Radiation World Trade Center Debate 2019

This is not normal demolition steel scrap," said Anantha Padmanabhan, executive director of Greenpeace India. "Just look at the circumstances in which the twin towers came down. High-temperature incineration

Shipments of Scrap and Stress

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2002-01-27-0201270268-story.html



 Dr. Andre Rousseau is a former researcher in geophysics and geology at the National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) said the earthquakes were do to explosives.

9/11 Free Fall 1/10/13-- Interview with Dr. Andre Rousseau

[PDF]

Were Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals Emitted ...

Gerry Edmondson

Admin · 19 hrs

Daniel M. Plesse I’ve removed you’re post about Nukes at the towers, read the group rules before you post again, and if you’re going to post something don’t slag off this group, like you just did. When you post something give an explanation about the post, rather than random memes, and expect everyone to guess what you’re talking about.

4Lou Napoli, Bill Lighthall and 2 others

34 Comments

Like

Comment

Comments

• 

  Daniel M. Plesse Memes? The graphic is seismic graph for 9/11.
  Everyone should know what seismic graph for 9/11 looks like Gerry Edmondson.…See More

  

  1

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 18h
  •  · Edited
• 

  Daniel M. Plesse This is BRNJ

  

  1

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 18h
• 

  Daniel M. Plesse All I said was: this group deletes material that publicly posted at Harvard University .. No memes. just data.. public data ..

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 18h
  •  · Edited
  • 

    Gerry Edmondson Daniel M. Plesse you said this group deletes posts about nukes showing your graphs as if to say Harvard university says there where nukes used ,

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 12h
  • 

    Daniel M. Plesse Gerry Edmondson The graphic itself shows this and you should take the graph to someone for confirmation and NOT delete these things. Why aren't you doing that is another issue. That is the reason for all my post. Is to get confirmation from outside sources if need be..

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 8m
• 

  Lou Napoli Nukes at WTC makes no sense.

  1

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 17h
  • 

    Lou Napoli Jon Thomas
    
    It makes no sense due to the fact that you had people actually surviving the South tower collapsing at lower level floors. How could they have survived a mini nuke explosion.

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 16h
• 

  Chris Mahony I always wonder about mini nukes because the high cancer rate in survivors and firemen

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 16h
• 

  Nicholas George Nukes are fake

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 15h
  • 

    Justin Haywood Nicholas George tell that to Japan

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 14h
  • 

    Nicholas George Justin Haywood
    My dad moved to Nagasaki when he was 12 years old. He was there less than 18 months after the supposed nuclear fission devices went off. His CIA father was tasked with propagandizing the Japanese so that they no longer believe that the…See More

    1

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · 14h
    •  · Edited

  
  

  View 14 more replies
• 

  Jesse Brunner How can you call this a 911 truth group if you don't 'do' no planes at the WTC? Even if you haven't researched deep enough to where you understand this to be true you still are censoring content which means this is just another controlled opposition gr…See More

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 9h
• 

  Gerry Edmondson Jesse Brunner has left the building!!!

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 8h
• 

  Gerry Edmondson Right listen Daniel Daniel M. Plesse you posted saying Harvard is saying there was a nuclear strike at the wtc , that’s wrong and misleading.

  

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 8h
  •  · Edited
  • 

    Daniel M. Plesse Gerry Edmondson What I said was. Things that are posted at Harvard aren't censored. What they did say was they have NO IDEA WHAT HAPPENED on 9/11.
    
    “Nuclear explosion seismology, 7260 Theory and modeling“
    
    “It is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been.”
    
    http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AGUFM.S11D..03K
    
    No truth members has made this an issue and you have to wonder why that is.
    
    and You have to wonder why they can't seem to come to answer while telling the public that the signals were do falling buildings and airplane impacts.
    
    Also look at this link
    "http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/.../urban-earthquakes..." they are adding nuclear bombs and 911 to their URL's
    
    and the link above stopped working the moment I posted it on facebook..

    ADSABS.HARVARD.EDU

    Seismic Waves Generated by Aircraft Impacts and Building Collapses at World Trad

    Seismic Waves Generated by Aircraft Impacts and Building Collapses at World Trad

    
    

    • Like
    •  · Reply
    •  · Remove Preview
    •  · 16m

Debate Link

Molten World Trade Center Example

Tarik Alsafi

Original Author · 13h ago

“Your own expert doesn’t mention anything about radiation either”

What “expert” what are you talking about?

The point about India was the people were getting sick issue.

“ WTC Scrap Is Hazardous, Activists Say; Asia: Greenpeace complains that the metal is contaminated and endangering recyclers in India.”

Lets stick to this issues at hand.
911 Radiation Poisoning Ground Zero Indira Singh 2005
https://youtu.be/U35CcmmQtv8

Toxicology Exam Shows Radiation Poisoning

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiGbbkSZ2BQ

Yes the Jet Fuel part was dropped because you can’t incinerate steel with jet fuel. You can’t even soften steel until you hit 1,600 degrees via Dr. Astaneh-Asl a real expert who witnessed incinerated steel. i.e

https://youtu.be/PcXUmNxEsI0 You can see the reporter pushing for softening and undermining his incriminating statement.
Another quote you can look up.
"Dr. Astaneh-Asl also hopes to send samples of steel to Dr. Claudia P. Ostertag, a professor of civil engineering at Berkeley, for metallurgical testing. Above about 1,600 degrees Fahrenheit, the crystal structure of steel shifts to a softer, weaker form."


“Your own expert “?? The executive director of Greenpeace India is NOT an expert. He is more like tree loving hippie.
“There is every possibility that high levels of toxins are in the debris”

I don’t think the toxins were inside the steel on on the steel. Do you think the toxins survived the travel to India outside in the rain traveling across the sea in an open barge.
A visual of a scrape steel barge
Scrap Metal Barge Goes Up in Flames
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hy41BiD7y3I

Tarik Alsafi

Original Author · Sun

Dan you can’t deliberately misquote someone because it doesn’t conform with your version of reality. If you don’t like the quote then you don’t use the quote ! You have been exposed. No one can trust anything else you post. You have lost the debate.

Reply

Upvote

Dan Plesse

Just now

I did not deliberately do anything. I was quoting from my own source which must have subtracted the “Jet fuel” part but all the rest validates 9/11 truth. The quote talks about incineration of steel. A fact hidden by the media.

You have to agree the quote of Jet Fuel Melting steel beams can’t be correct. Therefore your reaction should be that you agree with the edit not that it was a misquote.

Also the fact of molten steel at the World Trade Center has been validated by Greenpeace India.

Reply

This comment has been deleted · 21h ago

Tarik Alsafi

Original Author · 6h ago

Dan Plesse

Just now

“Dan you can’t deliberately misquote someone because it doesn’t conform with your version of reality” WHAT? This means you believe Jet Fuel CAN melt WTC Steel? THis is not reality this is what morons believe and you have been exposed. Good luck with your moron ideas.

Reply