The seismic signals
1. were richer in low-frequency energy2. it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency
situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOlQn0TD1pY7R0kuAAYU0birt31jjzyUhepo7s2TIQchD-uukNNp6Yo9Q8Z0IaV_g?key=M1ozdjBZOGc1WERKandacF90akhyQXpVSUN4dGdR
|
1:17 AM (0 minutes ago)
|
|
Cc:
"Local explosion" was reported by someone.. Exactly who and why is unknown.
The seismic signals
1. were richer in low-frequency energy2. it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergencysituation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.
https://photos.google.com/ share/ AF1QipOlQn0TD1pY7R0kuAAYU0birt 31jjzyUhepo7s2TIQchD- uukNNp6Yo9Q8Z0IaV_g?key= M1ozdjBZOGc1WERKandacF90akhyQX pVSUN4dGdR
The seismic signals
1. were richer in low-frequency energy2. it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergencysituation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.
https://photos.google.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment