Molten 9/11 Photos
APEX-17/17. This is an EMPI proprietary material similar to LAX-134
originally developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Its density is approximately 2.1 g/cm 3
originally developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Its density is approximately 2.1 g/cm 3
It is comprised of perfluoropolyether mixed with aluminum. In the EMPI APEX-17/17 formulation, the aluminum component of this material has been modified to increase reactivity.
No I don't think its about seeing things differently it just you can't seem to exempt the evidence right in front of you.. You see molten materials and you know what the requirements are.. You see the ball of fire in the photograph.. How did that happen?
Museums are great third party validation for anyone.. Beyond "two thousand degrees Fahrenheit"
"The museum hired specialists to perform forensic testing and analysis of two large composites and several smaller pieces that had broken off. Consequently, the museum conducted additional research, analyzing the heat levels that had created the fused material. Scientists determined that, at heat levels in excess of two thousand degrees Fahrenheit.. "
IF the heat was too high then its called arson or High Temperature Accelerant Fire..
"One factor that made the arsonist difficult to track and (also matches up with 9/11 because they both used the same accelerant ) was that he used a fuel of unknown origin; an accelerant that left behind no residue, called a "high temperature accelerant" or HTA. It generated temperatures between 5000 and 7000 degrees; three times hotter than a normal fire.
"WTC First 24 hours" even video taped an reaction by mistake carpeting? don't do this..
9/11 World Trade Center Red Gray Chips LAX-128 or LAX-134 https://youtu.be/5hZCfs_4pos
you have zero hard evidence while I have both photographs and lab results from third parties both showing temperatures beyond the normal..
|
|
1:57 AM (1 hour ago)
| |||
Mr. Plesse,
Thanks, interesting photos/exhibits. Dynamic loads/shocks, confined combustion/heat soak, thermal expansion, loss of material strength (against compression), and elastic waves all worked to shatter the buildings to pieces, which fell to the ground. An interesting sequence of mechanics/dynamics and thermodynamics that produced a massive human tragedy.
Regards,
On Nov 8, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Daniel M Plesse <danplesse@gmail.com> wrote:
Molten 9/11 Photos
<Melted.jpg>
<Lava911.jpg>
<9-11 Jet Fuel Did this Or Pressure.png>
<High Temp Arson two different displays 9-11.jpg>
<0883.jpg>
<Bush to streamline anti-terrorism fight.jpg>
<9-11 HTA Arson Evidence.jpg>
|
2:46 AM (1 hour ago)
| |||
Google HIGH TEMPERATURE ACCELERANT FIRES then word search pdf for "thermite"
HIGH TEMPERATURE ACCELERANT FIRES
http:// carmanfireinvestigations.com/ dl/%28Carman&Associates%29%20- %20High%20Temperature% 20Accelerant%20Fires.pdf
High Temperature Accelerant Arson—Revisited - ASTM International 1998
"how hot is a house fire"
The average house fire burns at a temperature of about 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit, which isn't hot enough to destroy most metals and earthly-made substances. And if an item is well-placed and small in size, its chances of survival increase drastically.
https://www.google.com/search? q=how+hot+is+a+house+fire&oq= how+hot+is+a+house+fire&aqs= chrome..69i57j0l5.11664j0j8& sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
No Lava, No Molten Steel Basement beams, no missing people, No photo of blasts
5 "further collapses" or bombs?
HIGH TEMPERATURE ACCELERANT FIRES
http://
High Temperature Accelerant Arson—Revisited - ASTM International 1998
and
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
"how hot is a house fire"The average house fire burns at a temperature of about 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit, which isn't hot enough to destroy most metals and earthly-made substances. And if an item is well-placed and small in size, its chances of survival increase drastically.
https://www.google.com/search?
No Lava, No Molten Steel Basement beams, no missing people, No photo of blasts
5 "further collapses" or bombs?
The Key to 9/11 is forensics.. Key forensic research elements include: Heat Levels, Dust Elements, Seismic Records, computer modeling.. ARCHITECT & ENGINEERs should look at ALL forensic elements or have someone else look a forensic spin off organization is therefore required i.e Forensics & Research for example .. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory conducted a cover up and hijacked the data like NIST.. Therefore these people need to be exposed just like University Of Fairbanks exposed NIST.. You can keep up the pressure..
http://www.ae911truth.org/contact-us.html