Why did Pete Zalewski leave flight 11 flying off course into oncoming traffic out of the equation on 9/11?

 

2 hours and six minutes 9/11 off course time totals using military radar and
USA Today. 

AA officials—Bill Peacock and David Canoles—later say that the hijacker transmissions were not attributed to a flight..  

Why did Pete Zalewski leave flight 11 flying off course into oncoming traffic out of the equation on 9/11?

Spoiler Alert

It was clearly a cover up by the FAA. Pete Zalewski was told to turn him 20 degrees Northwest because the other 9/11 flights needed more time to get airborne and I bet this request from FAA HQ was recorded on 9/11. What Pete did was a small stepping stone towards 9/11. Every organization took a single step across a single stone and together all the steps combined added up. Otis told FAA Cape to go F themselves. Then the issue was who was allowed to call who. Whatever it took to waste time. What choice did FAA have after the military wasn't functioning? Someone picked 9/11 was the day that everyone was going to be too busy to fight for America. We have "Operation Red Flag", Operation Southern and Operation Northern Watch which sent fighters away to Iraq! 

 Operation Tripod I and II DOJ, FBI, FEMA NYC war games on the ground which allowed the building of the new OEM for NYC after running from WTC 7 early, all before 9/11 and another cover up and cover story no one seemed to pick up on.  

The trolls will try and throw you off the issues get you off track as much as possible. 

Why did Pete Zalewskileave flight 11 flying off course into oncoming traffic out of the equation on 9/11?

BROKAW: (Voiceover) But the second controller did have incoming flights directly in the path of American 11.

(Controller working)

Mr. MARTINS: I had to plan ahead. On this new heading he was on, he was opposite direction with my Boston arrivals, and I had to get them underneath him.

“Zalewski radios the pilot a routine order to turn, to keep enough space between American 11 and another plane.” (No other plane was seen on radar in front of AA11)
http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=9-11/air-traffic-controllers-recall-events.txt

Air traffic controllers recall events

Air traffic controllers recall events { September 11 2002 } Original Source Link: (May no longer be active) http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2002/msnbc091102b.html http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2002/msnbc091102b.html America Remembers Air traffic controllers describe how events unfolded as they saw them on September 11th Dateline NBC September 11, 2002 BODY: Announcer: Here now is Tom Brokaw. TOM BROKAW: Good evening. Where were you on September 11th? Today, certainly here in New York, with all the sad memories and solemn memorials, we've heard answers from a number of people: grieving family members, survivors, government officials. But there is one group we have not heard from. They saw the attack coming from the very beginning to the end. They are the air traffic controllers who were in charge of America's air space that morning. What they witnessed, even now, is hard to fathom. And what they managed to do had never been done before. Tonight, for the first time, they tell their compelling story. Offscreen Voice #1: (Voiceover) It's beautiful day. It was a great day to be flying. (Plane taking off) Unidentified Air Traffic Controller #1: Contact Boston center line, 1-2-5. Offscreen Voice #2: (Voiceover) Controllers are doing a great job moving the airplanes. (Airplanes taking off and landing) Unidentified Air Traffic Controller #2: Runway four left, clear for takeoff. Voice #2: (Voiceover) Nothing was different. (Airplanes taking off and landing) BROKAW: (Voiceover) September 11th seemed a perfect day to fly in the Northeast. Daybreak was crisp and bright. There was unlimited visibility, no ceiling, conditions were just right. (Airplane taking off; New York City; World Trade Center before attacks) Unidentified Air Traffic Controller #3: Northwest 553, you're evac is correct. Mr. GREG CALLAHAN: We were very busy. Things were moving nicely. Unidentified Air Traffic Controller #4: Zero-one-five, you may see traffic inbound from runway four right. BROKAW: (Voiceover) As usual, the skies over America that day were crowded with airplanes, often 4,000 to 6,000 airborne at any given time. For air traffic controllers, keeping them moving safely and on time is an intricately choreographed ballet, each plane moving through the air at different speeds, altitudes, and headings. (Airplanes at airport; controllers in control tower; radar screen; map showing plane locations) Mr. CURT APPLEGATE: It is a thing of beauty. It is like clockwork. BROKAW: (Voiceover) Making it all happen is a complex mix of manpower and technology, procedure and judgment. The pressure is constant, the stress, unrelenting. (Controllers in control tower) Unidentified Air Traffic Controller #5: British Midland 701 descend and maintain flight level 350. BROKAW: (Voiceover) Despite the computers and training, the backup systems and safety equipment, in the end, it is the air traffic controllers who must at a moment's notice make sense of it all. But on this day,

http://newsmine.org/content.php?ol=9-11/air-traffic-controllers-recall-events.txt

(BROKAW: (Voiceover) But then, 8:20 AM, American 11 abruptly changes course, turning to the northwest.) Nope !
The northwest heading started at 8:14 and never stopped until 8:26 .. 


Mr. LINO MARTINS is the NEXT Air Traffic Controller.

“"He was off-route and not responding," says Martins, one of several dozen air traffic controllers on duty at the FAA's Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center” and “The flight had gone radio silent and stopped obeying air traffic control instructions and it was now flying into Martins' sector.” I new sector.
Air traffic controller recalls 9/11

Why was the Flight path data was never published? USA Today published flight path maps for 9/11 which shows why I am asking this question in the first place.

“He became even more concerned as its route changed, moving into another sector’s airspace. Controllers immediately began to move aircraft out of its path, and searched from aircraft to aircraft in an effort to have another pilot contact American 11" into another sector's airspace which is why Pete calls the controller in Athens sector. Tracking the Flights Hijacked on 9/11

Why is there a refusal to identify Flight 11 as being off its flight path by 8:16 by officials while maps and early statements say it was off course earlier than what officials have said? The map below is the only data published which shows when flights went off course. Try and find official flight path data from official sources and none exist. The reason is cover up and an inside job.

“Nobody knew it would happen except those who did it.”

“I am a flight attendant for 30 years. Flew out of JFK the morning of 9/11 on TWA flight #3, we were scheduled to leave at 8:00am. I was the in-flight Service Manager (head stew). But when I got on the plane it wasn't the same tail number plane we were supposed to go on.” This had to planned for before 9/11. My 9/11 Plane Swap Story

Are you talking the 9/11 inside trading before 9/11. Well they had to know before hand. SEC said all the trades were from Israel. Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 on JSTOR

Larry Silverstien

Developer Sues to Win $12.3 Billion in 9/11 Attack he had to know too. Are you talking about that?

What about the changes to hijack protocols on June 1. Did someone just happen to see something wrong with the protocols before 9/11? They had to know.

The list goes on and on.

Why didn't the FAA ROC contact the military soon after "we have some planes" was reported to them at around 8:24?

Maybe they did contact the military but the false inputs and war games made it so much harder by design. So they had to know.

Otis denying help on 9/11 means 9/11 was an inside job

Flight 77 success meant Flight 93 is no longer needed

 

Flight 77 success meant Flight 93 was no longer needed

Flight 93 flight plan on its onboard computer was altered and the entire system was changed mid flight to allow Flight 93 to enter DC airspace. ATC have claimed to have made the change and the flight itself claimed to have been to source of the change or both the flight and ATC at the same time made changes to allow flight 93 to attack an unknown target in the DC area. Reagan Airport (DCA) even updated their system to schedule flight 93 to land and gates were cleared for flight 93. This change allowed flight 93 to safety enter the DC area. Computer system today still have Flight 93 landing at Reagan Airport (DCA). Flight Aware updated their data to read Reagan Airport (DCA). All the data points point to one idea that Flight 93 was flight 77 backup plan. Flight 77 success meant Flight 93 was no longer needed.

Flight 93 radar anomaly

The reason Justice enters a new flight plan for Flight 93 is unclear. A minute earlier, the hijacker pilot on Flight 93 reprogrammed the plane’s navigational system for the new destination of Reagan Airport (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001). [LONGMAN, 2002, PP. 182; 9/11 COMMISSION, 7/24/2004, PP. 457] And according to the St. Petersburg Times, controllers typically only change a plane’s destination when this is requested by the pilots. [ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, 9/12/2001] But one of the FAA chronologies will state that Justice’s change to the flight plan is “not a result of any communication with the pilot.” [FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 9/11/2001]
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=linday_justice_1

FLIGHT 93 PRIMARY RADAR RETURN AFTER CRASH PATH

FLIGHT 93 PRIMARY RADAR RETURN AFTER CRASH PATH 

"Jarrah dialed in the VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) frequency for the VOR navigational aid at Reagan National Airport at 09:55:11 to direct the plane toward Washington, D.C."    

Not only did Flight 93 adjust its destination via VOR but it also was recorded as landed!  We can assume or at least 
hope that the landing part is not a verified by rather an estimate, but you never know, right. 

How did people on the ground know about the flight 93 flight plan change?

"Soon, someone at the controls of Flight 93 filed a new flight plan, listing Reagan National Airport in Washington as the destination." Is this even possible, or is this a case for Remote Control?

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2001-sep-20-mn-47836-story.html Between 4:45 – 6:45 am: Hijacker-Pilot Jarrah phones girlfriend in Germany
In a Newark, New Jersey hotel room, Ziad Jarrah, places five telephone calls to Lebanon (his home country), one call to France, and one call to his girlfriend, Aysel Senguen, in Germany.4 In this brief call, he tells Senguen that he loves her.5 Jarrah and three male companions check out of the Days Inn at approximately 6:48 am6 and head to Newark International Airport to board United Airlines Flight 93.
Until 8:00 am: Passengers relay changes in travel plans
At least ten of the passengers and crew on Flight 93 had planned to take later or earlier flights or found themselves on Flight 93 due to schedule changes.19 One of these, passenger Lauren Grandcolas, phones her husband in San Rafael, California and leaves a message saying that she will arrive home an hour earlier than expected. She had been scheduled for United Airlines Flight 91, but her car service arrived at the airport early, allowing her to take Flight 93 instead. “Hey, I just want to let you know I’m on the eight o’clock instead of the 9:20,” Lauren told her husband.20
8:42 am: Flight 93 takes off 25 minutes late
Air traffic is typically heavy at the Newark Airport, causing delays on the runway. When United Airlines Flight 93 finally takes off, it is running about 25 minutes late.26
8:42-8:46 am: A second plane is hijacked

Every success launched another flight or two flights on 9/11

9:22 am: United Airlines transmits message from first officer’s wife
United Airlines sends a text message to First Officer Leroy Homer at the request of his wife, who is concerned about him after learning about the attacks on the World Trade Center.43

What did the wife say and what was his response. Did he say that the cockpit was locked and 
he was fine?  Was the crash axe taken off the side panel? Was any of the crash axes found for any 
of the 9/11 hijacked flights? 

9:26 am: Flight 93 pilot asks United for confirmation of warning message
Flight 93 pilot, Jason Dahl, responds to the Ballinger warning he received at 9:24: “ED CON9:28 am: Cleveland Center hears struggle as Flight 93 is hijacked.

Was the "warning message" was actually a recording of a fake struggle for Flight 93 which the pilot is confused about. Jason Dahl has no idea that someone hijacked the radio transmissions and 
selling the fake 9/11 situation to Air Traffic Controllers. If I am reading this correctly that is or 
was the warning message just so happens to be sent at the same time as the recorded conflict?      

What did Jason Dahl, say in responds to the Ballinger "warning" i.e fake recording is the question? 
https://www.nps.gov/flni/learn/historyculture/september-11-2001-timeline.htm

Its possible that "Jason Dahl, response" was the struggle for Flight 93 or was it? If so Jason Dahl
never did respond to Ballinger because how can you say a response back to Ballinger was the 
recording of the struggle because that is NOT a response. 

It seems like the pilots wife was all the early warning they needs for a proper defense 
of the cockpit. What does "First Officer Leroy Homer Wife Melodie Homer say she said to him? 

"I just said, 'Send the message and say I'm glad he's OK,' " she recalled.
How does she know he's OK? lame..  She had a chance to change things. A good warning 
messages and details about the events of hijackings was all she need to convey. 
She don't feel bad about it and no second guessing her lame message.  However if United was 
sending messages why didn't they better inform the pilots? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeRoy_Homer_Jr.

9:32 am: Hijacker’s announcement heard by Cleveland Center and other pilots An out-of-breath hijacker, probably Jarrah, makes this announcement which was heard and recorded by Air Traffic Control: “Ladies and Gentlemen: Here the captain, please sit down keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board. So, sit.” Jarrah then programmed the plane’s autopilot to turn the aircraft around and head east.52 The cockpit voice recorder also captures the voice of a woman, most likely a flight attendant, who is held captive in the cockpit. Based on this overheard transmission, Cleveland Center reports to the Herndon Command Center (FAA) that Flight 93 may have a bomb on board.53

 Jarrah makes the same mistake as flight 11's Atta and starts making  public announcements over the air. 
How many "mistakes" does it take to make to turn a "mistake" into a planned controlled intended pattern?  Someone wanted the hijackings to be clear to everyone while at the same time masking the 
mistakes as mistakes. 

“We just, ah, we didn’t get it clear . . . Is that United Ninety Three calling?” 

ATC makes the same mistake as Flight 11 and suddenly can't hear the transmissions. 

“shockingly calm.” flight attendants start making calls to the wrong phone number outside predefined protocols just like Flight 11 and contently low flying flight enables cell phones to be made 
which the FBI hijacks for their their "investigation" and is never made public. 

9:58:55 am: Cockpit Voice Recorder captures English-speaking voices:
The cockpit voice recorder captures the voice of a native English-speaking male: “In the cockpit! In the cockpit!” 

They somehow don't know who this is?  They don't say unidentified English speaking voices. 

 A native English-speaking male voice or voices says, “Stop him” and “Let’s get Them"

They are trying to sell the idea that the mic is left on and the passengers are heard. Is this even possible?
Can someone test this idea out?  

Was the cockpit voice recorder released to the public because Aysel Senguen 
could then say that is NOT Jarrah so the cockpit voice recorder will forever remain 
hidden to cover up the true crime of 9/11. 


 

9/11 Explosions USGS

KEITH MURPHY FROM
ENGINE 47

Seismologist Won-Young Kim assumed that the building fell as a whole and as an intact object which then "generated seismic waves comparable to a magnitude 2.1 earthquake". Does he know exactly what hit the ground to create a magnitude 2 earthquake?

"Nuclear explosion seismology, 7260 Theory and modeling"

"It is not possible to infer (with detail sufficient to meet the demands of civil engineers in an emergency situation) just what the near-in ground motions must have been."  Won-Young Kim

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AGUFM.S11D..03K

“Urban Earthquakes, Nuclear Bombs and 9/11″
  Won-Young Kim

“He is one of the leading researchers in the United States in methods of
using seismic waves to discriminate between earthquakes, industrial
explosions in mines and quarries, and underground nuclear explosions. “
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/news-events/urban-earthquakes-nuclear-bombs-and-911

Is Won-Young Kim trying to tell us something about 9/11?

Steve Marriott

, said "Kim believes the minor tremors were the result of a whopping big pile of rubble from a collapsing building hitting the ground as the collapse ended." 

Dan Plesse

Just now

“Kim believes the minor tremors were the result of a whopping big pile” So the towers turned into a “whopping big pile” and that hit the ground even after Kim said it was not possible to infer just what the near-in ground motion must have been because he can’t say explosives for some reason like the other guy?

We all know this statement is false, but does Won-Young Kim know exactly what hit the ground to create a magnitude 2.1 earthquake?

 He has just two possibilities remaining.

1. A large section of a WTC perimeter column dislodged. 
2. The towers didn't cause the earthquake and it was something else like an explosive. 

Paul Earle USGS refers to 9/11 as an explosive event which can be correctly assumed given no other possibilities exist.  

9/11 Explosions USGS

Caption Jay Jonas 9/11 Stairwell B Survivor

"sharp spike of short duration" is how seismologist Thorne Lay of Univ. of California at Santa Cruz told AFP an underground nuclear explosion appears on a seismograph."

Dan Plesse

Just now

They switched out an explosion sound with additional comments about that explosion i.e "is that the building? YES" with "was it a bomb?, No it plane hit it." https://www.bitchute.com/video/SGKT4lasunIc/ the exact opposite.

Someone switched out a video clip of WTC 9/11 explosion sound with a clip of the exact opposite. Did they do this for every explosion sound on 9/11?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/SGKT4lasunIc/

andola jackson

6 days ago (edited)

i mean i used to scavenge old VET/dark web threads...from some ANONS that were deep in black ops/retired and thus turned against the MIC. They stated it was mossad They were "temp" hire "maintenance" workers....ever seen elevator closed/caution tape/under service....they did this over the course of a month id say aug 2001 obviously...day in day out...planting nanothermite in stair wells/dry wall/installs....and elevator shaft/wall/installs. Makes me wonder their room for error on detonation...and how many they had to plant to be "sufficient". NO surprise that off site "dust" had traces as well.......not even remotely surprised....as noted in the thread. Just point to the aspect of "efficacy" and how much time the spent and how many damn charges they placed if you really think about it....that was the first time i ever heard of WTC7....and you do some research on the Actual aspects of what WTC7 was responsible for or what kind of business was being conducted there....it was as clear as day. The same anon also posted back when hillary was In obamas cabinet....that BENJI widely hated her...and had attempted to hit hillary on multiple occasions while in Israel. Apparently our secret service....told them about how her motorcade was going to do a tour/parade....of which was "hit"....that she was never on board....just to see if there was a mole....it was that easy to expose...as well as which base she was stationed/protected in....which also saw militant paratroop activity. Also fake intel we provided to see if it would leak......I mean she was in bed with the saudis after all...but still WTH. Trump was the clear choice for israel in that regard...i do the math on that and the marc rich fbi publication weeks prior to the election as being integral aspects to the 2016 election...which is somehow also not general knowledge to the general public. Let alone marc rich as it is. 9/11 has me look at moments like benghazi with a totally different scope/optics. So what ECHELON/CIA/FBI hears intel of an attack....blocking that informations passage to the higher ups...and creating a "FIASCO" is exactly how you push ppl like hillary out of your way if your the deep/state or military leadership that doesnt want to fight under her warhawk beak or at her/saudis behest(laughs bc trump wound up in bed with saudis and israel, which is just a W in my book)considering hes not even a seasoned politician, yet paints the MIC in plain sight. If your in that Field you let benghazi happen 15 times out of 10....thats the optics i have on that kinda BS which is damning. I wouldnt let it happen, but the whole bigger picture aspect...since the DEEP states just a good ol boys party...thats what i meant about the 15 times outta 10....

​​