Friday, May 11, 2018

Jules Naudet is the First Documented Crisis Actor of September 11th.

Jules Naudet Reading "Ameican Airline"







Jules Naudet Relative to EWR Flight Path 
Jules Naudet Possible Viewing Options before building Obstruction NTSB has the Altitude between 10,000 and 3,000 feet  

Jules Naudet Possible Viewing Options


Jules Naudet Building Issue 3d


Sean Murtaugh says it was 737! 

Jules Naudet Reading 

NTSB Graphic still too high. 
Possibilities are two or more planes . One flying high and another flying low.. Another plane making 555 spoofed calls and yet another plane crashing at controlled locations with  functioning ELT's.  The black boxes are to be swapped later or to be gone missing. For example no trace of any of the four black boxes at WTC were found and yet two people reported them recovered. Also NY State documented that signals from black boxes are  functioning.. If the signals were found the boxes were fine. 

Jules Naudet is the First Documented Crisis Actor of September 11th... He does not say he witnessed a silver plane with red, white and blue stripe  or the red and blue AA's on tail or any details whatsoever but the an incorrect colorless logo of "American Airline" which should be just a red font  spelling of  "American".  Thank God one no has corrected him and thank God he has never bothered look at online photos of the plane in question to see if it matches up with what he witnessed. In order to be more convincing Jules digs a deeper hole for himself. In fact the hole digging started on 9/11 when he mistakenly told  FDNY Engine 7, Ladder1 on video details which are impossible given the location of logo, buildings, speed of the object and position of Naudet relative to plane's flight path according to EWR Radar. NTSB report is completely about the high flying plane and says nothing about flight 11 off course path beginning at 8:13. 

Jules is the most consistent plane witness of 9/11 at the World Trade Center. He is recorded across many video as reading "American Airlines" from the side of plane. He never adds the font color, the plane size or any paint scheme. His recall is dead on each time. 


The Reading  "American Airlines" by Jules Naudet has many problems and are as follows!

Video Example of the "reading" issue

http://time.com/collection-post/4476645/jules-naudet-beyond-9-11/

Problem #1. The logo is just  "American". not "American Airlines"
Problem #2 Logo is oddly on the upper curve of the plane and makes it impossible to see from the ground and at 12 degrees below. 
Problem #3 Plane was around 950-2000 feet up, primary radar last record it was 2,000 feet up at a distance of 10, 000 feet from the North Tower. NTSB has higher numbers
Problem #4 No one else made this claim of reading "American Airlines".
Problem #5 Jules was only 12 degrees to the right from the flight path.
Problem #6 Jules reports on 9/11 it was  "American Airlines" however the comment was deleted from the original video! No reason given at this time. 

(If CBS thought it was a problem, so should you!) Solution: Jules Knew 9/11 was going to happen. They got 10,000 dollars on 9/11 before the FBI could get the footage.. Another lucky break or conspiracy?

Why did Jules  make up this "READING American Airlines" story?  Because he had to explain how he knew and reason for blurting out "It was American Airlines" . He made up HOW he knew it was "American Airlines" in the worst way possible..by reading incorrectly the logo on the side.. 

 Why did Jules make this story up? He told the guys of Engine 7, Ladder1 on video and possible others. By saying it was  "American Airlines" and not just a plane, the cat is out of the bag and he knew too much. . He says it right on the original video https://youtu.be/_g3qsIbw_mQ?t=2m17s "Big one, looks like American Airlines" and then CBS deleted that exchange. It was then the creation of reading  "American Airlines." off the side of plane  as means of covering up knowing too much. 

The funny part is he didn't SEE anything else, just the impossible because that's what he said originally on video.. 

Naudet reading American Airline On 9-11 was impossible  

Naudet Brothers Plotted Against America

Naudet clearly shows his hand when he signals that he READ "American Airlines"  in interviews after 9/11 from on top of the plane, while the other brother denied basement level explosions. Naudet #2 Fixated on upper floors fires. The Plot to control the narrative to a jet fuel only source for all the damage does below the lobby area was on.  

at 17:00 he motions with his hand and fingers and makes it clear that he is reading in two parts "American" then "airline" while the logo is just "American" NOT "American Airlines". The Logo "American" is on top of the plane. He could not see "American" from his location which is street level.  So he lying and he was part of a plot to sell the idea of 8:14 flight path divergent "American Airlines" which no one witnessed but a few insiders . Witnesses saw a white plane, just like at all other locations. PA, DC etc. They edit out his original "America Airlines" comment from his own movie because they didn't know if that would gave away the plot and knowing too much to soon. They had GAMMA Press as their go between to sell their videos on the morning of 9/11 if they decide to become unknowns to the world. 

https://youtu.be/-eqRWOVA8BI


FIVE Red Flags Clues THe Naudet Brothers task was to Hijack and Mind Control 9/11 Events


World Trade Center Mechanical i.e support floors i.e basement levels had explosions which effected the lobby area.  Naudet unnaturally left this undocumented which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt their goal was to hijack and mind control away from all other areas of interest (bombs) which includes Building 7 and set the focus back on the standard  historical story line of Jet Fuel and Planes impact caused the twin towers to collapse.. This video is the only known 9/11 documentary which contains sold evidence of foreknowledge and Hijacking the true cause of the events of 9/11  without the possibility of excuses. 


FIVE Red Flags Clues THe Naudet Brothers task was to Hijack and Mind Control 9/11 Events

1. AA logo is on top of the plane making Naudet repeated comments of seeing "American Airline" impossible.
2.  American Airlines logo is just "American" not "American Airline" an error he keeps repeating. 
3. Selling of disaster tapes during the disaster and having an agent GAMMA Press likely contracted BEFORE.
4. Bombs in the Mechanical, support or B  ignored before Flight 11 impact 
5.  Ignored earthquakes before towers collapse.
6. No one else witnessed seeing Flight 11, a giant 767 silver plane on 9/11. 

Naudet Reading American Airline On 9-11 was impossible






Naudet reading American Airline On 9-11 was impossible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eqRWOVA8BI






Where does he say he READ "American Airlines"? He says he can see that it (the plane) is American Airlines, probably from the rather distinctive livery.




Jules Naudet READ American Airlines Logo Which is on TOP of Plane The video opens with audio and the same interview includes audio and video at 16:57 with him saying and motioning with his hand saying he READ "American Airlines"..off the side. Which one else witnessed and LOGO is just "American" https://youtu.be/-eqRWOVA8BI



911Truth Now1 So what? Radar proves it was Aa11




ELT's, stolen black boxes, 904-555-0004 phone calls from two planes. proves it was NOT AA11.. or the others..




911Truth Now1 How?









ELT are designed to go off. None did. End of story. 904-555-0004 can't connect to any phone , end of story. Naudet READ "american Airline" he could not do that. End of story. 2 sets Black Boxes were said to be found and then went missing FBI said they misplaced four black boxes and don't know were they are - end quote.. Dear FBI -Why is that?



Joe Plumber

911Truth Now1 >>>Jules Naudet was 2,800 feet below and 12 degrees to the right. Clearly He could NOT read "American" and "American Airlines" is NOT the logo. the "Airlines" part DOES NOT EXIST! ....................................................................................................... A brand new nutter theory emerges. Don't forget the other 10s of thousands of people who saw the AA plane hit the north tower. And somehow the 767 dove 2000 feet in 5 seconds to keep Naudet from seeing the livery. Idiot.

1

Joe Plumber

911Truth Now1 𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐢𝐬 𝐪𝐮𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨 𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 "𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬" He remembers it as saying American Airlines. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟏. 𝐈𝐭𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 "𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧". So what? It's one of those things that witnesses do all the time. He saw "American" and remembered it as "American Airlines". American has one of the more recognizable liverys of any airline. It is a sure thing that Naudet knew what he was looking at the moment he saw it. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟐 𝐋𝐨𝐠𝐨 𝐢𝐬 𝐨𝐝𝐝𝐥𝐲 𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐓𝐎𝐏 No, the logo is on the upper curve of the side. http://tinyurl.com/y8fcmw46 http://tinyurl.com/ycg7gbne http://tinyurl.com/ycokmnge 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟑 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝟗𝟓𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐮𝐩, 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐚𝐫 𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝟐,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐭. A 767 is a huge airplane and so is its graphics. You changed your original claim of altitude after I proved that it was bogus, yet 2000 feet isn't any more reasonable. The plane would have still had to dive 1250 feet in under 6 seconds. This is a 12,500 ft per min dive. I've never read any witness say the plane was in a steep dive before it hit. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟒 𝐍𝐨 𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦. ...that was documented. There is a piece of video out there with some people who identified the airplane by livery. I'm trying to track it down and I know, no vid no points. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟓 𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐨𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝟏𝟐 𝐝𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭. And the plane rolled to a 26 degree left bank before impact. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟔 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 "𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬" 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨! (𝐈𝐟 𝐂𝐁𝐒 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦, 𝐬𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮!) The actual question is, why? We see logos blurred out all the time on TV. Doesn't mean that coca cola proves it was an inside job. 𝐒𝐨𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐊𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝟗/𝟏𝟏 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐠𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧. 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐠𝐨𝐭 𝟏𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝟗/𝟏𝟏 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐁𝐈 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐞.. 𝐀𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐮𝐜𝐤𝐲 𝐛𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐤 𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐲? This is the most laughable theory in the history of laughable theories. I honestly should just delete all my rebuttals, because this crap will do far more damage to the brand than I could ever do alone. Even better, I'm going to document this whole mess and forward it to Jules so he can sue the shit out of you for defamation. Perhaps then you idiots will learn you cannot casually drag someones name through the mud with impunity.
Show less
1

911Truth Now1

1. "He remembers it as saying American Airlines." Answer: He never said "saying" "American Airlines" He says "I can read "American Airlines" on it So WRONG 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟏. 𝐈𝐭𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 "𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧". So what? Answer review above.. Reading BOTH Words is what he said, correct? . He could have just said "American" but no he says the whole thing "American Airlines" and he says the same thing each time.. Not "American" or "AA".. Just as said before. I was right then and I found the video. So Wrong 2. "No, the logo is on the upper curve of the side Answer The upper curve just means he could not see it from 950-2000 feet straight up. Again he couldn't do it. You are wrong.. http://tinyurl.com/y8fcmw46 Photo shows the correct colors http://tinyurl.com/ycg7gbne Photo shows the correct colors http://tinyurl.com/ycokmnge Photo shows a white plane. Wrong Colors See I was right again, you idiot.. 3. 𝟗𝟓𝟎-𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎 is a range, you idiot. Look up what "range" means! So Wrong 4. plane rolled to a 26 degree left bank before impact. Answer 1. 26 degree is still not enough bank. If you are 12 degrees to right and 950 - 2000 feet straight down.. 26 degrees is nothing.. and you are an idiot. 2. He didn't say the plane was banking and then read "american Airlines" 3. Radar does include things like turns or degrees left bank before impact. Shows a bank but after Naudet 3,910 feet from Tower distance.. 4. Typically airliners are limited to 25 degrees angle of bank 5. 𝟏𝟐 𝐝𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭. means he is right under it.. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟔 THE 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 "𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬" by Naudet 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨! (𝐈𝐟 𝐂𝐁𝐒 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦, 𝐬𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐲𝐨𝐮!) The actual question is, why? We see logos blurred out all the time on TV. Doesn't mean that coca cola proves it was an inside job. Your rebuttals are all stupid.. #6 THE 𝐒𝐞𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 "𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬" by Naudet 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐨! Answer #6 Naudet comments were editrf out NOT American Airlines logo you idiot!.. Another Example "Jules so he can sue the shit out of you for defamation." Answer: Jules is a public figure and my documentation of his actions is accurate. He made up "see American Airlines" because he had to explain how he knew. He made up HOW he knew it was "American Airlines" in the worst way possible..by reading incorrectly the logo WHY because that is WHAT HE SAID ON VIDEO on the date of 9/11.. Why did make it up? He told the guys of Engine 7, Ladder1 and possible other that it was "American Airlines" Cat is out of the bag. . He says it right on the original video https://youtu.be/_g3qsIbw_mQ?t=2m17s "Big one, looks like American Airlines" and then CBS deleted that exchange. It was then he had to backtrack..with reading "American Airlines." as means of knowing. What else could he say.
Show less

911Truth Now1

𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦 #𝟒 𝐍𝐨 𝐞𝐥𝐬𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦. ...that was documented. There is a piece of video out there with some people who identified the airplane by livery. I'm trying to track it down and I know, no vid no points. Answer: Remember they have to READ "America Airlines" you idiot..


Hide replies





David Chandler

1:00 AM (13 hours ago)
to me
The flaw I see in your premise is that the large AA logo on the tail could well be described by an
observer as the "American Airlines logo."  Also the tail, not the words above the windows are likely
 what was seen.

Daniel M Plesse danplesse@gmail.com

2:00 PM (1 minute ago)
to David, bcc: Matt, bcc: Matt
First I am not talking about any "observer" I am talking about Jules Naudet.. and his recordings on
9/11 and interviews after 9/11.. 

The flaw in your argument is Naudet was recorded as reading the words "american airline" off the plane
and not the Blue and Red AA logo on the tail. He repeats this statement of reading "American Airlines"
across interviews and exactly the same way each time for years. which is rare to get
such a constant statement from any individual, yet Jules Naudet manages this feat over and over again..

If you watched the videos I sent you all these concerns should have been clear. No other person has
brought this issue up because they might have actually watched the video.

No witness has ever said they witnessed blue and red AA at the World Trade Center, only a white
plane with blue and a red tail. White small plane is the most common statement. Again included in the
video. If they do say they saw "American Airline" they don't say why they believe so i.e via logos and
or paint scheme. 
Jules Naudet clearly only says he reading "American Airlines" off the airplane a stunt that
indicates foreknowledge, anticipation, premeditation and conspiracy.


Someone should petition for a mandamus order is made to compel a judicial or
government officer to perform a duty owed to the 
petitioner.

Only Mike Walter witnessed two red "AA's" at the pentagon.. Again they should be
Blue and Red..

David Chandler

12:45 AM (12 hours ago)
to me
Are you asserting that you find it remotely plausible that planes did not hit the towers?
Answer is: No you idiot

Daniel M Plesse danplesse@gmail.com

1:27 PM (1 minute ago)
to David

While

   1. four ELT's failed to trigger on 9/11 at WTC, PA, ETC
   2. No serial numbers on black boxes or plane parts where located.
   3. some parameters fields in FDR data columns failed to function.
   4. Originating 905-555-0004 phone calls from BOTH American 11 and American 77.
source UNSEEN JAW DROPPING - 911 THEY KNEW 2017 27:23
   5. Flight 175 was circling NYC according FAA records.
   6. NTSB "NOT INVOLVED IN INVESTIGATION" 9/12.2001
source UNSEEN JAW DROPPING - 911 THEY KNEW 2017 28:23
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PYUDMt3CBn2M/
   7. BTS shows no AA77 records
   8. United Flight 93 Cancel Date 09/28/2005  United Flight 175 Cancel Date 09/28/2005
   9. American Airline Work Order for phones removal 1/12/2001
   10. Clear enough photo showing other planes 
   11. Hand drawings showing other planes and other logos. source
https://www.bitchute.com/video/SZ0MswaArwKt/

EVIDENCE NAUDET VIDEO PROVES 9/11 CONSPIRACY FBI AGENT

https://www.bitchute.com/video/at5SqrWXhk9P/
No way Naudet saw  "American Airline" on 9/11 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eqRWOVA8BI

What I believe is derived from the archived record.

David Chandler

3:46 PM (1 hour ago)
to me
OK.  I've heard what you have to say.  We don't agree.  You an stop sending this stuff to
me now. 


1 comment:

911Redpill said...

9/11 Box Cutters Were Not Allowed
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2018/05/9-11-september-11th-box-cutters-were.html

Search