jjjA third building = WTC Building 7
"A third building"
"A building next to the trade center"
and
"large building next the trade center “has also collapsed” 10:40 ..
It was Mr. Hess's interview that told the story and provided the details which BBC 9/11 news updates and Jennings subtracted on 9/11. Mr. Hess interview provided 1. the building number who he was with 2. Barry Jennings and the story of 3. an explosion inside the building. Without Hess's interview the early morning BBC building 7 was "attacked" report and [a few minutes later] collapsed can now be associated with early explosives and conspiracy.
It was ultimately Mr. Hess's interview that was the only one to provide the details on the morning of 9/11 that is the ultimate convincer of an 9/11 insider bombing attack concept. The theory is that insiders set up bombs timed to explode while the dust was still to thick to see anything to fell a building and get away with it. Without him, WTC building 7 bomb witness evidence would be less supportive for other major evidence like how building 7 falling like elevator into center of the earth and looking exactly like how a building would act if it was a building demolition. The BBC and Barry Jennings both hid those facts from the public. I wonder if Dr. Leroy Hulsey was told to not to talk about or bring up the explosive nature building 7 collapse and or it was it about leaving that part out as an inference for people to figure out on their own. Or is it that control demolition requires a different set of evidence and expertise. I will go with BOTH!
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7 World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) University of Alaska Fairbanks
My theory is that details could have been subtracted or deemed unimportant due to organized conspiracy to omit important facts, nonetheless at the time and in any case the BBC reported this news: and I quote “another building [next] to trade center collapsed” and “there has been an attack on [other] trade center”. Only a follow up interview of these BBC reporters would get to bottom of the missing details and get them to explain what they meant by [other] trade center and [next] to the trade center and what an "attack" is and meant to be and why they thought Building 7 collapsed right as the North Tower collapsed. My guess is the plan was to bring down Building 7 while the dust blinded NYC but that it failed to work. The building stood. Maybe a BBC watch dog group could do this kind of work. Or maybe that hinting of bombs and explosives is the only way to get past the Orson Welles censorship and only a follow up interview of these BBC reporters will get to bottom of the missing details and get them to explain what they meant by [other] trade center and [next] to the trade center and what an "attack" meant and why they thought Building 7 collapsed during or soon after the North Tower collapse. My guess is the plan was to bring down Building 7 while the dust blinded NYC and it failed to work. The building stood. Maybe a BBC watch dog group could do this kind of work.
The BBC reported “the other building” and “a building next to trade center” was also “attacked” but that is NOT all, other news outlets included “explosions” in their reports and not just fire. The BBC reported a large building “next” the trade center “has also collapsed” because a large explosion happened AFTER South Tower fell and the same large explosion happened AFTER the North Tower collapsed as reported by Captain Jay Jonas who was inside the B stairway..
https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2021/10/there-is-no-reason-for-explosions.html
In his presentation, Graeme showed how Sue’s account of what she witnessed — as vividly documented in the breathtaking book Women at Ground Zero — included all six characteristics of explosions outlined in the textbook Practical Bomb Scene Investigation. One by one, he listed these characteristics and Sue’s corresponding statements:
- Sound: “A couple of minutes later, it sounded like bombs going off. That’s when the explosions happened.”
- Positive blast pressure phase: “The windows blew in.” “Each one of those explosions picked me up and threw me.”
- Partial vacuum during positive blast pressure phase: “There was this incredible rush of air, and it literally sucked the breath out of my lungs.”
- Negative blast pressure phase: “Everything went out of me with this massive wind . . . Stuff was just flying past. Then it stopped and got really quiet, and then everything came back at us. I could breathe at that point, but now I was sucking all that stuff in, too. It was almost like a back draft. It sounded like a tornado.”
- Incendiary or thermal effect: “. . . he threw me under the hose, which in a way felt great, because I didn’t realize until then that my skin was actually burning. I had burn marks, not like you’d have from a fire, but my face was all red, my chest was red.”
- Fragmentation and shrapnel: “. . . there was stuff coming out of my body like you wouldn’t believe. It was like shrapnel. It’s still coming out.”
Actual video on of all 6 phrases of an explosion exist on YT @
 |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1dMsKnBQFU |
