 |
| 9/11 thermite red grey chips? https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=22&v=wFEtOhI2X2c |
Death and rebirth sounds like a phoenix or Operation Phoenix 2001 9/11 version
"In Greek mythology, a phoenix or phenix (Greek: φοῖνιξ phoinix) is a long-lived bird that is cyclically regenerated or reborn. Associated with the sun, a phoenix obtains new life by arising from the ashes of its predecessor. The phoenix was subsequently adopted as a symbol in Early Christianity. While the phoenix typically dies by fire in most versions of the legend, there are less popular versions of the myth in which the mythical bird dies and simply decomposes before being born again"
Runway 69 TV Commercial rough cut
Silverstein is blackmailing Bush using dancing girls
The scale, scope and death and rebirth all covered inside the paperwork smoke cloud of foreknowledge, neatly packed inside rule bound lawyer loving ground lease agreement. A set of rules which I am sure no one bothered to read. I wonder if the Sears Willis Tower also includes these same alarming concerns?
The time enormous span of 99 year lease could have been key to uncontroversially installing the concept of a restart i.e the destruction and rebuilding of the the World Trade Center. Objects get old, time moves on and fresh paint and maintenance is always a basic concern, however did he go too far with his concerns? Did his insurance concerns point to some other unlikely event? Did he go too far in detailing exactly what to cover? Was the kicker or deal sweeter or did he dollar signs everywhere up and down the towers. It all makes sense to me now why such a enormous time span was included, it definitely bled into the going concern chapter of accounting and talk of doom unless something was done and soon. The white elephant had to go. The lease stated he had/has the right to re-build if something happened and the 99 year time frame made that concern more likely then a 5-10 year time span. The go go Clinton years and higher rents would never really happen for poor Silverstein. Letting go of the towers is one likely outcome of the overreach of greed and living in the past. Building on the bodies should have given most mortals cancer from guilt and shame. Not Lucky Larry.
 | ||||||
 | ||||||
| ||||||
| SACRED GROUND Produced by Nick Rosen Directed by Kevin Sim | ||||||
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sacred/etc/script.htmlLARRY SILVERSTEIN: Seven million square feet were occupied by the investment-grade tenants, who occupied large blocks of space, and in many instances, were paying rents that I felt were significantly below market. We saw an opportunity to significantly enhance the value of the properties. It was really the culminating transaction of my business career.
ROLAND BETTS, Chairman, Site Planning Committee: There's a lot of ego. Neither of them really wants to give an inch, and neither really wants to share. At one point, Larry Silverstein wanted to move the tall tower. That idea had to be defeated. Silverstein wanted to put another tower on top of the train station. Why? He could make more money, more rentable square feet. Well, that's not the plan we adopted, so we stuffed that.
LARRY SILVERSTEIN: It's my absolute right to choose the architects. I signed the ground lease. I have the obligation to pay the grounds. I have the obligation to rebuild. I have the obligation to collect the insurance, policy proceeds for purposes of rebuilding. Who's going to make the decisions? I've got to make them. No one else is equipped to make them. No one else can.
No comments:
Post a Comment