Friday, April 25, 2014

The 9/11 World Trade Center one acre Floor scam


The 9/11 World Trade Center one acre Floor scam


 
Dear Larry Leeder You have duped and misdirected into focusing on the floors. First its NOT " why a one-acre,." its only 60 feet long and 30 feet long on the sides. The core area was different and DID NOT have this configuration. Only morons don't know about the WTC floor scam.

The main issue is the core columns NOT the stupid floors.

Please explain what happen to the core is the right question? Airplanes could not and evidence has shown that the "planes" attacked enough of the core columns to do anything.

Leslie Robertson "Central core started down first" 2002 Stranford
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CYF2EsaChU

Jim Gartenberg Core WTC 1 blown out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVLuH3Plr1k

The inner core connections cover up, Stairwell B missing for NIST 9/11 Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3GRKBhR6lw


Leslie Robertson "Central core started down first" 2002 Stranford 9/11 Widow & l... See More
Could a truther please explain, with calculations, why a one-acre, four-inch-thick slab of concrete falling 8-10 feet would not completely overwhelm the floor joists of the floor below.
I'll start you off: Average weight of a cubic foot of concrete is 150 lbs. Each floor was aprroximately one acre (43,560 square feet) and the floor slabs were four inches thick. 43,560 X .3333 = 14,520 cubic feet.
14,520 x 150 = 2,178,000 pounds. or, 1,089 tons. Each floor. Now, obviously, the openings for the elevator shafts, stairwells, etc. must be subtracted, but I'll let you carry on the work of refining the calculations, since it is, after all, your assertion. I just wanted to get it into your brain what a shit-ton of mass that is, on its own, not to mention all the furniture, walls, people etc, AS WELL AS the same mass duplicated from the floors above, falling one storey on to an identical slab secured to both the perimeter and core columns with 5/8" (.625") diameter bolts.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/floors.html


  • Larry Leeder Sorry, Dan Plesse. The Towers were about 200' on a side, and you haven't addressed the question.


    • Dan Plesse Nope 60 feet. The rest was core columns and inner connections which look like core columns but the inner connections were "T" shape while the core was box shape.
    • Larry Leeder So, you're saying the outside footprints of the Towers WEREN'T about two-hundred feet on a side? This is news the world should hear, because even truthers accept the size of the buildings.
    • Dan Plesse 60 feet out from the core column area.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_Trade_Center_Building_Design_with_Floor_and_Elevator_Arrangment.svg


6 comments:

Unknown said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Unknown said...

23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.

Unknown said...

20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed
with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.

Unknown said...

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.

Unknown said...

This looks like a professional disinformation agent (person or computer) at work here. Notice the use of several disinfomation tactics.

911Redpill said...

He is a new stupid shill on facebook. Thanks for the reminders.

Holy crap I can write a reply here! I just never did that and I am not sure why.

P.s the NTSB wrote back. A single link
i.e http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/process.html what dicks.

"
Aviation

Message: According to airframes.org it seems that its strange that the
NTSB did not have some kind of official report for the four flights

Graphic of their database and sheet shot of the comment is here.
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/2014/04/ntsb-official-report-fo
r-911.html

Does every flight that crashes get an "accident report"?
Was 9/11 Skipped ?


"http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/process.html"

*** THIS REQUEST FOR AN INFORMATION PRODUCT REQUIRES A RESPONSE ***

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - THIS E-MAIL TRANSMISSION MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY, SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT, AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IT IS FOR THE USE OF INTENDED RECIPIENTS ONLY. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the original sender immediately by forwarding what you received and then delete all copies of the correspondence and attachments from your computer system. Any use, distribution, or disclosure of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful."


Search