counterparts, the shape of these particles indicates they were molten at the time of their formation.
EDX analysis of these particles showed iron or iron oxide, albeit
with varying degrees of surface contamination from concrete dust. The Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel. It follows that these particles were heated to at least 1500 °C at the time of their formation. .
http://www.scientificmethod911.org/docs/WTC2_dust_sample.pdf surface contamination .from concrete dust of The Mn/Fe particles Shows The Mn/Fe particles were created at the time this photo was taken
World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel but will other controlled demolitions contain the same?
Bob Byron last time I talked to him, he was still working on a new mass distribution information for the load he tries to claim was there.....that was...two years ago.....he all but admitted his http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf is totally wrong. Shirt forget about Frank and his bizarre summary saying it was activity taken over 40 years ago given the particle's Mn/Fe ratio, small size and concentration in the sample he should ruled this out. He thinks its 40+ year old elements in the dust, I wonder if you can use carbon dating on those elements to find out for sure. Chris "When cement is pulverized tadah it's there" So the 40+ year old element fell into the cement mixers and then released because of why? Was any of these 40+ year old elements also found encased in concrete? Chances are NO! All this just to say the elements was not created on 9/11. The mental gymnastics is incredible.. The amount of 40+ years dust required at the start of the blast to then be dispersed and fall on a shirt as brown sand 1000 feet away was never estimated given the amount still on a shirt and the distance..
She seems motivated by hatred of the 9/11 Truth Movement
How does she know about thermite and why bring that up? She assumes that's reason for my interest. This is pure partisan language supporting the findings of governments, History Channel, and the Smithsonian
"the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel." is not from welding they because they use different materials designed for welding.. Then he says grinding operations..I wonder how many tons of 40 year elements would have to exist to fall on someone 1000 feet away..
"the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel. (It follows that these particles were heated to at least 1500 °C at the time of their formation.) 2732 degrees Fahrenheit at least.. but he is really talking about much higher temperatures then melting points. He should talking about is vaporized core columns, you know the photo with big yellow sphere in the middle you have been thinking about, yea that photo. zoom in and fest your eyes. So Vaporized steel google search says "Iron melts at 1538 °C and turns into a gas at 2862 °C. " So the core columns as a gas, flung out of the towers and onto a shirt 1,000 feet away. I am guessing the 1,001 feet cooled the core columns enough to land as brown sand between the threads of Christine Sakoutis shirt..Does not sound like jet Fuel to me boys. Stranger things have known to happen just not inside a scientific paper about Trade Center dust.. "
proof pos·i·tive
noun
- evidence taken to be final or absolute proof of the existence of something.
mrs.prknz23 hours ago
easier to clean up then giant heavy beams |
Undoubtedly the most intriguing particles found in the WTC 2 sample were the spherical magnetic particles. As with their glassy counterparts, the shape of these particles indicates they were molten at the time of their formation. EDX analysis of these particles shows they are iron or iron oxide, albeit with varying degrees of surface contamination from concrete dust. Furthermore, the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel. (It follows that these particles were heated to at least 1500 °C at the time of their formation.) 2732 degrees Fahrenheit at least.. but he is really talking about much higher temperatures then melting points. He should be talking about is actually the vaporizing core columns, you know the photo with big yellow sphere in the middle you have been thinking about, yea that photo. zoom in and fest your eyes. So Vaporized steel google search says "Iron melts at 1538 °C and turns into a gas at 2862 °C. " So the core columns as a gas, flung out of the towers and onto a shirt 1,000 feet away. I am guessing the 1,001 feet cooled the core columns enough to land as brown sand between the threads of Christine Sakoutis shirt..Does not sound like jet Fuel to me boys. Stranger things have known to happen just not inside a scientific paper about Trade Center dust..
easier to clean up then giant heavy beams |
Manganese or MN mixed with steel has something to with the core..
Frank Greening own results of 2732 degrees Fahrenheit contradict earlier statements i.e
"spherical particles observed in WTC dust were formed in the WTC fires – has been ruled out by considering the maximum temperature attained by the WTC concrete which was certainly less than 900 °C and therefore insufficient to melt, let alone sphericize "..
but other tests
"The museum hired specialists to perform forensic testing and analysis of two large composites and several smaller pieces that had broken off. Consequently, the museum conducted additional research, analyzing the heat levels that had created the fused material. Scientists determined that, at heat levels in excess of two thousand degrees Fahrenheit."
But what! There's more!
Time to change course Frank Shameless Greening 9-11 U-Turn time..
Fire tests carried out by NIST on reconstructed WTC workstations and floor assemblies, (see NIST NCSTAR 1-5B), showed that steel members reached a maximum temperature of only about 800 °C, which is well below the melting point of steel.
It is therefore suggested that the iron-rich spherical particles in the WTC 2 sample are from on-site cutting and grinding operations that were carried out during the construction of the Twin Towers
all fixed.. Holy crap, I hope they don't remember a few paragraphs ago...
It is therefore suggested by who ? Other people who didn't read the first half of your report about how it can't be on-site cutting and grinding operations??? Are people this stupid? We'll see.. He thinks so..
Here is review of three part U-turn in Yellow, white then blue.. Every part of 9/11 is like this.. 9/11 Insider trading, not a single name given but Sydney White said all the trades was from Israel..
Closer view of the fireball shows a brownish ring around a white center
HTML Color Picker says its this color
HTML code: | #A27C80 |
RGB code: | R: 162 G: 124 B: 128 |
HSV: | 353.68° 23.46% 63.53% |
PDF Meta Data
NIST Frank Greening debunked Video
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Last Seen
- 08-30-17 @ 09:10 PM
- Gender
- Posts
- 29
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Last Seen
- 08-30-17 @ 09:10 PM
- Gender
- Posts
- 29
- Join Date
- Aug 2017
- Last Seen
- 08-30-17 @ 09:10 PM
- Gender
- Posts
- 29
So, whether there was thermite used or not doesn't matter to me. The larger point is that the entire official narrative is false, contradicted by all the facts and evidence.
Aerosol Post Sept 11, 2001 Shows Silicon, Aluminum, Iron in the air
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv04JW5FfbE
| ||
9/11 Molten Sample FDNY Scott Schrimpe Sample Question On Facebook | https://photos.app.goo.gl/z0DczhuUgGB8f6c23 |
9/11 Molten Sample FDNY Scott Schrimpe Sample Question On Facebook
"It took roughly 25 minutes for Schrimpe to dig himself out of the debris. He immediately began assisting with the recovery effort. Schrimpe was a firefighter with Squad 41 in South Bronx, which lost six firefighters. He said that it wasn’t until later that afternoon that he realized members of his squad were missing,”We didn’t know where they were on the site. It wasn’t until two months later that we realized that they were in the South Tower, once they released the tapes. We found three of the six in March of 2002.” The other three were never found.
He assisted in the recovery effort until the day it was called off on May 28th, 2002."
https://photos.app.goo.gl/z0DczhuUgGB8f6c23
Holy crap Youtube is now locking up my videos as private.
"Hi 911TruthNOW,
At YouTube we want to make our site great for creators and viewers all over the world.
One of the ways we try and do this is by prohibiting the use of unrelated or misleading tags. Your video, New Never Before Seen Footage Of 9/11 Will Give You Chills, was identified as violating this policy, and because of that it has been locked as private.
To undo this change, please:
- Watch this video to learn more about YouTube’s policy on misleading metadata.
- Remove any unrelated or misleading tags from the “description” and “tag” sections of your video. (Here are some metadata tips.)
- Once you’ve made your changes, submit the video for review by clicking the “Locked as private [Appeal]” button in the Video Manager section of your channel. You can only file one appeal per video, so please be sure to review all the information above before submitting!
Once we review the video, we’ll contact you with the next steps.
Please note: this action has not resulted in a strike.
Thanks! - The YouTube Team"