Friday, August 18, 2017

Seismologist André Rousseau Says Explosives were used on September 11th

Dr. Rousseau is an expert on measurement of acoustic waves.

Rousseau says that the seismic waves measured on September 11th proves that the 3 buildings were brought down by controlled demolition. Specifically, in a new scientific article published by the Journal of 9/11 Studies, Rosseau writes:

The seismic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7. WTC SEED Data Zip


Seismic Evidence Implies Controlled Demolition on 9/11


Joe Cereola all those "9/11 Further collapses" are bombs right in your face "Further collapses" of what ? More buildings? No

they say they don't know or it was bombs 
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, in Palisades, N.Y;
" it is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been. "
André Rousseau is a Doctor of Geophysics and Geology, a former researcher in the French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS), who has published 50 papers on the relationships between the characteristics of progressive mechanical waves and geology.

André Rousseau videos

Reply
2
5 hrs
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse someone wrote "local explosion" and the conflicting graphs are public and so are the "further collapses" starting at 11:01:01 further collapse of what exactly at 11 O'clock Andy Campbell

Second collapse ML=2.3
11:01:07 Explosion reported 
11:15:04 EDT, Explosion reported 
11:29:46 EDT, Explosion reported
  • Seismic Station AMNH 5.15 miles away No 9/11 data Not listed
  • Seismic Station CPNY 6.15 miles away No 9/11 data No Graph
  • Seismic Station CNY 8.37 miles away No 9/11 data Not Listed
  • Seismic Station CUNY 10.19 miles away No data
  • Seismic Station FOR 12.51 .19 miles away No 9/11 data No Graph
  • Seismic Station MONJ 13.25 miles away No 9/11 data Not Listed
  • Seismic Station N61a 13.25 miles away No 9/11 data

Seismic Station PAL is 20.86 miles away YES 9/11 data

My question is how did Prof Kim manage to avoid all these other closer stations and pick the one station 20 miles away and what happened to thousands of other seismologist at these other locations seeing the explosions and opted to say silent for cash? Cash is king.. 24-hour Daily Display of LCSN Data The daily display for station FOR on 2001254 is not available right now, please check in later The daily display for station CPNY on 2001254 is not available right now, please check in later
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/LCSN/WebSeis/2001_NEIC_daily shows




911TruthNOW20 minutes ago (edited)
As I said before 904-555-0004 is a NON FUNCTIONAL number. If you bothered to look at details of all the calls NOT ALL CALLS Were 555 numbers, some were cell callsi.e 9-1-1 call for example. The father of one of the girls on flight 11 got the bill for Amy's collect calls.. NON functional means it was NOT used on 9/11 or any date.. You can make guesses but those are the facts.. No I don't believe your guesses are valid with regard to 555 numbers. They are just random nonsense.. Not worth any follow up research. But you ask GTE people if all calls were 904-555-0004 but you will not bother.

Zacarias Moussaoui never made the news during his arrest or after . Why is that? Zacarias Moussaoui also represented himself and could not read english well.. Charged with six conspiracy theories.. al Qaeda is known to be a fake organization .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVwj7tQ9cPw " asking too much or moving the goal posts to expect him to provide an explanation for what he thinks did happen. " You are still moving the goal post and he will provide an explosive explanation because that is only other explanation remaining.. I notice you are not coming up with alternatives are you? Why is that? You have to now, right? You are wrong on all facts and that is a fact..

Dr. James Millette ruled out flakes of red primer paint .. and iATL found "sub-micron aluminum iron" i.e thermite so a third party found the chip which James Millette even more fraudulent. He  or anyone did not address the video I provided.. You seem to avoiding that evidence.. Dr. James Millette. also did not do the same test as the video showed.. He did not repeat the tests as shown in the video.. So he can't say its not thermite.. Right? You have to do the SAME TESTS and then look at the results..  He failed to the basic test required..He avoid the only test that matters is heat until explosion and write down the temp..

"With regards to the sounds of explosions, you know as well as I that people can be mistaken about the cause of loud sharp noises"

I am addressing ONLY RECORDINGS and not people. If you can review the RECORDINGS we can't address your issue.. If you continue to avoid the explosive RECORDINGS and other videos I can't reply to your incorrect statements like a broken record.. Explosions were also record by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory as further collapses 11:01:07 Further collapse 11:15:04 EDT, Further collapse 11:29:46 EDT, Further collapse We know that "further Collapse" means explosives. These explosion are giants.. Some say BEYOND the numbers which are public.. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LEDO) Seismic researchers hint at even larger numbers for 9-11 http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2017/04/more-hints-of-bigger-then-reported-911.html

Show less
REPLY

Aaron Swirski "the massive explosion that caused the building to collapse. So it was something completely unforeseen, so far as the design criteria was (concerned)." cnn http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/12/wtc.architect.cnna/






911TruthNow YouTube 
555-0100 through 555-0199 are reserved for fictional use. This number is 0004 so its not "reserved for fictional use" " the other numbers have been reserved for actual assignment" So I contacted the 555 Administration She has more bad news for you = Inside job http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2015/09/911-flight-11-and-flight-77-both.html So you tried to attack the data but I would go back name calling.. 2. "WHY DON’T THEY MATCH?? " They do match and the maps you provided are all cut off. You don't see the whole Island of manhatten are and you can't read the key.. So the google maps version is clearer.. Inside Job. 3. Silverstein talks about building design April 2000 however wiki and Silverstein both say "Construction began in 2002" No month given.. https://youtu.be/GKbLhkslNcQ?t=58m55s First design meeting in April 2000 and he is reading these statements from notes. His timeline was clear. = inside job.

3. "Research being done by an engineering school ranked less than 130 in the country is not impressive" Says who? Attacking the messenger.. The data model should be exactly the same program regardless of school.. "They haven’t released their results and has gone thru the peer review process" Its an open process, anyone can review the results. Peers are anyone now.. The results so far rules out FIRE so. I don't think FIRE THEORY is coming back? right? FIRE IS OUT! = Inside Job 4. "because 2 rouge airlines" DID NOT HAPPEN YET.. This was BEFORE the second plane.. Look at the photographs.. Photograph #1 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLdEx1dUxuQzFMMkE/view?usp=sharing Photograph #2 https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE45bGZsVjQ/view?usp=sharing No plane has a flight path that goes around the towers as seen on radar"Says who?? Says the public radar information.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGcWaF5TtrA&t=110s One object is circling the south tower.. Again You have data problem.. 5. "On what planet does explosion always  = explosives.." When the explosion is large enough it means explosive.. again Inside Job.. they also wrote 11:01:07 Further collapse 11:15:04 EDT, Further collapse 11:29:46 EDT, Further collapse We know that "further Collapse" means explosives. These explosion are giants.. Some say BEYOND the numbers which are public.. Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (LEDO) Seismic researchers hint at even larger numbers for 9-11 http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2017/04/more-hints-of-bigger-then-reported-911.html Inside job
Oldschooldan1 
911TwoofNow+ 1. ” 555-0100 through 555-0199 are functional. This number is 0004 .. 0004 is below your range.. 904 is Florida” are FICTIONAL not functional, you retard, learn to read. “Reply (its not a yes or a no)” Funny how Nancy doesn’t answer this, she says to call her 2. ”They do match and the maps you provided are all cut off.” No moron, these are the maps YOU provided as proof on YOUR video. Where did they get the info to make the Google map??? Who is the source of the Google map and why does it not match the FDNY maps???? Why would the FDNY submit incomplete maps???? Are they involved with the deaths of over 300 of their own men???? According to you fucking idiots, Silverstein said the FDNY made the decision to “PULL”. 3. ”Silverstein talks about building design April 2000” He meant April 2002, he also stated that construction started soon after. Construction started May 7, 2002 if you had actually read the Wiki page you would have seen this. I would say 2 years later is not soon after, but 1 month certainly is. 4. ” The data model should be exactly the same program regardless of school” Unless they input improper data, which many are saying has already happened. Until they release their final paper and it is peer reviewed, you have nothing but speculation…. 5. ”This was BEFORE the second plane” So what??? So they diverted flights after the first one hit. ALL you have is speculation and conjecture. 6. ”When the explosion is large enough it means explosive” Bhahahaaaaaa….The stored potential energy within a single tower was 480,600 megajoules, that’s equivalent to 115 tons of TNT. How does that work for you???? You have nothing but speculation, conjecture and hearsay. If these are your strongest points for an inside job, you failed miserably…
911TruthNOW 
1. I did call her and she said the number was NOT FUNCTIONAL. Period.. Inside Job. You can also call her or email her and she will tell YOU the same thing.. Period.. Inside Job... What is your problem? Why didn't you call her? Chicken? Truth is truth.. Did the Phoenix Unit write any reports about the body parts? Nope. = Inside Job very clear The Medical Examiner reported to Newspapers that he was blown up, but over time that story went away.. Medical Examiner 9 11 Explosives Cover Up Body Part Map https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTZG238jH9k No report from the medical Examiner for any of the victims of 9/11.. 9/11 Evidence Walking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBBB2QNJZiE&t=2107s A Design meeting in April of 2002 sounds too late and fence around the site in May 2002 does not sound like a start to anything.. When was the other design meetings? 2. 1. My video only contains 911 Maps data who uses FOIA data https://911maps.wordpress.com/ down load the KML file or contact the creator yourself 2. Your maps are cut off and generalize too much and you can't use distance mapping tools so WHO SAID 500 feet? Nobody.. Who? Better Link to crap maps.. Why didn't they make KML file or a report? https://archive.org/details/NYCLAW_FOIL_WTC_Victim_Parts_Maps_Mar_03_2011 "Why would the FDNY submit incomplete maps?" inside job deal with it.. no report and bad maps. total cover up and criminal activity.. 3. "The construction phase of the new 7 World Trade Center began on May 7, 2002, with the installation of a fence around the construction site" A fence is NOT construction.. First design meeting could still be in 2000..read from notes "soon after the site was cleared of debris" debris? Should have been called evidence and the evidence clearing started on 9/11. too soon for zero victims.. Cover Up from start to finish. 4. " Unless they input improper data" Keyword is unless which is NOT True.. "many are saying has already happened." Says Who? People who don't like the fire fraud debunked? " peer reviewed final report" broken record.. Fire theory was stupid then and now proven stupid again in a peer review process.. Computer review has so far won our case and will never change and will never flip to your side period.. Inside Job NIST did simulate a BLAST.. What happen to that data? 5. ”This was BEFORE the second plane” So what???" So you did not see those details, what other details are you missing.. It was also basis of your stupid argument. The giant circle in the front of plane..Did you see that? I also provided radar data..photos and witness What happened to to that?.. What plane has theose details? None.. All planes have to log their flight path BEFORE takeoff.. Flight 11 went off course starting at 8:14.. " ALL you have is speculation and conjecture." I have photos, radar and witnesses.. Wrong again.. Deal with it.. 5. "the stored potential energy within a single tower was 480,600 megajoules" Clearly you can't see the timeline of reported explosions.. I keep posting them. You keep missing it.. Inside Job 11:01:07 Explosion 11:15:04 EDT, Explosion 11:29:46 EDT, Explosion The tower were long gone by this point.. So why are you even talking about the towers? Can you explain that? Silverstein said April 2000 and that was a written statement. Silverstein also confessed to Controlled Demo, but that film is missing.. History Channel Business has him confessing away..

Bill Rositi ? bill Rosati he was here when it all happened he saw it for himself bill if you can just tell us what you saw what you heard I was standing like two blocks away and all of sudden I just seen a big flash and then I seen the building coming down and I just seen people just running everywhere chaotic like first year ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo7zl62vNng






Distance Body Part Map Nov 6th 2001 

No comments:

Search