Con Edison diesel tanks or structural deficiencies and who falsified WTC 7 blueprints

Con Edison Lawsuit about "structural deficiencies" or Port Authority installed "diesel fuel tanks"

Section 5.0 explains how the inadequate bracing of the interior columns was directly responsible for the progression of global collapse.
https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/aegis-nordenson-expert-report-2-pdf.16785/


nydailynews says its about "structural deficiencies"
"Con Edison and its insurance companies claimed a company owned by developer Larry Silverstein and others was responsible for World Trade Center 7 being destroyed in the terrorist attacks." i.e an inside job.. "
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/court-strikes-wtc-building-collapse-suit-article-1.1537539

thefederation says its about "diesel fuel tanks"

Con Ed and the insurers say that several diesel fuel tanks installed at 7 World Trade Center to power emergency generators for the command center were responsible for feeding the fire and triggering a failure of the building’s steel structural supports.

Con Ed’s suit charges that the Port Authority was negligent in allowing the fuel tanks to be built and in failing to follow city and state fire codes. The Port Authority has maintained that it has met or exceeded code requirements in its buildings.
http://www.thefederation.org/documents/index.htm

WTC7 - The Stiffener Plates Explained

Bailey conversely bases his assumptions on the ignition of the diesel. His summary was essentially thus-There weren't enough shear bolts. If the diesel fuel ignited......Then, later, it was revealed there was (appx to my memory) 30 more bolts than previously known in the relevant parts." Is this part of the blueprint falsification issue?

World Trade Center 9/11 Blueprint Fraud Key Points. Credits From Albury Smith

1. -Two 3/4" X 5-1/2" X 18" WEB stiffener plates (.580" web in A2001 girder) weighing ~21.5# each
2. -12" bearing vs 11" is only 1/2"
3. The three W12 X 19 beams were only there to stiffen that one spandrel beam
The key to the stiffeners is that they strengthen both the web and bottom flanges.  NIST's failure mode was in the flange.  When they got caught they obfuscated by saying they weren't necessary for the analysis because there was no web crippling.  The WEB stiffener plates factor that defeats the initiation hypothesis and the spandrel beam stiffeners would also stiffen the G3005 beam and in turn work against the girder buckling also defeats the initiation hypothesis..  

 Dr. Pepper's letter to Todd Zinser at Commerce: