Are the still missing people still not enough evidence for explosives? Or is the body distance maps still not enough evidence that forces acted upon thousands of people to send them flying all the way to Battery Park and the Hudson River? Or what about late falling torso reported in the record Is that just another strange story to be dismissed?
| 9/11 A Raining Torso |
Are the people who heard explosives i.e Hans Kunnen not reasonable enough of a person to say what it sounded like and what happened to those sounds by the way? Do we not hear them on videos i.e 911 Eyewitness Hoboken TV and what happened to the seismic location data ? Why are they generalizing? The location data should show the true exact targets of 9/11! So the exact location of these events are very important.
911 Eyewitness Hoboken TV (Video 2005) - IMDb
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1016147/
911 Eyewitness Hoboken TV (Video 2005) - IMDb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ808QZjHxQHans Kunnen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJ808QZjHxQHans Kunnen
BRNJ Station matches up with PAL Station except for instance, an explosion so great it had to be deleted from the record.
What engineers say is Circular reasoning i.e is when you attempt to make an argument by beginning with an assumption that what you are trying to prove is already true.. They begin without including all the evidence or blocking all the good parts out and then say: well it got hot and fell down.
They don’t see or read reports of red powder falling from tower or see that it is running like reddish river from inside the tower but people do see it like Tad Hanc.
No comments:
Post a Comment