Saturday, November 30, 2013

2017 World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel

counterparts, the shape of these particles indicates they were  molten at the time of their formation. 
EDX analysis of these particles showed iron or iron oxide, albeit 
with varying degrees of surface contamination from concrete dust. The Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel. It follows that these particles were heated to at least 1500 °C at the time of their formation. . 

http://www.scientificmethod911.org/docs/WTC2_dust_sample.pdf surface contamination .from concrete dust of The Mn/Fe particles Shows The Mn/Fe particles were created at the time this photo was taken 



World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel but will other controlled demolitions contain the same?

2017 World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel but will other controlled demolitions contain the same contents? If not then this means the World Trade Center is beyond even Military Controlled Demolitions. 

Sam Haschets Daniel M. Plesse Plasco was just fire damage, no evidence of explosives, the fact you see flashes just shows what fire can do in a collapse

Reply10 hrs
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse Wrong Again Sam Haschets video of other collapses have never shown these flashes and dust collected from all other controlled demolition excises will never show the core infrastructure as nano particles on clothing or any location those dust samples are tested .. Frank Greening has done it again and almost matched NIST's BIGGEST LIE Yet "its contract with the finite elements analysis subcontractor was now terminated" and can't develop "visualizations of global structural collapse" which should have been the main goal from the beginning. So what the hell were they doing over there without software and only 1 percent of World Trade Core column infrastructure ? If the answer is watching porn, I would believe it.


Reply1 minEdited
World Trade Dust Study: Shirt Has WTC Structural Steel but will other
controlled demolitions contain the same?

Bob Byron last time I talked to him, he was still working on a new mass distribution information for the load he tries to claim was there.....that was...two years ago.....

he all but admitted his http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf is totally wrong.
Shirt forget about Frank and his bizarre summary saying it was activity taken over 40 years ago given the particle's
Mn/Fe ratio, small size and concentration in the sample he should ruled this out. He thinks its 40+ year old elements in the dust, I wonder if you can use carbon dating on those elements to find out for sure. Chris "When cement is pulverized tadah it's there" So the 40+ year old element fell into the cement mixers and then released because of why? Was any of these 40+ year old elements also found encased in concrete? Chances are NO!  All this just to say the elements was not created on 9/11. The mental gymnastics is incredible.. The amount of 40+ years dust required at the start of the blast to then be dispersed and fall on a shirt as brown sand 1000 feet away was never estimated given the amount still on a shirt and the distance..

She seems motivated by hatred of the 9/11 Truth Movement
I spoke to Greening. We are considering a 3rd party to receive a sample. Yes I have more sample. I found Greening when I saw him on a 9/11 documentary saying he wished he had a sample. So being I had dust I contacted him. Given truthers have such a dedicated agenda we think it's best if there was a 3rd party. The samples you guys cite have origins outside the affected 9/11 dust range. That's weird.

At no time does Frank any video ask for a dust sample https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcO6m_z83LI your story does not seem to pan out

You need to stop. This is becoming pathological on your part. Greening and I went into this with open minds. In fact he says he would have been excited to find thermite. But he didn't. You need to accept his finding. You cannot change it no matter how much you whine like a mule. Now stop.
How does she know about thermite and why bring that up? She assumes that's reason for my interest. This is pure partisan language supporting the findings of governments, History Channel, and the Smithsonian
Leave me alone. I don't care what you think. You are a nut case.


Chris Anastasy Whatever freak. You weren't there. You have no degree. Greening is a billion times more qualified than you ever could even imagine. Yanno being he's a chemist, a professor, a PHD and you are nothing.

Reply12 minsEdited
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse Clearly he is against the idea of core super heating on 9/11 and he clearly states its NOT his opinion but "therefore suggested" which means he is a coward and a loser and a traitor to this country..

ReplyJust nowEdited
Chris Anastasy He's from Canada you moron

Reply9 mins
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse Traitor to mankind then

Reply6 mins
Manage
Chris Anastasy Whatever. As I told you during your endless barage of harassing messages: SEEK HELP.

Reply4 mins
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse You are writing to me you moron.. You seek help..

Reply4 mins
Manage
Chris Anastasy Disputing your foolish, erroneous statements is not "writing to you". Don't flatter yourself.

Reply3 mins
Remove
Daniel M. Plesse Responding with "freak", "seek help" is not disputing anything.. You have never been on topic.. just name calling. which is embarrassing for an adult.. You should feel ashamed of yourself.

ReplyJust now
Daniel M. Plesse  I had to fix my blog too.. His last paper in August 2017 summary says or "some suggest" that mn/iron core column particle were formed 40+ year ago.. My question to you is Bob Byron wouldn't oxidation destroy these nano particles and turn them into pure iron oxide? And I don't think there is any dating method to determine the true birth date as being 9/11/2001 via the degree of oxide if any on the these small particles.. Your thoughts..

LikeShow more reactions
ReplyJust nowEdited
Manage
Bob Byron Daniel.....you are talking WAY above what I can tell you....Im just a builder whom knows fire and gravity did not do what we see.

all I can add is why would this happen only on 9-11 to those core columns and never once the culprit in any other incident from fire prevention history?
"the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel." is not from welding they because they use different materials designed for welding.. Then he says grinding operations..I wonder how many tons of 40 year elements would have to exist to fall on someone 1000 feet away..
"the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel. (It follows that these particles were heated to at least 1500 °C at the time of their formation.) 2732 degrees Fahrenheit at least.. but he is really talking about much higher temperatures then melting points. He should talking about is vaporized core columns, you know the photo with big yellow sphere in the middle you have been thinking about, yea that photo. zoom in and fest your eyes. So Vaporized steel google search says "Iron melts at 1538 °C and turns into a gas at 2862 °C. " So the core columns as a gas, flung out of the towers and onto a shirt 1,000 feet away. I am guessing the 1,001 feet cooled the core columns enough to land as brown sand between the threads of Christine Sakoutis shirt..Does not sound like jet Fuel to me boys. Stranger things have known to happen just not inside a scientific paper about Trade Center dust.. " 
proof pos·i·tive 
noun
  1. evidence taken to be final or absolute proof of the existence of something.

    Chat Conversation Start
    1 mutual friend: Stuart Crosbie
    Lives in North Pole, Alaska

    1. Do you have any more sand samples? 2. Did You find Greening or did he find you? 3. Greening knows about other Red Grey chips reports and you can see them in his report.. He knows about giant flash photos and I have sent him a copies for years and he is Nuke Guy and so is Dr. Won-Young Kim of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, so you figure all of this would be included in his report but no he actively avoids the chips, the fireballs and comes to unique conclusion which validates the truth more then other report so far has and key phrase is "the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel." So 1000 feet away a giant flash is photographed with brown circle around it and white in the middle.. The key finding AND the photograph has to be showing the core columns being process into your sand sample. I don't know if you can process this but the next step is finding what can do that and it is NOT JET FUEL..
    👎1

    Chris Anastasy accepted your request.

    I spoke to Greening. We are considering a 3rd party to receive a sample. Yes I have more sample. I found Greening when I saw him on a 9/11 documentary saying he wished he had a sample. So being I had dust I contacted him. Given truthers have such a dedicated agenda we think it's best if there was a 3rd party. The samples you guys cite have origins outside the affected 9/11 dust range. That's weird.
    Only 1 sample cited is within the affected area. The other 3 are not.
    Do you understand what this means ""the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel."?
    Sure do.
    His conclusion is that in the process of welding the iron, those particles were formed
    Steel etc
    He researched a dust sample and wrote of his findings. Why is that freaking you out so much?
    Yeah he says you're wrong
    Who says?
    He does.
    Your shirt was locked away right?
    It's in the report.
    Yes or no please
    What do you mean by locked away? In a va ult?
    Free from contamination as the first paragraph in the report says..
    When I changed out of my clothes I put it in a plastic bag and there it sat. Sure as hell has better providence than samples you guys used.
    So the answer is yes?
    The dust was from the collapse of the first tower only. After being covered in dust I left the area and eventually was able to change. So yes.
    So how can it welding the iron operations 20 or more years ago ? He said therefore "suggested" by who?
    Because after welding the re is no mop crew to mop it up. The fragments remain. When cement is pulverized tadah it's there
    How can be welding and iron operations of 20 or more years ago just to get out of saying it did not happened during the creation of the fireballs on 9/11?
    again who says welders created the dust? Welding creating molten welding materials not the same materials as the core columns anyway..
    welders don't use MN/Iron radio the same as core columns
    You guys are NOT welders period..
    He is an expert in this field. PHD and everything. He routinely does chemical analysis. Don't you think it's rather silly of you, who is not an academic to question his finding? This is what he thinks. Deal with it. I'm not going to forever debate something already explained to you. His conclusion is that it's from welding. That's his professional opinion.
    He is NOT a welder. Never spoke to welder and he has no idea what he is talking about..
    Ok. Believe what you want. Frankly my dear I don't give a damn.
    his bio says nuclear whistle-blower..
    Go talk to iron worker ..
    I already know the truth so why would I?
    They don't use the same ratio .. period sorry..
    Ok whatever Mr no degree
    You don't need to use the same materials..
    I weld so I know ...
    Good for you.
    the dust is NOT 40 years old
    No but elements within it apparently are
    apparently he didn't carbon date those elements?
    I wonder how many tons of 40 year elements would have to exist to fall on someone 1000 feet away..
    extrapolating consentrations in the dust and walking back to source how many tons?
    You need to stop. This is becoming pathological on your part. Greening and I went into this with open minds. In fact he says he would have been excited to find thermite. But he didn't. You need to accept his finding. You cannot change it no matter how much you whine like a mule. Now stop.
    He did not carbon date correct?
    You stop
    I'm done. I don't feel well from my chemo.
    I have the photos which you deny
    open minds my ass ..
    Was any of these 40+ year old elements also found encased in concrete?
    . The amount of 40+ years dust required at the start to then be disperse and fall in on a shirt as brown sand 1000 feet away was never estimated?
    Seek help.
    open mind?
    I'm done with you for today. Have other things to do.
    your behavior is like 2 year old.. name calling "seek help" etc too bad you can't past my questions or the photo..
    I'm having dinner with my husband. Either stop harassing me or get blocked.
    block away, works for me go name call other people on your list..


Leslie Crofford The local EPA office sidelined the regional EPA office. Dr. Cate Jenkins, a whistle-blower EPA scientist, said that on September 12, 2001, a regional EPA office offered to dispatch 30 to 40 electron microscopes to the WTC PIT to test bulk dust samples for the presence of asbestos fibers. Instead, the local office chose the less effective polarized light microscopy testing method. Dr. Jenkins alleged that the local office refused, saying, "We don't want you f—ing cowboys here. The best thing they could do is reassign you to Alaska."" wikipedia This is a little off topic....All these dust studies weren't done in the PIT. Notice the word "PIT" next time bunkers want to argue with me that there wasn't craters or pits that the WTC were sitting in.https://en.wikipedia.org/.../Health_effects_arising_from...

There has been growing concern over the health…
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG

Reply
1
5 hrs
Remove
Bryan Boden Our current establishment Puppet Rod Rosenstein head of the DOJ is part of the problem. He hired Muller to investigate because he is the Puppet that has a proven record of burying the truth like he did on the 911 investigation. tRump needs him out next if he is going to truly drain the Swamp.

LikeShow more reactions
Reply48 minsEdited
Remove

Daniel M. Plesse Bryan Boden Frank Greening is not Conspiracy theorist and no Conspiracy Theorist are NOT using their Brains and the can't even read Frank's report or any report or see photos or videos which have always been validating their claims the whole time.. Case in point.. The "further collapses seismic signals " and missing seismic attributes have always meant further explosions and cover up.. All these report have always been clear as day wins for 9/11 Truth .. I guess if no media outlet covers this, it will as dead as dead can be and the zombies will head to the next shooting headline..


mrs.prknz

911TruthNOW This channel and yours are the BEST 9-11 Channels on YouTube. Most in depth and informative...



911TruthNOW

This celebrity obsessive compulsive disorder taken over ALL news and "the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel." lacks sex, porn, celebrities etc http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2013/11/911-molten-steel-debunked-think-again.html will be covered, known about or understood in a society who has gone to hell..

easier to clean up then giant heavy beams

Undoubtedly the most intriguing particles found in the WTC 2 sample were the spherical magnetic particles. As with their glassy counterparts, the shape of these particles indicates they were molten at the time of their formation. EDX analysis of these particles shows they are iron or iron oxide, albeit with varying degrees of surface contamination from concrete dust. Furthermore, the Mn/Fe ratio for these particles is consistent with WTC structural steel. (It follows that these particles were heated to at least 1500 °C at the time of their formation.)  2732 degrees Fahrenheit at least.. but he is really talking about much higher temperatures then melting points. He should be talking about is actually the vaporizing core columns, you know the photo with big yellow sphere in the middle you have been thinking about, yea that photo.  zoom in and fest your eyes. So Vaporized steel google search says  "Iron melts at 1538 °C and turns into a gas at 2862 °C. " So the core columns as a gas, flung out of the towers and onto a shirt 1,000 feet away. I am guessing the 1,001 feet cooled the core columns enough to land as brown sand between the threads of Christine Sakoutis shirt..Does not sound like jet Fuel to me boys. Stranger things have known to happen just not inside a scientific paper about Trade Center dust.. 

easier to clean up then giant heavy beams
If I was a military guy and someone said here's what your towers will look like after we're done, I'd say Operation Phoenix Approved !!!

 Manganese or MN mixed with steel has something to with the core.. 

Frank Greening own results of 
2732 degrees Fahrenheit contradict earlier statements i.e

"spherical particles observed in WTC dust were formed in the WTC fires  – has been ruled out by considering the maximum temperature attained by the WTC concrete which was certainly less than 900 °C and therefore insufficient to melt, let alone sphericize ".. 

but other tests

"The museum hired specialists to perform forensic testing and analysis of two large composites and several smaller pieces that had broken off. Consequently, the museum conducted additional research, analyzing the heat levels that had created the fused material. Scientists determined that, at heat levels in excess of two thousand degrees Fahrenheit."

But what! There's more!

Time to change course Frank Shameless Greening 9-11 U-Turn time..  

Fire tests carried out by NIST on reconstructed WTC workstations and floor assemblies, (see NIST NCSTAR 1-5B), showed that steel members reached a maximum temperature of only about 800 °C, which is well below the melting point of steel. 

It is therefore suggested that the iron-rich spherical particles in the WTC 2 sample are from on-site cutting and grinding operations that were carried out  during the construction of the Twin Towers 

all fixed.. Holy crap, I hope they don't remember a few paragraphs ago... 

 It is therefore suggested by who ? Other people who didn't read the first half of your report about how it can't be on-site cutting and grinding operations??? Are people this stupid? We'll see.. He thinks so.. 


Here is review of three part U-turn in Yellow, white then blue.. Every part of 9/11 is like this.. 9/11 Insider trading, not a single name given but Sydney White said all the trades was from Israel..


   Now using "Characterization of a World Trade Center Dust Sample" we can link said 1001 foot away  fireball  back to Frank Greening Brown Sand Sample using his own heat estimates.

Characterization of a World Trade Center Dust Sample

Closer view of the fireball shows a brownish ring around a white center

HTML Color Picker says its this color 

HTML code:#A27C80
RGB code:R: 162 G: 124 B: 128
HSV:353.68° 23.46% 63.53%



PDF Meta Data
PDF meta data says Author: Frank Greening Creator: Microsoft® Word 2016 Producer: Microsoft® Word 2016 CreationDate: Tue Aug 1 22:34:05 2017 CEST ModDate: Wed Nov 15 07:39:24 2017 CET Tagged: yes UserProperties: no Suspects: no Form: AcroForm JavaScript: no Pages: 44 Encrypted: no Page size: 612 x 792 pts (letter) Page rot: 0 File size: 2017059 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.7
Thx!
he made an edit in November 15th 2017
I wonder what he changed

NIST Frank Greening debunked Video




















































User
Join Date
Aug 2017
Last Seen
08-30-17 @ 09:10 PM
Gender
Posts
29
Hi all. I'm Christine Sakoutis from Greening' S paper. If anyone has any questions regarding my involvement down there, please feel free to ask. I spent 10 days down there.



















































User
Join Date
Aug 2017
Last Seen
08-30-17 @ 09:10 PM
Gender
Posts
29

The paper was just published. Completed in July.



















































User
Join Date
Aug 2017
Last Seen
08-30-17 @ 09:10 PM
Gender
Posts
29
As for my story it's too long to post here in one shot. It is on facebook. 

 Matt Tartaglia's testimony or death from radiation sickness, and it does not change the fact that the pictures Kurt Sonnenfeld took for FEMA reveal damage grossly inconsistent with the claim advanced by NIST.

So, whether there was thermite used or not doesn't matter to me. The larger point is that the entire official narrative is false, contradicted by all the facts and evidence.

Aerosol Post Sept 11, 2001 Shows Silicon, Aluminum, Iron in the air
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv04JW5FfbE










9/11 Molten Sample FDNY Scott Schrimpe Sample Question On Facebook 
https://photos.app.goo.gl/z0DczhuUgGB8f6c23


9/11 Molten Sample FDNY Scott Schrimpe Sample Question On Facebook

"It took roughly 25 minutes for Schrimpe to dig himself out of the debris. He immediately began assisting with the recovery effort. Schrimpe was a firefighter with Squad 41 in South Bronx, which lost six firefighters. He said that it wasn’t until later that afternoon that he realized members of his squad were missing,”We didn’t know where they were on the site. It wasn’t until two months later that we realized that they were in the South Tower, once they released the tapes. We found three of the six in March of 2002.” The other three were never found.
He assisted in the recovery effort until the day it was called off on May 28th, 2002."


https://photos.app.goo.gl/z0DczhuUgGB8f6c23




Holy crap Youtube is now locking up my videos as private.



"Hi 911TruthNOW,
At YouTube we want to make our site great for creators and viewers all over the world.
One of the ways we try and do this is by prohibiting the use of unrelated or misleading tags. Your video, New Never Before Seen Footage Of 9/11 Will Give You Chills, was identified as violating this policy, and because of that it has been locked as private.
To undo this change, please:
  1. Watch this video to learn more about YouTube’s policy on misleading metadata.
  2. Remove any unrelated or misleading tags from the “description” and “tag” sections of your video. (Here are some metadata tips.)
  3. Once you’ve made your changes, submit the video for review by clicking the “Locked as private [Appeal]” button in the Video Manager section of your channel. You can only file one appeal per video, so please be sure to review all the information above before submitting!
Once we review the video, we’ll contact you with the next steps.
Please note: this action has not resulted in a strike.
Thanks! - The YouTube Team"

CNN Breaking News 400 to 530pm WTC 7 demolition flashes

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

New WTC 7 "Pull it!" Slip Up By Photographer in MSM Movie

New WTC 7 "Pull it!" like Slip up by Photographer in MSM Movie makes precision prediction



Precision predictions are impossible!


While general predictions and generalizations and estimates are normal and shared openly, precision predictions however are activities of criminals and fraudsters which are not shared in the public domain. On 9/11 this sharing of private knowledge was made public and was shared openly and even found its way on the evening news. 


A photographer said that the search rescue efforts ended at 5 P.M because they anticipated a steel frame building falling! (which it did at 5:20). Even Amy Goodman stopped her broadcast to go watch the event. A precise prediction was shared and allow thousands of people to take on uniform activities of filming, photographing and gathering for the shared experience.



Amy Goodman WTC 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2RexpiIDXs


As noted here

Not only did this prediction happen but on 5:15 P.M a banner running on BBC said the prediction did actually happen a few minutes later.

Not only that but a bunch of people said it was being taken down as noted here:

The owner said the building was "pulled"

DEBUNKER Reply:

"Firefighters also predicted it.  you can interpret it as the building looked like a mess, or as a miracle.

you cant seriously imply that a steel frame building could never look like it might give up?  like imagine a giant building standing on one girder with the whole rest of the bottom gone.  do you think people would say "steel buildings never fall, so im sure it will hold"

you can only push the "it never happened, so it cant happen" logic so far."

Reply

The keyword or concept you are avoiding is:

anticipation inside of a small time window!

I don't think you are grasping the tight time window, anticipation concept and have over estimated mankind's abilities to estimate and predict the future. 

          1. All rescue efforts were stopped because building 7 was going down 20 minutes before it happens.

          2. 15 minutes before it happened news origination have already announced WTC 7 has fallen down. 

         3. All fraudulence has to sold via marketing to make the impossible possible.

Monday, November 25, 2013

Can people anticipate something that has never happened?

Can people anticipate something that's never happened? Because a photographer said that search rescue efforts ended at 5 P.M because they anticipated a steel frame building falling which it did at 5:20.


As noted here

Not only did this prediction happen but on 5:15 P.M a banner running on BBC said the prediction did actually happen a few minutes later.

Not only that but a bunch of people said it was being taken down as noted here:

The owner said the building was "pulled"

Sandy Hook Report Update November 25th: GPS ends on the 13th! the day A...

Friday, November 15, 2013

The Master is not Crazy by Noam Chomsky They blamed Saudis Not Iraqis

The Master is not Crazy by Noam Chomsky

Noam chomsky defense was

" either complete lunatics or they weren't involved." my reply below

The reasons are quite straightforward, and have been presented many times to ears that are unwilling to listen.

Uncontroversially, the Bush administration (or their Masters, in your version) intended to invade Iraq well before 9/ll.  You agree, and have even sent me some of the minor evidence to this effect.

General Wesley Clark said "Sir we made the decision to go to war with Iraq. AND WITH SEVEN COUNTIES IN FIVE YEARS

Uncontroversially, they blamed 9/11 mainly on Saudis, not Iraqis.

Uncontroversially, they had quite a struggle to gain support for the planned invasion of Iraq, and in fact overwhelmingly failed.  Almost the entire world was opposed, and even in the US in order to gain support they had to launch a huge propaganda campaign, fabricating laughable tales that soon fell apart discrediting them, etc.

Uncontroversially, if they had blamed it on Iraqis, they would have had clear sailing: overwhelming support domestically and internationally, a UN resolution, etc.

Therefore, they are either complete lunatics or they weren't involved.

They are not lunatics.

QED

"Therefore, they are either complete lunatics or they weren't involved."

If you change "complete lunatics" into "complete confidence" that everyone would fold under pressure of patriotism, or could be duped by scientific fraud and successes in Oklahoma City and other operations I would say you are correct.

As a person who understands the propensity for a population to be duped by a strong enough force, I am shocked that YOU can't see the blizzard of emotions that the media has perpetrated globally with a supporting cast of scientists, politicians, yellow journalism and the removal of ALL investigative compatibility to look deeper and independently, surely you can see confidence level increasing with these lunatics?

The Master is not Crazy by Noam Chomsky They blamed Saudis Not Iraqis

"Uncontroversially, they blamed 9/11 mainly on Saudis, not Iraqis" 

No they blamed Osama Bin Laden and he was kicked out of Saudi Arabia  and also the 

"Red Headbands" was The "Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine". 

 So no the Saudis were not blamed until much later, By that time WMD's was the next mess fraud of main stream media. 

Why isn't the "a huge propaganda campaign, fabricating laughable tales" not considered evidence of  lunatics?  

http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2013/11/911-they-are-not-lunatics-noam-chomsky.html












Sane Human
5:27 PM
 
Reply
+danp5648 seriously dan... I don't understand what you are saying.. Your comments are completely incoherent... Noam Chomsky is exactly right.  If they had blamed it on Iraqis, the whole world would have supported them invading Iraq... A desire that Chomsky and many others clearly admit they had long before 9/11.... What he is pointing out is the simple fact that IF 9/11 was an inside job aimed at gaining the support they sought to invade Iraq... then they would have made the hijackers Iraqi not Saudi... Why do you not seem to understand this?  







danp5648
5:37 PM
They did NOT blame Saudis,  they actually blamed Osama Bin Laden and he was kicked out of Saudi Arabia and The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, why can't you understand that?

I know what you are saying BUT your basic facts are 100% wrong.

Which "FACTS" do we agree upon? ZERO! NOTHING!
Not one fact from you or him have been correct or nor will your facts will ever become correct...  You assume their is common ground or Uncontroversial facts. That is not true.

"The desire (to invade Iraq) that Chomsky and many others clearly admit they had long before 9/11.." is not 100% true. The desire was ALL OF THE MIDDLE EAST.  THAT's why the video "seven countries in five years" was included above, it  debunks the Iraq only "desire" Why can't you understand that? 

I disagree with you on everything you say, even your hypothetical stories and hypothetical outcomes. Why? because its not correct and not even close. That's the bottom line. 






Sane Human
5:52 PM
 
Reply
+danp5648 Did the government say that 19 men hijacked planes and crashed them into the twin towers and the Pentagon?

Did the Government provide us with the identities of the 19 alleged hijackers?

Were those 19 men that the government identified as the perpetrators of 9/11 of Saudi Arabian decent or were they not?
These are Uncontroversial facts... 9/11 according the "official story" was carried out by 19 SAUDI ARABIAN men... 





Atta the ringleader WAS  Egyptian Egyptian Egyptian.  You do understand??  

Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta was an Egyptian hijacker and one of the ringleaders of the September 11 attacks

Get you facts right!

"Did the government say?" Can you please say exactly who and what you are talking about or stop everything until you do? Did a report say? Please mention the title. But NO the government DID NOT SAY. NO  

Abdul Rahman al-Omari living Florida has four children. 
Abdulaziz al-Omar was living in Jeddah has four children.

Abdul Rahman al-Omari (Arabic: عبدالرحمن العمري‎, Ê¿Abd ar-Raḥman ... He had moved out of his Vero Beach, Florida residence with his wife and four children on September 3, 2001, but it was quickly arrested by The FBI then named Abdulaziz al-Omari as a hijacker,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rahman_al-Omari

Ziad Jarrah WAS Lebanese. 

Add an "i" you get  Abdulaziz al-Omari a fake person who happen to have
Abdulaziz al-Omar  Florida address and he sued and won.  

Robert Fisk 9/11 Osama Bin Laden Meeting Ziad Jarrah WAS Lebanese
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVuonQP1oNc



Bobbo Seas
6:27 PM
 
Reply
+danp5648 ppl really have lost all common sense and critical thinking abilities!!! It hard to understand how ppl still think Iraq was responsible for 911 Israel has everything to do with 911!!!


danp5648
6:54 PM
+Bobbo Seas He thinks that because the fake 19 hijackers were Saudi Arabian (which they were not)  9/11 it was not insider developed because that's a stupid mistake..  Part 2 Just because the desire for an Iraq invasion was high does not mean 9/11 was insider developed., it clearly makes it more possible because of 9/11. The question falls on LIHOP let it happen or MIHOP make it happen.  Both argument are not correct. The desire was much larger. 

While everyone else blamed the Jews via Urban Moving Systems, Odigo Messanger.

Abdul Rahman al-Omari living Florida has four children. 

Abdulaziz al-Omar living in Jeddah has four children.



Tuesday, November 12, 2013

9/11 Rumbling Reports and Witnesses Right Before Impact and WTC Collapse

9/11 Rumbling Witnesses

Sources:

9/11 Red Devil_s Head (switch to 1080 HD)
9 11 Depleted uranium, Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center
WTC 911 Notice the ground shake
South Tower Explosions Right Before Impact
Guns n Butter Indira Singh 9/11 mold, earthquake damage report
9-11 Ground Shaking Like An Earthquake
9 11 Loud Rumbling earthquake witness before plane crash witness


Search