Letting the cat out of the bag or is the Foot In Mouth new Term like "Pull It"
Blanchard Implosion World 9/11" vague similarity relates more to military explosive demolition"
The military was reported inside the WTC 1 and 2 the weekend before..
Military Controlled Demolition
The military was reported inside the WTC 1 and 2 the weekend before..
Military Controlled Demolition
That's one small quote from a man, one giant leap for mankind.
Subject: Brent Private Pooled Seismic Data from 9/11
Hey Brent did you or anyone ever publish that Private Pooled Seismic Data from 9/11?
"These seismographs recorded data that relates to the terrorist attacks that morning, and Protec Documentation Services, along with several other firms, is in the process of pooling this data."
"The goal of this collective effort, spearheaded by Dr. Ed Walter & Associates, is to help ascertain which, if any, structures located beyond the actual World Trade Center site may have been affected by the event."
I contacted Dr. Ed Walter & Associates and guess what no answer.
http://drwalter.com/contact-
"These seismographs recorded data that relates to the terrorist attacks that morning, and Protec Documentation Services, along with several other firms, is in the process of pooling this data."
"The goal of this collective effort, spearheaded by Dr. Ed Walter & Associates, is to help ascertain which, if any, structures located beyond the actual World Trade Center site may have been affected by the event."
I contacted Dr. Ed Walter & Associates and guess what no answer.
http://drwalter.com/contact-
What happened to "National Demolition Association Convention 4/22/03 Protec's two -hour video" ??
|
Feb 8
 | | ||
That effort was made well over a decade ago, and had nothing to do with conspiracy theories. Most of the bat-shit nutso stuff on the web now didn’t even become imagined until well after 2001. Ed Walter has long since retired, other current employed weren’t with the company in ’01. This is not a grand conspiracy, just the way all companies and employees change and develop over time. See Columbia University data, it was the most detailed and revealing of all vibration recordings on 9/11. Good luck-
The towers EXPLODED Australian 9/11 survivor explosive Witness
The towers EXPLODED Australian 9/11 survivor explosive Witness
Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11
Written in spring 2005, a modestly language-corrected version Corrected by another person than the original author.
The photographs attached in this non-profit distribution are for securing volatile, important evidence on 9/11 for discussion and education. Author hereby grants full permission to reproduce the drawing 'The Bombs in the WTC' and his writings. You are encouraged to mail, publish and mass produce these documents or your enhanced versions of them. Due to concerns for his personal safety, the author has chosen to remain anonymous.
- The 9/11 Operation: A Summary
- The Bombs in the WTC
- The Development of Bomb Technology Related to the 9/11 Operation
- Observations Suggesting the Use of Small Hydrogen Bombs
- View of a Military Expert: Why the Towers of the World Trade Center Collapsed
HOW DOES THIS EVENT COMPARE WITH A NORMAL BUILDING IMPLOSION?
The only correlation is that in a very broad sense, explosive devices (airplanes loaded with fuel) were used to intentionally bring down buildings. However it can be argued that even this vague similarity relates more to military explosive demolition than to building implosions, which specifically involve the placement of charges at key points within a structure to precipitate the failure of steel or concrete supports within their own footprint. The other primary difference between these two types of operations is that implosions are universally conducted with the utmost concern for adjacent properties and human safety---elements that were horrifically absent from this event. Therefore we can conclude that what happened in New York was not a “building implosion.”
The only correlation is that in a very broad sense, explosive devices (airplanes loaded with fuel) were used to intentionally bring down buildings. However it can be argued that even this vague similarity relates more to military explosive demolition than to building implosions, which specifically involve the placement of charges at key points within a structure to precipitate the failure of steel or concrete supports within their own footprint. The other primary difference between these two types of operations is that implosions are universally conducted with the utmost concern for adjacent properties and human safety---elements that were horrifically absent from this event. Therefore we can conclude that what happened in New York was not a “building implosion.”
ENGINEERING FIRMS ASSIST WITH WORLD TRADE CENTER VIBRATION STUDY
Implosionworld.com World Exclusive, September 14, 2001
On September 11, 2001, several independent vibration monitoring firms were recording ground vibration data on construction and demoliton sites throughout New York City. These seismographs recorded data that relates to the terrorist attacks that morning, and Protec Documentation Services, along with several other firms, is in the process of pooling this data.
The goal of this collective effort, spearheaded by Dr. Ed Walter & Associates, is to help ascertain which, if any, structures located beyond the actual World Trade Center site may have been affected by the event.
Our thoughts and prayers are with our friends and families who have been touched by this tragedy, and we appreciate the calls and e-mails from around the world checking on the well-being of our employees.
https://web.archive.org/web/20020622151835/http://www.implosionworld.com/news/jhsph.htm
In February 2000, a federal grand jury indicted Mark Loizeaux, Douglas Loizeaux and Controlled Demolition, Inc. on charges of falsely reporting campaign contributions by asking family members and CDI employees to donate to the campaign of State Rep. Elijah E. Cummings.
|
WTC COLLAPSE STUDY BBlanchard 8-8-06.pdf
Version 2
Article-WTC STUDY 8-06 w clarif as of 9-8-06 .pdf
Earl Garder, Gary McGeever Michael Golden John Golden
http://911research.wtc7.net/reviews/blanchard/index.html
Tully Construction, D.H Griffin Wrecking, Mazzocci Wrecking, Yannuzzi Demolition, Gateway Demolition and Manafort Brothers.
National Demolition Association Convention 4/22/03 Protec's two -hour video
2 comments:
Which planes? PLEASE SHOW ME ONLY ONE PLANE IN THE WORLD THAT CAN PASS TROUGHT STRUCTURAL STEEL... JUST ONE. THEM, IF YOU SHOW ME THAT... i will believe... Wing planes are .3 cm thick... you can't even step on the wings, because you can cause structural damages to it... even them... they made a ROAD RUNNER CARTOON MARK ON WTC 1 AND 2... Are Americans that stupid to believe on that CARTOON MADE BY CNN?
this page is made by US GOVERMENT OR ANY OF THEIR AFFILIATES... CIA....this is a joke page... If the goverment did want to prove, they had to do it on that year... mantaining the steel beams and columns intact for future analisys... they sent WHAT WAS LEFT... FROM DISAPEARING IN THE DUST... this was very unusual ...
Post a Comment