Wednesday, August 22, 2018

FEMA photographs show cut columns at WTC building 7



37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg-image071 taken  October 9th 2001 or 29 days old.  I am sure the same problem column existed on the 9/11 but camera were not allowed. 

Camera

MakeEastman Kodak Company
ModelKODAK DIGITAL SCIENCE DC260 (V01.00)
Exposure1/198
Aperture4.4
Focal Length24.0 mm

Location

GPS coordinates not found.

EXIF

MakeEastman Kodak Company
ModelKODAK DIGITAL SCIENCE DC260 (V01.00)
OrientationHorizontal (normal)
XResolution72
YResolution72
ResolutionUnitinches
YCbCrPositioningCentered
ExposureTime1/198
FNumber4.4
ExifVersion0200
DateTimeOriginal2001:10:09 14:26:14
ComponentsConfigurationY, Cb, Cr, -
CompressedBitsPerPixel2.4
ShutterSpeedValue1/256
ApertureValue4
ExposureCompensation0
MaxApertureValue2.8
SubjectDistance14.28 m
MeteringModeCenter-weighted average
LightSourceUnknown
FocalLength24.0 mm
FlashpixVersion0100
ColorSpacesRGB
ExifImageWidth1024
ExifImageHeight1536
ImageWidth64
ImageHeight96
BitsPerSample8 8 8
CompressionUncompressed
PhotometricInterpretationRGB
StripOffsets1744
SamplesPerPixel3
RowsPerStrip96
StripByteCounts18432
PlanarConfigurationChunky

XMP

XMP data not found.

Maker Notes

KodakMakerEastman Kodak Company
KodakModelKODAK DIGITAL SCIENCE DC260
KodakImageWidth1024
KodakImageHeight1536

FEMA photographs show cut columns at WTC building 7
https://www.quora.com/Can-an-architect-or-an-engineer-explain-how-jet-fuel-could-have-melted-the-steel-I-beams-of-the-World-Trade-Center/answer/Dan-Plesse?srid=iSwSG


Brian Good

1h ago
Reply
· Upvote
· Downvote
· Report
Dan Plesse

Dan Plesse

55m ago


You said “twin towers was pre-cut on 9/10 “ which does not mean “on or before”.

The photo clearly shows they on the center because they called CORE COLUMNS.. CORE means center. We know were they are because of blueprints.

The FEMA Photo is called “37-debris of WTC7 against Verizon bldg-image071” so its not on the edge at all. Its between the WTC 7 pile and Verizon bldg.
You have cut the core columns for CD.. Cleanup starts at the edge. Both goals are polar opposites.. You start at the edge because you have to load these things.
When a tree falls do people start in the middle. Use your head.

Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, August 19, 2018

Cell Towers Prove September 11th Conspiracy

Blue Logo 8:54 Plane Now in five photos 9/11




Update 9/1/2018
Airfones connect to towers like cell phone do and can be used verify the 9/11 flight paths as it turns out flight 175 don’t match the flight location.







Flight 175 flight is well known and call events are public. Flight 175 passes the NJ/NY line at 9:02:24 one minute before impact and the another cell tower is right under the flight path and
does not connect. 

Last 7 phone calls from Flight 175 connect starting from 64 miles away
to E. Elmhurst 053 LGDA from 8:56 to 9:01  is only 5  minutes but at 


1. Brain Sweeney #2 09:00:02-09:01:02 / 32 miles away 
2. Hanson Family #2 09:00:03-09:03:15 / 32 miles away
3. Gamet Bailey #4 08:58:57-08:59:07 / 42 miles away
4. Brian Sweeney #1 08:58:45-08:59:12 / 44 miles away 
5. Gamet Bailey #3 08:57:39-08:58:04 / 54 miles away 
6. Flight Attendant #3 08:57:28 Duration: No connection 
7. Flight Attendant #2 08:56:19-08:56:50 / 64 miles away


And that is how you know.
The other cell tower is  New Cumberland 066 NWCM which is 87 miles away from the plane.

9/11 Conspiracy Theories: If the planes that hit the WTC were really drones, then what happened to all the passengers that went missing?
Answer: The drones could also contain passengers who made calls. The passengers could have walked onto any plane which turned into an automated guided plane drone.


David Handschuh Circling Plane 

Was 9/11 a conspiracy?
http://qr.ae/TUNpb8

Number of families who got no remains: 1,717
Total number killed in attacks in New York: 2,753
62% percent Missing

Those 62% were blown all over city, 3,000 feet in all directions in some cases. So 62% were NOT killed by any other means but explosives. So the murder weapon was explosives and only explosives. 

Dan Plesse
Dan Plesse · Add Credential



Here is my 9/11 Research for Flight 175 circling the towers theory based on 1. FAA comments 2. cell tower location, 3. four or more photographs, and 4. video files and 5. witnesses. It should be case closed by now but more photos and witnesses keep showing up - week after week.

You have know to look for.

Almost every photo has the same plane after the first crash. This is one example. The other links have more examples. if you click the photo the enlarged version shows more information.

Larger Photo link

New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now

Its a single photo taken by David Handshuh which shows a circling plane.

Last seven cell calls connected to LaGuardia Airport

New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now

Blue Logo plane photo #4 


Blue Logo plane photo #4 enlarged

9 11 Blue Logo Plane Photo Number 4 circling around the twin towers

Google photos #1 New photo by daniel plesse'

Blue Logo plane photo #1, #2 New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now
Marc Birnbach drawing photo New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now
Hijacking the Mind pdf Elias Davidsson - Hijacking America's Mind (2013).pdf
Flight 175 Last Seven Calls Connected to LaGuardia Airport. This is Circling PLane Evidence
New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now
Blue Logo plane #4 9 11 Blue Logo Plane Photo Number 4 circling around the twin towers
Google photos #1
New photo by daniel plesse'
Blue Logo plane #1, #2 New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now
Marc Birnbach drawing New photo by 911Truth “911TruthNow1” Now
Hijacking the Mind Elias Davidsson - Hijacking America's Mind (2013).pdf
More Information about the photo
David Handschuh, a veteran New York Daily News staffer, drove towards NYU on 14th Street to teach his first photojournalism class of the new semester. … In search of a Starbucks, New York City Fire Department Rescue Company is shown on the bottom of the photo.

Why is the cell service down at each location 1:56 when cell phones could ping for another tower.










Right? At 1:44 she says “The cell phones are down...” and then again at 1:54 she says “You can’t use your cell phones...” My question is: If a commercial airliner crashed into the Pentagon, why would that render everyone’s cell phones unusable? Last I checked cellular devices run on networks that use towers, which send signals to devices to have them respond with the data requested, in order to supply them with the cellular waves needed to function as well as give a general idea of the location of the device via triangulation. This is done by a method called “pinging” and the signal sent from the tower is what is known as a “ping”. When u travel a certain distance and leave a tower’s network radius, the next nearest tower to ur location then sends out a signal or “ping” to ur device, retrieves that data needed and takes over from the previous tower to supply u with continuous cellular service. These towers are erected and owned by various phone companies. So why would a plane crashing into the Pentagon have any effect on a tower that provides cellular services? It seems to me that perhaps one or more devices that jam/block cellular waves were intentionally activated to prevent communication of what was being witnessed to any outside sources. This would then make their version of events the first one the public would hear which would cause citizens to doubt anything contrary to that heard afterward. A very basic, yet very sneaky, psychological tactic.



1



I wonder if cell phones ping the whole area and select from the best towers. When I connect via WIFI I get a bunch of connections to pick from therefore the same has to true of cell phones on 9/11. We totally agree on this! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEu6hjJrBbs&lc=z23iurmqzyzlcbtyv04t1aokgnyft5sn3xzjdkjzscmgbk0h00410.1534961594447843&feature=em-comments


Posted by at 1 comment:

Thursday, May 17, 2018

9/11 flight attendants phone calls were all traced to a single number 904-555-0004

9/11 904-555-0004

Flight 11 Calls_t7b13

What is a Passenger Name Report ???




Penny Elgas Supports CTI team Left of CITGO gas station theory and her plane part does not match or belong to any Boeing 757. it had a white shell and brown inner fiberglass core does not belong but it would take a visit to plane boneyard to find out for sure. Why the Truth movement can't visit a plane boneyard is beyond me.



Passengers Name Report
 Elias, 

    "Passengers Name Report" is another 9/11 detail we missed. I wonder who was on and NOT on this list of names. 

" She got him on the phone and apologized and soon things were cleared up. The FBI needed the plane's manifest, and the PNR, the Passengers' Name Report. That wasn't easy to do, she said, to get permission to release " 



Reclaiming the Sky: 9/11 and the Untold Story of the Men and Women ...
































































































1:08 PM (3 minutes ago)















to Elias, bcc: Matt, bcc: Manuel, bcc: Pub, bcc: Mick
















































"where I go in depth into the issue of passenger lists" i.e the Flight Manifest

I have your book and I am not talking about the Flight Manifest but another list you admitted to not knowing about and an issue you missed. 
You also missed the originating phone call number 904-555-0004 from at least two planes. 







904-555-0004 is the WTC building 7 for the four planes on 9/11








It would be nice to know what real cell phone numbers look like for Flight 11 and Flight 77 and what they should have been.. 

No help so far. 
































9/11 Flight 11 routed away  from a Nuclear Power Plant at Indian Point by 7.66 miles then rejoined the river










9/11 Box Cutter Cover Up







 Advances in Monitoring Nuclear Weapon Testing ( Preview )



Detecting a test of a nuclear weapon has become so effective and reliable that no 
nation could expect to get away with secretly exploding a device having military 
significance






https://web.archive.org/web/20091013192310/http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=advances-in-monitoring-nuclear






Won-Young Kim and Paul G. Richards are also the only two who looked at only 
PAL Station. Why only PAL? 

9/11 Planes created equivalent energy of 240 tons of TNT

If Flight 11 and Flight 175 caused the released of 240 tons of TNT on 
9/11 then how large was the towers? MANUEL GARCÍA,  estimated 
1.9 kilotons of TNT and WTC 2 is 717 tons of TNT energy equivalent. 
Does that sound like a nuke or a building collapse? 





MANUEL GARCÍA does not say how much TNT energy equivalent for the
explosion which happening in WTC 7 between North and South tower 
collapse. This explosion was NOT recorded by PAL Station during 9/11






Building 7 Spike between Tower Collapses











"The energy contained in the amount of fuel combusted was the equivalent to the energy released by 240 tons of TNT," said Lerner-Lam"

"falling debris was absorbed by the towers"  ??
"but not causing significant ground shaking."??


http://www.earth.columbia.edu/news/story11_16_01.html

Estimates so far MANUEL GARCÍA, JR.
The fires in WTC 1 released an energy equal to that of an explosion of 1.9 kilotons of TNT; the energy equivalent for WTC 2 is 717 tons. 
"The NYFD, and the rest of them knew it was going to collapse, they started running away from the area waving and screaming for everybody to get back. I figured I’d better run too. When you see all of them rescue people running, it’s time to go. Then the whole street shook, it was unnerving, or disorienting like losing your equilibrium, "https://www.counterpunch.org/2007/09/12/forgetting-9-11/





Robert Fisk: Even I question the 'truth' about 9/11



https://web.archive.org/web/20071011205223/http://news.independent.co.uk:80/fisk/article2893860.ece


Fox I’ve never seen so much real world stuff happen 
during an exercise.










Nasypany Yeah, 41.
Nasypany Yeah, we’re putting it in.
Background Fourteen-forty-three.

Nasypany
Fourteen-forty-three, look for it, right there, O.K., 
mode three, fourteen-forty-three, last known. No, 
this is real world. O.K., we’re in the high chair

Background
 "I got a decoy" 

Background
I’ve got a Z point, sir.   

Nasypany







 Last known position, 




that we got out this guy, was right there at the Z 
point, he’s headed one-nine-zero at 29,000 feet, 
heading down, so we’re looking for  somebody, you know 
what start hitting up tracks all around that area, 
that Z point, O.K., just north of ah...
                                                
                                            











1443 is AA11 Beacon Number. That why they are saying 1443.
    








Besides the ACARS 7500 Hijack code sent up to planes issue on 9-11 and box 
cutter cover up reported as being allowed by via fake media the other issue 
is lack of random military planes around Flight 11  and Flight 175. 
Witnesses have seen military plane around all other 
planes on 9/11. this must be looked into.  


"I have never seen so much REAL WORLD during an exercise 
"and then "we have an decoy" Both comments are not clear 
and not part of any transcript somehow the military 
can find AA11 beacon code 14XX on radar.. 

https://youtu.be/Vt4wh58vBLk?t=39m51s




Flight 11 also flew over Major Military Airports


Griffiss Air Force Base
106th Rescue Wing
109th Airlift Wing, Stratton Air National Guard Base, Schenectady,  
Stewart Air National Guard Base 105th Airlift Wing














(an Air  Mobility Command-gained unit of the New York Air National Guard and 
"host" wing for the installation. Wikipedia Address: 1 Maguire Way, Newburgh, NY 12550)
How many military planes launched or landed from bases near the flight path of flight 11 on 9/11? 

1. Stewart Air National Guard Base 105th Airlift Wing
2.  109th Airlift Wing Stratton Air National Guard Base, Schenectady,  
3. Griffiss Air Force Base
 
How much traffic did these bases generate on 9/11 and how close was the nearest 
fighter jet and why didn't they do anything?












ACARS 7500 code spoof issue on 9/11 . Unknowing pilots i.e KAL 085 and  
AA189 seemed to have no idea but the military took the bait completely 
and added to confusion along with the fake radar inputs. The people who hacked ACARS 
system are part of the criminal network. 








































ACARS 7500 fake hijack sent. 





TWA 3 switched before takeoff. 

1. AA189 7500 fake hijack sent. 
2. KAL085 7500 fake hijack sent. 

Not sure how deep or what happened here 

Elaine Scarry said during  "Dangerous Developments in Modern Weaponry" that 11 other planes had there transponders turned off.

1. AAL2247
2. USA41
3. DAL89
4. DAL989
5. NWA197
6. UAL641
7. UAL57
8. USA633
9. UAL163
10. UAL177
11. Continental 321

Lost Contact Flight number List  
1. UA641  
2. UA415
3. UA399

Lost but found Flight number
1. UA103 
2. UA634
3. UA57
4. UA2725
5. UA1211
6. UA1695
7. UA2101
8. UA2256
9.UA2102

Matt emailed me this video, a book and more. 

As of April 30, 2004 per the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of New 
York City (OCME), of the 

American Airlines Flight 11 total 87 dead (not including 5 terrorists), 
52 were ID’d , 45 of those by DNA. Including IDs made after 2004 there 
are more, named here. 

United Flight 175: 60 died (not including 5 terrorists): 27 ID’d, 26 by 
DNA. (Robert C. Shaler, Who They Were – Inside the World Trade Center DNA 
Story: The Unprecedented Effort To Identify the Missing, Free Press, 2005, 
p. 302) 
 https://www.amazon.com/Who-They-Were-Unprecedented-Identify/dp/1416584471

















How many military planes launched or landed from bases near the flight path of flight 11 on 9/11? 

1. Stewart Air National Guard Base 105th Airlift Wing
2.  109th Airlift Wing Stratton Air National Guard Base, Schenectady,  
3. Griffiss Air Force Base
 
How much traffic did these bases generate on 9/11 and how close was the nearest fighter jet.

Show less























































http://www.earth.columbia.edu/news/story11_16_01.html
How much energy in TNT did the towers release? The Lamont seismographs established the following timeline:
8:46:26 a.m. EDT [1240 UTC] Aircraft impact - north tower, Magnitude 0.9; 9:02:54 a.m. EDT [1302 UTC] Aircraft impact - south tower, Magnitude 0.7; 9:59:04 a.m. EDT [1359 UTC] Collapse - south tower, Magnitude 2.1;
10:28:31 a.m. EDT [1428 UTC] Collapse - north tower, Magnitude 2.3.









September 11: Chronology of terror
http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/chronology.attack/






8:45 a.m. (all times are EDT): A hijacked passenger jet, American Airlines Flight 11 out
of Boston, Massachusetts, crashes into the north tower of the World Trade Center, tearing
a gaping hole in the building and setting it afire.9:03 a.m.: A second hijacked airliner, United Airlines Flight 175 from Boston, crashes into the south tower of the World Trade Center and explodes. Both buildings are burning.
10:05 a.m.: The south tower of the World Trade Center collapses, plummeting

 into the streets below. A massive cloud of dust and debris forms and slowly

drifts away from the building.


10:28 a.m.: The World Trade Center's north tower collapses from the top

 down as if it were being peeled apart, releasing a tremendous cloud of

 debris and smoke.
















































    
    






      
        
      
    
    
  
    
  




    
    
    




    
    
    








    
    



I think you missed the point.  I'm not arguing where the plane flew.  I'm questioning the relevance.  I've yet to be able to get you to say that.  The only thing I can figure is you're saying that a rogue plane flew over a military base and it wasn't shot down via artillery.
    


    
    


















    
  
        
      




    
    






      
        
      
    
    
  
    
  


        
      
    
    
  
      

      
  
    
      
        
      
    
    
  
      

      
  
    
    
    
    
  
        
        
    
    



        
      
    
    
  


















    
    



calls from 904-555-0004 on 9/11 

Barbara Olson ...           Flight 77

Renee May                     Flight 77

Betty Ong                       Flight 11 
MADELINE SWEENEY  flight 11


 Fact check that!


 The relevance is the total absence of any planes flying, landing, taking off along the path of a rogue plane which flew over many Air National, Air Force and Air Ports and not a single issue generated, documented, alerts made, no alarm or assistance given.  For example, if a boater becomes in trouble other boaters are required to aid and give assistance without question. The only assistance that was attempted was ATC to the pilots of Flight 175 to look out for flight 11 who both flew over Stewart Air National Guard Base..

So I am NOT talking about NON-AIRFORCE military bases and I AM NOT talking about artillery. Why do you keep bringing that up? 

 A change in standard operating procedures [for fighter intercepts] was introduced on June 1st, 2001; this inserted the Secretary for Defense into the mix making fighter intercepts impossible. 
Then they reversed it after 9/11..


 June 1st, 2001 could be the same time the Visa Express Program allowed the U.S.S Cole Bombers to fly to JFK and then become the "muscle" of Flight 77.












Just FYI you've made so many comments that YouTube is now calling them spam and flagging them for review so I'm going to say let's stick to this one area and one topic at a time so they actually get posted so at some point down the road others can respond and discuss because that's a good thing.  

So on to this specific topic.  Nothing to fact check, that's in the video above.  

I actually really like your analogy on why nobody sent up red flags.  You've got a rogue plane flying west and nobody is even talking, right?  Actually that's not 100% true.  Unfortunately, and I'll take blame for it, I didn't spend the time to tell people which voices were talking in the video.  Originally I had done it on purpose and in the description I stated that there's just a lot of traffic over the airways and it's tough to get it all in the "audible space" of the event.  So basically there's a pocket where Boston hears Atta's voice that they start ringing off the hook of ATC, FAA, and basically any air traffic they can get on the horn and they start talking... all at the same time.  In some of the video you can tell everyone is on the mic together.  One voice you don't hear is the military and that was an actual complaint they had was that they weren't on the radio to hear it, which is why Boston tries to reach out to Otis directly, which you hear them talk about.  Unfortunately by the time this happens Flight 11 has turned toward the South following the Hudson.  So what you're explaining did actually happen and if you look up some traffic you'll be able to hear it and, thankfully I strategically placed it in my video, match it up to what you see above.  

Correct, they changed the procedure, but there's is, and let me make this clear, no proof that it would have changed any of the events that transpired on 9/11.  The biggest change was the permission to engage which wouldn't have helped based on the reporting procedure of the FAA during the event.  The only plane they could've officially intercepted would've been 93, but because Delta 1989 was the one they believed was hijacked and had fighters headed for it, on a similar course and FAA not reporting that 93 was a hijack after it had crashed.  

Here's the other thing.  Nasypenny ordered planes to protect the state house so that defeats any hold down orders.  On the video you can clearly hear foxxy send them out to Whiskey 386 confused, out to sea where they engage foreign attacks while Nasypenny is telling to send them North, and that was a confusion they dealt.   He was ahead of the ball, but one of the things we see here is communication was a problem, which is why they overhauled the whole system after 9/11.

Show less







    
    








        
      
    
    
  








    

    
  




    
  
        
      




    
    







      
        
      
    
    
  
    
  








    
    



The phone number 904-555-0004 could be the reason for the spam issue. 

 May 2001: Five 9/11 Hijackers Take Advantage of New, Anonymous Visa Express Procedure. 
 June 1st procedures [for fighter intercepts] was introduced .


 Did you just avoid clear evidence nothing seems what it is? That is the topic. 

904-555-0004 on 9/11 makes it clear. So don't avoid the facts. Thanks. 

 Barbara Olson ... Flight 77 Renee May Flight 77 Betty Ong Flight 11 MADELINE SWEENEY flight 11 all the same number.. ffff handsets.. 

 This is NOT tracing information, but it as close as we are going to get. 

 They changed the hijack procedure and the Anonymous Visa Express Procedure with U.S.S Cole Bombers was set up for 9/11, without those changes and Anonymous Visa Express Procedure would have made 9/11 impossible. A Hijacking without 7500 hijack code for four planes which causes the beacon to show up brighter than the normal data block on the radar is another issue not addressed here.. The ATC can assign 7500 to radar block and they did nothing. 

 More evidence that the problems are much larger than you possibly imagine.  Starting with Air Traffic Control and ending with black box data with missing plane IDs and officially missing but rather stolen black boxes for 175 and 11.. 

 1. Flight 11 went NORTH/ WEST flying up to Canada. NOT just west.. Get your facts right. Your details need work. 
 2. no proof that it would have changed any of the events that transpired on 9/11.. What are you talking about? First the NORDO, off flight path causes no questions response from ANY of the four or more  Air Force bases in NY or any military traffic or any plane in the area.  I thought I covered this, what happened? 

3. Did you hear "we have a decoy" yet? I made a video about it.. Go look now! 
4. "Boston hears Atta's voice" Has anyone confirmed it was Atta? Which Atta was this by the way? Portland Atta? Brooklyn Atta and JFK employee? or Florida Atta?

5. They all should have been intercepted. No one witnessed giant "AA" of Flight 11 in a city living on rooftops.. reported a white plane. So it was NOT Flight 11 flight 175 FAA has another flight path then officials have. ..

6. "Whiskey 386 confused, out to sea where they engage foreign attacks " foreign attacks ? from who? 
 7. "overhauled the whole system after 9/11" No they went back to what works.. Who said they have a whole new system?
    






      
    
  
        
        
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
  
      

      
  
    
    
    
    
  
        
        
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
  
















    
    



The phone number 904-555-0004 could be the reason for the spam issue. 

May 2001: Five 9/11 Hijackers Take Advantage of New, Anonymous Visa Express Procedure. June 1st procedures [for fighter intercepts] was introduced .

Did you just avoid clear evidence nothing seems what it is? That is the topic. 904-555-0004 on 9/11 makes it clear. So don't avoid the facts. Thanks. 

Barbara Olson ... Flight 77 Renee May Flight 77 Betty Ong Flight 11 MADELINE SWEENEY flight 11 all the same number.. ffff handsets.. 

This is NOT tracing information, but it as close as we are going to get. 

They changed the hijack procedure and the Anonymous Visa Express Procedure with U.S.S Cole Bombers was set up for 9/11, without those changes and Anonymous Visa Express Procedure would have made 9/11 impossible. A Hijacking without 7500 hijack code for four planes which causes the beacon to show up brighter than the normal data block on the radar is another issue not addressed here.. The ATC can assign 7500 to radar block and they did nothing.  More evidence that the problems are much larger than you possibly imagine.  Starting with Air Traffic Control and ending with black box data with missing plane IDs and officially missing but rather stolen black boxes for 175 and 11..  

1. Flight 11 went NORTH/ WEST flying up to Canada. NOT just west.. Get your facts right. Your details need work. 
2. no proof that it would have changed any of the events that transpired on 9/11.. What are you talking about? First the NORDO, off flight path causes no questions response from ANY of the four or more  Air Force bases in NY or any military traffic or any plane in the area.  I thought I covered this, what happened? 
3. Did you hear "we have a decoy" yet? I made a video about it.. Go look now! 
4. "Boston hears Atta's voice" Has anyone confirmed it was Atta? Which Atta was this by the way? Portland Atta? Brooklyn Atta and JFK employee? or Florida Atta?
5. They all should have been intercepted. No one witnessed giant "AA" of Flight 11 in a city living on rooftops.. reported a white plane. So it was NOT Flight 11 flight 175 FAA has another flight path then officials have. ..
6. "Whiskey 386 confused, out to sea where they engage foreign attacks " foreign attacks ? from who? 
7. "overhauled the whole system after 9/11" No they went back to what works.. Who said they have a whole new system?
    










        
      
    
    
  






















    
    






      
        
      
    
    
  
    
  








    
    



Okay, so let's say everything you've said is correct.  Let's say my details need work and I'm somehow avoiding facts.  

What is the assertion and what would you like done about it?
    


    
    













    

    
  




    
  
        
      




    
    






      
        
      
    
    
  
    
  


    
    
      
        
      
    
    
  
      

      
  
    
    
    
      
        
      
    
    
  
      

      
  
    
    
    
    
  
        
        
    
    



        
      
    
    
  


















    
    



Find out about the "decoy" heard in your video. 
IF you can't hear it, ask a friend to listen for it. 
 Then look into 904-555-0004 and let me know what you find. 
 Then find Hani Hanjour seat number on Flight 77.

Why so many callers from the plane used 904-555-0004 as their originating phone number across different planes and what did tracing these numbers reveal? 
 Why did J. David.Canoles  FAA say flight 175 flew around NYC? 
Why did so many people see this circling plane?  If this is true, how did they manage to fake the radar data? 
 Who ordered the change to the hijack procedures and is that the same people who design the Visa Express Program.. 
 Find out more about Operation Phoenix text messages on 9/11 Wikileaks 570,000 messages.. 
Was that the cover name for 9/11? 
 What was  9/11 Operation Phoenix? 


What was  9/11 Operation Phoenix? 

2001-09-11 13:11:22 Arch [1421665] A ALPHA 
RtOPS Update #1536 Operation Phoenix - I.S-CDE/CE NE Owner=Core Infrastructure * Operation Phoenix 866-791-7190 Passcode 7508470# Call for 10:00 CT update - activities associated with World Trade Ce

2001-09-11 13:12:50 Skytel [007611174] B ALPHA 
RtOPS Update #1536 Operation Phoenix - I.S-CDE/CE NE Owner=Core Infrastructure * Operation Phoenix 866-791-7190 Passcode 75084

2001-09-11 13:12:58 Skytel [007045350] B ALPHA 
RtOPS Update #1536 Operation Phoenix - I.S-CDE/CE NE Owner=Core Infrastructure * Operation Phoenix 866-791-7190 Passcode

2001-09-11 13:13:01 Skytel [002812546] A ALPHA
<2 of 2> explosions. **Update** Operation Phoenix: 866-791-7190 passcode 7508470# Update at 13:00 CT <SIMS>

2001-09-11 13:13:50 Skytel [007611174] B ALPHA
<2 of 2> explosions. **Update** Operation Phoenix: 866-791-7190 passcode 7508470# Update at 13:00 CT <SIMS>

2001-09-11 13:14:48 Skytel [002812546] A ALPHA
I.S-CDE/CE NE Owner=Core Infrastructure * Operation Phoenix 866-791-7190 Passcode 7508470# Call for 10:00 CT update - activities associated with World Trade Center/Pentagon<1 of 2>
https://911.wikileaks.org/files/messages_2001_09_11-13_10_2001_09_11-13_14.html#message_3080

2001-09-11 13:14:46 Skytel [002812546] A ALPHA
RtOPS Update #1536 Operation Phoenix -
https://911.wikileaks.org/files/messages_2001_09_11-13_10_2001_09_11-13_14.html#message_3059

2001-09-11 13:13:59 Skytel [007045350] B ALPHA
e** Operation Phoenix: 866-791-7190 passcode 7508470# Update at 13:00 CT <SIMS>
 You should start looking and stop avoiding. No reporter has ever looked into it or they would be fired.
    































Posted by



at





No comments:
  


































        

      









Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








Search