The Master

• Noam Chomsky	Feb 20 (2 days ago)
  to me

  Uncontroversially, they claimed that the majority of the hijackers were Saudi.  Uncontroversially, they would have blamed Iraqis if they were involved.

  
  

  From: Dan Plesse
  Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 5:06 PM
  To: Noam Chomsky
  Subject: Uncontroversially, they blamed 9/11 mainly on Saudis, not Iraqis

  

  

  Dan Plesse <>	11:40 AM (0 minutes ago)
  to Noam

   The 9/11 Domino effect allowed cultures around the world  to be conditioned to be duped. Continuing frauds and threats which lead to the Iraq war was met with without enough counter measures by the media, governments, investigative or academia because they allowed the first domino to fall.. Other backdoor ringtones like "Support the troops" really sent resistance packing.  The 9/11 Domino effect also allowed for stronger negative reactive cognitive police state within these institutions. The cognitive police state removed threats like the Nazi SS removed people at night, firings, whistleblower arrests were celebrated in the streets. The drumbeat of justifications unquestioned. 9/11 shows how the sophisticated and already duped are vulnerable both cognitively and physically. We can only go downhill from here. If the pen is mightier than the sword, death by the pen has to to be the worst way to go. Control the pen, control the sword. America's Secret Destiny http://www.reversespins.com/masons.html

Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem as an unlikely contradiction:

"Your churches will be used to teach the Jew’s religion and in less than two hundred years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry. Once a man gives over to false religion, he is no longer rational because he originates no thought. His life is controlled by whomever controls his religion."Executive summary :   Noam Chomsky's pure logic debunks 9/11 insider theory is as follows:

1. The hijackers were not from Iraq its a disjointed story.
2. The risk level of lots of moving parts are too high,
3. Who benefits is not clear
4.The effects of 9/11 could have been done by less risky   means!
5. Someone would have talked or confessed.

"The Master is not Crazy" by Noam Chomsky - They blamed Saudis Not Iraqis

These are all powerful arguments to be made, but do they stand up to the facts? I have his emails and he said "the master" is not crazy.  Why didn't the press just do a better job and fake the hijackers as Iraqis. Answer: They used the names left behind in the car at Boston Logan airport.   That list matched up the other prefabricated stories about a cartoonish mastermind written by the FBI that summer.. The Phoenix Memo was Osama Bin Laden's prefabricated story connecting him to 9/11.  The media for the last 10 years has been interviewing and broadcasting this boogeyman for no reason. C.I.A the great myth of Osama Bin Laden



Operation Bojinka didn't work out, so 9/11 was "shock and awe".So Why didn't Operation Bojinka work?

William Cooper said "whatever is going to happen next, they're going to blame it on Osama Bin Laden, and don't you even believe it."

So what happened? I guess you didn't get the memo.

In summary: An American group needed a No-holds-barred,
No limits, NO rules New World in order to complete
whatever it is they need i.e the "transformation" of society even if it brings revolutionary change i.e Fascism

September 11th Exposed: Compressed 4 hours Radio on 9/11 into 28 minutes

9/11 created the environment  of total  allegiance,
obedience an necessary psychological blind spots
to be blind you from the truth.   

Operation Iraqi Freedom  was in a holding pattern, circling
aimlessly, until a catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor

I did not know PNAC just started

The PNAC was founded in the spring of 1997 by the well-known
Zionist neo-conservatives Robert Kagan and William Kristol

9/11 was the lens  that focused  everything
into laser. 9/11 Shaped society with the
help of the  media. 

Why did we invade Iraq? IT ENDED the 9/11 investigation !!
Basically everyone's married to the scam now, no turning back. 

BTW
Iraq was an  escalation NOT a new war. The war in the Middle East was not new,
it was a continuation of Operation NORTHERN WATCH . Maybe it was to end "threatens to its neighbors" or stupid Israel. Maybe to end Palestinians getting Saddam funds
which is most likely a bullshit story. 

Saddam's payments $10,000 per family $25,000 for family of a suicide bomber $35m paid since September 2000 PALF figure

So What was the reason for 9/11? 
9/11 was the perfect fuel for the new escalation a to get a new world order of death for "Terrorist".  You can't have a straight up culture of  death and still have a manageable culture. The NEW WORLD is thus a  culture of death for "Terrorist", which is backdoor for mass murder. The media's  Iraqi War Narrative is one of a giant disappearing act,  that disconnects from itself  each new step forward. the "How did we get here" issue can be answerable because the all scams are continuously being erased. The narrative is about small things like oil was the reason  however the power elites don't care about that. They care about large scale social transformation which is tricked society into believing that murder (whatever else) is justifiable and most of all  - good and necessary just like they do in Israel when they "defend themselves"... Maybe if we are killing, we will be less likely to interfere with Palestinian  murder by Israel.  Maybe that's the reason.A 2002 poem by Amiri Baraka wrote alleging that some Israelis had advance knowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks led to widespread outrage.

Somebody Blew Up America (on 9/11) by Amiri Baraka

They say its some terrorist,
some barbaric
A Rab,
in Afghanistan
It wasn't our American terrorists
It wasn't the Klan or the Skin heads
Or the them that blows up nigger
Churches, or reincarnates us on Death Row
It wasn't Trent Lott
Or David Duke or Giuliani
Or Schundler, Helms retiring

Who own them buildings
Who got the money
Who think you funny
Who locked you up
Who own the papers

Who owned the slave ship

Who run the army

Who the fake president
Who the ruler
Who the banker

Who? Who? Who?

Who know why Five Israelis was filming the explosion

Amiri Baraka "Somebody Blew Up America" is all over Youtube and somehow I never heard of it before.

Adam Kokesh

American Sniper has warped Americans' fragile little minds

Published on Jan 27, 2015

How does modern propaganda work? How effective is it? Adam blows these issues wide open with an incredible series of man on the street interviews. For the record, this was not a selective group, or even in a particularly conservative or pro-military area.

Sane Human

3 hours ago

Also, I read your blog on "Why 9/11 had everything to do with Iraq" and there are a couple of things you should understand:  First, if the Super Secret Government wanted to use 9/11 as the "sole means to get an ESCALATION" in Iraq, then why on earth would you suppose they made their "fake" hijackers Saudis instead of Iraqis?   If they are going to go to the trouble of murdering thousands of American civilians and blame it on Iraq, then they would have made the fake hijackers all Iraqis.. this is simple common sense.

Reply 

danp5648

1 second ago (edited)

+Sane Human
No you don't use "hijackers all Iraqis" because a LARGER target is required which is continuous and global in scope. Iraq just so happens to be in front of the list EXAMPLE Clark said "Seven Countries In Five Years".

General Wesley Clark: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTX-46e-96E

No you can't just fake it before 9/11. Too many people would ask questions. 9/11 terror attack alone justified not asking questions and allowing the fakery to run wild.  

  The Press talked about Iraq with Usama Bin Laden early on 9/11 and often via James Woolsey here  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvjOJdHN-hk

Fake WMD's. None found. Yellow Cake Fraud. Anthrax is hard to do! Only two labs.

" Saddam had WMD's and was prepared to use them... which happens to be EXACTLY what they did" WTF are you talking about ? Are you talking about the ANTHRAX Letters? If so that  was traced back to Fort Meade, so no that was inside job too, sorry.  Yellow Cake was a total joke.

Iraq was seen as GIANT and CURRENT problem according to press because that was the target all along via James Woolsey. You can't attack a country because of a few action of a few bad apples, You need BIG threatening country with who mindlessly manufactures of weapons of mass foolishness and labs on railways scam must be identified as targets for fireworks.  BIG Problems BIG Solutions. Even Osama Bin Laden was seen as TOO SMALL and the issue with hunting him down was long forgotten and dismissed.  
  
Here is a link to the diagram
http://s1222.photobucket.com/user/danp5648/media/WhyIraq3.jpg.html?o=0

+danp5648 hi Dan, I dont understand how you think the existence of GPS devices is evidence of a conspiracy...Can you please explain?  

 Its not the GPS devices themselves per say but the explosive evidence they gathered. via distance, degree and condition of the body parts. Was the GPS devices already ready before during or after 9/11 because video about the devices make
it sound like they made a few days after however FF said they were given these devices right away.

Sane Human

+danp5648 what difference does it make? If you could  prove the devices were waiting around the corner from ground zero in a warehouse and were somehow NEEDED for use in the conspiracy then you would of course have evidence of prior knowledge... Can you prove that?

danp5648

1 second ago (edited)

+Sane Human YES foreknowledge of an explosive event if proven would point back to the people who did 9/11. 9/11 would be solved I agree. Solving 9/11 is what I do...The problem was the bombing was the concept was withdrawn and replace with softer "aviation terror". Why that was done I have no idea.  Then that was too weak so they tried "Anthrax terror" and that worked a little better because more people are involved . Connecting  the causes of a war to a single guy looks silly and weak so someone kept manufacturing evidence to make the case stronger.. The wars helped validate the case of "Terrorists needed killing" look they are defending themselves. help us stupid ones.  
jjjj

Sane Human

+danp5648 Dan I'm sorry but that is a nonsensical argument.  You said 9/11 was all about Iraq.. You don't believe that the hijackers were real...  So if the New World Order can make their fake hijackers from anywhere they want, there's only one logical place, its the goddamn country you say they did this to invade... If the 19 hijackers are from Iraq, its instant support from the entire world to invade...
Not a single other country in the world would have opposed or even said a word about Bush invading Iraq instantly... But not only did they not make their fake hijackers Iraqi, they made them Saudi for christ sake!   Our biggest ally in the middle east... It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever... What could they possibly stand to gain from making the fake hijackers Saudis?

 The no holds barred, no limits, no rules New World order argument is completely ridiculous.  This is really all you need to understand to know that there is no inside job... Obviously you aren't going to accept that, but it can't be argued.  You cannot put forth a logical argument for an inside job scenario in which it makes sense for the Bad Guy Government to make fake hijackers Saudis instead of Iraqis.. it just can't be done. 

  danp5648

7:51 PM
YES the press could have made the Hijackers Iraqis or whatever they wanted, for some reason they didn't bother and I told you why already,  So ...stop with that crap and move on. Lets review.. 

So far the hijackers have been reported as crying, laughing and doing drugs, their I.D have been stolen. They have been murdered and reported still alive. I covered only the crying 9/11 hijackers so far.




I am looking  for
"DoJ briefing on cell phone calls from AA Flight Flight 11, 77, 93 Conducted by Team 7"


Dear Dan,

I have put out another email to our FOIA staff regarding your initial request. I will let you know if I hear a response.

Dear Mr. Plesse: This is in response to your recent email regarding "DoJ briefing on cell phone calls from AA Flight 11, 77, 93 Conducted by Team 7" from the series "Open Files Relating to the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on the United States, 2001-2004" (National Archives Identifier 7419198: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7419198). As you know, the briefings for Flights 93 and 175 are available in the series mentioned above. I searched the files further but did not locate any additional individual or compiled briefings for Flights 77 and 11.  I also conducted a search on Google and located a briefing for Flight 77 at the following link:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/18886083/T7-B12-Flight-93-Calls-General-Fdr-5-20-04-DOJ-Briefing-on-Cell-and-Phone-Calls-From-AA-77-408 I understand that Kris Wilhelm, my colleague in the Center for Legislative Archives, also responded to you concerning Team 7 documents in the records of the 9/11 Commission.  The "T7-B12" listed in the link, above, probably refers to Team 7 records in box 12. I hope this information is helpful. Sincerely, MARY KAY SCHMIDT Archivist Special Access and FOIA Staff National Archives and Records Administration MaryKay,        Do you know why MFR-00216.pdf  MFR-00217.pdf were derived expert technical assistance from GTE engineers while flight 93 and 77 was made without technical assistance?  The Study made without technical assistance are not found inside NARA.gov but private scribd.com/?  http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00218.pdf (flight AA 11 or 77)  http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00217.pdf UA flight 93http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00216.pdf UA flight 175  http://media.nara.gov/9-11/MFR/t-0148-911MFR-00215.pdf (flight AA 11 or 77)   The study made without technical assistance is too brief   https://www.scribd.com/doc/18886083/T7-B12-Flight-93-Calls-General-Fdr-5-20-04-DOJ-Briefing-on-Cell-and-Phone-Calls-From-AA-77-408#downloadDo you know why Flight 11 Study is still missing?

Please provide us with your mailing/postal/billing/shipping address in order to assist you more effectively.
Your request will be assigned to one of our staff members who will respond to you via letter or email in approximately 2-3 weeks. 

Sincerely, 
Rebecca L. Collier 
Assistant Chief, Textual Reference Archives II Branch (RDT2) National Archives at College Park, MD