New WTC 7 "Pull it!" like Slip up by Photographer in MSM Movie makes precision prediction
Precision predictions are impossible!
While general predictions and generalizations and estimates are normal and shared openly, precision predictions however are activities of criminals and fraudsters which are not shared in the public domain. On 9/11 this sharing of private knowledge was made public and was shared openly and even found its way on the evening news.
A photographer said that the search rescue efforts ended at 5 P.M because they anticipated a steel frame building falling! (which it did at 5:20). Even Amy Goodman stopped her broadcast to go watch the event. A precise prediction was shared and allow thousands of people to take on uniform activities of filming, photographing and gathering for the shared experience.
Not only did this prediction happen but on 5:15 P.M a banner running on BBC said the prediction did actually happen a few minutes later.
Not only that but a bunch of people said it was being taken down as noted here:
The owner said the building was "pulled"
DEBUNKER Reply:
"Firefighters also predicted it. you can interpret it as the building looked like a mess, or as a miracle.
you cant seriously imply that a steel frame building could never look like it might give up? like imagine a giant building standing on one girder with the whole rest of the bottom gone. do you think people would say "steel buildings never fall, so im sure it will hold"
you can only push the "it never happened, so it cant happen" logic so far."
Reply
The keyword or concept you are avoiding is:
anticipation inside of a small time window!
I don't think you are grasping the tight time window, anticipation concept and have over estimated mankind's abilities to estimate and predict the future.
1. All rescue efforts were stopped because building 7 was going down 20 minutes before it happens.
2. 15 minutes before it happened news origination have already announced WTC 7 has fallen down.
3. All fraudulence has to sold via marketing to make the impossible possible.
Can people anticipate something that's never happened? Because a photographer said that search rescue efforts ended at 5 P.M because they anticipated a steel frame building falling which it did at 5:20.
As noted here
Not only did this prediction happen but on 5:15 P.M a banner running on BBC said the prediction did actually happen a few minutes later.
Not only that but a bunch of people said it was being taken down as noted here:
Noam chomsky defense was " either complete lunatics or they weren't involved." my reply below The reasons are quite straightforward, and have been presented many times to ears that are unwilling to listen. Uncontroversially, the Bush administration (or their Masters, in your version) intended to invade Iraq well before 9/ll. You agree, and have even sent me some of the minor evidence to this effect. General Wesley Clark said "Sir we made the decision to go to war with Iraq. AND WITH SEVEN COUNTIES IN FIVE YEARS Uncontroversially, they blamed 9/11 mainly on Saudis, not Iraqis. Uncontroversially, they had quite a struggle to gain support for the planned invasion of Iraq, and in fact overwhelmingly failed. Almost the entire world was opposed, and even in the US in order to gain support they had to launch a huge propaganda campaign, fabricating laughable tales that soon fell apart discrediting them, etc. Uncontroversially, if they had blamed it on Iraqis, they would have had clear sailing: overwhelming support domestically and internationally, a UN resolution, etc. Therefore, they are either complete lunatics or they weren't involved. They are not lunatics. QED "Therefore, they are either complete lunatics or they weren't involved." If you change "complete lunatics" into "complete confidence" that everyone would fold under pressure of patriotism, or could be duped by scientific fraud and successes in Oklahoma City and other operations I would say you are correct. As a person who understands the propensity for a population to be duped by a strong enough force, I am shocked that YOU can't see the blizzard of emotions that the media has perpetrated globally with a supporting cast of scientists, politicians, yellow journalism and the removal of ALL investigative compatibility to look deeper and independently, surely you can see confidence level increasing with these lunatics?
The Master is not Crazy by Noam Chomsky They blamed Saudis Not Iraqis
"Uncontroversially, they blamed 9/11 mainly on Saudis, not Iraqis"
No they blamed Osama Bin Laden and he was kicked out of Saudi Arabia and also the
"Red Headbands" was The "Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine".
So no the Saudis were not blamed until much later, By that time WMD's was the next mess fraud of main stream media.
Why isn't the "a huge propaganda campaign, fabricating laughable tales" not considered evidence of lunatics?
+danp5648 seriously dan... I don't understand what you are saying.. Your comments are completely incoherent... Noam Chomsky is exactly right. If they had blamed it on Iraqis, the whole world would have supported them invading Iraq... A desire that Chomsky and many others clearly admit they had long before 9/11.... What he is pointing out is the simple fact that IF 9/11 was an inside job aimed at gaining the support they sought to invade Iraq... then they would have made the hijackers Iraqi not Saudi... Why do you not seem to understand this?
They did NOT blame Saudis, they actually blamed Osama Bin Laden and he was kicked out of Saudi Arabia and The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, why can't you understand that?
I know what you are saying BUT your basic facts are 100% wrong.
Which "FACTS" do we agree upon? ZERO! NOTHING! Not one fact from you or him have been correct or nor will your facts will ever become correct... You assume their is common ground or Uncontroversial facts. That is not true.
"The desire (to invade Iraq) that Chomsky and many others clearly admit they had long before 9/11.." is not 100% true. The desire was ALL OF THE MIDDLE EAST. THAT's why the video "seven countries in five years" was included above, it debunks the Iraq only "desire" Why can't you understand that?
I disagree with you on everything you say, even your hypothetical stories and hypotheticaloutcomes. Why? because its not correct and not even close. That's the bottom line.
Atta the ringleader WAS Egyptian Egyptian Egyptian. You do understand??
Mohamed Mohamed el-Amir Awad el-Sayed Atta was an Egyptian hijacker and one of the ringleaders of the September 11 attacks
Get you facts right!
"Did the government say?" Can you please say exactly who and what you are talking about or stop everything until you do? Did a report say? Please mention the title. But NO the government DID NOT SAY. NO
Abdul Rahman al-Omari living Florida has four children. Abdulaziz al-Omar was living in Jeddah has four children.
Abdul Rahman al-Omari (Arabic: عبدالرØمن العمري, Ê¿Abd ar-Raḥman ... He had moved out of his Vero Beach, Florida residence with his wife and four children on September 3, 2001, but it was quickly arrested by The FBI then named Abdulaziz al-Omari as a hijacker,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rahman_al-Omari
Ziad Jarrah WAS Lebanese.
Add an "i" you get Abdulaziz al-Omari a fake person who happen to have Abdulaziz al-Omar Florida address and he sued and won.
+danp5648 ppl really have lost all common sense and critical thinking abilities!!! It hard to understand how ppl still think Iraq was responsible for 911 Israel has everything to do with 911!!!
+Bobbo Seas He thinks that because the fake 19 hijackers were Saudi Arabian (which they were not) 9/11 it was not insider developed because that's a stupid mistake.. Part 2 Just because the desire for an Iraq invasion was high does not mean 9/11 was insider developed., it clearly makes it more possible because of 9/11. The question falls on LIHOP let it happen or MIHOP make it happen. Both argument are not correct. The desire was much larger.
9/11 Red Devil_s Head (switch to 1080 HD)
9 11 Depleted uranium, Radiation Exposure, World Trade Center
WTC 911 Notice the ground shake
South Tower Explosions Right Before Impact
Guns n Butter Indira Singh 9/11 mold, earthquake damage report
9-11 Ground Shaking Like An Earthquake
9 11 Loud Rumbling earthquake witness before plane crash witness
JPEGSnoop result on Robert Fisch photo. wtc_1_017_15.JPG below
I remember watching an old WTC being built video via NIST with that stupid 70's music. While watching that video I learned a few things. For Example, for safety reasons they made the outer wall a few feet above were the new floors would be so maintenance / construction workers could reach around and bolt in each new section and not fall to their death.. The plain worked perfectly and no one fell over the side . However, these four bolt seams could become a weak points to jet impacts. Maybe too many "No Plane Theorist" falsely believe the requirements were the columns themselves, however if you lower the requirements to four bolts then maybe its possible. Both towers was a bolt based house of cards. Weaken the bolts and blast. Anywho, so dead center between each floor just has these four bolt based creases / seams running around entire side of the whole tower. I would love to map out these creases / seams and check for a prefect storm or maximum creases running between the floors and check to see if those planes went for those locations. Maybe the floors acted like pivot points and helped tear the steel belts which belted up the towers. Maybe someone knew the column sections were made to break-a-way on impact. They never said the towers would resist an impact, maybe the requirements was just survivability and to hell with the people inside. One of issues was lack of resistance and the other was zero impact debris field. Maybe this solves those issues by lowering the requirements down to just the bolts.
This does not change the many issues that still exist. i.e
My name is Robert. I was having breakfast at Joe Junior's in the West Village when a crowd starting to form outside. In short order, we learned the World Trade had suffered some catastrophe.
After taking a look at the black gash in the facade of the building, I abandoned breakfast and ran to my apartment across the street and grabbed my camera. It was loaded and ready (I'd just gotton back from Florida several days before).
I snapped a few pictures and saw the second plane in my viewfinder. I snapped it instinctively. I had no idea it was going to hit the south tower.
My camera was trained on the towers when the second plane
came into view. The picture I took of the airplane should be in the repository.
As viewed from the north, the plane appeared to vanish. When the building erupted in flame, I still had this "disconnect" in my mind and at first refused to believe the plane I'd just seen hit the building. After a few seconds when the sound wave reached us, it was fairly clear that was what happened.
