Did you delete your comment? Did I delete it by mistake trying to delete my reply? Anyway I saw someone was going to delete your comment so I saved it here:
If you didn't delete it can you cut and copy it back? Lets see if it deleted again!
https://911truthout.blogspot.com...
SatIf you didn't delete it can you cut and copy it back? Lets see if it deleted again!
https://911truthout.blogspot.com...
Hi Dan, I didn't delete the comment. The only comments I've ever had deleted on Quora have been if they were about 9/11. Quora deleted a comment back along, so I rarely bother answering questions on any topic now, just the occasional answer on bunkers. Q- whore-a (as my friend Chakra likes to call them!) is of course no different to other mainstream sites, and the official story of 9/11 will get far more upvotes on here. You've got people like Charles Fletcher writing technical sounding "cobblers" which the "sheeple" lap up so that they can sleep well in La La land.
All the best, I'll write to you here later.
SunAll the best, I'll write to you here later.
Hello again Dan. I think we're "fighting a losing battle" going against the official fairy tale and that most folks are not really that concerned about what really happened on 9/11, certainly that's my experience here in the UK locally. I know a vicar here, Jeff, who told me he'd received a long letter from another priest that was sure 9/11 was done with the help of the CIA. Jeff just told me he'd dismissed the letter as ridiculous, and saying to me "as if the US government would do THAT to their own people".
As we know, all the media are as "bent as a 9 dollar bill" and complicit in covering up the hoax. Kevin E Sjolund on here was telling me that he realised a long time ago that Quora is also a mouthpiece for the official story just pretending to be impartial and allowing discussion on "conspiracy theories" on here.
Someone asked me my thoughts on how 9/11 was done, after I'd commented on an answer that had got tens of 1000's of views, and several thousand upvotes, his answer confirming the WTCs fell due to gravity collapses and "pancaked down". The guy said he was a structural engineer, though my guess is he's probably a toffee salesman or something like that. My comment got quite a few upvotes, but then Quora took it off for "infringing their policy" NB presumably those "on high" prefer the official 9/11 explanations and don't like anything that gets TOO near the truth. There was nothing offensive in it.
Brighton Jaimeson on here is among those writing good 9/11 stuff, but there are as you'll know many others , including ex-firefighter Adrian Mallet, and James Lingren. The biggest problem seems to be the; "but we saw the planes hit on TV and ALL the TV channels said Bin Laden did it" attitude. Even those that "look into 9/11 further" have often only watched mainstream documentaries such as by the BBC, "National Geographic", or "The History Channel". Often this corrupt lot just repeat what either NIST or the equally bent; "Popular Mechanics" criminals have come out with.
One thing used time and time again is the; "but you see the steel only needed to get hot enough to weaken it, not melt, then once that happened OBVIOUSLY the WTCs would have lost their strength and collapsed ". No hope, as that convinces perhaps 75% of sheeple that the official explanations are true. The point that the Twin Towers didn't so much collapse, as 85% of them turn to dust in roughly 11 seconds, doesn't register with these " our government CAN be trusted as we'd always known" eager to be reassured folks.
SunAs we know, all the media are as "bent as a 9 dollar bill" and complicit in covering up the hoax. Kevin E Sjolund on here was telling me that he realised a long time ago that Quora is also a mouthpiece for the official story just pretending to be impartial and allowing discussion on "conspiracy theories" on here.
Someone asked me my thoughts on how 9/11 was done, after I'd commented on an answer that had got tens of 1000's of views, and several thousand upvotes, his answer confirming the WTCs fell due to gravity collapses and "pancaked down". The guy said he was a structural engineer, though my guess is he's probably a toffee salesman or something like that. My comment got quite a few upvotes, but then Quora took it off for "infringing their policy" NB presumably those "on high" prefer the official 9/11 explanations and don't like anything that gets TOO near the truth. There was nothing offensive in it.
Brighton Jaimeson on here is among those writing good 9/11 stuff, but there are as you'll know many others , including ex-firefighter Adrian Mallet, and James Lingren. The biggest problem seems to be the; "but we saw the planes hit on TV and ALL the TV channels said Bin Laden did it" attitude. Even those that "look into 9/11 further" have often only watched mainstream documentaries such as by the BBC, "National Geographic", or "The History Channel". Often this corrupt lot just repeat what either NIST or the equally bent; "Popular Mechanics" criminals have come out with.
One thing used time and time again is the; "but you see the steel only needed to get hot enough to weaken it, not melt, then once that happened OBVIOUSLY the WTCs would have lost their strength and collapsed ". No hope, as that convinces perhaps 75% of sheeple that the official explanations are true. The point that the Twin Towers didn't so much collapse, as 85% of them turn to dust in roughly 11 seconds, doesn't register with these " our government CAN be trusted as we'd always known" eager to be reassured folks.
Sorry, "SENT" too soon. My best friend on Quora, Chakra Simhan, despairs at how people believe the official 9/11 story. He went to university with a scientist that's worked on the Indian Space program and who told him that this idea of rocket fuel bringing down the WTCs like that is obviously "bollocks". But the trouble is that most scientists don't like to admit it in public for fear of ridicule or even losing their jobs.
The mainstream media usually say stuff like:"Most scientists agree that the official WTC collapse explanations are correct". We'd say that a lot of scientists prefer to say nothing in public about the WTC collapse mechanisms, or if they do confirm them, it's because they just can't accept that people could be so wicked as to do that to their fellow Americans.
The book : " 9/11 revealed" makes the point that many scientists and engineers on first seeing the WTCs collapse thought to themselves that such collapses would be impossible without controlled demolition with something like explosives used, but with further thought they then overruled their brains and thought :"Well they DID collapse, and it was ONLY the planes that hit, so what other explanation could there possibly be?". Like NIST, who admitted they'd not looked for evidence of explosives "because explosives were ruled out right from the start", I've no doubt that if they were given an open tin of baked beans, but told no tin opener or implement of any kind was used to remove the lid, they'd come up with all these theories such as; "Agitation during transportation caused a build up of gasses inside the baked beans tin which put excessive pressure on the seam of the tin that had already been corroded due to reaction with the tomato sauce over some months, thus forcing off the baked bean tin lid as though it LOOKED like a tin opener had caused it!" It's the sort of crap that gets spouted with WTCs collapse. No hope mate.
SunThe mainstream media usually say stuff like:"Most scientists agree that the official WTC collapse explanations are correct". We'd say that a lot of scientists prefer to say nothing in public about the WTC collapse mechanisms, or if they do confirm them, it's because they just can't accept that people could be so wicked as to do that to their fellow Americans.
The book : " 9/11 revealed" makes the point that many scientists and engineers on first seeing the WTCs collapse thought to themselves that such collapses would be impossible without controlled demolition with something like explosives used, but with further thought they then overruled their brains and thought :"Well they DID collapse, and it was ONLY the planes that hit, so what other explanation could there possibly be?". Like NIST, who admitted they'd not looked for evidence of explosives "because explosives were ruled out right from the start", I've no doubt that if they were given an open tin of baked beans, but told no tin opener or implement of any kind was used to remove the lid, they'd come up with all these theories such as; "Agitation during transportation caused a build up of gasses inside the baked beans tin which put excessive pressure on the seam of the tin that had already been corroded due to reaction with the tomato sauce over some months, thus forcing off the baked bean tin lid as though it LOOKED like a tin opener had caused it!" It's the sort of crap that gets spouted with WTCs collapse. No hope mate.
That WTC7 fell for 105 feet at absolute freefall speed with zero "heat weakened steel" or "crushing concrete" slowing the fall is easy proof that all the columns were blown out of the way for those 8 floors. I've asked official story believers to explain this without explosives being used, but they just go silent, or waffle on about a different aspect of 9/11. Jonathan Buttall on here, (not his real name) who I know well, just went back to the "billons saw those planes hitting " response. He's a nice chap but seems to have a mental block that makes him believe the official 9/11 story, as do most people. Cheers.
something like this
Reply
Michael Thomas
3h ago
Looks a bit like a still from CGI to me, but surely not!
Presumably, this is a: “plane melts into WTC” picture from a video where an entire plane can go through 14 inch steel structural box girders with just 26 inches between each girder, that are also backed by several reinforced concrete floors, but not smash to bits until the entire plane gets behind the girders, not 1 little plane bit falling off outside? The Perdue animation type of thing?
Apparently, it’s the momentum that allows that miracle. Obviously, such a thing is possible then. I must go, as I’m taking my goldfish out for a walk on a leash. It’s true I tell you.
Reply
Upvote
Dan Plesse
56m ago
Nope not from a video, sorry. But no photos exists from a city filled with people taking photographs all day about this event and everyone of those people forgot to take this photo?
It was not just a U-turn. This plane if tracked back to source correctly would likely be from a strange source i.e the a PA controlled airport.
Reply
