9/11 Commission staff memos behind the 28 Pages

National Archives releases 9/11 Commission staff memos behind the 28 Pages.. Received via Barbara Honegger, "The Cat's out of The Bag ..." The memos can be viewed at:https://assets.documentcloud.org/doc…/2838281/2553-001-1.pdf

Bingo! Note the pages in the Congressional Report recommend for review in this staff memo and this: On page 13, it talks about the CIA headquarters getting vital information that if acted on, had the potential to stop the planed attack, but the CIA failed to respond.

On page 31, the report notes that "Neither the CIA nor the FBI were able to confirm if KSM was in the US or sending recruits before 9/11". As I understand, Marshal points out that this statement means that the story about who attacked us that day was obtained by forced confession alone, and that there's NO other evidence to validate what the official story claims

On page 153, there's a communication between the FBI Headquarters and a New York agent. In short, as I understand it, the New York agent is not a happy camper because the SOP of the CIA is going to get Americans killed.

On Page 158, the short story is that Congress wanted to talk to that fellow that's was a informant with the FBI out in San Diego, that happen to have a couple of the hijackers renting from him. It looks like the FBI was playing defense counsel at one point and needed a lot of legal cover for the guy if he was going to be forced to spill the beans, even though Congress already knew that the dude was full of it, nothing happened about getting the guy on record.

On page 159, the FBI started leaning on their informant where as he let on that he was actually pretty close to the hijackers but "...expressed disbelief that the two were involved]."

On Page 162, the informant uses the Guidelines, as set forth by the Attorney General to say that he had no clue about the two.

On page 163, the San Diego office did get a clue but when Congress asked them about it, they said that the informant was clueless.

One page 164, the FBI guy that had contact with the informant attributed inconsistencies in the informants' lack of a clue because of the guys' clueless personality.

After a couple of redacted lines from the same page, the same agent told congress that the informant was "very credible, highly reliable, very, very credible, very useful" and that the informant had been "duped".

Finally, at the bottom of page 164, Congress has got some serious issues with all of this and thinks the guy might be full of it.

On page 167, headquarters knew about the two, connected to the informant that didn't have a clue but headquarters kept the San Diego office clueless about the two.