Warning the the David Durowiecki / Jim Mars cover could be edited |
Ryan Dawson is Judy Wood 2.0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYMEBV3b7dI
Says the debunking Thermite story exactly the same way as Judy Wood and I have video evidence.
I do bashing videos about Ryan Dawson. Case in point. This Guy Hans Kunnen totally undermines Ryan case and exposes him as part of the problem and solution. He is making another Judy Wood Cult against the bombs being all over the place. Smoke patterns Six black zones mark the placement clearly. I will blog about this problem and show the photo too there.
At the 2:36 minute mark and this guy has been talking all over world about this. Has A&E bothered to connect with him? The answer is i assume it is a "NO!"
Lots of people assumed or denied the WTC explosions because they were told is was the floors by other people who were working the room. But you don't see those people.
Listen to Hans Kunnen about the WTC explosions. Talk with him and find out more about why what heard and saw was not recorded or reported by the people around him.
Hans Kunnen
http://mpegmedia.abc.net.au/news/audio/am/201009/20100911-sam-03-aussie-911.mp3
FBI
After the 9/11 attacks, international investigations were launched into financial transactions that seemed to indicate foreknowledge about the coming catastrophe.1 For its part, a technology firm named Convar, located in Pirmasens, Germany, had been tasked by the U.S. Department of Defense to restore data on damaged hard drives gathered from the ruins of the destroyed WTC skyscrapers. These investigations stemmed from suspicious and untracked transactions – up to 100 million dollars – carried out using WTC computers right before the attack, pointing to foreknowledge of the total destruction of the evidence.
In what follows it will be demonstrated that Convar's investigations were followed and reported by global media in 2001–2002, and that in 2003 the FBI denied that they had ever been carried out. Pliantly, the media became silent about the investigations, and the 9/11 Commission did not mention them at all in its report.
FBI
After the 9/11 attacks, international investigations were launched into financial transactions that seemed to indicate foreknowledge about the coming catastrophe.1 For its part, a technology firm named Convar, located in Pirmasens, Germany, had been tasked by the U.S. Department of Defense to restore data on damaged hard drives gathered from the ruins of the destroyed WTC skyscrapers. These investigations stemmed from suspicious and untracked transactions – up to 100 million dollars – carried out using WTC computers right before the attack, pointing to foreknowledge of the total destruction of the evidence.
In what follows it will be demonstrated that Convar's investigations were followed and reported by global media in 2001–2002, and that in 2003 the FBI denied that they had ever been carried out. Pliantly, the media became silent about the investigations, and the 9/11 Commission did not mention them at all in its report.
The FBI's Denial
Fast forward to 2003, when the 9/11 Commission had a briefing about the 9/11 insider trading investigations with the FBI. The members of the Commission asked the FBI, perhaps somewhat leadingly, about
”persistent press reports that a [sic] certain damaged hard-drives had been recovered from the WTC site and sent to Germany, where a company was working to restore them. These press reports contend that large volumes of suspicious transactions flowed through computers housed in the WTC on the morning of 9/11 as part of some illicit but ill-defined effort to profit from the attacks”.11
In its briefing memorandum, the Commission states that the
”assembled [FBI] agents expressed no knowledge of the reported hard-drive recovery effort or the alleged scheme. Moreover, one of the New York agents pointed out, from personal experience, that everything at the WTC was pulverized to near power [sic], making it extremely unlikely that any hard-drives survived to the extent they [sic] data be recovered.”
Based on the FBI's statement, in its final report published in 2004, the Commission did not mention Convar's widely publicized WTC hard drive investigations. The topic was also never again addressed officially, and it was dropped from mainstream media reporting.
However, in September 10, 2006, the Dutch investigative program Zembla resurrected the issue by interviewing Convar's spokesperson, who replied that the company cannot give any further information but made ”creatively” clear that it sticks with its earlier reports. One of Convar's early press reports, from February 14, 2002, notes:
”In mid-November, CONVAR Deutschland started work on the recovery of data from hard disks from the World Trade Center and neighbouring buildings. The use of the latest techniques, the long experience of the German specialists and the high security standards of the Data Recovery Center in Germany led many US companies and state institutions to decide to entrust CONVAR with the recovery of sensitive data. (see. SAT1 video - On the Traces of 11th September / Galileo – FBI Investigators Waiting for Data)”12

According to the CNN article, some other companies were also involved in the WTC hard drive data recovery effort.13 I contacted via email the author of the article, Rick Pereira, who was unable to recall – due to the long time that had elapsed since his reporting – what these other companies were.
Convar is not shy about its WTC hard drive restoration assignment – see the introduction video on the company's main page.14 The U.S. Department of Defense is stated as the client of the operation here.15
Later Developments Contradicting the Commission's Conclusions
The 9/11 Commission famously stated that ”Ultimately the question [of who financed the 9/11 attacks] is of little practical significance” and that the financial transactions, suspicious on their face, had innocent explanations. The Commission also determined that their
”investigation has uncovered no credible evidence that any person in the United States gave the hijackers substantial financial assistance. Similarly, we have seen no evidence that any foreign government – or foreign government official – supplied any funding.”
16
In 2015, several congressmen have supported resolution HR 428 by representatives Walter Jones and Stephen Lynch, which upon passing would obligate President Obama to declassify the 28 redacted pages in the congressional 9/11 report from 2002. Congressmen who have been allowed to read the censored pages have testified that the pages describe the participation of ”specific foreign governments” in the attacks. In particular, leaks from the censored pages concern financial and other support by Saudi government officials living in the United States to the alleged hijackers.
17
Also contrary to the 9/11 Commission's conclusions, several more recent academic analyses have confirmed the original suspicions of trading with foreknowledge of the attacks. In 2006, California University Press published a peer-reviewed analysis by Allen Poteshman, Professor of Economics at Illinois University, about the put options placed on United and American Airlines. The study concludes that there is ”evidence of unusual option market activity in the days leading up to September 11 that is consistent with investors trading on advance knowledge of the attacks”.
18
In January 2010, a group of Swiss economics experts published a study
19 concluding that some investors had advance knowledge of the attacks in at least 13 stock trades, and in April of the same year an international group of economics experts demonstrated that just before the 9/11 attacks there was a spike in trade volume deviating from long-term trading volume, leading the researchers to conclude that some investors were acting on inside information about the coming catastrophic events.
20
In line with the ”forgotten” Convar investigations, these research results have not even been discussed in mainstream media, let alone inspired any well-funded or well-publicized investigative journalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment