Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Airborne Cell Phone Tests Project Achilles

Airfones

In 2001, GTE Airfone used the North American Telephony System (NATS) Terrestrial Radio System. There were 138 active base stations, each with a nominal 200-mile radius coverage.

From 1991 to 2006 some commercial airlines provided passengers with access to "seat-back" air-to-ground "Airfone" voice communications. On-board GTE radio transceivers linked to Airfone ground radio sites, which then interfaced with surface telephone carriers. The following digram shows where Airfone ground radio sites were located in the northeastern USA in 1991. Two typical coverage areas, with estimated radii of 128 miles, are represented by the red circles.


  • Dermal Deviations I'm all for asking questions about what really happened that day and who was responsible, but most calls were made at very low elevation through regular cellular towers.
  • Dan Plesse Which plane was "at very low elevation" and which cellular towers were used? Do you have there address? Locations? Thanks
Jason Lickness   "What happened to the people who bought tickets to be on those flights?" and you have never answered those questions.
Dan Plesse "What happened to the people who bought tickets to be on those flights?"

Well to find out more you have to trace the calls through the system to locate the source.
Tracing had to be done first to find out more about your question. Get the tracing done and YOU WILL HAVE YOUR ANSWER!!! and you will be a "truther" just like Jeffrey!!


airfone ground sites 1991

In 2003, Project Achilles researchers performed low altitude cell phone tests in private aircraft in the London, Ontario area of Canada. They found limited communications above 2,000 feet AGL (above ground level) and essentially no communications at 8000 feet AGL and above. The planes used in these tests had cruising speeds of 138 and 127 knots.


Here is a map of all RBS in 2006 (Source).



The list makes it possible to determine the time and RBS when the call was commenced as well as the time and RBS when it was disconnected.


Zacarias Moussaoui  OG00010.zip can't find
http://www.911myths.com/html/official_manifest_images.html

     Caller         Seat      Begin of Call         End of Call         # Handoffs

                             Time       RBS        Time    RBS     

I wonder what the average distance is between aircraft and (RBS) base station is and if that is still technically feasible.

Thomas Burnett     24ABC   9:30:32  Fort Wayne   9:31:19  Columbus     *

Flight Attendant   34ABC   9:32:39  Fort Wayne   9:34:17  Fort Wayne 

Flight Attendant   34ABC   9:31:14  Columbus     9:31:34  Columbus

Flight Attendant   33DEF   9:35:40  Detroit      9:41:45  Fort Wayne   *

Flight Attendant   34ABC   9:35:48  Detroit      9:37:32  Detroit

Flight Attendant   33ABC   9:35:58  Detroit      9:37:42  Detroit

Mark Bingham       25DEF   9:36:10  Detroit      9:36:51  Detroit

Mark Bingham       25DEF   9:37:03  Detroit      9:40:05  Fort Wayne   *

Jeremy Glick       27DEF   9:37:41  Detroit     11:44:00  Pittsburgh   ********

Thomas Burnett     25ABC   9:37:53  Detroit      9:39:19  Detroit

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:39:21  Detroit      9:40:21  Detroit

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:40:42  Detroit      9:41:04  Detroit 

Mark Bingham       25DEF   9:41:20  Detroit      9:41:36  Detroit

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:41:34  Columbus     9:41:52  Columbus

Mark Bingham       25DEF   9:41:53  Detroit      9:42:29  Detroit

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:42:03  Columbus     9:42:19  Columbus   

Joseph de Luca     26DEF   9:42:13  Columbus     9:42:47  Columbus

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:42:25  Columbus     9:42:41  Columbus

Todd Beamer        32DEF   9:42:44  Detroit      9:42:48  Detroit

Todd Beamer        32DEF   9:42:44  Detroit      9:43:29  Detroit 

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:42:45  Columbus     9:43:02  Columbus

Joseph de Luca     26DEF   9:43:03  Columbus     9:45:28  Columbus 

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:43:24  Columbus     9:43:31  Columbus

Lauren Grandcolas  23DEF   9:43:44  Columbus     9:44:16  Columbus  

Todd Beamer        32DEF   9:43:46  Detroit      9:43:49  Detroit

Todd Beamer        32DEF   9:43:48  Detroit     10:50:20  Detroit      ******

Thomas Burnett     25ABC   9:44:23  Columbus     9:45:37  Columbus

Waleska Martinez   34ABC   9:45:37  Columbus     9:47:55  Columbus

Linda Gronlund     26DEF   9:46:05  Columbus     9:47:44  Columbus

Ceecee Lyles       32ABC   9:47:57  Columbus     9:49:28  Columbus

Joseph de Luca     26DEF   9:48:48  Columbus     9:48:57  Columbus

Marion Britton     33ABC   9:49:12  Columbus     9:53:01  Pittsburgh   ***

Sandra Bradshaw    33DEF   9:49:30  Columbus     9:49:45  Columbus

Sandra Bradshaw    33DEF   9:50:04  Columbus     9:58:27  Pittsburgh   ***

Honor Wainio       33ABC   9:53:43  Pittsburgh   9:58:23  Pittsburgh


 9/11 Commission paper on the GTE airfone calls. For a better view click  here.
Airfone is a terrestric system. The calling passenger is connected to the recipient via a net of ground stations (RBS=radio base station) scattered over the country. They connect the caller with the dialed number via landline. If the plane moves from one RBS area to the next, a handoff takes place, similar to cell calls. So in general, the position of a plane can be determined by the RBS with a decent uncertainty, just like VHF ACARS messages. Because the net of RBS is more wide-meshed than the net of ARINC RGS, the uncertainty is even bigger. Nevertheless, the list delivers valuable position information.

http://911woodybox.blogspot.com/2012/11/list-of-united-93-airfone-calls.html

DOJ's Fake report might show where the calls were made and murders actually happened.  They say two cell towers was used to call parents, call centers, loved ones and Senator Ted Olson

Zero Cellular Tracing was done by any 9/11 Truth researcher and the 9/11 Truth Movement completely forgot. I am hear to remind researchers what has been missing, new videos, text messages whatever. Please find the location of cell towers and point them out on a map. 

Takedown (2000) "This film is based on the story of the capture of computer hacker "Kevin Mitnick". What method did they use? Cellular Tracing! Somehow everyone forgot, again!







  • Al Venden Ya , they didn't really think that whole cell phone thing through. You can ask any ham radio operator or pilot and they'll tell you it's impossible to connect to a cell tower from a flying aircraft. The main reason is the cell companies have developed special antennas that don't allow any signal to go up. They want their signal to reach as far out on the horizon as possible, any signal that goes up is considered waist.

    This came out shortly after 9/11 and there was an investigation and a hearing. Where under oath all were forced to admit there were no calls! They've all known the calls were phoney for a very long time now.


    "
    In the mid-1980s, when the first commercial cell phone networks began operating, the U.S. government adopted rules prohibiting their use onboard commercial flights. The rules were based on the above concerns.


    On Sept. 11, passengers disregarded those rules when they called loved ones and law enforcement officials using both Airfone-type and traditional cell phone technology. Another safety concern, however, is that terrorists might use the signal from a cell phone to detonate an onboard bomb."
     http://computer.howstuffworks.com/in-flight-mobile-phone-services2.htm

    http://www.rense.com/general56/cellpp.htm




New York Underwater Crop Circle Sparks UFO Talk



Happy New year is right 4,000-5,000 people visit a photo everyday. A single photo. A photo taken on 9/11. they said it would become nothing. nothing would change. no one would care. People who should have been on my side suddenly choose a different path. A path of darkness, a path negativity. Without this single photo 9/11 would be the same and now it is different and for many it is still the same. Believers and none believers have to deal with the facts caught via photons on film.

Exhibit A
WTC 2 impact # 57 rare
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYgE0g5d8lQ

Exhibit B
9 11 Jumper photo under 1400% magnification turns into CIA Drone NIST NYPD FOIA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkRRKVXwcmk




Monday, December 30, 2013

Using a war to Cover up a Crime: Hitler's Big Lie Theory in action.


Atta's many driving licenses http://s1222.photobucket.com/user/danp5648/profile/

Tell a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously."

Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11 (2nd Edition)
“This week, Congressional representatives Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and Walter Jones (R-NC) have officially requested a congressional resolution demanding President Obama declassify the heavily redacted Congressional Investigative Report on 9/11. The two representatives had just been given authority under penalty of ‘national security secrecy’ to read the censored 28 pages of the 800-page report that had not been seen. What has been made clear is that President Bush was fully aware that neither Afghanistan nor Iraq were involved in 9/11 and that military action against those two nations was done to cover involvement of his administration in 9/11, involvement that included support from foreign intelligence agencies.
 The representatives, while reviewing the report, came to the portion titled ‘Specific Sources of Foreign Support.’
A 28-page section here had been ‘butchered’ by the White House on the personal orders of President Bush. On the original report given to Congress, an estimated 5-10,000 words were omitted from this section with page after page of dotted lines replacing text.”

Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11 (2nd Edition)
My latest book, "Rumors Fly, Truth Walks: How Lies Become Our History" goes right to the essence of why I write books. I have noticed a pattern of how we receive news of crisis events such as 9/11 - television images convey emotion, panic and grief; while we recoil in horror and fear, evidence pops up briefly then fades off; then our attempt to secure the truth takes years to catch up to the emotions which have already set in.
"Rumors Fly, Truth Walks" comes out on Amazon January 4, 2014.
The truth is not always easy to find, nor is it well received. But searching for it is my passion. I am an introvert who listens closely. I am not afraid to stand against a majority. And my mind is focused on the long term rather than the short term.
I hope you enjoy reading my works as much as I enjoy writing them!


You can also download programs which tell you what happened if anything to the photo.

Download Photo
NYPD 9/11 Drone Photo Film Roll #3
JPEGsnoop is the Fake fabricated solution!!!
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jpegsnoop/

JPEGSnoop Sniffs Out Signs of Editing

Results .... Video Reply via Youtube

The epic single reason why millions of photos are never seen about 9/11. News editors, web site admin just  block, remove and delete the truth out until you left with the official story. Privately talks are also  forbidden until the masters say its fine and good behavior.








Saturday, December 28, 2013

Keven Ryan Exposes NIST contractor James Millette With NYPD Museum FOIA from 911datasets.org

James R. Millette Progress Report
http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112webHiRes.pdf
Nanoengineered explosives Makowiecki
5,505,799

Keven Ryan Exposes NIST contractor James Millette  With some help from the NYPD Museum and FOIA videos from 911datasets.org

The Nano Energetic materials was found in the lungs and defined as carbon nano tubes or CT. Both the Anthrax letters and the Nano aluminum nano carbon tubes are manufactured  by the military.  Case closed.

Dust: The Inside Story of its Role in the September 11th Aftermath By Paul J. Lioy
Page 154 "Some new chemicals were mentioned by Dr. Cahill fused iron spheres"




"Case Report: Lung Disease in World Trade Center Responders Exposed to Dust and Smoke: Carbon Nanotubes Found in the Lungs of World Trade Center Patients and Dust Samples"

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2854726/
“Nanoenergetics.” It’s a word that might sound like a new body-enhancement product, but it’s really all about the opposite: ripping bodies apart.”
http://nanobot.blogspot.com/2005/01/nanolife-vs-nanodeath.html

"Nanothermites exhibit vastly differing characteristics compared to their well known micron scale relatives and through the use of various preparatory chemical techniques can be tailored to have a
wide spectra of chemical and energetic properties. This may allow use as superior replacements
of conventional energetic materials in various applications"

Homogeneous mesoporous nanoenergetic metal oxide composite fabrication methods"Example applications of the invention include military, mining, demolition, detonation devices, fuses, smart ammunitions, propellant initiators, propellant systems, biomedical devices and power generation devices."


Nanoengineered explosives

NIST contractor James Millette produced an unreviewed paper that purports to replicate the finding of nanothermite in the WTC dust. This was apparently organized in the hope that doing so would discredit all of the evidence for thermite at the WTC.



Millette is well known for having helped create the official reports on the analysis of WTC dust. He was responsible for creating the form that was used to pre-screen all materials found in the dust prior to any analysis by official investigators. Those official reports did not mention any of the evidence listed above, in particular failing to report the abundant iron microspheres scattered throughout the WTC dust. Additionally, Millette’s official report team did not find any red-gray chips, let alone nanothermite.

Planes without Passengers: The Faked Hijackings of 9/11 (2nd Edition)


NIST was working with LLNL to test and characterize these sol-gel nanothermites, at least as early as 1999.


As he worked to debunk the WTC thermite research, Millette was still unable to find any iron microspheres. But he did claim to have finally found the red-gray chips. Curiously, he did not attempt to replicate the testing that would determine if those chips were thermitic.


Claiming to have found the chips, Millette perfomed an XEDS analysis for elemental composition but failed to do any of the other tests including BSE, DSC, the flame test, the MEK test, or measurement of the chip resistivity. Having inexplicably “ashed” the chips at 400 °C in a muffle furnace, thereby proving that they were not the materials of interest (which ignite at 430 °C), Millette ignored the remainder of the study he had set out to replicate. Because he did not do the DSC test, he could not do XEDS of the spheres formed from the chips. Since he had still not found spheres in the dust, he could not test those and this allowed him to ignore the testing of spheres from the thermite reaction.


Millette rested his case on FTIR, which I have also performed on chips from WTC dust but with a much different result. Like Millette’s paper, my FTIR work is not yet part of a peer-reviewed publication and therefore should not be taken as authoritative evidence. There has been less urgency to this supplemental work because what has been done to date has received no legitimate response from the government or from much of the scientific community. That sad fact should be the central point of discussion today.
In any case, Millette attempted only one tenth of the tests in his struggle to replicate (or refute) one tenth of the evidence for thermite at the WTC. His un-reviewed “one percent approach” was nonetheless very convincing to many people, including some of the people who produced the official reports for 9/11. But it is obvious to others that Millette’s work was not a replication in any sense of the word.

I’m looking forward to the peer-reviewed scientific article that finally does replicate the nanothermite paper or any of the other peer-reviewed scientific papers that document the evidence for thermite at the WTC. Hopefully, we can approach those efforts without concerns about the sources and without recalling all the deception and manipulation that preceded them.



Until then, it is important to recognize the difference between the superficial appearance of science and the actual practice of science. Ignoring 90 percent of the evidence is not scientific. And replication of the 10 percent means actually repeating the work. If thermite debunkers and alternate hypothesis supporters can find the courage and focus to step through that challenge, maybe they can begin to add to the discussion.

Jeff Prager, James Henry Fetzer both talk about issue with velocity

Jeff

Nanothermite, actually called Metastable Intermolecular Compounds and also Nanoenergetics, is a non-starter. Folks key in on temperature when in fact, it's velocity that's important here.

Fetzer
"T. Mark Hightower and I have reported that the highest detonation velocity for nano thermite is 895 m/s, which is close to 1,000 m/s, the figure you cite. But neither can destroy materials that require velocities of 3,200 m/s (for concrete) and 6,100 m/s (for steel)."

Roger
"what I've read for something to destroy steel it has to break the speed of sound in that material so that is were velocity comes in."

Always remember that the first WTC bombing completely invalidates this concept.

None of the core columns were replaced. I have a video someplace were someone, maybe it was  Leslie Robertson talking about how the bomb(s) did nothing to the steel and its my guess is the those weapons did have the velocity requirements.


This is a classical straw man argument to say X did not contain Y when that was never an issue . The requirements have always been three or more steps. Cut!, Blow! & Move i.e  The Blow, Move, Push, was X or explosions, both large and small  and the cut, weaken, unbolt was Y or the Nanoenergetics

What the 9/11 Criminals did was decouple the requirements into multiple different sources, space all the requirements over a longer period of time.

Confessions of a 9/11 truth activist.
Confessions of a 9/11 truth activist. This guy is kind of shilling for Judy Wood. He mentions the alternated theories but focuses on Judy Wood. As though Judy Wood is supposed to represent everything not A&E. This makes me suspicious that it's just another part of the A&E vs Judy Wood diversion. Truthers are being funneled to one or the other & they are both misleading us.

I don't see either of them as anything but controlled opposition. They're both trying to cover up, disinform and/or downplay tritium as it's a smoking gun that so few know about..

http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/dr-steven-jones-and-dr-judy-wood-lie-about-traces-of-tritium-and-neutron-nukes/

16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke -- Mini Nuke -- Nuke. It's 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue -- ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Also: The Collapse of the Spire http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7W0-W582fNQ

An Impossible "Fire" (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill's data on 'anaerobic incineration'. -- Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke -- Mini Nuke -- Nuke. It's 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue -- ZERO ANOMALIES. http://rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, 6 and 7) of WTC Land Brought to Searing Temperatures in a Few Hours by an 'Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled "Fire" -- Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us gov Thermal Images proof -- Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke -- Mini Nuke -- Nuke. It's 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue -- ZERO ANOMALIES. http://www.usavsus.info/WTC-MoreEvidence.htm Best, See: Update http://edwardmd.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/correction-9-11-wtcs-1-2-6-and-7-neutron-nuked/

9/11 Nano thermate Dust study early developments Gery Warner
9/11 Scientist Sergei Dudarev, : "Unusual Magnetic Forces"
General Aquino Satanic Cult Mk ultra is 9/11 Operation Phoenix  
9/11 Dean Warwick's WTC demolition and Solution




I was just thinking about how everything is exactly the way it always was. The Truthers are like the Jesus types questing and bothering people. The Romans are the duped masses and the Jews are back exactly where they were before.

9/11 what you might have missed


James Millette jmillette@mvainc.com

Search