9/11 Myths Answer Sheet

 Just now

“ The impacts from the planes were known to send debris and flaming fuel down the elevator shafts and the lobby was not spared the effects.” Is another myth, The 9/11 Commission did report and said indirectly that the fireballs hit every single command center up and down towers including the lobby floor which was most likely hit because the fireballs went up after hitting the command center below B levels.

Conclusion: Too many fireballs, hit too many critical command centers for it be jet fuel or sheer coincidence. Answer someone placed explosives in those locations.. Sad to say. 

Put that theory to bed right now!
Too many critical command centers hit to be jet fuel 

The collapse were likely imminent because of the sounds they were making and the OEM was saying “get your men away from the building on video” The sounds and orders are some kind of conspiracy linked to bombs.. The helicopters running away is just another element of foreknowledge in a sea of evidence of the same but that was not the point of the image.

Image of thousands of small explosive on 9/11 .. 

The explosive sounds video 9/11 Eyewitness is a DVD by Rick Siegel 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCrLDQwNlqw

“What’s the source of your quote” Are you saying the copying text into a search bar is beyond your ability? Then I see you discovered more and must have found the quote or is your information coming from an answer sheet?

“that it’s hearsay; you’re quoting an unnamed person”
The person who said the quote was Bobby McIlvane and he is talking about the evidence in the first person not hearing it from someone else. 

“McIlvane some kind of expert on demolitions” What happened to his son had to do with an explosion not demolition.

“flaming fuel down the elevator shafts” Bobby McIlvane didn’t say his son GOT BURNED to death i.e fireball at all, he said he was blown apart. 

and you avoided the larger issue of body part maps.

Civilian went 886 more feeet because they were up on higher floors.

“None of this gets close to explaining how and when the supposed explosives were installed.”

Larry talked about how, and he must know who, where and when. Ask him.

The bombs got through and penetrated security systems during power outages he forgot he ordered.

Bryan Ekers

·

11m ago

Yeah, you’re throwing out a lot of scattered ideas in hopes it’ll look like explosives were used without you having to actually prove explosives were used. That only works if you already believe explosives were used and are cherry-picking evidence to try to support that assumption.

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

No I never said “look like. “

Word search returns shows ZERO results.

9/11 Myths Answer Sheet search here

“ prove explosives were used” is the job law enforcement and not a job I can do. Unless you think I can. What is your answer to that?

“ That only works if you already believe explosives” Nope you only need to see. Remember you didn’t SEE “Command Center” label on the door? Or “NYPD got early notice” which you agreed with.

The problem is you most likely using an answer sheet. Are you using an answer sheet and these are all fake made up replies that you learned to reply to? How much money are you getting anyway?

3m ago

You never addressed any of my flaws. I addressed your flaws.
“conspiracy has to keep expanding” Now you are generalizing and not addressing.

“If the pilot got such a warning, I don’t see how that proves a conspiracy.” I told you why and followed up with a video. Explosion sounds was the reason. See, I address your flaws. That’s what it looks like.

Here again “ I’m not sure why they’d care about the helicopter” because they have control over the helicopter. See I am answering your flawed thinking.

You might not know how to do that so keep studying my answers and find out how do that and address the issue and not generalize.

Air Flow Visualization Study North Tower at or Below Impact

 When air flow studies are conduced they use colored smoke or just smoke or whatever they have Air flow visualization chambers to see what is happening. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRXZ8BZ1rDE

Now using the same concept of air flows chamber above apply the smoke that surrounds the tower as an indication of solids, downward pressure etc and from the change of direction of the smoke around the tower during the first second of collapse I can conclude the solid objects the floor NIST said fell is still intact. The intact floors are just below the impact zone and the creation of large amounts of dust from destruction of the core is flying outward and not inward like smoke disappearing down a a vent as seen above. 

The first second or less the dust was already being pushed out the impact area so yeah the dust was created by XYZ but the larger point is what is happening beyond the just the floors. The intact floors were directing the flows i.e the dust was hitting a solid object. That solid object was assumed to have caused the domino effect taking down the tower. The dust shows this was not the case. The falling mass was being taken apart.

The South tower shows a whole bunch of the small black puffs of black smoke..

Bryan Ekers

·

23h ago

And you conclude explosives based on this? Okay, wouldn’t there be some supporting evidence in that case?

I’m also curious why the helicopter is being pointed out, but I gather that is of lesser significance.

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

The helicopter was told to back off, they knew ahead of time what comes next. Its strange that you refuse the words “NYPD got early notice”. Are you natually this way or is someone paying for this blindness?

“supporting evidence” Are you talking about the body part maps and the 1,000+ still missing. Chances are you had no idea that bodies should contain the supporting evidence. Guess what, that issue is most likely blocked off and refused, no investigation into this topic. However quote “McIlvaine suspects otherwise. Based on injuries his son sustained, including to his face and chest, he maintains Bobby was killed by an explosion, possibly before the plane crash. As Bobby was among the first 10 bodies found, he says, McIlvaine believes his son was in the tower's lobby.”

As for me, I am looking at the dust during collapse initiation in slow motion trying to figure out what is happening to the North Tower. The dust particles generated are uniform around the tower at a single point at or below impact of flight 11. This tells me the dust is hitting a solid object (flooring) and deflected outward. Actually this is the exact opposite of 9/11 Official (NIST) Theory. One of the theories is that the collapse initialized at the point of impact(s). If that is the case the dust should have been or at least the outside nearby smoke should have been pulled into the tower(s) and not out of the towers.  Videos have always shown the opposite and that the dust has always exploded away from the towers. This force has always been explained as 1. Explosives 2. Pressure from the collapse. In actuality both explanations are true. The pressure is from falling debris from a mini controlled demolition(s).    The dust is indicting an intact floor at the below the point of impact. This tells me the impact had nothing to do the collapse. My theory, right now is they took down the towers in a number of small steps and directed the tower's spill by using the perimeter columns as a guide just like a tree is directed when felled.  So I tried to look at LIDAR image results for perimeter columns  symmetry between the towers and found out the U.S Army was partially interested in the same thing I was. I wonder if someone was checking his results and feeling pretty good about himself. 

Uniform Dust Accumulation Study North Tower




1m ago

The dust shows the complete pulverization of the concrete floors. Try an exercise. Get a sledge hammer and pound a concrete slab into dust. That takes a lot of energy.

According to the First Law of Thermodynamics, the energy consumed in pulverizing the concrete must come from the kinetic energy of the falling mass. For that reason, the fall should have been slowed down. The free-fall collapses reported by the government are impossible unless the lower structures were weakened by incendiaries or explosives.

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

The first second or less the dust was already being pushed out the impact area, so yeah the dust was created by XYZ but the larger point is what is happening beyond the just the floors. The intact floors were directing the flows i.e the dust was hitting a solid object. That solid object was assumed to have caused the domino effect thus taking down the tower(s). The dust shows this was not the case. The falling mass was recorded as being taken apart.

The South tower shows a whole bunch of the small black puffs of black smoke..

15h ago

And the dust (assuming that’s what it is for the sake of argument) indicates what, exactly?

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

The dust and smoke was showing what was happening to the inside of building as per videos I linked to. A collapse under the impact zone would have pulled the dust or smoke inside the building.. So it is very clear. For the record, you were the one who asked.

9/11 Whodunit North and South Tower 

21m ago

And I’m sure he accurately reported what he saw in his location at the time to the best of professional expertise. Regardless, the fires were large enough to doom the buildings so call them small if you like, but that doesn’t make them harmless nor does it conjure evidence for an alternate explanation for which I’ve been patiently waiting.

Dan Plesse

·

Just now

Not regardless, the fires were NOT large enough to doom the buildings, based on Orio Joseph Palmer report and based on 9/11 Commission omitted WTC core and they lied in their report and based YOU not being able to show large fires. An Alternate explanation is just as simple, just follow the dust. The dust shows the center fell and the where the dust spills out, that is a floor. They must have repeated this all the way down.