New Molten Steel World Trade Center Evidence

No one has seen 9/11 molten steel material on display with a witness talking about what he found until 2019, so no engineer will have to explain how fuel could melted the core columns because all they have to do is deny that it happened. Enter new physical evidence. No 9/11 Truther will ever stand with new evidence either, everyone is too invested in their pet theory. Therefore the government always wins by default and that is the state of 9/11 Truth Movement today - a total loss for the history books!

Case in point Glenn Zarmanov

The debunkers never had to address all the hard evidence because we never showed them all the evidence. We will never know if all the evidence was enough because it never happened. Thermite was too easy to dismiss and no one showed them the fireworks display that night. Has anyone FOIA the NYFD for their videos? I think Scott's molten sample is the first only time the evidence was showed to the public without the WTC pile being a factor for heat i.e compression theory.. It too bad we just have the people anymore to carry the load.

I now have proof of melting but no one is here
Here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcXUmNxEsI0 and
and here
https://youtu.be/uVfF9Vhh2jE

9-11 Engineer and Firefighter discusses Melting of steel from WTC

Engineer and Firefighter discusses Melting of steel from WTC 9 11 Molten Crime Scene Evidence and Cover up 2019 Astaneh Melting Of Girders Engineer discusses...

youtube.com

ok I’m busy at work ttyl

Glenn Zarmanov just dismisses the evidence I have found. "ok I’m busy at work ttyl" means you have been blown-off.

With molten steel and pre-weakening evidence as seen below, they would never allow the towers to stand one second more and allow a fire investigation . The Towers were shipped out to China and India, never to be seen again! No investigations were allowed by FDNY or NYPD. a total loss for the history books

Too many bombs, across too many floors.

You assume incorrectly it was FIRE to start with. It WAS NOT FIRE!. You CAN”T melt core columns with just normal fire heat and the molten steel was evidence for pre-weakening and thus it was meant for explosive demolition (steel). I am 100% sure you have NO idea about what happened on 9/11. Explosions and molten steel is what happened. That is the answer. It has NOTHING to do with fire. Remove the pre-weakening for explosive demolition (steel) and the towers would do just fine.

Fire Fighter Scott Schrimpe Molten Core Tower Display

Felix Chen

Original Author · 8m ago

Not convincing. That could easily be plastic deformation under high heat, which would appear just like that also. To a layman, as opposed to a professional metallurgist, that could easily be mistaken as a melted part. If an energy dispersive x-ray analysis revealed the distinct microstructural characteristics of melted steel (recrystallization, coarse microstructure, etc.), that would be convincing. The outward appearance isn’t enough to call it melting. It sounds simply like a layman seeing a heavily oxidized piece of metal and referring to it generically as “melting.”

Reply

Upvote

Dan Plesse

2m ago

Did you listen to Fire Fighter Scott Schrimpe story at all? The video shows he’s in public and no member of public disagrees with his findings and the sample has been cut open. Did you see that?

Studies were done but not on this item. Heat levels beyond 2,000 degrees.

. New York Times also reported this World Trade Center stalagmite problem.

“grotesque landscape of stalagmites formed by dripping metal”

https://web.archive.org/web/20140530120153/https://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/15/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-site-below-rubble-a-tour-of-a-still-burning-hell.html

Reply

Felix Chen

Original Author · 8h ago

Just because the folks in the video agree with this firefighter is evidence enough for you? How many of those folks are experts in the physical and mechanical metallurgy of steels? How many of them would be able to look at the iron-carbon phase diagram and describe the solidification of a hypoeutectic composition versus a hypereutectic composition? I disagree with this firefighter. Just about everyone on this thread would too. Tons of others who’ve never read this Quora question would disagree as well. You’re picking a mighty small sample size to hang the foundations of a conspiracy scenario upon.

So now you’re saying heat levels beyond 2000 °F were found. But in another thread one of your truther colleagues says temperatures beyond 250 °C in the steel didn’t happen. FEMA’s own tests show no temperatures in the range of 2000 °F. You’re disagreeing with your own side now.

flashes of bombs as seen in the video below and NOT During the collapse.
Many videos were taken of this flash 

September 11, 2001 North Tower Flash  9:33

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wETVXAKDSg

Same Flash https://youtu.be/-Pb2Df3QPPc?t=859

The towers would be fine without all the explosives.

Netanyahu in congress

Sometimes they have to be bombed into going to war. In 
fact, that is what happened in World War II. All of Europe had 
been conquered. America was actually bombed in Pearl Harbor and 
was--and that was a pivotal event that opened the eyes of 
Americans, and once their eyes were opened they gathered the 
power that is available in this great free Nation, and the 
result was preordained.
    I think in a similar way, the bombing of September 11th 
opened the eyes of Americans to see the great conflict and the 
great dirge that face us; and once opened, and the overpowering 
will of the majority of the people of the United States, of the 
steamroller that is inexorably moving to decide this battle.
 

Reply