Tuesday, July 15, 2014

11 Sept 2001 New Details Fake Plane Parts and Smoke Machines

11 Sept 2001 New Details Fake Plane Parts and Smoke Machines
http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/911/NRO911Simulation.pdf


"John Fulton, a CIA officer assigned as chief of NRO's strategic gaming division, the announcement says, "On the morning of September 11th 2001, Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building. Little did they know that the scenario would come true in a dramatic way that day."

  • Alan Phelps This document is over 3 years old. Old news.

    And how are they using parts for a small Lear jet to show that a trans co tinental American Airlines jet liner crashed there? Because I csn tell you the parts found there match the Boeing. Not a Lear jet that was part of an exercise that was ultimately cancelled at the NRO HQ.

  • Dan Plesse New relative to it first being reported 2002. Its new information and details adding on 2002 which hides  Dulles Airport, the engine issue and smoke machines.

    Exerciae Scenario:

    "A Learjet airplane loses power immediately
    after take off from Dulles Airport and smashes
    into Towers"

    "make this a Lear jet" does not mean is a Lear jet.

    "parts found there match the Boeing" They match a casting by Boeing, not a serial number, which means any Boeing type.

    They had all the materials ready to go and deploy in the field.


Alan Phelps Mr. Fulton and his team ... were running a pre-planned simulation to explore the emergency response issues that would be created if a plane were to strike a building.

" as soon as the real world events began, we canceled the exercise."
the exercise was going on for days before 9/11.

Jeffrey Harr normally runs when he sees the writing on the wall -. He normally just says "I don't know the document" whatever that means or maybe that was Ron Morales.

"strangely coincidental" fake plane parts and smoke machines.

In what the government described as a "bizarre coincidence", Notice the what the government says matches Jeffrey comments exactly.

9/11 Plane exercise with smoke machines and plane fake parts

"Tapestry Gold Xebec"
11 Sept 2001 Aircraft Crash at NRO Headquarters New Details

11 Sept 2001 Aircraft Crash at NRO Headquarters...See More

Engine Pre-positioned in NRO Compound


Looks like Norma Rae is right again! On September 11th 2001 at "NRO Headquarters"

1. They crashed a plane
2. and planted parts
3. made sure one engine was dropped off.


Jeffrey Harr
Date released February 15th 2011. Not old

Your link does NOT include the details. However my PDF is the actual details which includes the i.e Norma Rae Plane engine 1 and 2 drop off issue.


The document was released in 2011 and I just posted the document. Is this another document you going run away from?

Alan Phelps please read the document I just posted and not babble on and babble with false information.

Its not old news.

Page 20
Air Plane crash and smoke generator i.e Pentagon smoke generator.
http://documents.theblackvault.com/.../NRO911Simulation.pdf


Originally Reported on Sept 11th 2002
https://web.archive.org/web/20020911222515/http://boston.com/news/packages/sept11/anniversary/wire_stories/0903_plane_exercise.htm
  • Alan Phelps "This exercise had been going on for days"

    Yeah, the days prior were about shit like work place violence/shootings and the medical response to it. Sept. 11 was their small plane crash, which was cancelled.


    Either you are too stupid to read your own document or you are intentionally lying.
  • Dan Plesse Alan Phelps They never detailed what was cancelled. The small crash and fake plane parts, plus smoke machines were most likely at other locations. Most likely World Trade center and the Pentagon.
  • Jeffrey Harr Dan Plesse- You flatter yourself. In the world of actual evidence, not commenting on a document that hasn't been researched would be considered a good thing. I've never run from your posts, however, most are ridiculous and aren't worthy of a response. This particular one has some merit, in that it's based on an actual event. However, if you can't comprehend the difference between an exercise and real world, (and I know that you can't), you're subject to believe anything, which your sillier posts reflect.
  • Jeffrey Harr Jeremy is perpetually stuck on stupid. It's like a barking seal.
  • Jeffrey Harr My apologies to seals everywhere...
  • Dan Plesse Jeffrey Harr I recorded all your running and I am going to record this running bit too" document that hasn't been researched" whatever that means
    Dan Plesse " not commenting on a document that hasn't been researched" i.e running away again and as per normal.

    the other document Jeffrey had an issue with


    • Alan Phelps Or they cancelled it. Because they said they cancelled it.

      The document says right in there that it was to simulate a small aircraft falling out of the sky less than five miles from Dulles. Which, shocker I know, the NRO head quarters is about 4 m
      iles from Dulles.

      And then in the following article you posted they said it was cancelled.

      When will you stop lying? Or when will you learn reading comprehension?

      "It doesn't specify which was cancelled"

      Considering their simulation of a small aircraft falling from the sky about 4 or 5 minutes after takeoff and crashing into their building, and, as it says in the document, was scheduled for Sept 11-14, and is the last exercise listed on the document, AND them saying it was cancelled in an article ypu posted, it isnt very hard to see that the plane crash exercise was what was cancelled.
    • Dan Plesse Alan Phelps

      "1 Engine Pre-positioned in NRO Compound (Station 15 Asset)
      -In position no latter than 0915 Hrs

      Pentagon attack happened at 9:30 hrs
      Just now · Like
      Aircraft Crash Smoke Generator
      -
      Need to Notify DNRO of intention to evacuate building from
      0930-1030 on 11 Sept 2001


      • Dan Plesse Alan Phelps Does it matter if it was cancelled ? They still had the plane parts and smoke machine ready on 9/11 to go right? Parts and machines were purchased and ready for something.

        They just moved the cancelled program over a few miles.

  • Alan Phelps Im not off topic. Ive been asking you for a specific page number for these supposed plane parts since you abandoned your own thread about the document when I starting asking about it.
  • Alan Phelps The mentioning of engines is under "Fire Department Response" by the way.
  • Alan Phelps I refuse to think that Dan is actually this stupid. He is willingly and knowingly lying to people. "Fairfax Fire Department Response" and "Fairfax Fire Department Details" is, as far as I can see, the only mentionings of "engines" which when you arent a complete moron and read the sections, will know it is not aircraft engines, but about fire engines from Fairfax Fire Department.
  • Dan Plesse Searching the correct document yields results
    8 mins · Like


Saturday, June 28, 2014

9 11 meteorites don't match footprints of the box columns

9 11 meteorites don't match footprints of the box columns

The guns on the right are long gone!
LikeLike · ·

Dutch, Steven

2:16 PM (28 minutes ago)


to me
I don't know what you're trying to say with the LDEO reports, which I'm already familiar with. The first two M<1 events are the plane impacts. The second two M=2 events are the towers falling. That last M=0.6 event is probably WTC 7. What does this prove? What's the point of arrows to the UTC and EDT columns? UTC is Greenwich and EDT is Eastern Daylight. Of course they're several hours apart. So what?

The FBI screws up. Duh. How does that show the WTC was a conspiracy?

Like I said, you must have some first-hand experience that the world works this way. No, I do not care in the least that you personally read something. That's still second hand. Tell me something that you personally witnessed or experienced. Because I've asked this question a lot and so far I have zero responses. As far s I can tell so far, not a single person who believes in conspiracies has any first-hand experience to justify their beliefs. Not one.

I saw the video. So what? Tell me specifically, step by step, what that proves. The flashing lights are at the time of the fireball, not at the time of building collapse. So they have nothing at all to do with the collapse. And we know the buildings were hit by planes. BFD.

Steve Dutch

From: Dan Plesse [dan.plesse@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 6:55 PM
To: Dutch, Steven
Subject: Re: weeehhh

Nuclear explosion seismology Kim LDEO
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AGUFM.S11D..03K

"is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been."

B. THE PLOWSHARE PROGRAM

"Mere fact that the U.S. has developed atomic munitions suitable for use in demolition work. (58-8) "
http://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/rdd-7.html#I62

I said very clearly that LDEO or Kim refuses to give details to anyone. Those details were replaced by extra time zone columns. The Rumbling always started ahead of the collapse. Tom Canavan. Rumbling started then tower fell on him.
Another Witness South Tower Survivor South Facing No Plane seen. Tom Canavan
http://youtu.be/L6hO6xrFXx4

"epicenter data which was removed and replaced by extra time zone information"

South Tower: epicenter data should look like this
 Latitude:40.711044436950424 Longitude:-74.01313304901123

North Tower:
 Latitude:40.71207726282092, Longitude:-74.01320815086365

WTC building 7
 Latitude:40.71319952788825, Longitude:-74.01155591011047
  • Dan Plesse Its high temperature evidence and conclusive of temperatures beyond normal. Its called HTA arson evidence.
  • Ron Morales Only if there's evidence that it was actually molten rather than just impacted by pressure. Do you have evidence that it was actually molten Dan?
  • Dan Plesse "impacted by pressure" as I said was not possible because of the shielding of surrounding buildings and lack of objects large enough to impact.

    Also the largest object were box columns thus the shape of those foot prints would match the results. i.e the rocks would be a match the shape of the column which fell. None of these possibilities match up.
Dave McDougall Another moRon that thinks pressure can mould concrete
6 mins · Like
My email to Borovoye Geophysical Observatory. Maye they have something for us!
Dear Chaikinoy,
I have been writing to Columbia’s The Earth Institute for 9/11 details for a very long time and Won-Young Kim and all employees have been stonewalling. We also have this Lava Rocks on display in museums and found in World Trade Center 6, which all point to nuclear event.
http://s1222.photobucket.com/user/danp5648/media/lavarock.jpg.html

Columbia’s The Earth Institute duplicate and missing 9/11 data
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/06/size-of-911-wtc-seismic-summary-by-ldeo.html
Emails from Columbia
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/03/911-nuclear-explosion-seismology-and.html
I might have the 9/11 data files
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLb042a3p2X2VqYmM/edit?usp=sharing
but they need to loaded into specialized software program from the 90's.
American scientist might be under restrictions to talk about 9/11. I can't even find the event inside databases. Can you help?
This photo was uploaded by danp5648.
s1222.photobucket.com

  • Ron Morales No, the sign is someone's interpretation of that rock thing. There's no reason to assume it was written by a witness. Why do you assume that it was writteen by a witness? And where in it does it refer to "lava"?

    " Not a single scientific paper was wri
    ...See More
  • Dan Plesse The sign says "flowed like lava" and

    NIST FOIA: Leslie Robertson's Stanford Talk 2002 said he was taken aside and the lava or molten steel was pointed out as still running.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjmHqES_lto

    "We were down at B1 levels and little river of steel still flowing".

    Firefighter said "molten steel was running down the channel rails".

    The flows were recorded but hard to see.

    Play Video

    Les Robertson, in presentation at Stanford University, confirms that he saw a "r... See More


Search