of 9/11 started. Email with people also has not returned with good results.

The O.E.M was locked early with officers attending a committee meeting at City Hall about 
Jackie Robinson Park which is not the OEM's responsibility. They left the committee meeting went directly to the North Tower and on to another location avoiding their office at the 23 floor of WTC 7.  James Farmer, senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission was unable to trace the movements of Richard J.Sheier who died in 2010. 

Two groups of people attempted to enter the 23 floor became trapped after an explosion had blown the stairwell away at the 6th floor. They were filmed yelling from 8th floor for help. They were told to get out of that building.   

 
waOn Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Gerald Ginsberg <geg3001@med.cornell.edu> wrote:

Dan,
Most of the hospital adminiatrators from that time have moved on. The hospital was taken over by Cornell two years ago and that cleaned the slate. There isn't even a communications department left who might know some of this stuff. However, Anthony Ercolano is a very nice man who may still work there in administration and he may point you in the right direction.
Dr. G.

From: Dan Plesse [dan.plesse@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 5:59 PM
To: Gerald Ginsberg
Subject: Re: Dear Gerald Ginsberg I have a small 9/11 question about
Thanks for the quick reply. I asked Con Edison also but I wonder if a Hospital Administer
would be a better source however I can't find a single email address. 


On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Gerald Ginsberg <geg3001@med.cornell.edu> wrote:
Sorry, Sir,
I have no idea of those times at present.
Dr. G.

From: Dan Plesse [dan.plesse@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 4:11 PM
To: Gerald Ginsberg
Subject: Dear Gerald Ginsberg I have a small 9/11 question about
Dear Gerald Ginsberg,
     
                  I have a small 9/11 question about the earthquake you reported and I was hoping you could help with the timing issue.

9::03  a.m impact Flight 175
?:??  Ms. Mardenfeld transported to NYU
?:??  Ms. Mardenfeld operation started
?:??  NYU Downtown Hospital Emergency Room Lost Power.
?:??  about hour later during Ms. Mardenfeld operation an Earthquake occurred.


The world has assumed it was the North Tower I was hoping you could help unset this commonly held belief using your memory and records of some kind.

Also was the quake felt before or after the power issue or much later.

The seismic record for BRNJ shows a very large spike btw.

Thanks for your help.


​ 

+danp5648 Something I stumbled onto.
 Earthquakes or nuclear explosions?: seismic clues to dirty deeds


9::03  a.m impact Flight 175 

?:??  Ms. Mardenfeld transported to NYU

?:??  Ms. Mardenfeld operation started

10:28 a.m the North Tower collapsed

?:??  NYU Downtown Hospital Emergency Room Lost Power.

?:??  hour later during Ms. Mardenfeld operation an Earthquake







The burns were caused by something else and not fuel and 'they' are the doctors, first responders etc did not smell fuel. The game is to connect everything to normal things. Burns were not connected to Fuel and falling buildings did not cause the earthquake during Ms. Mardenfeld operations after hours have passed. The burns were at the highest degree. Ms. Mardenfeld was over by WTC 7 and was reported to be burned. Most likely blown up by a blast.


When Did NYU Downtown Hospital Emergency Room Lose Power on 9/11? I need a time stamp. Everyone assumes is has to be the North Tower. What else could it be? The doctors were operating Ms. Mardenfeld who was awarded roughly 8.6 million by the federal September 11 Victim Compensation Fund for about an hour. It seems at little late in the day to blame it on the North Tower.
http://youtu.be/4-WUfrnPh2M


Published on Jan 3, 2015
More 9/11 earthquake witnesses. Hospital lost power too.

When Did NYU Downtown Hospital Emergency Room Lose Power on 9/11?
The doctors were operating Ms. Mardenfeld who was awarded roughly 8.6 million by the federal September 11 Victim Compensation Fund for about an hour. It seems at little late in the day to blame it on the North Tower.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/04/nyr...




New York Presbyterian/ Lower Manhattan Hospital location
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.71026...

9/11 Emergency Room Documentary
http://youtu.be/hRw8HkwwLVw?t=32m41s

Code Yellow: Hospital at Ground Zero
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjJsk...

NYU Downtown Hospital Emergency Room earthquake

NYU Hospital came down in police cars to help. During the day, the hospital lost power, water and phones. They did have a back-up generator so they could retain electricity.
http://www.911families.org/wp-content...


Code Yellow: Hospital at Ground Zero 

2003
Distributed by 
Cinema Guild, 115 West 30th Street, Suite 800, New York, NY 10001; 212-685-6242
Produced by Daedalus Productions, Inc.
Directed by Nina Rosenblum
VHS, color, 42 min.
Sr. High - Adult 
Health Sciences 


Reviewed by Michael Fein, Coordinator of Library Services, Central Virginia Community College, Lynchburg, VA 

Recommended    
  
Date Entered: 12/21/2005

Reply
 · 


+danp5648 Interesting, I was curious how far away it was & found this "New York Downtown Hospital, founded two years after the Broad Street bombing of 1920, sits just four blocks from the northeast corner of what was the World Trade Center."www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/83619/topic/WS_HLM2_HOM/Lessons-Learned-New-York-Downtown-Hospital-and-911.html

The # 1 factor in the development of a nuclear detonations EMP side effect is the altitude of the detonation (obviously the size of the nuke is a huge factor too). With a ground level/near ground level nuclear detonation(s) the EMP will be highly localized & far less sever than with a high altitude detonation. Circuits will only burn out if the pulse is stronger than they're designed to handle but power will be temporarily disrupted. Patricia Ondrovic stated communications in the ambulance were out for 20 mins or so after each collapse. In addition to the cars there's a report of a burnt out cell phone tower in the area (I have not investigated that claim made by Dr. Bill Deagle so I can't confirm it).

I haven't found the specific time of her surgery at NYUDH. I did find info about her injuries. "Mardenfeld almost bled to death that day and needed an immediate transfusion of 31 pints of blood. Her buttocks were sliced off, her back was split open, her intestines were punctured and her legs were crushed and fractured, among other injuries." http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/news/8m-9-11-victim-survivor-hit-2nd-jet-wreckage-article-1.623597

Btw, an underground detonation has no EMP so the EMP evidence alone proves Khalzov's theory, at least, partially wrong. 
Show less
Reply
 · 

+danp5648 The link to the PDF proving radiation protocols were used on 9/11 is no longer working. Now something else comes up. Just thought I'd let ya know. I'm trying to find the info elsewhere to replace it. 
Reply
 · 

Friday, January 2, 2015

World Trade Smithsonian Curator, Chief Medical Examiner and Dust Scientist all Dead



Charles S. Hirsch, New York's Chief Medical Examiner 
  "That substance [9/11 Dust], which he would keep in a glass bowl on his desk, "





Alexandra Jorge and Michele Lent Hirsch returned to their schools blocks from Ground Zero just weeks after the 9/11 attacks. Years later they were diagnosed with thyroid cancer, which they connect to the toxins they were exposed to.
http://www.thirteen.org/metrofocus/2018/01/9-11-student-cancer/


David Shayt, eclectic 9/11 Smithsonian curator dies of cancer

Dan Plesse dan.plesse@gmail.com

12/31/14 (2 days ago)
to bcc: mfarfel, bcc: rbrackbi, bcc: paolo.boffetta, bcc: jcone, bcc: evelyn.bromet, bcc: taldrich, bcc: Kenneth.berger, bcc: adriana.feder, bcc: charles.hall
 thyroid cancer is currently  3.12 (95% CI 2.04-4.57)

Does the 3.12 mean 3 times higher or 3.12 % higher?

the risk of them getting thyroid cancer is currently 3.12 % higher than that of a normal person based on their preliminary findings. 

or

the risk of them getting thyroid cancer is currently three (3.12) times higher than that of a normal person based on their preliminary findings.
"A total of 575 cancers were diagnosed up to 12/31/2008 among 20,984 consented responders. After excluding the first six month after enrollment, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for all cancers combined was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.18), that for thyroid cancer was 3.12 (95% CI 2.04-4.57) and that of lung cancer was 0.62 (95% CI 0.37-0.98). Analyses according to C-ERI and OCRI are on-going. These preliminary findings highlight the need for continued follow-up and surveillance of WTC responders."

<B

3:14 PM (22 hours ago)
to me
It means the risk of thyroid cancer in WTC responders treated in one of the CDC funded Health Programs is three times higher than, I’m guessing, the rate for the populations of the 4 states where they accessed tumor registries (PA, NJ, CT, NY).

You’d need to write to Dr. Boffetta to verify the comparison but probably I’m right.

At that same meeting, there was another presentation from the WTC Health Registry. There is overlap in responders attending the WTC Health Programs and responders enrolled in the Registry – but lots of non-overlap as well.

Interestingly, the Registry scoured 11 states and reported a 2-fold increase in thyroid cancer (see abstract below).

Hard to know if it’s because of the differences in the samples – or the number of states where they hunted down cases.

One last comment. Neither presentation had data on exposure per se. Boffetta mentions his exposure index at the end but I don’t know if they’ve yet run the analysis.  The Health Programs were established in July 2002 – so even the first enrollees were reporting on what they did almost 2 years earlier. The exposure questionnaire is very detailed. But there’s no getting around the fact that self-reported exposure contains lots of recall bias.
Association between WTC Exposure and Excess Cancer Risk: Initial Findings from the WTC Health Registry


Abstract 

Objective To evaluate cancer incidence among persons enrolled in the World Trade Center Health Registry (WTCHR). 

Methods Observational study of 55 778 New York State residents enrolled in the WTCHR in 2003-2004, followed from enrollment through December 31, 2008. Cases were identified through linkage with 11 state cancer registries.Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and sex were computed with 2003-2008 New York State reference rates. Agreement between cancers self-reported on WTCHR surveys and cancer registry cases was assessed by sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values. Correlates associated with under- or over-reporting were examined using logistic regression. 

Results 1187 incident cancers were diagnosed, with an accumulated 253 269 person-years. The SIR for all cancer sites combined in 2007-2008 was not significantly elevated (SIR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.99 to 1.30] among responders vs SIR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.03] among survivors). Among rescue/recovery workers, cancers with significantly increased SIRs by 2007-2008 included prostate cancer (1.43, 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.82), thyroid cancer (2.02, 95% CI, 1.07 to 3.45), and multiple myeloma (2.85, 95% CI, 1.15 to 5.88). Overall sensitivity and specificity of self-reported cancer were 83.9% (95% CI=81.9-85.9) and 98.5% (95% CI=98.4-98.6), respectively. Underreporting was greatest among non-Hispanic blacks and Asians. 

Conclusions Among persons enrolled in the WTCHR, there was an excess risk for prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, and myeloma in 2007- 2008 compared with that for New York State residents. Sensitivity and specificity of self-reported cancer were relatively high. 

Impact

The WTCHR cancer incidence study suggests that overall cancer rates do not appear to be elevated, up to the end of 2008, among survivor or responder populations. However, there appears to be a significantly increased incidence of specific cancers, including prostate cancer, thyroid cancer and multiple myeloma, among responders. Increased medical screening cannot be ruled out as a potential cause for prostate or thyroid cancer. 

Many types of cancer in addition to the three types found to be increased in this study are currently recognized by the World Trade Center Health Program as potentially World Trade Center exposure-related. Survivors and responders are encouraged to contact the WTCHP (1-888-982-4748 or http://www.cdc.gov/wtc/index.html) if they have questions about accessing available resources for cancer evaluation or treatment. 
From: Dan Plesse [mailto:dan.plesse@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: 9/11 thyroid cancer was 3.12 (95% CI 2.04-4.57)


kkkkkk
+danp5648 Been looking for more info about the fission elements in the WTC dust. Came across this info too.

 "THE ASBESTOS was at first very worrisome. Initial reports claimed that the dust consisted of as much as 20% asbestos--"an enormous amount," according to Meeker. So early on, EPA and the U.S. Public Health Service recruited the help of those at USGS who are expert in testing for asbestos. USGS, in cooperation with the National Aeronautics & Space Administration's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, sent out a spectral imaging instrument that, when flown over the WTC site, determined the chemical composition of ground debris. The AVIRIS (Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer) essentially does environmental mapping with imaging spectroscopy.

The picture it created wasn't as easy to interpret as USGS had hoped. "We didn't realize the complexity of trying to map a pulverized building in amongst a bunch of other buildings," Clark said. AVIRIS pictures did indicate that localized pockets of exposed asbestos may have existed, he added. But he and his coworkers weren't able to confirm the suspicion with targeted sampling at those sites. And random sampling done around ground zero by a number of groups, including USGS, showed that levels of asbestos generally remained under 1%. Only one of the samples collected by USGS contained roughly 20% asbestos, and that sample came off one of the steel beams that had been coated with asbestos before its use was discontinued."

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/NCW/8142aerosols.html


Gordon Liddy
+danp5648 That makes more sense. I thought 3.12% sounded low. I didn't realize they were 3 x more likely though. It's even worse than I thought.

I've, finally, found some info about "clean" & "dirty" H-bombs. I was looking for info about MRR (minimum residual radiation) devices & it's accompanied by info about "dirty" bombs too. I just found it a few minutes ago so I haven't dug into it yet.

I did find data showing the elements in the WTC dust. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/leach1/wtcleachfig1_11...
Long Latitude World Trade Center
"Collapses of the two WTC towers generated large seismic waves, observed in five states and up to 428 km away The north tower collapse was the largest seismic source and had local magnitude ML 2.3. From this, we infer that ground shaking of the WTC towers was not a major contributor to the collapse or damage to surrounding buildings."
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001EOSTr..82..565K

Am I reading this right? He doesn't define which collapse. It can't be WTC 7 or WTC 2 and WTC 1 is the north tower. If the towers were the cause of the shaking then how can the shaking be one of possible causes of the collapse. Unless the shaking happened before. shaking happened beforehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N-EL4_K4jA


ANSS Catalog Search

http://quake.geo.berkeley.edu/anss/catalog-search.html
Blasts (Quarry or Nuclear)

Your search parameters are:
catalog=ANSS
start_time=2001/09/08,00:00:00
end_time=2001/10/01,00:00:00
minimum_magnitude=0
maximum_magnitude=10
event_type=B
include events with no magnitude



Date       Time             Lat       Lon  Depth   Mag Magt  Nst Gap  Clo  RMS  SRC   Event ID
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001/09/11 16:02:17.39  42.5220  -73.7150   0.00  2.39   ML   12                LD            
2001/09/11 19:28:47.39  35.4308 -120.5752   0.00  1.51   Md   13 150    5 0.07  NC      21193637
2001/09/11 19:30:26.46  36.7577 -121.5910   0.00  1.39   Md   21  53    5 0.04  NC      21193638
2001/09/11 21:07:26.61  46.7055 -122.7700   1.33  3.30   Mc   28  75    6 0.14  UW            
2001/09/11 21:52:03.99  36.4450 -121.2743   6.31  1.36   Md    9 178    4 0.03  NC      21193659
2001/09/11 21:57:18.95  40.7513 -122.3053   0.00  1.86   Md    7 150   21 0.18  NC      21193663


All Events
catalog=ANSS
start_time=2001/09/08,00:00:00
end_time=2001/10/01,00:00:00
minimum_magnitude=0
maximum_magnitude=10
event_type=A
include events with no magnitude

Date       Time             Lat       Lon  Depth   Mag Magt  Nst Gap  Clo  RMS  SRC   Event ID
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2001/09/11 08:26:32.54  44.7728 -110.8143   1.94  0.62   Mc    6 121    3 0.08  WY            
2001/09/11 08:32:34.52  34.0652 -118.4068  10.15  1.63   ML   22          0.31  CI       9704825
2001/09/11 08:34:57.08  18.7745 -155.3092   7.84  2.67   Mx   29 274   44 0.15  HV       5184704
2001/09/11 08:38:59.24  24.1040  121.9160  33.00  4.60   Mb   50          1.20  NEI 200109114018
2001/09/11 08:43:13.97  62.9437 -151.0084 116.40  2.13   ML   57          0.65  AK            
2001/09/11 08:47:35.55  58.4196 -154.7919   5.40  0.56   ML   17          0.35  AK            
2001/09/11 08:52:50.24  35.9982 -117.8792   4.10  1.08   ML   18          0.14  CI       9704829
2001/09/11 09:06:41.39  14.1580  146.7100  33.00        Unk    5          1.42  NEI 200109114019
2001/09/11 09:10:30.29  34.0680 -118.4033   8.91  2.18   ML   58          0.40  CI       9704833
2001/09/11 09:13:26.10  14.9950  -91.5710 161.10  5.60   Mw  299          0.98  NEI 200109114020
2001/09/11 09:21:10.85  33.3280 -116.1717  14.39  1.41   ML   25          0.22  CI       9704841
2001/09/11 09:21:40.92  38.7987 -122.7300   3.42  1.17   Md    7  90    3 0.02  NC      21193587
2001/09/11 09:24:51.75  36.0042 -117.8837   5.95  0.51   ML    8          0.03  CI       9704853
2001/09/11 09:26:32.31 -36.7830 -179.3670  33.00  4.30   ML   12          0.40  NEI 200109114021
2001/09/11 09:29:45.97  63.5693 -150.8923   7.29  2.33   ML   57          1.13  AK            
2001/09/11 09:32:17.80 -33.4750  -70.9940  65.80        Unk   10          0.00  GUC 200109114023
2001/09/11 09:35:40.33  60.9939 -149.0411   8.48  1.72   ML   45          0.70  AK            
2001/09/11 09:49:04.76  32.9108 -116.3412  11.35  1.93   ML   37          0.22  CI       9704861
2001/09/11 09:49:57.03  36.1131 -115.5758   3.24  1.35   ML   12          0.11  NN            
2001/09/11 09:57:28.32  34.6332 -116.2517  12.78  1.09   ML   10          0.14  CI       9704865
2001/09/11 10:03:04.94  18.5160  145.9010 225.30  4.40   Mb   16          1.17  NEI 200109114024
2001/09/11 10:04:40.21  34.2807 -117.4740   8.40  1.57   ML   24          0.17  CI       9704869
2001/09/11 10:16:56.69  36.0027 -117.8667   5.27  1.25   ML   15          0.15  CI       9704873
2001/09/11 10:30:31.34  37.6075 -118.4696   8.85        Unk   10          0.09  NN            
2001/09/11 10:32:07.39  63.2434 -151.1309   1.85  1.63   ML   33          0.92  AK            
2001/09/11 10:32:29.78  36.9527 -121.4507   3.58  1.02   Md    7 222    5 0.04  NC      21193598
2001/09/11 10:50:56.39  36.0322 -117.8805   3.01  1.07   ML   20          0.17  CI       9704877
2001/09/11 11:10:36.72  36.0108 -120.5675   2.76  1.10   Md    6 172    5 0.00  NC      21193600
2001/09/11 11:13:35.83  45.2760    7.3720   6.90  2.90   ML   34          0.00  GEN 200109114025
2001/09/11 11:19:38.23  60.3419 -152.8655 123.47  1.48   ML   19          0.75  AK            
2001/09/11 11:23:21.98  37.3787 -117.0814   4.75  1.01   ML   29          0.13  NN            
2001/09/11 11:28:36.69  37.4028 -118.4712  12.36  1.56   Md   16 106   12 0.02  NC      21193602
2001/09/11 11:36:54.96  35.8367 -121.3172  11.09  2.63   Md   49 175    8 0.11  NC      21193605
2001/09/11 11:52:13.20  46.8930 -112.5630   6.50  1.60   Mc   19 113   22 0.18  MB            
2001/09/11 11:57:02.90  44.7890 -111.1950   9.70  0.60   Mc   13 104    4 0.16  MB            
2001/09/11 12:04:22.50  37.4757 -121.8170   6.65  1.44   Md   33  34    3 0.06  NC      21193607
2001/09/11 12:09:10.33  37.3751 -117.7295   6.08  1.37   ML    5          0.00  NN            
2001/09/11 12:27:53.72  19.2875 -155.1092  40.55  1.48   Mx   17 215   15 0.09  HV       5184715
2001/09/11 12:31:07.67  60.0568 -149.1358  14.42  1.93   ML   40          0.97  AK            
2001/09/11 12:33:00.88  36.0028 -117.8845   5.08  1.34   ML   14          0.13  CI       9704893
2001/09/11 12:33:32.45  35.7443 -121.1543   7.83  1.73   Md   28 133    7 0.03  NC      21193609
2001/09/11 12:40:30.38  36.0507 -117.8838   4.83  0.91   ML   13          0.15  CI       9704897
2001/09/11 12:43:17.73  33.5583 -118.2173  12.02  2.41   ML   31          0.45  CI       9704901
2001/09/11 12:58:30.79  35.8067 -118.9980  16.63  0.67   ML   13          0.20  CI       9704981
2001/09/11 13:03:35.94  36.0322 -117.8977   3.41  0.88   ML   15          0.07  CI       9704985
2001/09/11 13:19:40.74  18.9018 -155.2673  12.51  2.21   Mx   32 247   35 0.12  HV       5184719
2001/09/11 13:31:22.74  35.9705 -120.5270   7.52  1.17   Md   14 159    5 0.02  NC      21193615
2001/09/11 13:32:11.45  37.4770 -121.8180   6.73  1.16   Md   13  75    3 0.04  NC      30223489
2001/09/11 13:41:48.57  -4.0850  147.7980  33.00  4.10   Mb    6          1.43  NEI 200109114026
2001/09/11 13:45:40.30  18.8623 -155.1575   8.59  3.32   Mx   44 259   46 0.13  HV       5184721
2001/09/11 13:50:30.81  36.0555 -117.8895   4.45  0.56   ML   14          0.24  CI       9704993
2001/09/11 14:01:37.86  36.8557 -115.8874  11.70  1.26   ML   36          0.13  NN            
2001/09/11 14:03:12.77  61.3441 -146.6464  28.65  1.30   ML   29          0.77  AK            
2001/09/11 14:03:54.50  36.8503 -115.8791  10.77  1.13   ML   27          0.14  NN            
2001/09/11 14:05:13.91  36.8602 -115.8947   9.27  0.26   ML   15          0.15  NN            
2001/09/11 14:23:32.49 -19.9840 -178.1990 500.00  4.30   Mb   26          0.55  NEI 200109114027
2001/09/11 14:28:31.27  36.8532 -115.8939  10.00  0.62   ML   21          0.11  NN            
2001/09/11 14:33:03.26  44.7512 -110.8528   5.86  0.10   Mc    9 104    4 0.05  WY            
2001/09/11 14:33:28.47  18.8058 -155.2528  11.53  2.21   Mx   18 281   45 0.09  HV       5184727
2001/09/11 14:36:38.11  38.7945 -122.8062   3.95  1.07   Md    7 105    2 0.01  NC      21193621
2001/09/11 14:47:15.06  38.8797 -119.7582  12.14  0.82   ML    5          0.03  NN            
2001/09/11 14:55:57.91  37.4938 -121.7443   6.52  1.02   Md    5 169    7 0.02  NC      21193623
2001/09/11 14:56:50.92  -0.5780  133.1300  33.00  6.50   Mw  174          0.89  NEI 200109114028
2001/09/11 14:57:46.33  19.3383 -155.0895   6.64  1.30   Mx   31 182    7 0.11  HV       5184728
2001/09/11 15:07:45.82  58.1676 -155.3029  -0.97  0.78   ML   17          0.46  AK            
2001/09/11 15:07:53.62  38.8973 -119.7609  11.38  1.67   ML   22          0.16  NN            
2001/09/11 15:08:44.81  33.7057 -116.8190  15.88  1.02   ML   16          0.06  CI       9705013
2001/09/11 15:16:16.39  -0.7230  132.9100  33.00  5.00   Mb   25          1.28  NEI 200109114029
2001/09/11 15:33:27.97  58.1675 -155.3028   0.00  0.20   ML   10 108    5 0.00  AV            
2001/09/11 15:38:45.88  36.0065 -117.8883   3.19  1.40   ML   22          0.31  CI       9705021
2001/09/11 15:48:58.86  36.5015 -117.9008   7.01  1.30   Mh   11          0.08  CI       9705025
2001/09/11 15:59:17.25 -36.8560 -179.4400  33.00  3.80   ML    9          0.66  NEI 200109114030
2001/09/11 16:02:17.39  42.5220  -73.7150   0.00  2.39   ML   12                LD            
2001/09/11 16:06:00.85  33.9490 -116.7315  17.75  1.57   ML   23          0.08  CI       9705029
2001/09/11 16:22:54.42  36.8583 -115.8947  11.95  0.25   ML   16          0.13  NN            
2001/09/11 16:40:45.24  60.9349 -151.7326  84.77  1.17   ML   28          0.66  AK            
2001/09/11 17:00:09.55  34.0830 -116.8390   8.86  1.22   ML   20          0.08  CI       9705069
2001/09/11 17:02:15.86  34.0602 -118.3900  10.58  1.87   Mc   26          0.25  CI       9705085
2001/09/11 17:08:14.05  33.9317 -117.0675  12.66  1.60   ML   46          0.16  CI       9705089
2001/09/11 17:23:29.56  19.2590  121.2610  33.00        Unk    6          0.55  NEI 200109114031
2001/09/11 17:27:06.92  38.8248 -122.8110   1.62  1.55   Md   13  55    2 0.03  NC      21193635
2001/09/11 17:27:30.01  38.8268 -122.8170   0.04  1.08   Md    7 143    3 0.12  NC      30223490
2001/09/11 17:31:39.66  33.3898 -116.7497  17.59  1.30   Mh   19          0.20  CI       9705097
2001/09/11 17:52:34.72  -1.0760  132.8740  33.00  4.50   Mb    8          1.04  NEI 200109114032
 

Your search parameters are:
catalog=ANSS
start_time=2001/09/08,00:00:00
end_time=2001/10/01,00:00:00
minimum_magnitude=0
maximum_magnitude=10
event_type=E
include events with no magnitude
Date       Time             Lat       Lon  Depth   Mag Magt  Nst Gap  Clo  RMS  SRC   Event ID
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001/09/11 08:34:57.08  18.7745 -155.3092   7.84  2.67   Mx   29 274   44 0.15  HV       5184704
2001/09/11 08:38:59.24  24.1040  121.9160  33.00  4.60   Mb   50          1.20  NEI 200109114018
2001/09/11 08:43:13.97  62.9437 -151.0084 116.40  2.13   ML   57          0.65  AK            
2001/09/11 08:47:35.55  58.4196 -154.7919   5.40  0.56   ML   17          0.35  AK            
2001/09/11 08:52:50.24  35.9982 -117.8792   4.10  1.08   ML   18          0.14  CI       9704829
2001/09/11 09:06:41.39  14.1580  146.7100  33.00        Unk    5          1.42  NEI 200109114019
2001/09/11 09:10:30.29  34.0680 -118.4033   8.91  2.18   ML   58          0.40  CI       9704833
2001/09/11 09:13:26.10  14.9950  -91.5710 161.10  5.60   Mw  299          0.98  NEI 200109114020
2001/09/11 09:21:10.85  33.3280 -116.1717  14.39  1.41   ML   25          0.22  CI       9704841
2001/09/11 09:21:40.92  38.7987 -122.7300   3.42  1.17   Md    7  90    3 0.02  NC      21193587
2001/09/11 09:24:51.75  36.0042 -117.8837   5.95  0.51   ML    8          0.03  CI       9704853
2001/09/11 09:26:32.31 -36.7830 -179.3670  33.00  4.30   ML   12          0.40  NEI 200109114021
2001/09/11 09:29:45.97  63.5693 -150.8923   7.29  2.33   ML   57          1.13  AK            
2001/09/11 09:32:17.80 -33.4750  -70.9940  65.80        Unk   10          0.00  GUC 200109114023
2001/09/11 09:35:40.33  60.9939 -149.0411   8.48  1.72   ML   45          0.70  AK            
2001/09/11 09:49:04.76  32.9108 -116.3412  11.35  1.93   ML   37          0.22  CI       9704861
2001/09/11 09:49:57.03  36.1131 -115.5758   3.24  1.35   ML   12          0.11  NN            
2001/09/11 09:57:28.32  34.6332 -116.2517  12.78  1.09   ML   10          0.14  CI       9704865
2001/09/11 10:03:04.94  18.5160  145.9010 225.30  4.40   Mb   16          1.17  NEI 200109114024
2001/09/11 10:04:40.21  34.2807 -117.4740   8.40  1.57   ML   24          0.17  CI       9704869
2001/09/11 10:16:56.69  36.0027 -117.8667   5.27  1.25   ML   15          0.15  CI       9704873
2001/09/11 10:30:31.34  37.6075 -118.4696   8.85        Unk   10          0.09  NN            
2001/09/11 10:32:07.39  63.2434 -151.1309   1.85  1.63   ML   33          0.92  AK            
2001/09/11 10:32:29.78  36.9527 -121.4507   3.58  1.02   Md    7 222    5 0.04  NC      21193598
2001/09/11 10:50:56.39  36.0322 -117.8805   3.01  1.07   ML   20          0.17  CI       9704877
2001/09/11 11:10:36.72  36.0108 -120.5675   2.76  1.10   Md    6 172    5 0.00  NC      21193600
2001/09/11 11:13:35.83  45.2760    7.3720   6.90  2.90   ML   34          0.00  GEN 200109114025
2001/09/11 11:19:38.23  60.3419 -152.8655 123.47  1.48   ML   19          0.75  AK            
2001/09/11 11:23:21.98  37.3787 -117.0814   4.75  1.01   ML   29          0.13  NN            
2001/09/11 11:28:36.69  37.4028 -118.4712  12.36  1.56   Md   16 106   12 0.02  NC      21193602
2001/09/11 11:36:54.96  35.8367 -121.3172  11.09  2.63   Md   49 175    8 0.11  NC      21193605
2001/09/11 11:52:13.20  46.8930 -112.5630   6.50  1.60   Mc   19 113   22 0.18  MB            
2001/09/11 11:57:02.90  44.7890 -111.1950   9.70  0.60   Mc   13 104    4 0.16  MB            
2001/09/11 12:04:22.50  37.4757 -121.8170   6.65  1.44   Md   33  34    3 0.06  NC      21193607
2001/09/11 12:09:10.33  37.3751 -117.7295   6.08  1.37   ML    5          0.00  NN            
2001/09/11 12:27:53.72  19.2875 -155.1092  40.55  1.48   Mx   17 215   15 0.09  HV       5184715
2001/09/11 12:31:07.67  60.0568 -149.1358  14.42  1.93   ML   40          0.97  AK            
2001/09/11 12:33:00.88  36.0028 -117.8845   5.08  1.34   ML   14          0.13  CI       9704893
2001/09/11 12:33:32.45  35.7443 -121.1543   7.83  1.73   Md   28 133    7 0.03  NC      21193609
2001/09/11 12:40:30.38  36.0507 -117.8838   4.83  0.91   ML   13          0.15  CI       9704897
2001/09/11 12:43:17.73  33.5583 -118.2173  12.02  2.41   ML   31          0.45  CI       9704901
2001/09/11 12:58:30.79  35.8067 -118.9980  16.63  0.67   ML   13          0.20  CI       9704981
2001/09/11 13:03:35.94  36.0322 -117.8977   3.41  0.88   ML   15          0.07  CI       9704985
2001/09/11 13:19:40.74  18.9018 -155.2673  12.51  2.21   Mx   32 247   35 0.12  HV       5184719
2001/09/11 13:31:22.74  35.9705 -120.5270   7.52  1.17   Md   14 159    5 0.02  NC      21193615
2001/09/11 13:32:11.45  37.4770 -121.8180   6.73  1.16   Md   13  75    3 0.04  NC      30223489
2001/09/11 13:41:48.57  -4.0850  147.7980  33.00  4.10   Mb    6          1.43  NEI 200109114026
2001/09/11 13:45:40.30  18.8623 -155.1575   8.59  3.32   Mx   44 259   46 0.13  HV       5184721
2001/09/11 13:50:30.81  36.0555 -117.8895   4.45  0.56   ML   14          0.24  CI       9704993
2001/09/11 14:01:37.86  36.8557 -115.8874  11.70  1.26   ML   36          0.13  NN            
2001/09/11 14:03:12.77  61.3441 -146.6464  28.65  1.30   ML   29          0.77  AK            
2001/09/11 14:03:54.50  36.8503 -115.8791  10.77  1.13   ML   27          0.14  NN            
2001/09/11 14:05:13.91  36.8602 -115.8947   9.27  0.26   ML   15          0.15  NN            
2001/09/11 14:23:32.49 -19.9840 -178.1990 500.00  4.30   Mb   26          0.55  NEI 200109114027
2001/09/11 14:28:31.27  36.8532 -115.8939  10.00  0.62   ML   21          0.11  NN            
2001/09/11 14:33:03.26  44.7512 -110.8528   5.86  0.10   Mc    9 104    4 0.05  WY            
2001/09/11 14:33:28.47  18.8058 -155.2528  11.53  2.21   Mx   18 281   45 0.09  HV       5184727
2001/09/11 14:36:38.11  38.7945 -122.8062   3.95  1.07   Md    7 105    2 0.01  NC      21193621
2001/09/11 14:47:15.06  38.8797 -119.7582  12.14  0.82   ML    5          0.03  NN            
2001/09/11 14:55:57.91  37.4938 -121.7443   6.52  1.02   Md    5 169    7 0.02  NC      21193623
2001/09/11 14:56:50.92  -0.5780  133.1300  33.00  6.50   Mw  174          0.89  NEI 200109114028
2001/09/11 14:57:46.33  19.3383 -155.0895   6.64  1.30   Mx   31 182    7 0.11  HV       5184728
2001/09/11 15:07:45.82  58.1676 -155.3029  -0.97  0.78   ML   17          0.46  AK            
2001/09/11 15:07:53.62  38.8973 -119.7609  11.38  1.67   ML   22          0.16  NN            
2001/09/11 15:08:44.81  33.7057 -116.8190  15.88  1.02   ML   16          0.06  CI       9705013
2001/09/11 15:16:16.39  -0.7230  132.9100  33.00  5.00   Mb   25          1.28  NEI 200109114029
2001/09/11 15:33:27.97  58.1675 -155.3028   0.00  0.20   ML   10 108    5 0.00  AV            
2001/09/11 15:38:45.88  36.0065 -117.8883   3.19  1.40   ML   22          0.31  CI       9705021
2001/09/11 15:48:58.86  36.5015 -117.9008   7.01  1.30   Mh   11          0.08  CI       9705025
2001/09/11 15:59:17.25 -36.8560 -179.4400  33.00  3.80   ML    9          0.66  NEI 200109114030
2001/09/11 16:06:00.85  33.9490 -116.7315  17.75  1.57   ML   23          0.08  CI       9705029
2001/09/11 16:22:54.42  36.8583 -115.8947  11.95  0.25   ML   16          0.13  NN            
2001/09/11 16:40:45.24  60.9349 -151.7326  84.77  1.17   ML   28          0.66  AK            
2001/09/11 17:00:09.55  34.0830 -116.8390   8.86  1.22   ML   20          0.08  CI       9705069
2001/09/11 17:02:15.86  34.0602 -118.3900  10.58  1.87   Mc   26          0.25  CI       9705085
2001/09/11 17:08:14.05  33.9317 -117.0675  12.66  1.60   ML   46          0.16  CI       9705089
2001/09/11 17:23:29.56  19.2590  121.2610  33.00        Unk    6          0.55  NEI 200109114031
2001/09/11 17:27:06.92  38.8248 -122.8110   1.62  1.55   Md   13  55    2 0.03  NC      21193635
2001/09/11 17:27:30.01  38.8268 -122.8170   0.04  1.08   Md    7 143    3 0.12  NC      30223490
2001/09/11 17:31:39.66  33.3898 -116.7497  17.59  1.30   Mh   19          0.20  CI       9705097
2001/09/11 17:52:34.72  -1.0760  132.8740  33.00  4.50   Mb    8          1.04  NEI 200109114032

Flight 175 Achimspok Radar and the Statue of Liberty



Hello I found an old web page from September 2006,

Quoting from web.archive.org
https://web.archive.org/web/20060902061411/http://www.nps.gov/stli/planyourvisit/hours.htm

"2006/09/20 Current Park Hours:  8:30 am - 6:00 pm.  Hours are adjusted seasonally." 

Or was the park closed before 8:30 ? 

The park must have adjusted the time to 9:30 or an hour later for the winter months. I am not sure what prime summer hours are, maybe 7:30. Do you have any idea? 

What time did the Ellis Island and Statue of Library Park open normally if  9/11 did not happen ? It looks like  8:30 am. Then I heard the park was closed for a while after 9/11 maybe to repair damage from the many Earthquakes. The Earthquakes took out the power grid and closed NYU.  Is the Statue vulnerable to earthquakes? Does the park have a seismograph machine on site for 9/11? Wave height for the waterway area would be interesting too? I don't know if the captains on boats reported seeing higher then normal wave activity but that's up to the boat captains to report. 

My theory is: Did someone close the park because that would allow hundred of people to take pictures and video of Flight 175 which according to new radar came right over the top.

Did you know the NYPD never released their footage of Flight 175? They were not shy about releasing video of other activities and events but when it comes to a video taping of the plane, which they that they were ordered to smash into somehow that video got hijacked by someone.   

thank Dan





On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Kelly, Joan <joan_kelly@nps.gov> wrote:
We would have no way of knowing if any tickets were sold on September 11, 2001 since there is no admission charged for either Liberty or Ellis Islands,.  That information would have to come from Statue Cruises.  Yes, you do have to take a ferry to get to both Liberty and Ellis Islands.


On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Dan Plesse <dan.plesse@gmail.com> wrote:
Joan,

         I believe a boat is required to get to Statue of Liberty &
Ellis Island. Where any tickets for the boat sold that day?

Thanks Dan.

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Kelly, Joan <joan_kelly@nps.gov> wrote:
> So sorry but the park never opened that day as the events happened prior to
> opening time.  No one took pictures.  Sorry we cannot accommodate your
> request for dust.
>
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 8:48 PM, <dan.plesse@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Email submitted from: dan.plesse@gmail.com at /stli/contacts.htm
>>
>> Mailing Address:
>> Dan
>> 37 sunny road
>> St. James , New York 11780
>> USA
>>
>> Was the park open on 9/11 at 9:00 a.m radar indicates that flight 175 flew
>> right over the top. Did anyone take pictures of it and were they asked to
>> turn in all images before leaving? Did the F.B.I visit the park during or
>> after 9/11. Did people collect the dust? Can you send me a sample? Thanks
>>
>> Flight 175 Radar 3D Google
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6rYif2RJcg
>
>
>
>
> --
> Joan A. Kelly
> Division of Interpretation/Education
>  & Visitor Services
> Statue of Liberty NM/Ellis Island
(646) 356-2134
>
>
> The people who make a difference in our lives are not the ones with the most
> credentials, the most money, or the most awards. They are the ones that
> care.
>



--
Add Ticker check it out
http://www.investingNideas.com




--
Joan A. Kelly
Division of Interpretation/Education
 & Visitor Services
Statue of Liberty NM/Ellis Island


The people who make a difference in our lives are not the ones with the most credentials, the most money, or the most awards. They are the ones that care.

Flight 175 radar Achimspok Radar 9/11




--

Search