World Trade Center NIST photos show some of WTC beams in the debris of the towers and WTC 7 were cut by 70 to 80 percent which means this wasn’t cleanup activity. Do these cuts prove criminal activity and the inside job theory?
The molten slag had to existed FIRST BEFORE any 9/11 dust in order to trap the dust.. The photo would then be taken after both after the slag creation AND the dust settling on the slag but not after the high pressure water lines started cooling the pile. The metadata date of October 9th could be a due to sharing between agencies.
High pressure water hit the this area pretty hard.
The photo shows a blacken area cut thin, enough to weaken the beam and therefore the structure.
The photo is online
9/11 molten slag existed BEFORE the 9/11 dust
I looked down the beam for repeating patterns and I think I found one. Maybe the slag is just nuts and bolts and someone cut the plate in half, but it still could have been cut before 9/11 but my theory rested on those bumps next to the cut as slag from cutting activity from before 9/11 .
The photos I’ve seen of angle-cut columns appear upon close inspection to be cleanup activity.
Where do you get the idea that “cut by 70 to 80 percent” would mean “this wasn’t cleanup activity” ?
What’s this about proof? What kind of proof? Beyond a reasonable doubt proof or preponderance of evidence proof? Or scientific “proof”?
Where do you get the idea that “cut by 70 to 80 percent” Look at the picture. The bottom part is untouched.
This would mean “this wasn’t cleanup activity” ? If you ever cut steel, you need 100% cuts. The stuff IS strong enough to resist breaking even if a small amount remains connected.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/the911forum/wtc7-debris-pile-visual-records-collection-t543.html
Leroy Hulsey Fairbanks WTC 7 computer simulation study and film successfully shows what happened.
The second stage is about the photos of the cuts on the steel to weaken the structure enough
and I found what looks like they are hosing down that very same area of interest.
It looks like area was sprayed down too.
As I was saying before I find it strange with all the high pressure water and rain
how could the dust remain standing in place unless the photo was taken much earlier then the metadata says. The dust was more like sand in most cases.
 |
| High pressure water was all over the WTC7 pile from day on. The the dust has to be packed in tight to the slag to survive this environment. |
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2wVJdJY0RXXP/
for the third stage which is the explosives as shown by my Building 7
flashes videos youtube deleted.
It looks like someone cut it part of the way.
How about supporting evidence? Flash Video and Steel Cuts
J Leroy Hulsey Fairbanks WTC7 Study supporting Evidence
My first video missed the partial cut, lateral movement of the slag.
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
File name 37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg-image071.jpg D:\911datasets.org\International_Center_for_911_Studies_NIST_FOIA\Release_32\Release 32\42A0378 - G33D12\WTCI-134-I WTC7 Analysis Photos\Images-W face\37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg-image071 Google drive photo https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QIXQqQAUpFrJRTTjzWr3H27j_zUat0y6/view?usp=sharing The #NYPD was sent more photographs of cutting combined with explosives #WTC7 evidence to remind them to make arrests for the #NIST 9/11 cover up. Will this be the turning point for 9/11 justice? A&E most likely will NOT get involved. 9/11 Lawyer's Committee should at least look at what I have, but the volumes of information I have produced most likely will adversely affect outcomes.
| 11:49 AM (11 minutes ago) |  | ||
| ||||
If you are going to do a criminal cover up at least do a good job.
https://youtu.be/-fu_5-C-5Ng
Don't post photos of the crime and think no one will SEE IT!
| WTC7 partial cut, lateral slag perfect example |
FOIA DOC-NIST-2021-000992
| Mar 12, 2021, 10:53 AM (4 days ago) | | ||
| ||||
The assumption is that "37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg" is a folder and the - photo numbers are the contents.
The clarification would be any folder or file name that starts with or contains this text "37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg" and
has or does not have a numbering system afterward.
Example
37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg-image001.jpg
37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg-image002.jpg
My FOIA also contained an open ended request for any files not released to the public. I would like to clarify that request now.
1. Any files not released to the public: because the release "might jeopardize public safety" i.e the modeling data
2. Any files not released to the public that has to do photos of early cut columns do to thermite or pre weaken efforts
4. Any files not released to the public of if no tests were done using thermite by NIST or subcontractors.
Originally the FOIA was considered "overly broad" and rejected. I hope this helps.
Dan
