Cataloging the crimes of 9/11

RJ Lee found the microspheres in amounts up to 6% inside the skyscraper across the street from WTC 2. Other scientists estimate a total of 10-100 tons of microspheres altogether throughout Lower Manhattan. These spheres were so abundant that RI Lee used them as a signature component of the WTC Dust. RJ Lee notes that the microspheres were created during the event and not by welding operations during the clean-up of Ground Zero.

woden1809

Yet RJ Lee believes the microspheres were produced from burning and flaking iron within the building. 'The formation of iron and other type spheres at temperatures obtainable by the combustion of petroleum or coal-based fuels is not a new or unique process' Lee correspondence with Ron Wieck

911RedPill

2 seconds ago

@woden1809 No they did not! full quote '...The iron is heated red hot or hotter and subjected to hurricane force blast furnace like wind. The iron flakes are liberated as small particles and some iron is vaporized...The formation of iron and other type spheres at temperatures obtainable by the combustion of petroleum or coal based fuels is not a new or unique process. ' Notice you forgot to add the sentence that stated 1. The iron is heated red hot or hotter 2. subjected to hurricane force blast furnace like wind. .. The combustion of petroleum or coal is a blast furnace is not new but it is outside the context of 9/11.

911RedPill

When you burn iron that has a small surface area you get iron Oxide not spherical iron microspheres https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNgyQD6FIFc

woden1809

So is your claim that Mick faked this experiment?

Simply Vibrations

The spheres and residue after Mick's experiments are a combination of iron oxide and Iron.

911RedPill

2 hours ago

@woden1809 Name someone else who found iron micro-spheres after a steel wool reaction.

911RedPill

2 hours ago

@Simply Vibrations Then you should be able to keep reusing the resulting fuel and make more reactions. Has he done that? Also name someone who found iron micro-spheres or any spheres for that matter resulting from steel wool reaction.

911RedPill

"Other ways that can be created like rust or flecks of iron". You can't burn rust or Iron Oxide. Strike one. Why would the towers shed iron flecks like shedding skin cells? Strike Two.

Paulie200

So you can't get iron from iron ore? Because that is mostly iron oxide. Aside from that, pick up a flake from a steel girder sometime, or just any old carbon steel that's outside. break it... you'll likely find un-oxidized iron inside.

911RedPill

1 hour ago (edited)

@Paulie200 Iron ore is not reacting i.e burning in air mixing with oxygen to create iron, hence the word burn. If you break steel and you should find steel inside not iron. To get iron you have remove the carbon content. The only people who follow mick are bigger fools. You are using stupid examples.

911RedPill

RJ Lee One type, which comprised about 6 percent of the samples, was spherical iron and silicate particles that indicated very high temperatures ("WTC Dust Signature Study" pp. 4, 24, 17). USGS "The primary metal and metal-oxide phases in WTC dust are Fe-rich [iron-rich) and Zn-rich [zinc-rich) particles. Frank Greening said "discovered fe/mn alloy microspheres"

Mick West

That 6% figure is demonstrably false. And most of the spheres studied had plenty of oxygen, meaning they were largely iron oxide.

911RedPill

12 hours ago (edited)

@Mick West So now you are questioning USGS paper or was that RJ Lee figures ?? "plenty of oxygen" then the iron rich part would read oxygen rich would it not. Elevated Tritium Levels at World Trade Center pdf says it all 1. No tritium signs at [the] WTC, 2. fire and emergency equipment not been the source, 3. 767–200 source: T2 was efficiently oxidized to HTO and then immediately vaporized do to heat. i.e not the source of Elevated Tritium!

Friday, April 3, 2020

Tritium WTC debunking the debunkers

Bruce Patin

9h ago

Did you not read your own sources? From the first Google link at Elevated tritium levels at the World Trade Center, the levels we're not above background level. From the second Google link at https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.osti.gov/biblio/15002340&ved=2ahUKEwidh5b6q-XzAh

… (more)

WTC Clean Nuke Attack Theory

“No HTO above the background was found in those samples. “ deals with this [list B] “ 1.Manhattan, 2. Brooklyn, 3. Queens, and the 4. Kensico and 5. Croton Reservoirs” However this [list A] 1. “A water sample from the WTC sewer, collected on 9/13/01, contained 0.164 {+-} 0.074 (2 {sigma}) nCi/L of HTO. 2. A split water sample, collected on 9/21/01 from the basement of WTC Building 6, contained 3.53 {+-} 0.17 and 2.83 {+-} 0.15 nCi/L, respectively.” deals with the topic “well below the levels of concern to human exposure” but avoids the issue of ABOVE background levels i.e a clean nuke attack. You maybe reading it wrong or reading too fast. Please review the lists and your issue again. If I am right, can you rewrite your statement above? Thanks

Bruce Patin

6h ago

The numbers of Tritium are still too small to prove any type of publicly known nuclear explosion, and skeptics and government officials write it off as exit signs and gunsights. Another example of such a thing are elevated levels of Strontium in the dust, which, even above background levels, are also too small to have come from a nuclear explosion, and have been explained as coming from the hundreds of computer terminals in the building. If those substances are an effect of the Tesla Project exploding, even the nuclear physicist participants did not apparently expect them. Charles said they detected some alpha radiation, and his main concern was the release of Xenon and Krypton gasses into the building, increasing the intensity of the fires. So, my attitude is that I can't significantly use it to prove anything to a skeptic, and don't want to spend any more time on it. The names of people involved are more useful.

Elevated Tritium Levels at World Trade Center

“still too small “ because it was a temporary pool of water like puddled on B5 that formed after 9/11 and some said they also tested running water. WTC sewer system for example is running water and they reported zero tritium after a few days . The issue they were looking at was human health risk and as long as tritium left the area everyone was happy, so they tested a few puddles of water due to go missing after a few days anyway. They looked at temporary things which would never be problem but they DID find a problem. After 40 million gallons of water they found a problem on 9/21.

PDF Tritium in the World Trade Center September 11 th, 2001 Terrorist Attack: It's Possible Sources and Fate

1. “that there were no tritium signs at WTC, “
2. “The source of tritium from the airplane(s) was released at the point of impact with the Towers” i.e not the plane.
3. “It was concluded that fire and emergency equipment could not have been a source of tritium, since such equipment does not typically use tritium RL devices”
4. “The weapon/watch source could have had two components:. and that component ii) could not have been a major contributor i.e so they could NOT find a contributor as far as I could tell and left it at that.

Tritium WTC debunking the debunkers

Original Author · 15h ago

I quoted the language. You did not.

There is no evidence of a tritium based explosive. You are making it up.

I did “quote the language” and the syntax. I can copy the phrase I used and ctrl+F the PDF and take screen shots directly from the PDF file. For example.

Original Author · 3h ago

Who said that? Your conspiracy theory folks? Plus, there is zero evidence of a tritium fueled detonation. None.

“Who said that?” The PDF you refer(ed) to and you refuse to read. Check the links? “Plus, there is zero evidence of a tritium fueled detonation. None.” I just posted that evidence 1.

and 2. Elevated Tritium Levels at World Trade Center that is just the start of it.

Dear X-Ray,

I read the attachments carefully and this is what I found:

1. No tritium signs at [the] WTC,
2. fire and emergency equipment not been the source,
3. 767–200 source: T2 was efficiently oxidized to HTO and then immediately vaporized do to heat.

I then wrote emails to Bruce Campbell at Boeing and posted a blog

Julian Danzer

Original Author · 1h ago

you sure about that?
because again, it does exist naturally in tiny, varying amounts

Do you SEE the < 0.13 measurement all over Manhattan? That is the tiny amounts “exist naturally” and that issue is well understood.

Daniel Plesse dan.plesse@gmail.com

12:22 PM (37 minutes ago)

to bruce.campbell

Dear Mr. Campbell,

Has elevated tritium been detected at the location of 757, 767 aircraft crashes?

Thanks

Dear David M Browne, Self-employed Since 1991, Business Trial Attorney

Answered 12h ago

The tritium is believed to be from a number of devices on the planes and emergency vehicles that were destroyed.

Elevated tritium levels at the World Trade Center

You didn’t READ the paper did you?

“The tritium is believed to be from a number of devices on the planes and emergency vehicles that were destroyed.” Actually they reported just the opposite!

“no tritium signs at [the]WTC,” strike one!

“fire and emergency equipment not been the source” strike two!

Plane source: "T2 was efficiently oxidized to HTO" and then

This oxide immediately vaporized due to the intense heat. strike three

Title Elevated tritium levels at the World Trade Center

Permalink

Original Author · 2h ago

The evidence supports ordinary uses of tritium to explain its presence.

Tritium is used in nuclear devices, and it is 100% clear that no nuclear devices were involved. They leave unmistakable signatures, and produce a huge explosion. The whole idea is pure nonsense. You might as well believe that aliens flying tritium powered space ships did it.

“The evidence supports ordinary uses of tritium to explain its presence.” No it does not. They said all possible reasons were removed as sources

1. No tritium signs at [the] WTC,
2. fire and emergency equipment not been the source,
3. 767–200 source: T2 was efficiently oxidized to HTO and then immediately vaporized do to heat.

“unmistakable signatures, and produce a huge explosion”. Documented by BRNJ station at the 15.01 second mark shows a demarcation line which is broken and not recorded by PAL station and goes right off the map. .

Original Author · Sat

LOL. The abstract point blank states that the tritium was believed to be from the various sources - the plane, law enforcement equipment, signage in the building. You did not read it.