Cataloging the crimes of 9/11: February 2018

Was Some of Ground Zero Dirt RED ?

9/11 LAWYERS COMMITTEE REVIEW: The Bombs Issue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIK58LlfLpU&feature=youtu.be

The Bombs Issue
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ftRLUFIgAnez/

evidence is everywhere 9/11 not what it seems

Airplane parts Not Flight 77 Not a commercial airline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv1IK1SFKc0

Comments

Tracy Blevins This can be described as "anomalous damage to metal", and it is not evidence of explosives. Explosives is just the only tool in the common "mental toolbox" that comes even close to explaining the damage to the World Trade Center, and it doesn't actually come close. The damage to the WTC is not consistent with explosives, although a few aspects of the damage point that direction. If you take a look at all the evidence, you can't conclude that explosives did the deed. EXPLOSIVES DON'T WORK LIKE THAT.
Manage

Like
Reply5h

Daniel M. Plesse 1. "anomalous damage to metal" Who said that?
2. Explosives is just the only tool in the common "mental toolbox" Not true at all.
a. We have copper oxide based thermite. Copper Oxide was not found by USGS
https://youtu.be/frpsDzWaEN0
b. Dean Warwick Original Judy Wood DEW
https://youtu.be/6ksxhCDR_zk
c. Neoteric Gas
http://www.breitbart.com/.../jordanian-daily-u-s-used.../
9/11 and the Neoteric Gas Report
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/.../911-and-neoteric-gas...
3. "it doesn't actually come close". American Society of Civil Engineers Team members say column C-14 had a something exploded through the column.
So Wrong Again!
a. Explosive Evidence September 11th Attacks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C5mlwBDM-Q&feature=youtu.be
b.ASCE Steel Explosive Evidence September 11th Attacks
https://www.bitchute.com/video/64eqBPRgnZ7Q/Manage

9/11 The NEW Veitch Ry Dawson 2018 melt down

YOUTUBE.COM

Like
Reply Remove Preview1m Edited

Tracy Blevins 1.A. Sadly, the other researchers are wrong, not me. High temperature does not cause steel to shatter into microscopic shards. These shards compose the majority of the matter contained in the WTC dust. 2.A. OK 3. C-14 doesn't explain the years-long fuming. 4. Water vapor comes from high heat, and there wasn't a large amount of high heat at Ground Zero more than one year later. 5. Explosives would have caused organic material to become carbon dioxide and water vapor. It wouldn't remain in the dust, if the dust was generated by explosives. 6. Look at 5. 7. I began studying 9/11 before Judy Wood, and her results are completely separate and different than mine. We didn't do the same experiments, and our research protocols aren't the same.

Manage

Like
Reply15m

Tracy Blevins Daniel M. Plesse I'm not denying the evidence. I've evaluated the evidence, and accept all of the evidence. The hearsay evidence doesn't count as much in my theory as the physical evidence, and it's really the firefighters saying they saw these large pools of molten metal that constitute the bulk of evidence that they existed. No documentary evidence of these large pools exists, and if it does and you have it, please share. Remember, it has to be large pools of molten metal to cause years-long fuming. It can't be a few drips here and there, and it has to be in the basement of the WTC. QUESTION: Don't you think a cold winter that included daily showering with water and dirt from 24/7 activity from fire fighters would have cooled the large pools of molten metal, therefore ending the fuming before one year? QUESTION: Where are the images of cooled metal? After the metal cooled, it would still be there in the form of a solid.

Manage

Like
Reply11m

Tracy Blevins Daniel M. Plesse I don't love Judy Wood. Personally, I think she is a creep. She dicked me over in a big way.

Manage

Like
Reply8m

Daniel M. Plesse 5. "Explosives would have caused organic material to become carbon dioxide and water vapor"

A: Says who? Please name a single person who said that? It sounds nuts. What percentage are you talking about? 100%?

6. The hearsay evidence doesn't count as much in my theory..

I think it should..

7. firefighters saying they saw these large pools of molten metal that constitute the bulk of evidence that they existed.. and I am not using that. Can you see my posts? Get off the stupid. iphone..

A. I am using their display tables and displays at museums..

Also we video tape of explosions.. etc..

Manage

Like
Reply2m Edited

Daniel M. Plesse 1. "High temperature does not cause steel to shatter into microscopic shards." Explosives does that work.. Its seems like you mistaking evidence from explosives while looking for for evidence of heat. Its very strange..

We also have new chemicals which most likely new elements but they didn't say that at the meeting..

Manage

Like
Reply1m Edited

Write a reply...

BRNJ brnj seismic seismograph above and below show sharp spikes not covered by 9/11 Truth which includes Judy Wood.Manage

Like
Reply1m

Tracy Blevins To put it very simply, the WTC was destroyed at low temperature. This means that no explosive could have done it. Thermite of any variety couldn't have done it, either. Any suggested mechanism of destruction of those buildings must account for the damage done to the buildings. I constantly observed the buildings fuming for more than a year, for example. What explosive does that? Another example...the WTC dust contains organic material. What explosive can do that? Organic material burns up at a relatively low temperature, far lower than any known explosive. YES, the buildings exploded, but not through use of explosives. Explode yes. Explosive? No.
Manage

LikeShow more reactions
Reply19m

Tracy Blevins You can't just say, "Explosives can be used to bring down buildings that give off squibs similar to what was seen at Ground Zero" because squibs were not the only phenomena seen at Ground Zero. You can't talk about large pools of molten metal in the basement unless you have some images of large pools of molten metal in the basement of the WTC. Contemporaneous pictures of the basement of the WTC show dust and pools of water from the fire fighters and heavy rain. No pool of molten metal is going to do this.
Manage

LikeShow more reactions
Reply16m

Daniel M. Plesse 1. "To put it very simply, the WTC was destroyed at low temperature."
A: WRONG.. We have high temperature photos and witnesses and your own samples.. Frank Greening Dust samples also show high Temperatures.
2. Thermite of any variety couldn't have done it.
A. Didn't say that.. People confessed to this too.. as we know.
3. C-14 does account to explosive damage done to the buildings.
4. fuming for more than a year? Water vapor
5. WTC dust contains organic material? So? Why would explosives remove Organic material?
6. Organic material burns up at a relatively low temperature.. So?
7. "Explode yes. Explosive? No." i.e Judy Wood Cult.

Basically I don't agree with anything you said..Manage

LikeShow more reactions
Reply3m Edited

Daniel M. Plesse Tracy Blevins "unless you have some images of large pools of molten metal" I have images and you have them too.

What YOU have been doing is just denying all evidence, because you love Judy Wood..Manage

LikeShow more reactions
Reply1m Edited

Write a reply...

Alternative Photos showing the hidden truth of Red Dust fallig from the towers

TOWARD AN ACCURATE TECHNICAL HISTORY OF THE WTC2 COLLAPSE

National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) said:

The Sept 11 2001 events are not in the NEIC catalog because our station spacing was too sparse to get a good location and magnitude. We do not have classified information about the events. The events were carefully studied by the local seismic network at Lamont-Doherty.

3 results - TinEye

Compare your search image to your result image. Quickly click the "Switch" button to switch back and forth between the two images and see the differences.

tineye.com

n

Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/64eqBPRgnZ7Q
You may publish this video from the play screen.
The BitChute Team

RICK WILDER ACARS HIJACK ON 9/11 WHISTLEBLOWER

Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3vyhUuWhmcpg

SEPTEMBER 11TH EXPLOSION BETH FERTIG NPR

Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/hv2sc9IkddAu

JFK TWO RIFLES

Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0NX7iODCskig

9/11 RED DUST GEORGE SOROS WAS NOT A NAZI COLLABORATOR GEORGE SOROS WAS NOT A NAZI COLLABORATOR

Video: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ixYmh4gHiVgW

Click here to Reply or Forward

1.88 GB (12%) of 15 GB used

Manage

Terms - Privacy

Last account activity: 1 hour ago
Details

Cataloging the crimes of 9/11

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

9/11 World Trade Center Judy Wood Love Is Cancer

Comments

forum.skyscraperpage.com

Search

main-nav-top (Do Not Edit Here!)