Monday, May 30, 2016

Military radar in Massachusetts to undergo maintenance work morning of 9/11

9/11 Drone 911datasets.org



"Military radar in Massachusetts, which is used by NORAD’s Northeast Air Defense Sector (NEADS), is out of use this morning in order to undergo maintenance work. [9/11 Commission, 10/27/2003 pdf file; 9/11 Commis
sion, 10/27/2003 pdf file]
Radar Scheduled to Go Down - The J53 radar in North Truro, Massachusetts, is one of a number of radar sites that NEADS receives data from. [United States Space Command, 12/30/1995; Jane's C4I Systems, 9/1/2005; North American Aerospace Defense Command, 10/23/2006 pdf file] It has a range of 250 miles. According to Technical Sergeant Jeffrey Richmond, the assistant air surveillance technician at NEADS, J53 is scheduled to go down this morning for some major repairs to be carried out. [9/11 Commission, 10/27/2003 pdf file; 9/11 Commission, 10/27/2003 pdf file]

NEADS Personnel Refer to Radar - A member of staff at NEADS apparently refers to the J53 radar being offline shortly after those on the NEADS operations floor learn of the Flight 11 hijacking (see (8:38 a.m.) September 11, 2001) and while they are trying to locate the hijacked aircraft. She mentions that NEADS technicians “still should be able to get it” (presumably referring to the plane’s radar track) “without 53.” [North American Aerospace Defense Command, 9/11/2001] (According to Richmond, the area covered by J53 is overlapped by other radars, “so the need for radar to undergo routine maintenance is accounted for.”) ID technician Shelley Watson will later recall that the NEADS ID desk uses the J53 radar as a point from which it attempts to locate Flight 11. At some time during the morning, Richmond insists that J53 be put back online at some capacity. Whether this happens is unstated. [9/11 Commission, 10/27/2003 pdf file; 9/11 Commission, 10/27/2003 pdf file]

Radar Part of 'Joint Surveillance System' - The J53 radar site is part of the Joint Surveillance System (JSS). [Transportation Safety Board of Canada, 9/2/1998; US Department of the Air Force, 11/1/1999 pdf file; 9/11 Commission, 2004] The JSS consists of “long-range radar sites around the perimeter of the US, with data shared by the [Department of Defense], FAA, Customs, and others.” A 2003 Department of Defense report will state that, at the time of the 9/11 attacks, US air defense relies “largely on outward looking ground-based radars, specifically, the Joint Surveillance System.” [US Department of Defense, 7/2003 pdf file] According to General Ralph Eberhart, the commander of NORAD, NORAD has access to the JSS, “which is that system that rings the United States and looks out.” He will say this system “looks for that foreign threat. It looks for someone coming into our airspace that’s not authorized.” [US Congress. Senate, 10/25/2001]

Entity Tags: Joint Surveillance System, Northeast Air Defense Sector, Jeffrey Richmond, Ralph Eberhart, Shelley Watson

Sunday, May 29, 2016

Dear Chief Callan on 9 11 did you try the WTC loudspeaker system

GPS Red Icon means Fire Fighters 

Dear 
Chief Callan,
Did the FDNY try the WTC loudspeaker system or not. Anytime, any tower?
"Minimal transmissions on the handy talky and I think that was because of the building  construction" 
Why didn't FDNY  use the WTC loudspeaker system to announce evacuation orders rather then default to blaming the radios which lead to 343 deaths?

Barry

"But the point is a good one, there was that means to communicate, and,the OEM should have been coordinating and whatever system worked, ensuring an effective chain of command. Of course the OEM may have found that hard to do, since they were out of their base of operations early
I have an interesting thing i am currently looking into, i just purchased a book on aviation disasters, it covers 230 of them from the late 50s to the early 90s and is very interesting in terms of demonstrating dispersal of debris after mid air break up or explosion, vs impact into ground at speed,"


Sam Haschets In regard to which building and when?

Daniel M. Plesse Sam Haschets did the FDNY try the WTC loudspeaker system or not. Anytime, any tower?

Sam Haschets is there a point? do you think the FDNY left their own men in there to die?

Daniel M. Plesse Answer the question Sam Haschets.. Don't you think they should have tried to use it or tested it and reported that success of failure? Would the failure of every system in building point to insiders placing explosives and programming the elevators to fall? THe  9/11 squeegee man said the elevators fell slowly until he hit the emergency stop button.. 9/11 squeegee man got out and was hero, but what about the other elevators that assumed to have crashed? Were they empty? Would only a programmed elevator be able to fall?  Why didn't the emergency stop button work 100% of the time on 9/11? Or maybe it did and some elevators were fully loaded with explosives like a die hard movie..   

Sam Haschets I don't know if it was working post collision - do you?
LikeReply3 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse Sam Haschets that issue should be clear by now, don't you think? Not clear means the system was working.. The lights were working.. The narrative was the radios didn't work. Fine but what about the Universal loud speaker system? Chances are they workedfine and same with CCTV around WTC complex which would have captured the car fires starting spontaneously.. The speaker system continuously Billy Joel Music outside the building..

If you don't know, ask around at fair debates.. I don't seems to be theme with you.. The reasons I ask is you DON"T seem to be really thinking for yourself for these 12+ years..

You do know about crash ax in the cockpit.

LikeReply17 mins



CALLAN FIRE MARSHAL STARACE: Today's date is November 2, 2001. The time is 1440 hours. This is Michael Starace, Fire Marshal, New York City Fire Department, conducting an interview with Chief Callan. Q. Could you state your command and - assigned command and rank? A. Assistant Chief Joseph Callan, C...
NYTIMES.COM


http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Callan_Joseph.txt

Monday, May 23, 2016

Con Edison diesel tanks or structural deficiencies and who falsified WTC 7 blueprints


Con Edison Lawsuit about "structural deficiencies" or Port Authority installed "diesel fuel tanks"

Section 5.0 explains how the inadequate bracing of the interior columns was directly responsible for the progression of global collapse.
https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/aegis-nordenson-expert-report-2-pdf.16785/


nydailynews says its about "structural deficiencies"
"Con Edison and its insurance companies claimed a company owned by developer Larry Silverstein and others was responsible for World Trade Center 7 being destroyed in the terrorist attacks." i.e an inside job.. "
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/court-strikes-wtc-building-collapse-suit-article-1.1537539

thefederation says its about "diesel fuel tanks"


Con Ed and the insurers say that several diesel fuel tanks installed at 7 World Trade Center to power emergency generators for the command center were responsible for feeding the fire and triggering a failure of the building’s steel structural supports.

Con Ed’s suit charges that the Port Authority was negligent in allowing the fuel tanks to be built and in failing to follow city and state fire codes. The Port Authority has maintained that it has met or exceeded code requirements in its buildings.
http://www.thefederation.org/documents/index.htm





WTC7 - The Stiffener Plates Explained



Bailey conversely bases his assumptions on the ignition of the diesel. His summary was essentially thus-There weren't enough shear bolts. If the diesel fuel ignited......Then, later, it was revealed there was (appx to my memory) 30 more bolts than previously known in the relevant parts." Is this part of the blueprint falsification issue?

World Trade Center 9/11 Blueprint Fraud Key Points. Credits From Albury Smith

1. -Two 3/4" X 5-1/2" X 18" WEB stiffener plates (.580" web in A2001 girder) weighing ~21.5# each
2. -12" bearing vs 11" is only 1/2"
3. 
The three W12 X 19 beams were only there to stiffen that one spandrel beam
The key to the stiffeners is that they strengthen both the web and bottom flanges.  NIST's failure mode was in the flange.  When they got caught they obfuscated by saying they weren't necessary for the analysis because there was no web crippling.  The 
WEB stiffener plates factor that defeats the initiation hypothesis and the spandrel beam stiffeners would also stiffen the G3005 beam and in turn work against the girder buckling also defeats the initiation hypothesis..  

 Dr. Pepper's letter to Todd Zinser at Commerce: 

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

9/11 Commission staff memos behind the 28 Pages



National Archives releases 9/11 Commission staff memos behind the 28 Pages.. Received via Barbara Honegger, "The Cat's out of The Bag ..." The memos can be viewed at:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/doc…/2838281/2553-001-1.pdf

Bingo! Note the pages in the Congressional Report recommend for review in this staff memo and this: On page 13, it talks about the CIA headquarters getting vital information that if acted on, had the potential to stop the planed attack, but the CIA failed to respond.

On page 31, the report notes that "Neither the CIA nor the FBI were able to confirm if KSM was in the US or sending recruits before 9/11". As I understand, Marshal points out that this statement means that the story about who attacked us that day was obtained by forced confession alone, and that there's NO other evidence to validate what the official story claims

On page 153, there's a communication between the FBI Headquarters and a New York agent. In short, as I understand it, the New York agent is not a happy camper because the SOP of the CIA is going to get Americans killed.

On Page 158, the short story is that Congress wanted to talk to that fellow that's was a informant with the FBI out in San Diego, that happen to have a couple of the hijackers renting from him. It looks like the FBI was playing defense counsel at one point and needed a lot of legal cover for the guy if he was going to be forced to spill the beans, even though Congress already knew that the dude was full of it, nothing happened about getting the guy on record.

On page 159, the FBI started leaning on their informant where as he let on that he was actually pretty close to the hijackers but "...expressed disbelief that the two were involved]."

On Page 162, the informant uses the Guidelines, as set forth by the Attorney General to say that he had no clue about the two.

On page 163, the San Diego office did get a clue but when Congress asked them about it, they said that the informant was clueless.

One page 164, the FBI guy that had contact with the informant attributed inconsistencies in the informants' lack of a clue because of the guys' clueless personality.

After a couple of redacted lines from the same page, the same agent told congress that the informant was "very credible, highly reliable, very, very credible, very useful" and that the informant had been "duped".

Finally, at the bottom of page 164, Congress has got some serious issues with all of this and thinks the guy might be full of it.

On page 167, headquarters knew about the two, connected to the informant that didn't have a clue but headquarters kept the San Diego office clueless about the two.

Monday, May 16, 2016

9 11 Two photos and a video



Past researches only found one photo (NYPD top photo). The second photo  (SIPA blue) reinforces the problem with the nose NOT being a normal plane and other details i.e giant dark mark on the side. Background screenshot is from  WB11. The idea is to connect the dark circles on photos to the dark area on videos i.e within the same area of interest i.e the dark area on the left side. as a means pin the plane flying in the area to the real impact plane.. 

The two photos are from 911datasets 1. by NYPD and 2. 





6. WB11 (WPIX-TV) Metrocam



Devin S.what am I looking at? a comparison between what? a drone?
LikeReply10 mins
Daniel M. Plesse  NORAD drill, 'Vigilant Guardian' Comparison between video and photos the blue logo plane
https://youtu.be/814rcm4KC5w?t=2m56s

and two NIST 911datasets.org photos

each has a black mark..

The Problem is no witness has seen the Black Logo plane impacting the towers however one witness did see a blue logo plane..
  • "On one NORAD drill, 'Vigilant Guardian', is admitted by the Commission to have been in progress but is dismissed in a footnote as being unrelated to the hijacking scenario..."
Found these in the NIST FOIA folders (911datasets.org-7, Release 18, 42A0053 - G16, StarLedger, Jennifer Brown, Disk 5):

Two more planes. Both towers are burning (image file: DSC_0112, meta data: 9/11/2001, 9:22pm): Found these in the NIST FOIA folders (911datasets.org-7, Release 18, 42A0053 - G16, StarLedger, Jennifer Brown, Disk 5):

Two more planes. Both towers are burning (image file: DSC_0112, meta data: 9/11/2001, 9:22pm):

SIPA 403
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0pxVbXyB9OLZkNwWEJvSXhsU2c/view?usp=sharing

SIPA 402
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B0pxVbXyB9OLdVhtV3RjYmdfUEU

Roll #3 1.jpg
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B0pxVbXyB9OLaUpNRkNmSzhiRzg&usp=sharing


9/11 World Terror Inc.




xxxx

Rob Balsamo Daniel, the photos match the ATA livery. When was the last time you had a colorblind test? Mine was 6 months ago.... and every 6 months before that since I was 16.

Ken Hulet thanks for posting this
UnlikeReply111 hrs
Daniel Edd Bland Explain the dark circle.
LikeReply11 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse I can not explain it, Rob believes its a ATA logo..
LikeReply11 hrs
Daniel Edd Bland On the plane.
LikeReply10 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse

Write a reply...
Daniel M. Plesse Rob Balsamo First off ATA is WHITE painted on top, MY PLANE IS NOT idiot!
LikeReplyJust nowEdited
Daniel M. Plesse ITS NOT A White painted PLANE DOES NOT Match not even close.. Rob Balsamo
For example
https://drive.google.com/.../0B0pxVbXyB9OLdEx1dUxuQz.../view

LikeReplyJust nowEdited
Daniel M. Plesse and this are source file btw Rob Balsamo.

ITS NOT A White !
https://drive.google.com/.../0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE4.../view...



9/11 Drone by NYPD SLR
DRIVE.GOOGLE.COM
LikeReplyRemove PreviewJust nowEdited
Rob Balsamo
Rob Balsamo Daniel, when was the last time you had a color blind test? Why do you continually try to move the goal posts each and every time I have shown that you were wrong? What are you trying to prove? I am almost starting to think you are planted disinfo.
Reply6 hrsEdited
Daniel M. Plesse Rob Balsamo its NOT A White PLANE!

NOT White
https://drive.google.com/.../0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE4.../view...



9/11 Drone by NYPD SLR
DRIVE.GOOGLE.COM
LikeReplyRemove PreviewJust nowEdited
Daniel M. Plesse Jeffrey Love Can you look at the photo and make a call? Do you see a white plane or not..
LikeReply6 hrs
Rob Balsamo
Rob Balsamo Daniel, if you are going to troll your own thread and refuse to answer my questions, I'll let you be. Again, you are welcome to believe whatever you want. But you are not entitled to your own facts.
Reply6 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse Rob Balsamo Let a third party make a ruling.
LikeReply6 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse Dear Jeffrey Love Link please review Rob Balsamo
White or Not?
https://drive.google.com/.../0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE4.../view...



9/11 Drone by NYPD SLR
DRIVE.GOOGLE.COM
LikeReplyRemove Preview5 hrsEdited
Daniel M. Plesse

Write a reply...
Rob Balsamo
Rob Balsamo ok... i'm turning off notifications of this thread. If anyone would like to ask questions, feel free to contacts us.

Daniel, if you tag me once again in this thread, you are gone and blocked.

Daniel M. Plesse Run while you can..
Like5 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse ITS NOT A White COLORED PLANE!!! retard Rob
https://drive.google.com/.../0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE4.../view...



9/11 Drone by NYPD SLR
DRIVE.GOOGLE.COM
Daniel M. Plesse ATA Timetable Rob Departure times don't look good for you..
Like5 hrs
Daniel M. Plesse ITS NOT A White COLORED PLANE
https://drive.google.com/.../0B0pxVbXyB9OLMkFaWE4.../view...



9/11 Drone by NYPD SLR
DRIVE.GOOGLE.COM
LikeReplyRemove Preview4 minsEdited

Youtube "World Terror Inc" review:
Keep it up Dan.
Thanks. This must have taken hours of work but I am going to give you a fair critique. I am not a fan of videos without commentary which are supposed to let the evidence stand for itself, the main reason being I find it hard to know what exact point is being made. You provide a commentary of sorts, but not sufficient for the claim you've busted all those people. You should make two shorter videos with narration. One about the existence of Al Qaeda and the other about this mysterious plane. The Al Qaeda one is a REAL scoop, I had no idea Kharzi did not think it was real. No idea Fisk, hugely respected, was not asking about Al Qaeda at the time. But I'd say you need to ram your point home. Then you need to use it to throw doubts on statements at the time, e.g. from Bush's diary.
Second, the planes. Again this is great evidence. You show your sources too. But it raises questions which you should nail: if you are trying to say the planes pictured are the same you need to identify your best guess as to the type of plane, you need to show that there is more in common than a single black dot and as the pics are at different angles you'd need to show similarity by 3D rotation. Then I am asking myself, why has the fragment of aeroplane pictured got windows if the guy interviewed said it was a cargo type plane. like which source are you backing: forgive me but I with several degrees including one from the University of Life need a little guidance here, which a verbal narration would nail. Then again you have to say who this discredits and why. I give you honest opinion as a friend a truther and a youtube viewer. Don't mean to discourage. Ciao
" the fragment of aeroplane pictured got windows" No fragment shows windows of anykind.. WTF The "cargo type plane" was the host not the witness.. and the T.V host was thinking of a C-17 Globemaster III and I have seen one of these thing fly right over my head without sound and a child next to me had no idea a giant plane flew right overhead..
http://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/AIR_C-17_Top_lg.jpg
"the planes pictured are the same" (in the two videos and the two photo) Why did you not say the planes in the two photos and two videos are being matched up?. That is key point and looks like a key hang up too via your missing words.. Hang-Ups A psychological or emotional difficulty or inhibition. Like a poker tell.. You should look into this.. Every person has them and they keep us blinded..
The last issue: Witness verses debris they agree via the color of a cargo plane and not flight 175 however the windows could have been covered and then blown out after the crash.. So not much of an issue there.. Narration could be added by any person at anytime in the future.. It just another audio track.. Maybe you can do that.. Use this chat if you like..
and no it did not take that long and hours its mostly parts of other videos I have done and photos which I just fold together..
Chat Conversation End


Daniel M. Plesse James McDonald Its a Comparison between a video frame 2:56
https://youtu.be/814rcm4KC5w?t=2m56s

and two NIST 911datasets.org photos and each has the same black mark, is that hard to understand?

Lawrence Fine Do you see the black spot mark inside each example image and the video still?


9/11 Drone Attack Photos 

2,278 Electronic Records of The WTC Collapse Investigation


Download Link: http://911datasets.org/images/FOIA_Release_of_3160_Electronic_Records_of_The_WTC_Collapse_Investigation.torrent
Dataset Size: 27,997,942,713 bytes (26,700.92 MB) (26.08 GB)
File Count: 2278
911datasets.org
down_right_arrow_sm.png
FOIA Release of 3,160 Electronic Records of The WTC Collapse Investigation (current folder)
down_right_arrow_sm.png
group 1 - 186 photos
group 2 - 195 Photos
group 3 - disk 1 of 3 - 51 videos
group 3 - disk 2 of 3 - 253 photos
Current Location: /911datasets.org/FOIA Release of 3,160 Electronic Records of The WTC Collapse Investigation/group 3 - disk 2 of 3 - 253 photos/Roll #3 1.jpg
File Size: 21,582,519 bytes (20.58 MB) (0.02 GB)
      down_right_arrow_sm.png          Roll #3 1.jpg    download   (Help)
Facts about 5OCVVXOJFKULAM3I53UJPFFBP6GHLU5GRDF feed
File NameRoll #3 1.jpg +
File Size21,582,519 +
Full Path/911datasets.org/FOIA Release of 3,160 Electronic Records of The WTC Collapse Investigation/group 3 - disk 2 of 3 - 253 photos/Roll #3 1.jpg
Page TitleSFile:5OCVVXOJFKULAM3I53UJPFFBP6GHLU5G +
Path Depth+
Resides In FolderSFolder:ZN4XYSUIYDJVSVYC2ZIS3H6BLGJ2KAPN +
Source TorrentSTorrent:QCXWZ5PRWWUSDNH2Q3YTSNHS3V2BAU5V +
Release_29
down_right_arrow_sm.png
Release 29 (current folder)
down_right_arrow_sm.png
42A0315 - G29D1
42A0316 - G29D2
42A0317 - G29D3
42A0318 - G29D4
42A0319 - G29D5
42A0320 - G29D6
42A0322 - G29D8
42A0323 - G29D9
42A0324 - G29D10
42A0325 - G29D11


Current Location: /911datasets.org/International_Center_for_911_Studies_NIST_FOIA/Release_29/Release 29/42A0325 - G29D11/WTCI-412-STB SIPA

42A0325 - G29D11
down_right_arrow_sm.png
WTCI-412-STB SIPA (current folder)
down_right_arrow_sm.png
SIPA-N~1.JPG
SIPA-N~2.JPG
SIPA-N~3.JPG
SIPA-N~4.JPG
SIPA-N~5.JPG
SIPA-N~6.JPG
SIPA-N~7.JPG
SIPA-N~8.JPG
SIPA-N~9.JPG
SIPA-~10.JPG
SIPA-~11.JPG
SIPA-~12.JPG
SIPA-~13.JPG
SIPA-~14.JPG
SIPA-~15.JPG
SIPA-~16.JPG
SIPA-~17.JPG
SIPA-~18.JPG
SIPA-~19.JPG
SIPA-~20.JPG
SIPA-~21.JPG
SIPA-~22.JPG
SIPA-~23.JPG
SIPA-~24.JPG
SIPA-~25.JPG
SIPA-~26.JPG
SIPA-~27.JPG
SIPA-~28.JPG
SIPA-~29.JPG
SIPA-~30.JPG
SIPA-~31.JPG
SIPA-~32.JPG
SIPA-~33.JPG
SIPA-~34.JPG
SIPA-~35.JPG
SIPA-~36.JPG
SIPA-~37.JPG
SIPA-~38.JPG
SIPA-~39.JPG
SIPA-~40.JPG
SIPA-~41.JPG
SIPA-~42.JPG
SIPA-~43.JPG
SIPA-~44.JPG
SIPA-~45.JPG
SIPA-~46.JPG
SIPA-~47.JPG
SIPA-~48.JPG
SIPA-~49.JPG
SIPA-~50.JPG
SIPA-~51.JPG
SIPA-~52.JPG
SIPA-~53.JPG
SIPA-~54.JPG
SIPA-~55.JPG
SIPA-~56.JPG
SIPA-~57.JPG
SIPA-~58.JPG
SIPA-~59.JPG
SIPA-~60.JPG
SIPA-~61.JPG
SIPA-~62.JPG
SIPA-~63.JPG
SIPA-~64.JPG
SIPA-~65.JPG
SIPA-~66.JPG
SIPA-~67.JPG
SIPA-~68.JPG
SIPA-~69.JPG
SIPA-~70.JPG
SIPA-~71.JPG
SIPA-~72.JPG
SIPA-~73.JPG
SIPA-~74.JPG
SIPA-~75.JPG
SIPA-~76.JPG
SIPA-~77.JPG
SIPA-~78.JPG
SIPA-~79.JPG
SIPA-~80.JPG
SIPA-~81.JPG
SIPA-~82.JPG
SIPA-~83.JPG
SIPA-~84.JPG
SIPA-~85.JPG
SIPA-~86.JPG
SIPA-~87.JPG
SIPA-~88.JPG
SIPA-~89.JPG
SIPA-~90.JPG
SIPA-~91.JPG
SIPA-~92.JPG
SIPA-~93.JPG
SIPA-~94.JPG
SIPA-~95.JPG
SIPA-~96.JPG
SIPA-~97.JPG
SIPA-~98.JPG
SIPA-~99.JPG
SIPA~100.JPG
SIPA~101.JPG
SIPA~102.JPG
SIPA~103.JPG
SIPA~104.JPG
SIPA~105.JPG
SIPA~106.JPG
SIPA~107.JPG
SIPA~108.JPG
SIPA~109.JPG
SIPA~110.JPG
SIPA~111.JPG
SIPA~112.JPG
SIPA~113.JPG
SIPA~114.JPG
SIPA~115.JPG
SIPA~116.JPG
SIPA~117.JPG
SIPA~118.JPG
SIPA~119.JPG
SIPA~120.JPG
SIPA~121.JPG
SIPA~122.JPG
SIPA~123.JPG
SIPA~124.JPG
SIPA~125.JPG
SIPA~126.JPG
SIPA~127.JPG
SIPA~128.JPG
SIPA~129.JPG
SIPA~130.JPG
SIPA~131.JPG
SIPA~132.JPG
SIPA~133.JPG
SIPA~134.JPG
SIPA~135.JPG
SIPA~136.JPG
SIPA~137.JPG
SIPA~138.JPG
SIPA~139.JPG
SIPA~140.JPG
SIPA~141.JPG
SIPA~142.JPG
SIPA~143.JPG
SIPA~144.JPG
SIPA~145.JPG
SIPA~146.JPG
SIPA~147.JPG
SIPA~148.JPG
SIPA~149.JPG
SIPA~150.JPG
SIPA~151.JPG
SIPA~152.JPG
SIPA~153.JPG
SIPA~154.JPG
SIPA~155.JPG
SIPA~156.JPG
SIPA~157.JPG
SIPA~158.JPG
SIPA~159.JPG
SIPA~160.JPG
SIPA~161.JPG
SIPA~162.JPG
SIPA~163.JPG
SIPA~164.JPG
SIPA~165.JPG
SIPA~166.JPG
SIPA~167.JPG
SIPA~168.JPG
SIPA~169.JPG
SIPA~170.JPG
SIPA~171.JPG
SIPA~172.JPG
SIPA~173.JPG
SIPA~174.JPG
SIPA~175.JPG
SIPA~176.JPG
SIPA~177.JPG
SIPA~178.JPG
SIPA~179.JPG
SIPA~180.JPG
SIPA~181.JPG
SIPA~182.JPG
SIPA~183.JPG
SIPA~184.JPG
SIPA~185.JPG
SIPA~186.JPG
SIPA~187.JPG
SIPA~188.JPG
SIPA~189.JPG
SIPA~190.JPG
SIPA~191.JPG
SIPA~192.JPG
SIPA~193.JPG
SIPA~194.JPG
SIPA~195.JPG
SIPA~196.JPG
SIPA~197.JPG
SIPA~198.JPG
SIPA~199.JPG
SIPA~200.JPG
SIPA~201.JPG
SIPA~202.JPG
SIPA~203.JPG
SIPA~204.JPG
SIPA~205.JPG
SIPA~206.JPG
SIPA~207.JPG
SIPA~208.JPG
SIPA~209.JPG
SIPA~210.JPG
SIPA~211.JPG
SIPA~212.JPG
SIPA~213.JPG
SIPA~214.JPG
SIPA~215.JPG
SIPA~216.JPG
SIPA~217.JPG
SIPA~218.JPG
SIPA~219.JPG
SIPA~220.JPG
SIPA~221.JPG
SIPA~222.JPG
SIPA~223.JPG
SIPA~224.JPG
SIPA~225.JPG
SIPA~226.JPG
SIPA~227.JPG
SIPA~228.JPG
SIPA~229.JPG
SIPA~230.JPG
SIPA~231.JPG
SIPA~232.JPG
SIPA~233.JPG
SIPA~234.JPG
SIPA~235.JPG
SIPA~236.JPG
SIPA~237.JPG
SIPA~238.JPG
SIPA~239.JPG
SIPA~240.JPG
SIPA~241.JPG
SIPA~242.JPG
SIPA~243.JPG
SIPA~244.JPG
SIPA~245.JPG
SIPA~246.JPG
SIPA~247.JPG
SIPA~248.JPG
SIPA~249.JPG
SIPA~250.JPG
SIPA~251.JPG
SIPA~252.JPG
SIPA~253.JPG
SIPA~254.JPG
SIPA~255.JPG
SIPA~256.JPG
SIPA~257.JPG
SIPA~258.JPG
SIPA~259.JPG
SIPA~260.JPG
SIPA~261.JPG
SIPA~262.JPG
SIPA~263.JPG
SIPA~264.JPG
SIPA~265.JPG
SIPA~266.JPG
SIPA~267.JPG
SIPA~268.JPG
SIPA~269.JPG
SIPA~270.JPG
SIPA~271.JPG
SIPA~272.JPG
SIPA~273.JPG
SIPA~274.JPG
SIPA~275.JPG
SIPA~276.JPG
SIPA~277.JPG
SIPA~278.JPG
SIPA~279.JPG
SIPA~280.JPG
SIPA~281.JPG
SIPA~282.JPG
SIPA~283.JPG
SIPA~284.JPG
SIPA~285.JPG
SIPA~286.JPG
SIPA~287.JPG
SIPA~288.JPG
SIPA~289.JPG
SIPA~290.JPG
SIPA~291.JPG
SIPA~292.JPG
SIPA~293.JPG
SIPA~294.JPG
SIPA~295.JPG
SIPA~296.JPG
SIPA~297.JPG
SIPA~298.JPG
SIPA~299.JPG
SIPA~300.JPG
SIPA~301.JPG
SIPA~302.JPG
SIPA~303.JPG
SIPA~304.JPG
SIPA~305.JPG
SIPA~306.JPG
SIPA~307.JPG
SIPA~308.JPG
SIPA~309.JPG
SIPA~310.JPG
SIPA~311.JPG
SIPA~312.JPG
SIPA~313.JPG
SIPA~314.JPG
SIPA~315.JPG
SIPA~316.JPG
SIPA~317.JPG
SIPA~318.JPG
SIPA~319.JPG
SIPA~320.JPG
SIPA~321.JPG
SIPA~322.JPG
SIPA~323.JPG
SIPA~324.JPG
SIPA~325.JPG
SIPA~326.JPG
SIPA~327.JPG
SIPA~328.JPG
SIPA~329.JPG
SIPA~330.JPG
SIPA~331.JPG
SIPA~332.JPG
SIPA~333.JPG
SIPA~334.JPG
SIPA~335.JPG
SIPA~336.JPG
SIPA~337.JPG
SIPA~338.JPG
SIPA~339.JPG
SIPA~340.JPG
SIPA~341.JPG
SIPA~342.JPG
SIPA~343.JPG
SIPA~344.JPG
SIPA~345.JPG
SIPA~346.JPG
SIPA~347.JPG
SIPA~348.JPG
SIPA~349.JPG
SIPA~350.JPG
SIPA~351.JPG
SIPA~352.JPG
SIPA~353.JPG
SIPA~354.JPG
SIPA~355.JPG
SIPA~356.JPG
SIPA~357.JPG
SIPA~358.JPG
SIPA~359.JPG
SIPA~360.JPG
SIPA~361.JPG
SIPA~362.JPG
SIPA~363.JPG
SIPA~364.JPG
SIPA~365.JPG
SIPA~366.JPG
SIPA~367.JPG
SIPA~368.JPG
SIPA~369.JPG
SIPA~370.JPG
SIPA~371.JPG
SIPA~372.JPG
SIPA~373.JPG
SIPA~374.JPG
SIPA~375.JPG
SIPA~376.JPG
SIPA~377.JPG
SIPA~378.JPG
SIPA~379.JPG
SIPA~380.JPG
SIPA~381.JPG
SIPA~382.JPG
SIPA~383.JPG
SIPA~384.JPG
SIPA~385.JPG
SIPA~386.JPG
SIPA~387.JPG
SIPA~388.JPG
SIPA~389.JPG
SIPA~390.JPG
SIPA~391.JPG
SIPA~392.JPG
SIPA~393.JPG
SIPA~394.JPG
SIPA~395.JPG
SIPA~396.JPG
SIPA~397.JPG
SIPA~398.JPG
SIPA~399.JPG
SIPA~400.JPG
SIPA~401.JPG
SIPA~402.JPG
SIPA~403.JPG
SIPA~404.JPG
SIPA~405.JPG
SIPA~406.JPG
SIPA~407.JPG
SIPA~408.JPG
SIPA~409.JPG
SIPA~410.JPG
SIPA~411.JPG
SIPA~412.JPG
SIPA~413.JPG
SIPA~414.JPG
SIPA~415.JPG
SIPA~416.JPG
SIPA~417.JPG



If whatever attacked this street light pole also attacked WTC 7 and made the entry points for two 737 planes 1 and 2 WTC 1 and 2 then I pretty sure I got the solution to what happened..

Search