 |
| disintegrated |
"She said the ambulance disintegrated."
Oral Histories All PDF's
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLcG13X0xNR3JuVHc/view?usp=sharing"Why are so many histories severely redacted?
1. Take Rene Davila for instance (File No: 9110075)-- almost ten pages of redacted testimony.
2. Take Ronald Coyne (File No: 9110395)-- about four pages of redactions.
3. Take John Coyle (File No: 9110406)-- a paragraph completely redacted."
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/11/why-so-many-redacted-911-wtc-oral.html
New York Court of Appeals heard oral argument in the matter of The New York Times Company v. City of New York Fire Department.
The New York Times Company v. City of New York Fire Department 2005 New York Court of Appeals
OVERALL, a very large percentage of these reports have major redactions.What are they hiding from us?? They aren't taking out gruesome descriptions, or reports of explosions-- because these are left in.They aren't taking out names.I can only imagine that mostly they are taking out the most highly incriminating testimony that tells of the towers being blown up-- quite possibly to all matters relating to nukes.
http://www.nycourts.gov/ctapps/decisions/mar05/13opn05.pdf
The appeal court ruled that the Fire Department would be given the opportunity to show the trial court portions of the oral histories that should not be disclosed because they would "cause serious pain or embarrassment to interviewees if they were disclosed."
Apparently the trial court ruled that many portions met that standard. We will never know what they said and why it would cause serious pain or embarrassment.
Page 15 of 22 of the opinion is where that was said.
Here's a paper on the case.
http://www.citylaw.org/studentcomments/Published%20Version.doc
The 911 calls and dispatch calls were also protected from full disclosure. If there had been a real investigation I could perhaps see this, but since local, state and federal law enforcement have not done real criminal investigations, and the people need the information to do what the authorities have failed to do, the ruling is wrong.
There's no telling what has been covered up but we have every reason to suspect that statements inconsistent with the official story would be redacted for that reason.
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
RICHARD ERDEY
Interview Date: October 10, 2001
Transcribed by Nancy
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
PARAMEDIC MARK HARRIS
Interview Date: October 11, 2001
Transcribed by Elisabeth F. Nason
Mark Harris
EMT EDWARD MARTINEZ
INTERVIEW DATE JANUARY 24 2002
TRANSCRIBED BY ELISABETH NASON page 6875
Page 833
G. ASAEDA Page 889
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
EMT PATRICIA ONDROVIC
Interview Date: October 1 1, 200 1
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
EMT STEPHEN HESS
Transcribed by Elisabeth F. Nason
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
EMT DULCE McCORVEY
Interview Date: October 3, 2001
Transcribed by Laurie A. Collins
https://archive.org/stream/911OralHistoryProject-AllTestimoniesInOneSearchablePdf/911truthFull#page/n155/mode/2up
EMT STEPHEN HESS
Transcribed by Elisabeth F. Nason
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW
EMT DULCE McCORVEY
Interview Date: October 3, 2001
Transcribed by Laurie A. Collins
https://archive.org/stream/911OralHistoryProject-AllTestimoniesInOneSearchablePdf/911truthFull#page/n155/mode/2up
1 comment:
It's obvious the alleged commercial flights weren't the planes we saw in NYC or the one witnesses saw at the Pentagon. The flight records of those commercial flights can be added to that list of evidence. The plane parts not matching said commercial planes are the best evidence of modified planes being used.
There were additional plane scares as there are airports in the area. The witnesses/survivors had no way of knowing how many planes there would be. Despite the "no fly zone" put in effect some flights had no choice but to land there as they were low of fuel. Especially transatlantic flights.
Post a Comment