Bush Did 9/11 by Letting It Happen On Purpose

9/11 Context: War Games 

Tragic day The 1st At Force public affairs officer was in the middle of a NORAD-wide air defense exercise when the day's events unfolded. 

"You know, I—I think, I just got a call from the Northeast Air Defense Sector. There’s a hijacked plane." 1st Air Force talking with brother South Tower

"Operation Amalgam Virgo  (9/11) Amalgam Virgo 01 and 02

A war game was planned before the attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center,"  Arias said.

“We were preparing for aviation terrorism already,” he said. “We just finished a simulation of a terrorist hijacking of a passenger airliner. Now we’re doing small aircraft.”

What was suppose to happen? 

"Bush would spend a few minutes reading to schoolchildren and urging Congress to pass his education reform package." My guess is this was all to be done from the same reading room. a  "scrub trip" however maybe not. Then, he and his entourage of aides, Secret Service agents, and reporters would make the 90-minute flight back to Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington.

 What actions was the president supposed to make if he was not guilty of 9/11?

 1. Never give away your location during terrorism activities unless you are in control and have foreknowledge. 

George Bush went back to the White House and gave away his location to the world at 8:00 p.m. George Bush also gave away his other locations. A total three times on 9/11. If he wasn’t in control of 9/11, why would do that?

2. Ask questions and look interested, unless you already know all the answers and have a better understanding of the terror events!

Comments
1. I would expect a president should have called the F.A.A headquarters.

I would expect a president who was informed of an attack on the the USA to get up and go out and find out what was going on. I would expect him to ask if the White House was being evacuated. I would expect him to ask if there was an air defense above D.C. Call the FAA!!!

Pres George Bush "What the hell is going on!!" FAA "Well sir we have XYZ happening and the military is refusing to respond because of chain of command issues, then after that they don't know what to do and placed fake radar returns on the screens and that is not all sir!"  George "great we have a coup d'é·tat". 

3. Never pre-announce a major event before it happens unless you already know what is going to happen, so you don't look like you can see into future or seem like you planned the attack yourself and can't wait to go to work and i.e don't jump the gun. 

Mon 11:13 AM

Jerome sent January 25 at 11:13 AM

what is the george bush communication that indicates foreknowledge of 911? I didn't know the answer.

10:12 PM

You sent Today at 10:12 PM

President George was asked about the first plane by a nearby reporter. He asked him "Do you know about what is happening in New York" George said "he will talk about that later" which he did but that was already after the second plane hit which signaled terrorism and also during the third plane count down to hit the pentagon. This was still early when the reporter asked him the question and during this time the plane could still be considered an accident and not requiring an update by the president. So George jumped the gun a little bit by saying he was going to talk about it later. Its a small hint that he knew more at that point then anyone else.

Part I

At no time during 9/11 did George reveal any information about the other missing planes flight 77 and flight 93, but he did reveal that a new press announcement that was to begin at some point and it was based on the events in New York, even before the second plane hits the South Tower.  

Ray Ross

·

1h ago

Data Extraction at Mxkintl (2007–present)

They whispered we are under attack to him and he chose to stay at the school because he knew nobody at that school was in danger.

1 view

View Upvoters

 · Answer requested by Dan Plesse

You upvoted this

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

So that means they had foreknowledge of 9/11 events. The only problem I have with this is it has been part of the literature from the very beginning. Even Micheal Moore got into this idea with Fahrenheit 9/11 and Loose Change and all the rest. The word hackneyed comes to mind.. By 8:00 pm George made his way back to the White House for his third speech and but time he was selling a the war footing tone filled with lies to make the New Pearl Harbor into the “catastrophic and catalyzing event” PNAC war pushers and Israel required to unlock the full potential of evil. The problems and thus solutions were 1. Scare some money out of congress and increase the war budget. 3. Allow the CIA greater freedoms to conduct human rights abuses and allow the creation of Black Sites CIA Extraordinary Rendition - Google My Maps.. 4. Blame the Palestinians and Muslims in order dehumanize and justify more crimes against them inside those Black Sites and drone strike them relentlessly and forever . 5. Build war palaces, military bases all over the middle east to do more of the above. 6. deduce resistance from others for all of this above. 7. Create the “it was for oil issue” as cover for all of the above CIA, military, budget and human rights abuses and crimes. 

9/11 unlocked all of this evil in a few short years without any resistance from anyone. They would gotten away clean too if it wasn't for a few individuals pointing out a few things but somehow even now the public is still not onboard because they more or less are in agreement with bombing of women and children and the general warmongering . 

 The public somehow can't make the connection back to its source.

The Gulf of Tonkin Attack is the same playbook as 9/11 and so was the USS Liberty Attack.. It just keeps happening.  It works so well even a caveman can do it . I think they retired that playbook now, The same 10% of population that resisted the British in 1776 has won again if that playbook is been put out to pasture. But you never know. 

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

“Bush hinted it was about terror attacks at 8:53” By that time, all four aircraft are up in the air and likely missing, off there flight path or something has gone wrong i.e controllers' text message not taken seriously "lock doors" .


 Each step on 9/11 was synchronized in stages according to a successful hijacking,

For example, another plane would launch after 8:13 takeover of flight 11, or  flight 175 would launch at 8:14 and so on.. 

Part II

Was Bush connected to the FAA or was he in the dark? 

Lennart Regebro

·

34m ago

“Why would you wait and not ask for information?”

Oh, Dan, Dan, Dan. How amazingly ignorant you are.

The President is surrounded by people whose job there is to gather the information and give it to the president. He doesn’t need to ask. He will get the information when it arrives.

“People who are in c

 … (more)

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

Why are you claiming the “the people around the president” are trustworthy when clearly they were not.

Wiki Quote
9:29 “No one in the President's traveling party has any information during this time that other aircraft were hijacked or missing. [45]

However two people who were with the president were linked to the phone bridges JOC, PEOC and monitoring the Secret Service and staff radio channels which also means they are connected with the FAA.

Col. Mark Tillman

: Everything started coming alive. We were hooked into the PEOC [the White House bunker] and the JOC [Joint Operations Center], for the Secret Service. They’re all in the link now."

Master Sgt. Dana Lark

"We’re just monitoring the Secret Service and staff radio channels. It was chaos. What’s next? All of a sudden, other reports start coming in—explosion at the White House, car bomb at the State Department. We’re under attack."

The JOC and the PEOC where linked to the FAA on 9/11.

His omissions of the size and scale of  9/11 was in effect meant to maximize the damage caused to the United States and to harvest the effects believed to exist by PNAC's New Pearl Harbor's founders.  The Pentagon attack was 8 minutes after The New York was Attacked speech at 9:29. 

“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. “  

Bush Did 9/11 by Letting It Happen On Purpose or LIHOP 

What announcement did George Bush make on the morning of 9/11 which hints that he knew the full scope of the September 11th terror attacks?

 
What did George Bush say which spilled the beans about 9/11 foreknowledge with Andy Card making him criminally responsible for 9/ 11?

Sonya Ross, reporter, Associated Press: This was a garden variety trip. It was low-ranking staff and a lot of the top journalists didn’t come. It was a scrub trip.

Do "scrub trips" normally have the presidential podium  set up with a room staged and filled with people? 

At 9:29 eight minutes before Flight 77 impact, the president held his tongue about the on going crisis in D.C. in all his speeches. 

Lennart Regebro

·

3h ago

OK, so they DO have a special portable presidential podium. Just as I expected.

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

The point was they brought all the equipment to make an major announcement, while Bush hinted it was about terror attacks before the terror attacks at 8:53 by mistake.

8:55: President George W. Bush arrives at Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida
9:03: President Bush enters a classroom as part of his school visit.
9:05: Chief of Staff Andrew Card interrupts to whisper to the president, "A second plane has hit the second tower. America is under attack."
9:14: President Bush returns to an adjacent classroom commandeered by the U.S. Secret Service. 

9:37:* President Bush makes his first public statements about the attacks, in front of an audience of about 200 teachers and students at the elementary school. He states that he will be going back to Washington. "Today, we've had a national tragedy," he starts. "Two airplanes… have crashed… into the World Trade Center… in an apparent terrorist attack on our country," and leads a moment of silence. No one in the President's traveling party has any information during this time that other aircraft were hijacked or missing.[45]   

CHERYL RYEFIELD 2002 testimony said she was listening to Bush terror attack speech on the radio while flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

 President Bush makes his first public statements about the attacks at the same time flight 77 hit the Pentagon

1:04: 9/11 Remarks at Barksdale Air Force Base:  no information revealed again. Nothing about hijackings yet.  Basically you are left with your imagination and details don't matter because you are not to switch on your analytical  part of your brain. Not until its too late away. 

^{15 minutes of foot dragging 9:14 - 9:29.}   

The quote in question: 

"He [the President] got out of his hotel suite this morning, was about to leave, reporters saw the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. The reporter said to the president, 'Do you know what's going on in New York?' He said he did, and he said he will have something about it [i.e. a statement] later."

After all he got the presidential podium with him, maybe that was reason to ask what was happening in New York.  

source:

Special Report, 'Planes Crash into World Trade Center,' ABC News, September 2001, 8:53 AM ET.

Backstory:

Normally presidents never talk about current events, but George pre-announces a conference before 8:53.  However later, with the presidential podium in tow he announces only two events and forgets or omits the word hijacking to this speech.  Was "have something about it" linked to the  large terrorism events of 9/11. Did Bush already link the first plane, flight 11 with the total 9/11 attack i.e foreknowledge!  via his omissions. All four flights were impacting or missing at this point for two hours.  Who was his speech writer.  

Full Quote 

in an ABC News ‘Special Report’ John Cochran reported; “Peter, as you know, the president’s down in Florida talking about education. He got out of his hotel this morning , was about to leave, reporters saw the White House chief of staff, Andy Card, whisper into his ear. The reporter said to the president, ‘Do you know what’s going on in New York?’ He said he did, and he said he will have something about it later. His first event is about half an hour at an elementary school in Sarasota, Florida.”

Back Back Story: 

The phone bridges with the FAA were set up pretty fast and with the secret service, therefore it could be reasonable he was told that Flight 11 was a hijack at that moment BEFORE Andy Card whispered into his ear the first time and therefore reasonable that he would be announcing a press release afterward but he never said a word hijacked airliners.   

Why would so many members of the press be interested in reading comprehension in a poor black school in Florida?  Is that news? That alone seems fishy. Holding a sign "Not yet" more fishy! A cattle call to follow the president to a classroom. Fishy! The presidential podium Fishy! 

The catch-22 is if everyone did their job the president would have known about the hijacking at around 8:20. Also if flight 11 turned right for a second and continued along its normal flight path, the impact would be too soon and all the 9/11 flights would have been grounded and thus spoiling the events of 9/11. The president definitely couldn't do his Emma E. Booker Elementary School scam. The whole ball of rubber would be a mess.  

Other spoiling events would have been texting to all flights about the hijacks by the controllers. Lucky controllers dropped word hijack or HJK in the nick of time as to not  alarm the pilots. However one controller said something like "bar the cockpit door" Flight 93 which they responded with a lame reply: Okay!. The reply should have been, Why?  What would controllers have done then. Spilled the beans? No chance of that. 

The flight paths for the 9/11 flight was never an issue of the 9/11 Commission Report and most people don't know about flight paths and that they are registered with the FAA. This tells me the 9/11 Commission Report used the public's ignorance of the general topics  on every issue it could as to defend of the indefensible crime of 9/11. This stupid-is-as stupid-does-strategy of the commission worked like a charm and the John Q Public got the report its tiny brain could handle and they went back to the ballgame feeling just as ignorant as before and blissful as a new born baby.  
    

 Hi, Daniel -- 

   cc to Jane Clark and Dave Meiswinkle  

   Yes, I've seen this extremely important videotaped testimony by Pentagon Army Public Affairs civilian employee Cheryl Reyfield

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=215bbK_BPOs You sent in the below and have cc'd Jane and Dave on this as They may not have yet.  The two most important parts of her testimony -- 1) beginning at 

c. 1:12 min. that a plane was destroyed in a fireball at the Pentagon while Bush was on the radio speaking at the press briefing at the Florida School, and 2) at c. 15:55 min. that the plane was marked with the Stars of the Air Force -- are both consistent with the findings of 'Behind The Smoke Curtain' which marshals the evidence that the plane approach, destruction and explosion stopped the outside Heliport clock at 9:32:30, much earlier than the official story alleged impact time of Flight 77 of 9:37:46 (April Gallop's watch was stopped in the outer E Ring at 9:30 from an even earlier inside explosion).  She saw the plane approach and explosion while Bush was speaking at the Florida press briefing which began at c 9:30 and was suddenly cut short by the Secret Service which urgently removed him from the building precisely because they had just received word that the Pentagon had been attacked during the briefing.  Because Cheryl assumed the official story is true, i.e. that Flight 77, a commercial airliner, was the Pentagon plane, after holding up the drawing She made of the plane She saw immediately afterwards She mused that maybe She'd seen 'two planes'.  But from all the evidence in 'Smoke Curtain' We know that You don't need to hypothesize two planes as the relative timing proves that the plane She saw couldn't have been Flight 77.  Also supporting that insead It was the plane whose destruction in a fireball near the Heliport stopped the Heliport clock   at 9:32:30 is the fact that this was just a few seconds after a Marine Corps attack helicopter that had been buzzing near the West Wall and over to I 395 and back suddenly flew off from the Pentagon.  

From her testimony the fact that emergency responders raced out of the building immediately after the fireball means that They almost certainly were already in place for the 'exercise' scheduled for there that morning on how personnel would respond to the threat of a plane on a flight path towards the building.  High ranking Army General James Civarelli told two first responders I've interviewed that the Pentagon was holding a pre-scheduled 'exercise' on this scenario  that morning. That Cheryl first saw the plane at/near the Navy Annex, also, is consistent with the testimony of two Sheraton Hotel maids I've interviewed who were in the ballroom on the top floor of the Hotel that morning when there was an extremely loud and growing screeching noise, the building shook and then the huge plate glass window they were looking out of facing the Pentagon's West side was filled by a plane as They watched It descend and explode in a fireball at/by the building, as both the Sheraton and Navy Annex were in the flight path.  The FBI quickly arrived at the Sheraton, took the video the employees were watching that they had retrieved from one of the security cameras as well as all the others, and ordered the employees not to talk about what They saw.  One of the maids who saw It from the Ballroom happened to be the one for my room when    I stayed there for the Pentagon Conference on the 9/11 Anniversary a few years ago.  She took Me to the Ballroom and showed Me exactly what She saw standing at the window where She and the other maid, her friend and co-worker, saw It.  Finally, her perspective from I27, like so many others stuck on the highway and elsewhere, could not distinguish between a plane being destroyed by remote signal just before it would otherwise have hit the wall and actually hitting the wall.  'Smoke Curtain' marshals the evidence that the c. 9:32:30 approaching plane, which She saw, was actually the plane for the 'exercise' that was destroyed by a remote control signal just before it would otherwise have hit the wall and that the destruction in the wall and internally was by other means ... 

   Barbara  

Hi Dan,

My guess is that he got his instructions on a need to know basis - he is too dumb to be trusted with much more.

So he may have known only just before what was happening.

Xray

Thanks Ray I am still working on it. It turns out he did have a script to read from. 

They most likely told him he was going to make an announcement and he slowly found out what that announcement  was .

They brought in everything they needed. 


Hi Dan,

Yeh, just happened to have the podium there to hand.

Does he appear to be reading from or referencing the script?

Ray

Hi Ray, 

     It looks like they wrote one thing on one page and he flipped through as to look like he had volumes of information. 
  
"I have spoken to the Vice President, to the Governor of New York, to the Director of the FBI, and have ordered that the full resources of the federal government go to help the victims and their families, and -- and to conduct a full-scale investigation to hunt down and to find those folks who committed this act." 

At no time during 9/11 did George reveal any important information even when asked directly. He only revealed that a press announcement was to begin later in the day.  

This behavior was in effect meant to maximize damage to the United States and to harvest the effects of the New Pearl Harbor.   

Hi Ray, 

   That sounds about right.

What I found out was he didn't say any details at all. He never said the word hijack or hijacked for example. 

His first announcement sounded like the attacks were over and clearly they were not.

The Pentagon was impacted 9:37. and his speech was around 9:29 .. That's 8 minutes before impact. 

He could have given warnings about Flight 77. The whole area should have been evacuated by then. but no.. 

The 9/11 Rigger and Murder of Dave Adam Possible Real Name Michael Calabrese

The 9/11 Rigger and Murder of Dave Adam Possible Real Name Michael Calabrese

Hi Dan,

Don't know if you are familiar with the Michael Calabrese story?

If not, you can read here if your interested:

https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2014/11/17/calabrese/

I could never quite resolve if it was true or not because there was some conflicting angles to it.

If "Dave Adam" (pseudo name from the American card makers) was a real person, and was a 911 rigger
 he would have known that 911 was some kind of nuclear event, and therefore he would not have first
 approached the AE "Truth" people, because he would have known it was controlled opposition

Also the story rests on just one person Wayne Madison - so there is no other verification.

That said, Michael Calabrese absolutely fits the exact psychological profile of someone who could
do such a thing as rig those buildings. We see him on video on a local channel after his boat was
run aground and subsequently. Without going into too much detail it looks like he is suffering from
PTSD and GUILT "I know I am not god's favorite son", and yet makes a comment about being able
to "crush a man's skull with his bare hands". He really had Navy Special ops written all over him.

I couldn't resolve it, so instead I decided to spend a few years watching Wayne Madison and making
notes everytime he popped up with something new. Long story short, I have come to the conclusion
that far from Wayne being an EX-ONI whistleber, he really is the very current NI mouthpiece. And
gets out there anything special that they need getting out there.

 It's likely that with no single point of failure allowed there may have been more than one team. One
[of] may have done the Towering Inferno drama script special, and another dropped of the nukes for example. 
So why then tell us via the Pentagram Website VT about the manager of at least one team of the riggers? 

The conclusion I have come to is that with Calabrese going all PTSD, getting arrested/ alcoholism/
being on TV/ talking about writing a book etc. That this was a strong warning to others about what
will happen if they start attracting too much attention to themselves...

Interestingly, the Harbor master who found him bobbing up and down in the water tied to a block
of concrete was BRITISH. Is there a shortage of US harbor masters that a Brit can get a work
permit/ or green card to do that job?  Just seemed a strange job to be doing, and strange that he
 just happened to be there at the time.

Let me know what you think??

Regards

Xray

BEGINS]

December 31, 2010, Dr. James Fetzer interviewed Dr. Chris Busby

 

Jim Fetzer: Well I would like for you to elaborate on that because this is a very important point. I have longed believed that it was the chemical residue that was going to tell us what was going on here.

 

Dr. Busby: Right. Well, from what I just said, from what Emilio Della Guidice told me, this weapon is deuterium dissolved in uranium. OK. Now if that’s the case, you’re not going to get a hundred percent fusion. I mean I’d be surprised if you got more than five percent fusion. And it could well be that you could regulate the level of fusion by regulating the gamma radioactivity of the uranium. So if you put more U235 into the mix, you might be able to increase the electron density and therefore, because of the ionization of the U235 is much more radioactive than U238, and then you might be able to regulate the percentage of the material that went to cold fusion. But I would be extremely surprised if the percentage of fusion was very high at all.

 

Because, if it were for me [to say], there would be all sorts of parts of this weapon that didn’t reach super-saturation. So some part of it would get this fusion reaction and it would blow the rest of it away. Just like the atom bombs. That’s why they had to put these big uranium casings on the atom bomb because the initial fission explosion would blow everything away and then the neutron density would fall down, so you would lose a lot of efficiency. And even the way in which they did it with atom bombs, they still only got about five percent fission. So there was an awful lot of wastage.

 

And the same here. So the wastage, of course, would lead to all that deuterium being released in the explosion as deuterium, not having been turned into anything else… like tritium and so forth and would be able to be there in the ground, see, and hence the deuterium.

Jim Fetzer: Yes.

Dr. Busby: I have no idea how powerful it is, but I would suggest that it is very very powerful in terms of its size. So if you want something that’s small that somebody can walk and just stick it in the corner somewhere that has enough power to blow this building down, you know, then it’s a good bet. 

Leuren Moret: A chemical explosive does not release enough energy to do what happened to the World Trade Center buildings, which was to nano-powder them. And they were in lower orbital space within 48 hours of the disaster. Those are very very tiny particles and I am an atmospheric dust expert. I’ve never heard of it going up into lower orbital space that fast.

The whole key to what happened at the World Trade Center is the energy budget. How much energy was necessary to break those building materials into nano-particles? And that could not come from a chemical explosive.

 

And secondly, the data that Dr. Thomas Cahill reported from his air monitoring of the World Trade Center for five months beginning October 5th after 9-11 was…He’s the one that reported high levels of uranium, elevated levels of uranium in the dust that was released from the WTC, the highest concentration of fine particles ever measured in an air sample in the US and the highest concentration of metal ever measured in an air sample in the US. And also he reported deuterium, tritium, and like I said the elevated uranium levels.

 

Jim Fetzer: Go ahead Chris, yes.

 

Dr. Busby: Well, there you are. You have all those three ingredients, don’t you? The tritium, the deuterium and the uranium – yes, that’s all you need. It seems quite a plausible hypothesis.

 

Jim Fetzer: It does indeed and I just want to clear, Chris, about the ingredients. You have the deuterium that is a solution of uranium, or depleted uranium, powder that is diluted with deuterium, and then all you have to do is project it or impose some pressure upon it to cause it to…

 

Dr. Busby: That’s right. That’s how it works.

 

Follow up Email:

The concentration of Uranium is a key. This is slightly too high in the dust and much too high in the girder coatings. The activities for 2.7, 3.2, 4.7 and 7.57 are 33, 40, 58 and 93Bq/kg. The graph shows that there is too much U on the girder coatings. Normal levels of U are about 12, at most 40Bq/kg.

 

My belief is that there is a cold fusion weapon or device of some sort. This employs Uranium and Deuterium. The output is neutrons, lots of heat, lots of energy, gamma radiation. The devise is the size of an apple or grapefruit but heavy (20-40kg). No radioactivity after the explosion except from Tritium H-3 which together with He-4 is the product and some short lived gamma radiation from neutron activations products (e.g. Ca-45 from the Ca in the concrete, Fe-55 from the steel). These would be radioactive for a few days only.

 

You would thus expect to find too much Uranium and also Tritium. You find both. There is a paper showing high levels of Tritium in the water at WTC. We also see U levels are too high.

 

Maybe the Barium is part of this mixture, and the Strontium. I have certainly found high levels of both in the war samples.

 

Regards, Chris Busby

 

Emilio Del Giudice 

Emilio Del Giudice is the guy who was mentioned in the Professor Chris Buzby interview that I had the script for and then you found the audio for (April 2020). It was the interview between Dr Buzby, James Fetzer and Leuren Moret.  

Back story was that it was featured in Veterans Today 2012 and I had seen it, copied it, but failed to realise its significance. At the time Fetzer was pushing his string of mini nukes every 10 floors theory, and we had Dimetri Khalesov's nuke-in-a-hole theory going on. So I had the "Expectation" that they were on the right path and would somehow have it all figured out fairly soon.

I only came across the article again when I was in an argument with one of the 9/11 AE guys on their YT channel (2019). They had posted about whether to leave comments open or closed and I had sarcastically replied - if you don't close them then people like me will post stuff like this - and then proceeded to list all the radiation readings :-) So the argument ensued... and one of their top guys/ defenders was all prove this, prove that, prove something else - you know how it goes... So I started searching through my old notes looking for Buzby's comment in this case about the Uranium readings and came back across the article. 

The article transcript had wrongly spelt Professor Emilio Del Giudice's name but I found it and then found his book -
The book is called  The Secret of Three Bullets: How New Nuclear Weapons Are Back on Battlefields by 
Maurizo Torrealta (Author), Emilio Del Giudice (Author) 

The book details how they found the evidence for, and then the discovery off the use of 4th generation nuclear weapons. It includes interviews with Fleischmann who worked on nuclear research for the British Navy.  Because Emilio Del Giudice was a celebrated Nuclear Theoretical Physicist who developed "String Theory" amongst great works, they couldn't discredit him, so instead his book and work on uncovering 4th gen nukes went completely ignored. He died in 2014 just before his book, which was first published in italian, was released by Trineday in English.

The extracts I sent you are just some of the information given in the book that seems to correlate with the type of weapons we see used on 9/11. The latest being the discovery of carbon nano-tubes in the lungs of survivors - and the book mentioning carbon nano-tubes being used to pack the Uranium/ Deuterium powder into to increase the weapons effectiveness.

From Emilio Del Giudice's wikiepedia entry it can be seen that he was indeed a heavy hitter in the Nuclear Physics field - and the most qualified individual ever to have commented on 4th generation nukes, and via Professor Buzby to hypothesize what weapons were used on 9/11.

I definitely recommend getting a copy of the book and seeing what you think yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emilio_Del_Giudice

Carbon nanotubes found in lungs requires High Temperature 

Below is some extracts from the book which mentions the use of  nanotubes to pack the Fussionable products into.

 “The Secret of the Three Bullets” (subtitled: “A New Generation of Micro-Nuclear Weapons is on the Battle Field”), by Maurizio Torrealta and Emilio Del Giudice

Mysterious Weapons in Gaza

 

Inexplicable wounds which have led to the amputation of a lower limb in at least eighty cases… small fragments, often invisible to X-rays, as well as incomprehensible amputations of the lower limbs caused by what appears to be an extremely strong blast of heat. I noticed that the wounds are never more than 1 meter and 10cm above the ground.

 

The area around the amputation was black, burnt…  necrosis of the tissue had already set in, they were hardened, and the injury seemed old even if it had only just happened a few minutes before. We managed to identify some non-metalic fragments in the tissue.

 

“ I didn’t hear any noise, only a screech, a whistle… there are electronic materials among the fragments, similar to the ones in a radio or TV.  Defence Tech describes a remote-controlled weapon fired from a drone designed to minimise environmental damage. The bombs are packed with Tungsten Powder, aimed at the target using a particular angle, and as they become charged with energy accurately destroy everything in their path within a range of 4 meters. The bomb is known as a DIME (Dense Inert Metal Explosive). It spreads a kind of dust that burns the entire surface of the body.

 

The results of the analysis reveal that the main element is carbon, but also compounds of metallic elements such as tungsten and silica.The devices can have various sizes and functions, but the one described in Defence Tech uses Tungsten powder; a heavy metal used in many Hydrogen LOADING experiments in order to produce so called Cold Fusion. The Hypothesis that a kind of” energetic” loading of tungsten is in fact the same thing as charging tungsten with hydrogen., seems to be entirely plausible. A hypothesis that is also reinforced by the fact that the wounds self-cauterize shortly after explosion, and that organic material doesn’t seem to respond to traditional treatment. These effects may be compatible with the release of hydrogen atoms, which tend to bind to Oxygen, literally sucking it out of the organic matter with which they come into contact.

 

(Professor) Emilio Del Giudice says “ Let’s assume that this tungsten powder contains an extremely high percentage of hydrogen and that, on impact external pressure or an internal explosion caused it to reach the threshold of the Bridgman effect, with the subsequent production of nanoparticles. So at the moment of impact, Hydrogen would be released in atomic rather than molecular form. At this stage, the hydrogen would be exceptionally active from a chemical standpoint, and would thus have an extraordinary affinity with the oxygen contained in the human targets’ biological material, “stealing” its oxygen and causing the bodies to collapse by chemical means. An eventual jet of atomic hydrogen, combining with the oxygen, would create water, which would then pass unnoticed.

 

And so here is an example of a dynamic act of destruction produced by an extremely intense reaction, because oxygen and hydrogen are two of the strongest reagents. If we then consider that Tungsten powder can be packed into carbon micro-tubes which are 400 times sturdier than steel and much lighter, the accurately aimed explosive force may produce effects very similar to those you have encountered.

 

To cope with this sort of damage to the organism and combat tissue necrosis, the body would have to be re-oxygenated through strongly aqueous solutions. - I am referring to the studied of my friend Vladimir Voeikov, professor of Biorganic Chemistry at Moscow University.

 

The careers of Fleischmann and Pons were destroyed as quickly as a nuclear flash.

 

… the secret hidden away for [30] years is that if Uranium is charged with Deuterium beyond a critical threshold, it causes a sort of explosion that triggers a Fusion-Fission process? I think I have understood that it has a radioactive effect, anyway, for example gamma rays, but very limited both in terms of its nuclear mass, and the process it triggers.

 

If you do research on 4^th Generation nuclear devices, the 4^th the miniaturised bomb. Research has shown that some devices hypothesize uranium shielding around the explosive core, according to the level of radioactive pollution that must be produced, because that's no longer a secondary effect imposed by critical mass of uranium, but a deliberately chosen primary effect. In other words these new small bombs may have a very limited radioactivity and pollutant effect, perhaps too limited.. so they’re aren’t weighed down with outer layers or uranium that increase both the pollutant and explosive effect.

 

The bomb responsible for the Khaim crater, produced with deuterium-charged uranium that triggered first Fusion and the Fission.

 

Fleischmann said in his interview about how his experiments developed by substituting Palladium with Uranium to study its potential for Fusion and Fission. Uranium charged with deuterium, the trigger for a nuclear bomb the size of a bullet. It was larger than a bullet , because 5Kilotons would have required 250 Kg of natural uranium, a quantity that could have been reduced by using enriched uranium.

 

Deuterium-charged uranium.. is a true nuclear bomb the size of a bullet, and it was used in Khiam against underground shelters, starting with the data collected in Kosovo, Iraq and Lebanon, this is the most concrete interpretation of all those made until now..

But don’t stop there... we’re talking about a new class or weapons that exploits the hydrogen or deuterium charging of heavy metals. So when you see severed legs in Gaza and read its a bomb with dense inert and explosive material remember the rule about adjectives in military acronyms: they mean the opposite. And so, not inert tungsten powder but deuterium or hydrogen charged powder, and not of generic energy… 

Damaged caused to workers and the population in the areas of Deja Vu Sans like those reported at the Concord Plant in Massachusette and at Starmet Corporation.

 

Patent for a new generation of weaponry – the following list of materials emerge: titanium, zirconium, hafnium – which all have the same outer electron structure. - and the thorium and uranium. These materials have been under study for some time as hydrogen absorbers and are also quite expensive. The idea of using micro or nano-structured materials stems from the high surface to volume ratio that they have. Which is extremely useful for all chemical processes that take place on the surface.

 Did the weapon contain Uranium charged with Deuterium packed into carbon nanotubes?

The elevator man’s tale The South Tower the same exact basement explosion as the North Tower but was covered up?
I wonder why
http://www.thrnewmedia.com/adayinseptember/pdf/p06.pdf