Wednesday, March 31, 2021

September 11th A Street Clock Says 9:04 was the Impact Time

September 11th A Street Clock Says 9:04 was the Impact Time

Or was it based on  NIST 9:02:59 based on the moment the broadcasters lost power?

National Institute of Standards and Technology in September 2005, pp. 83-84, timed this event at 9:02:59 a.m., established from time stamps in four September 11 telecasts."
Basically saying "we saw it on T.V and NOT based on power issues or was the power issue actually the real story? So why would NIST create a cover story about a stupid detail like this?
"The time was 9:02:59 A.M.: The times used here for both plane crashes are those established by the NIST, which based its readings on the moment power was lost to television broadcasters working on the top floor of the north tower.
The NIST times, while lacking the elegant arithmetical acrobatics, have the virtue of being directly fixed by the moment the broadcasters lost power. "

The power went out two times?  This quote makes no sense at all. Both crashes?
Posted by at 1 comment:

Saturday, March 20, 2021

How Bad Is Ebay Now in 2021?


How Bad Is Ebay Now in 2021? 
https://community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/How-Bad-Is-Ebay-Now-in-2021/m-p/31717014#M1718346

I need Defamation lawyer

Defamation is typically defined as a false statement someone makes about you, which they publish as a statement of fact, and which harms your personal and/or professional reputation or causes you other damages, including financial loss and emotional distress.

Character Defamation allowed by eBay feedback?

Not allowed Not removable

These types of feedback comments aren't removed:

  • Feedback comments containing accusatory language such as "fraud," "liar," "cheater," "scam artist," or "con man." Although this type of comment is strongly discouraged, it isn't removed unless it also contains content that isn't allowed

Slander on Ebay, Lawsuit next! 

The main issue was why are buyers allowed to name call sellers on ebay?  Did you address that? Have you ever been called a "scammer" on ebay? What can be done to stop this?   I think it is called slander what he did on ebay and ebay is run by bots, so no one is home to consider anything.  These responses are just a way to  create a distraction from the issue of slander.  That didn't work. 

lets review "sellers posting negative feedback for buyers." not the main issue but okay. 
I copied the last guys "negative" feedback to my  feedback and guess what! Only one got deleted !! 

"eBay's customer service has explained the company's position" No they have not! I never spoke to customers service" What the hell? 

"Your feedback was removed and will not be reinstated" It was NOT negative. Look at the screenshots!  I copied the last guy!

"it's apparent eBay will not remove your buyer's feedback." This I DO CARE ABOUT! 

"Speaking strictly for myself, I generally won't buy from a seller who has a rating lower than 99%. That's what I'd be working on--getting that percentage back up there." Good! this shows that I have been damaged and since I have no control over what people say, it was eBay's job to stop this slander when I notified them.  So now the focus is legal.  Have a nice day!  

Missing the "99th Ave" part 

The USPS Shipping Label missing 99th Ave


"Based in United States, yaiynf0 has been an eBay member since Jun 01, 2020" No he is not based in 
United Stated or why would he need a third party shipper which an online troll "" said was perfectly fine thing to do! 





 
ebay deleted by ebay.com


Hello danplessegreatstuff,

You have received a private message in The eBay Community.

Subject: Two of your recent threads and one of your recent posts have been removed
 to 
‎03-20-2021 03:34 PM

Your post "Re: Why Did Ebay refused to remove 'This seller is a scammer, do not buy anything here' ??" from 03-20-2021 10:16 AM PST was removed. You posted the following:

QHow Bad Is #Ebay Now in 2021?
https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-bad-is-ebay-now-in-2021.html

Your thread "How Bad Is #Ebay Now in 2021?" from 03-20-2021 10:17 AM PST was removed. You posted the following:

QHow Bad Is #Ebay Now in 2021?
https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-bad-is-ebay-now-in-2021.html

Before posting again, please review the Rules of Engagement. Thank you for your cooperation in keeping the eBay Community a friendly, productive place for all.

kh-gary
Moderator


ebay just deletes away the problem. 


Buyer has been giving out wrong addresses to sellers and sellers can't warn other sellers about the wrong address issue because the negative review button is inactive. Why can't ebay check all address before a shipping label is printed with AI? Then ebay deleted my review of buyer so now more sellers might get caught in a giant trap by a scammer who wants to destroy ebay. Ebay bot review process FAILED to removed his bad review defaults to agreeing with the sellers because it is not worth time or effort to do anything. After that a troll responds or another AI bot again agrees with seller on community forums. Making the situation worse for sellers.  reply  from troll #2  Trolls seem to know more then what I tell them which could be the same guy trolling with different accounts.  


 feedback when it wasn't deleted yet by ebay.com



This is what I got from the jerk! "This seller is a scammer" 

Your question about feedback removal
Hello danplessegreatstuff,  Thanks for contacting us about this feedback that you received:

From: yaiynf0
On: 2021-03-18 12:23:52-0700
For the item: (174643423966) Nike Zoom Freak Black Iridescent 11.5

We’ve looked carefully at this feedback and see that it doesn’t qualify for removal.

eBay

We're reviewing your report

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for letting us know about a buyer who may have been violating our policies. Here's a summary of your report.

Buyer: yaiynf0

Reason: Claimed the item was not as described when that wasn’t true

Comments:He is calling me a scammer now.

Third Party agrees with me: 

Daniel,  Gasset is a customer in Dominican Republic . He make the mistake . He is the buyer and he ship to me ( courier/ freight forwarder ) abd we ship to him to Dominican Rep . I will call him but you can and to tell him that please That it’s no part of my business I’m only trying to help you and my customer Best regards Jose Luis Montero Flash Air Cargo 305-305-2497


After all this ebay comes complete with an online community troll called 
 


Who refuses to understand what happened and cherry picks what the buyer didn't 
do wrong.  

Ebay's Online Troll 


Online Troll #2 

Hi @danplessegreatstuff 

 

It's a violation of policy for sellers to leave negative comments for buyers.  eBay will always remove them if the buyer contacts them ... and will ding the seller for the policy violation.  And the buyer gets to keep the positive feedback point.'

 

The negative comment you left appears to be in retaliation for receiving negative feedback ... which is precisely the reason why eBay took away the ability for sellers to leave leave negative/neutral feedback.

 

I'm confused why you'd think a buyer would deliberately give a wrong address?  Buyers can't collect a refund if tracking shows the package was delivered to the address they provided.

 

eBay merely rents out web space for sellers to list items.  Sellers are paying for marketing exposure ... not for detective services.  Buyers frequently buy items as gifts and have them sent directly to the recipients ... so there's no reason for the 'ship to' address to match the address on record. 

Buyers should NOT be able to do relay shipping. 

danplessegreatstuff
  
Adventurer 
 
‎03-20-2021 10:57 AM

Hello. I am just one victim out of many wrong address victims by this individual.   
Why are YOU questioning me? 

The package was never delivered to any address. It was sent back to me.
He sent me a new address DURING the delivery process after two weeks. 

I said:
Please change your address in ebay settings to this:

ATTN: Jose Yassett
Flash Air Cargo
5930 NW 99th Ave Suite 13
Doral, Florida 33178--2710

yaiynf0:

Hi, apparently there has been an error with the shipment of the article so I did not
receive it, I would like to know what happened this is my address

5930 NW 99th Av Unit 13
Flash Air Cargo
Doral, Florida
Zip Code 33178-2710

If you can clarify, I will appreciate it, best regards..

Notice he doesn't dare say his real name even now in his too late
message! 

My "negative comment" was please change your address to ... and I
attempted HELP him correct his mistakes. 

I saved all the issues via screenshots so I could refer back to them here 
https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2021/03/how-bad-is-ebay-now-in-2021.html

>>package wasn't moving along correctly ... so they resent you their address<<

How can you change an mailing address in transit ??? 
IF you can change a mailing address in transit please let me know!!! 
Or are you just making stuff up? 

>>You have no evidence whatsoever that the buyer is a scammer.<< 

I do. He does not give his real name. The shipper refuses to give his full real name.
The address was incorrect and he was told it was incorrect before and yet he still sent me the
wrong/incorrect address. 

After that he blames me for his mistake and gives me a negative review . I did nothing wrong but try and help.  

 >> The two addresses are identical.  <<

No they are not, read what the "shipping label" says.

Second he does not give his name. How does a business know who to then
ship too? 

Shipping Label says: 
YASSETT JOSE YNFANTE JIMENEZ
5930 NW AVENUE SUITE 13 UNIT 13
FLASH AIR CARGO YASSETT YNFANTE JIMENEZ
MIAMI FL 33178

Yassett Jose Ynfante Jimenez facebook page 

https://www.facebook.com/yassettjose.ynfantejimenez




Tracking Number: 9400108205496357264069  


March 18, 2021, 10:54 am
Delivered, To Original Sender
SAINT JAMES, NY 11780 
Your item has been delivered to the original sender at 10:54 am on March 18, 2021 in SAINT JAMES, NY 11780.


March 18, 2021, 7:59 am
Out for Delivery
SAINT JAMES, NY 11780 

March 18, 2021, 7:48 am
Arrived at Post Office
SAINT JAMES, NY 11780 

March 17, 2021, 10:12 pm
Departed USPS Regional Origin Facility
MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 17, 2021, 12:02 pm
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 17, 2021, 8:43 am
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
METRO NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 16, 2021, 5:43 am
Departed USPS Regional Facility
OPA LOCKA FL DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 14, 2021, 12:15 pm
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
OPA LOCKA FL DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 13, 2021, 10:54 am
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
METRO NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 13, 2021, 10:21 am
Departed USPS Regional Facility
MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 12, 2021, 1:46 am
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 11, 2021, 11:43 am
Departed USPS Regional Facility
JERSEY CITY NJ NETWORK DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 10, 2021, 3:53 pm
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
JERSEY CITY NJ NETWORK DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 9, 2021, 9:59 am
Departed USPS Regional Facility
JACKSONVILLE FL NETWORK DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 9, 2021, 8:27 am
Arrived at USPS Regional Destination Facility
JACKSONVILLE FL NETWORK DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 6, 2021, 6:59 am
Return to Sender Processed
MIAMI, FL 33166 

March 5, 2021, 3:41 pm
Insufficient Address
MIAMI, FL 33178 

March 5, 2021, 11:24 am
Insufficient Address
MIAMI, FL 33178 

March 5, 2021, 6:10 am
Out for Delivery
MIAMI, FL 33178 

March 5, 2021, 2:15 am
Departed USPS Regional Facility
OPA LOCKA FL DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 5, 2021, 1:33 am
Insufficient Address
MIAMI, FL 33178 

March 5, 2021, 1:33 am
Arrived at Post Office
MIAMI, FL 33166 

March 4, 2021
In Transit to Next Facility

March 4, 2021, 6:13 pm
Arrived at USPS Regional Facility
OPA LOCKA FL DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 1, 2021, 7:25 pm
Departed USPS Regional Facility
MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 1, 2021, 5:26 pm
Arrived at USPS Regional Origin Facility
MID NY DISTRIBUTION CENTER 

March 1, 2021, 1:57 pm
USPS in possession of item
SAINT JAMES, NY 11780 

February 27, 2021, 1:11 pm
Shipping Label Created, USPS Awaiting Item
SAINT JAMES, NY 11780 

February 27, 2021
Pre-Shipment Info Sent to USPS, USPS Awaiting Item


Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, March 14, 2021

The 9/11 Report on 9/11 Scumbags

Should be called: Inside Cover Up   

Scumbag Cover up in chief  was Thomas H. Kean the whole time!



The commission the uncensored history seems censored


How could any calls on 9/11 be bogus? 




Stand down deleted and a Bogus Phone Call?

Military conflict context (deleted from wiki)


Whoever marketed the term "9/11 debunker" did a great job with with scamming the public and selling the term and the idea. I wonder who first started up with that idea? Hats off to evil. I think someone should come forward and identify themselves. However for the American and the rest of the still thinking people of the world the new refence point will be designated as the " 9/11 scumbags".  

The good news is some scrambling did take place, however the wasn't scrambling jet
at Otis AFB. All the scrambling efforts were misplaced scumbag cover up bullshit.  

The real story was Otis indirectly through CAPE2 said OTIS requests NEADS authorization. Then after that issue, we have "The national operations manager has a request to clarify, that we were able to permit military and law enforcement aircraft to fly. ". So 9/11 fighters have to deal both  1. NEADS authorization 2. then wait for authorization again after national ground stop. 3. The war games were never ended and audio tape proves the military was laughing all throughout  9/11. 


 

So who are the scumbags? Is it the military laughing away or Otis or was it the "national operations manager" ? 


At 10:17 the FBI hand written notes say "aircraft down". It would be interesting if flight 93 or flight 77 primary radar actually went dark during this time.  We know both planes went dark. 



Dick Chaney says lets stay put


An Amazing Coincidence source 

June 22, 2006, when "Hannity & Colmes" (on the FOX/RNC Channel)
"I point you to Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta's testimony before the 9/11 Commission. Mineta said he had encountered Vice President Cheney in a bunker in Washington, DC, at 9:20 AM, on the day of the attacks [forty-three minutes earlier than Cheney said he had arrived]. Every few seconds a young man would come into the room and say, 'Sir, it's 50 miles out. Sir, it's 40 miles out. Sir, it's 30 miles out,' and so on. Finally the young man asked the Vice President, 'Sir, do the orders still stand?' Cheney replied gruffly, 'Of course, the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'

The very next morning, less than twelve hours after his 9/11 testimony had been unexpectedly "exposed" to the FOX faithful, Norman Mineta resigned as Secretary of Transportation!! 

Another amazing coincidence and never heard of before 05/23/2003 story is Lynn Spencer and her spontaneous and random decision to change UAL flight 93 flight plan to help manufacture a new story about how Norman Mineta was confused on 9/11 and what he really meant was flight 93 i.e the ghost ship idea was the plane that Norman Mineta was actually talking about and not really flight 77. I wonder why it makes a difference which plane it was? Anyway, Flight Explorer does NOT support any of this new crazy made story after 5/23/03 the 9/11 Scumbags make up . NOT One one bit of it is true. So who was the " controller in Washington, unaware that the flight had crashed, was calling position reports for the coast track of United 93 to the White House"? Somehow the 9/11 Scumbags manage to create duplicate Air Traffic control managers who are will to say anything. Those duplicate and fraudulent ATC have so far been exposed but so far these stories about duplicate Air Traffic control by 9/11 Truth and so have been gone unnoticed by the public. 

9/11 Air Traffic Control Duplicates  (191 views go truth movement! go! )




New Flight Plan Causes False Reports of Plane Approaching Washington - According to author Lynn Spencer  

Touching History but this was printing in 2008  

5-23-03 

Mineta 9/11 Testimoney plenty of time to create a cover story. 

 

the new flight plan creates a “coast track” of Flight 93 on the traffic situation displays at air traffic control facilities. “A coast track,” Spencer will write, “differs from a radar track in that it is not supported by radar returns but rather by a computer-generated, projected course for the flight. Although this track did not appear on controller radar screens, its presence on their [traffic situation displays] allowed Washington controllers to monitor the flight’s progression toward Washington.” According to Spencer, the presence of this coast track leads to incorrect reports of an aircraft approaching Washington in the minutes after Flight 93 crashes. She will write, “A controller in Washington, unaware that the flight had crashed, was calling position reports for the coast track of United 93 to the White House (see (Between 10:10 a.m. and 10:18 a.m.) September 11, 2001)… as well as the FBI at the Pentagon (where firefighters were evacuated and the firefight suspended in anticipation of a second impact)” (see (10:15 a.m.-10:38 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [LYNN SPENCER, 2008]

Use The National Ground Stop to include the Military response to 9/11. 
(T8 B1 ATCSCC Tape Transcript- Position 14 Fdr- Contents- Parts 1 thru 4.pdf) 



9/11  National Ground Stop Another Opportunity For more delay i.e Stand Down 

9/11 National Ground Stop Was Another Opportunity For Military Stand Down or delay 
 
The national operations manager has a request to clarify, that we were able to permit military and law enforcement aircraft to fly. 

MR.  Okay. So you're releasing  law enforcement military aircraft.
MR.  Well, we're checking with,  with, with you and make sure that it's all right to

MR. : Okay; thank you. Okay. So we'll--we have the national operations manager here at the Command Center, and we will, you know, await your work on military and law enforcement, if it's okay for 'them to go. 

MR.  We'll get right back to you. 

The military and police [inaudible] requesting permission to go airborne [inaudible]. No. They're grounded all aircraft nationwide--MR. Okay. TAC Net back to Air 

MR.  We are working on that  request. I'll get right back on it. 

MR. : FAA Tactical Net to Air Traffic Command, Herndon. 

MR. 

MR.  Air Traffic Command. I have an affirmative on that  request to release law enforcement military 

aircraft.


Timeline for AAL77 based on radar to correlate with Mineta's testimony.

9:26 - AAL77 was 50 nautical miles out from DC
9:30 - 30 nautical miles out
9:33 - 10 nautical miles out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

 9/11 Military Mission Step One: Redefine What Stand Down Means 2021

Notes 
Flight 93 never came within 50, 30, or 10 miles of Washington D.C.


New document supports Norman Mineta's testimony about VP Dick Cheney



source 
NARA 9-11 Commission Records Released Jan 14 2009
Source: Team 8 Box 1 T8 B1 ATCSCC Tape Transcript- Position 14 Fdr- Contents- Parts 1 thru 4.pdf



Norman Mineta must have learned from the critics that his testimony on C-span was evidence of a military stand down order, so now every time Mineta talks about 9/11 he is actually trying redefine what the phrase "stand down [order] " means and he spends time trying to change the language every time he has a chance . Only a total moron would fall for Mineta's redefinition campaign. Trolls are selling the stand down redefinition campaign like their lives depend on it and in may ways their lives DO depend on it.

UAL Flight 93 A Crack In The Blue Pill Wall : When Knowing Too Much is a problem
https://youtu.be/Sxh-abiecEk

Here are some interesting 9/11 phone bridge FAA screenshots: 
TEAM BOX 8 9/11 Commission

Here flight 93 was a local flight. 

Flight 93 took off from Pittsburgh.jpg

National Ground Stop was used as another reason for the USAF not to do anything!

9/11 Norman Mineta Stand Down 2021
https://youtu.be/s68luawXrHw

Stand down shut down order.jpg


Another file T7 B19 Key 302s Fdr- Entire Contents- FBI 302s.pdf has everything 
else. 
https://www.scribd.com/document/24392516/T7-B19-Key-302s-Fdr-Entire-Contents-FBI-302s

Bombs and only three hijackers. Fours hijackers was the official amount. 

"her attendant husband" Flight 93 had no male flight attendants  

T7 B19 Key 302s Fdr- Entire Contents- FBI 302s.pdf
Titled the "Javis Johnson Bogus Call" document 

Evidence about Javis Johnson, a phone call recipient from flight UA93 
159482737_10158208042614958_5238883897211678524_n (1).jpg
Linda Justice, of Cleveland Center made the change, but no member of the press knew about it? Sounds like a scam!

How did Linda Justice see the UA 93 with a data block (thus prompting her to enter a new flight plan for the sectors it appeared to be tracking toward) when her fellow Cleveland controller, Stacy Taylor, stated to Tom Brokaw in 2002 that she saw it drop off from radar at 10:03? When did Ms Justice first see UA 93 "tracking toward Washington" on her screen?
Hide reply
boone870
The way an air traffic controller explained it to me was UA 93's data block would go into a "coast track" after the transponder returns went away. The data block would've continued on allowing Justice and other controllers to see it and tag it.
 @911RedPill  Not sure. Also not sure how it would help get the terrorists to DCA.
@boone870 Primary radar was lost too. How is that possible. Transponder was lost at 9:40. Primary was lost at 09:52:03. Once the primary is gone the data block is gone too and your story falls apart.
@boone870 autopilot to DCA. Are you kidding me right now?

@boone870 No evidence of coast track on flight software as far as know. Does this mean the story is a scam?

I search for ZOB-UA-93-new-flight-plan-and-alert-to-ZDC.mp3 and found this page:
8. UNITED 93 and it was NOT found on that page! 
094106 UA93 lost transponder controller talks to two airplanes.mp3

At 18 seconds, ZOB advises
ZDC: "We put in a new flight plan on United 93, Hagerstown, DCA.
We did that so (?) process for you".
http://www.oredigger61.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ZOB-UA-93-new-flight-plan-and-alert-to-ZDC.mp3

Not popular with the ladies

UA 93 "flight plan " No results 

United Airline Flight #93 Cockpit Voice Recorder Transcript

UA 93 lost on TSD at 1028 EDT

Here is a clip from the F2 Position, National TRACON (1 DCA 101-102 Tape 1-2 F2 1327-1450 UTC, as archived by NARA as part of the Commission files)  The F2 Position controlled the Andrews fighters once airborne.  As of 1028 the F2 Position knew that there was no target associated with UA 93. 1028 UA 93 not in system

The issue looks to be of primary interest, because it does appear that someone tampered with the 20-page transcript of the real time conversation that O’Brien had with ZOB Cleveland ATCs, on the morning of 9/11.

I believe that transcript offers some powerful clues about what transpired. I am attaching the file below. It’s pretty big — apologies for the size. Or you can download it at [http://www.911datasets.org/]

from 1407-1411, appears to have been deleted. It’s gone!

Could it be because O’Brien saw the unspeakable, i.e., saw a cruise missile crash at 10:06 AM — and reported this to the ATCs? This observation, had it been reported to the commission and/or made public, would have exposed the entire official 9/11 story as a HUGE lie, and at the same time would have revealed a criminal conspiracy in the act of “cleaning up” flight UAL 93, which had turned into a fiasco.

LJ, 26:10: "I changed the flight plan"
LJ 26:43: "by changing the flight plan, routing, they got where he came from, what kind of aircraft he was, I don't have to stay on the line with them ... Washington Center. So, that's why I changed the routing, but..."
27:28 Q: "help me understand what you did that became controversial?"
LJ: "Putting in Hagerstown..."

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7970544

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKaEtq4EMoY&t=63s

I am trying to figure out how the flight plan change from flight 93  was known by people on the ground.  This could mean evidence of a script and i.e knowing too much? 

Daniel M. Plesse
Erik Marette
 How did third parties on the ground know about the flight 93 flight plan change? How could anyone other then a select few know what was happening to Flight 93 data block on the FE displays?

You will be surprised: I CAN name the individual who said she did that - change the flight plan to HGR-DCA: The name is Linda Justice, Cleveland Center.
Here is her full interview with the 9/11 Commission:
Listen to the whole thing, if you are interested. The part we are here interested in comes at 25:30 minutes:
Q: "When you saw where the plane was heading, did you have an opinion of what his destination was?"
LJ, 26:10: "I changed the flight plan"
LJ 26:43: "by changing the flight plan, routing, they got where he came from, what kind of aircraft he was, I don't have to stay on the line with them ... Washington Center. So, that's why I changed the routing, but..."
27:28 Q: "help me understand what you did that became controversial?"
LJ: "Putting in Hagerstown..."

  • Daniel M. Plesse
     "From the Javis Johnson Bogus Call document
    How did people who were relatives of the passengers and or crew of flight 93 know about the flight 93 flight plan change as document Team 8 Box 1 from a "bogus call"?     .

    hhhh


    • Like
    • Reply
    • Share
    • 1d
  • Daniel M. Plesse
    Erik Marette
     You are not answering for a reason. Is it checkmate already? I was hoping another 20 years.

Posted by at 2 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Search