Wednesday, August 16, 2017

World Trade Center Clear Inside Job Drones, Explosives and Phone Call Data 2017


911TruthNOW 
1. 904-555-0004 is the number traced back to callers. It looks fake to me. if the data points to fake then deal with it. . Name calling will change the phone number. or its 555 nature.. You have done nothing to solve this problem or any of the problem below.. You attack only the messenger.. Weak.. 2. "then why does your Google map not match the FDNY’s maps???? You are showing bodies way off the maps they provided. " They DIDN"T NOT MAKE ANY MAPS.. They only collected data. Others made the maps.. Name calling will not change that. 2. "The FDNY map shows victims found no more than 500 feet from the edge of any tower…" I think they made zero maps.. Show your work .. 3. 3. Silverstein clearly said he made blue prints in 2000, NO Speculation, hearsay and conjecture. Money issue is off topic. 3. "Says Who?” MIT, Stanford, UCB, Carnegie Mellon…UAF didn’t even rank in the top 130…" Again, says who? and what does that have to do with their results which shows clear fraud on the part of NIST? Again you keep attacking the messenger and not the data.. The Data clearly says everything you need and you continuously avoid the data attack other objects like RANKINGS? Holy shit.. 4. No plane has a flight path that goes around the towers as seen on radar as beacon 1433 M3.. Name calling will not change the radar data or witnesses which you deny both. 5.. seismologist at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory wrote explosion therefore it does mean explosives from their distance of 20 miles yes it does and So does the body part maps show explosives.. The first Twin tower explosion DID NOT RECORD ANY EXPLOSION.. Eat that .. 6. Attacking the messager again and not the data..You left out Jeffery Farrer, why?


1. 904-555-0004 is a fact, deal with it! Data reported by DOJ and clearly documented traced calls from airphones http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2015/09/911-flight-11-and-flight-77-both.html 2. The body part maps all use the same data from the same source.. it's a fact deal with it! and the fire fighter parts flew 1,800 feet is some cases in all direction. You don't need an endorement..
http://beforeitsnews.com/9-11-and-ground-zero/2013/09/911-body-parts-map-2440282.html 9 11 Body Part Distance Tracking Database The Phoenix Unit FDNY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxTlMXOHoOo&t=0s 3. Larry Silverstein said he he got the blueprints for building 7.. The other bids could be for the complex or was fake. Larry Silverstein mispoke is false. Deal with it! 4. A Drone buzzing around two photographs and commented by witnesses. Deal with it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9bvvdf17kI 5. ” 'Local Explosion' written down on seismographic record” not 'early explosion' is clear and photographed in draft reports http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-hunt-for-911-catalogged-seismicity.html 6. "Mark Basile. How’s his report coming??????" Great ! WTC Nanothermite Mark Basile, Steven Jones, Jeffery Farrer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GgRZtEp3EOk


Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Did Report WTC Explosions But
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-hunt-for-911-catalogged-seismicity.html Only Two "Collapse" before 5:20 yet we have have this criminal activity. These as large signals, most likely deep in the earth but not deep as far as earthquakes go.. Those details were never given to the public.. and no one has asked questions about this.. 11:01:07 Further collapse 11:15:04 EDT, Further collapse 11:29:46 EDT, Further collapse Lamont-Doherty keep mistaking the EXPLOSIONS as unknown collapses when the towers were long gone. They Also say it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.". your basic criminal cover up..
Oldschooldan1 
911Twoof+ 1. Telephone numbers with the prefix 555 are widely used for fictitious telephone numbers in North American television shows, films, video games, and other media in order to prevent practical jokers and curious callers from bothering real people and organisations by telephoning numbers they see in works of fiction; generally, in North America, a number with 555 as a prefix will not connect to a real person. Not all numbers that begin with 555 are fictional—for example, 555-1212 is one of the standard numbers for directory assistance throughout the United States and Canada. In fact, only 555-0100 through 555-0199 are now specifically reserved for fictional use; the other numbers have been reserved for actual assignment. The entire 555 exchange is reserved in all overlay North American toll-free area codes (800, 844, 855, 866, 877, 888)[1] and in Canada's rarely used non-geographic area code 600. Area code 555 in the North American Numbering Plan is reserved for Directory Assistance applications. Aww poor Twoofer it looks like only 555-0100 through 555-0199 are fictional. I’m not attacking the messenger, I’m attacking your stupidty… 2. ”They DIDN"T NOT MAKE ANY MAPS.. They only collected data. Others made the maps” You linked to “5 maps” Here they are! http://wayback.archive.org/web/20141116162405/http://www.htmlpublish.com/convert-pdf-to-html/success.aspx?zip=DocStorage/3ee9f8cf3d084eb4bf0fa05415affc5d/NYCLAW_FOIL_WTC_Victim_Parts_Maps_Mar_03_2011-%25204.zip&app=pdf2word They all have the FDNY Phoenix Unit seal on them. These are the maps that YOU claim were used to make the Google map…WHY DON’T THEY MATCH????????? 3. ”Silverstein clearly said he made blue prints in 2000” He had been talking about events after 9/11 the whole time, he clearly misspoke. He also said immediately after, that construction started soon after. Is 2 years later soon??????? It kind of contradicts itself doesn’t????? 3 again??? Research being done by an engineering school ranked less than 130 in the country is not impressive. ”what does that have to do with their results which shows clear fraud on the part of NIST?” They haven’t released their results you idiot! And until it is released and has gone thru the peer review process they have NOTHING to stand on and neither do you. 4. ”No plane has a flight path that goes around the towers as seen on radar” Says who??? Do you think that just fucking maybe, because 2 rouge airliners crashed, that just fucking maybe, they altered the normal traffic pattern???? Critical thinking is not you specialty… 5. ”Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory wrote explosion therefore it does mean explosives” On what planet does explosion always  = explosives???? There was an explosion when the planes hit the bldgs. Does that mean there was explosives??? 6. I’m not attacking the messenger, I’m attacking you the idiot, who post easily debunked bullshit. You are guilty of spreading lies and dumbing down the masses with your nonsense…
911TruthNow YouTube 
555-0100 through 555-0199 are functional. This number is 0004 .. 0004 is below your range.. 904 is Florida Also I contacted the 555 Administration She has more bad news for you = Inside job http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2015/09/911-flight-11-and-flight-77-both.html So you tried to attack the data but I would go back name calling.. 2. "WHY DON’T THEY MATCH?? " They do match and the maps you provided are all cut off. You don't see the whole Island of manhatten are and you can't read the key.. So the google maps version is clearer.. Inside Job. 3. Silverstein talks about FIRST building design meeting in April 2000 however wiki and Silverstein both say "Construction began in 2002" No month given.. https://youtu.be/GKbLhkslNcQ?t=58m55s First design meeting in April 2000 and he is reading these statements from notes. His timeline was clear. = inside job. 3. "Research being done by an engineering school ranked less than 130 in the country is not impressive" Says who? Attacking the messenger.. The data model should be exactly the same program regardless of school.. "They haven’t released their results and has gone thru the peer review process" Its an open process, anyone can review the results. Peers are anyone now.. The results so far rules out FIRE so. I don't think FIRE THEORY is coming back? right? FIRE IS OUT! = Inside Job 4. "because 2 rouge airlines" DID NOT HAPPEN YET.. This was BEFORE the second plane.. Look at the photographs.. Photograph #1 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLdEx1dUxuQzFMMkE/view?usp=sharing Photograph #2 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE45bGZsVjQ/view?usp=sharing No plane has a flight path that goes around the towers as seen on radar"Says who?? Says the public radar information.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGcWaF5TtrA&t=110s One object is circling the south tower.. Again You have data problem.. 5. "On what planet does explosion always  = explosives.." When the explosion is large enough it means explosive.. again Inside Job.. they also wrote 11:01:07 Further collapse 11:15:04 EDT, Further collapse 11:29:46 EDT, Further collapse We know that "further Collapse" means explosives. These explosion are giants.. Some say BEYOND the numbers which are public.. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LEDO) Seismic researchers hint at even larger numbers for 9-11 http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2017/04/more-hints-of-bigger-then-reported-911.html Inside job
"The destructive energy of the January earthquake was magnitude 2.4, a minor earthquake. It was felt in Manhattan and Queens. Dr. Sykes said the twin tower collapses were slightly larger in destructive energy. "

What Dr. Sykes does not know is that the reported explosions were below 2.4 and not above. Here he says the magnitudes were above 2.4.. How much above 2.4 does Dr. Sykes believe is the real magnitude? that is the question..


Distance Body Part Map 9/11

Monday, August 7, 2017

World Trade Center Crime Scene Investigation

"Local explosion" was reported by someone.. Exactly who and why is unknown.

The seismic signals
1. were richer in low-frequency energy2. it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency
situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOlQn0TD1pY7R0kuAAYU0birt31jjzyUhepo7s2TIQchD-uukNNp6Yo9Q8Z0IaV_g?key=M1ozdjBZOGc1WERKandacF90akhyQXpVSUN4dGdR

911TruthNow YouTube dan.plesse@gmail.com

1:17 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Bret, Implosionworld., contact, brentb, brent, xie, jha, wykim, sykes, David
To: David Slesinger <davidslesinger@yahoo.com>, Bret Baier <special@foxnews.com>, "Implosionworld.com" <mail@implosionworld.com>, contact@implosionworld.com, brentb@protecservices.com, brent@implosionworld.com, xie@ldeo.columbia.edu, jha@ldeo.columbia.edu, wykim <wykim@ldeo.columbia.edu>, sykes@ldeo.columbia.edu
Cc:

"Local explosion" was reported by someone.. Exactly who and why is unknown.

The seismic signals
1. were richer in low-frequency energy2. it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergencysituation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOlQn0TD1pY7R0kuAAYU0birt31jjzyUhepo7s2TIQchD-uukNNp6Yo9Q8Z0IaV_g?key=M1ozdjBZOGc1WERKandacF90akhyQXpVSUN4dGdR




Search