 |
| Flight 77 success meant Flight 93 was no longer needed |
Flight 93 flight plan on its onboard computer was altered and the entire system was changed mid flight to allow Flight 93 to enter DC airspace. ATC have claimed to have made the change and the flight itself claimed to have been to source of the change or both the flight and ATC at the same time made changes to allow flight 93 to attack an unknown target in the DC area. Reagan Airport (DCA) even updated their system to schedule flight 93 to land and gates were cleared for flight 93. This change allowed flight 93 to safety enter the DC area. Computer system today still have Flight 93 landing at Reagan Airport (DCA). Flight Aware updated their data to read Reagan Airport (DCA). All the data points point to one idea that Flight 93 was flight 77 backup plan. Flight 77 success meant Flight 93 was no longer needed.
 |
| Flight 93 radar anomaly |
The reason Justice enters a new flight plan for Flight 93 is unclear. A minute earlier, the hijacker pilot on Flight 93 reprogrammed the plane’s navigational system for the new destination of Reagan Airport (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001). [LONGMAN, 2002, PP. 182; 9/11 COMMISSION, 7/24/2004, PP. 457] And according to the St. Petersburg Times, controllers typically only change a plane’s destination when this is requested by the pilots. [ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, 9/12/2001] But one of the FAA chronologies will state that Justice’s change to the flight plan is “not a result of any communication with the pilot.” [FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 9/11/2001]
http://www.historycommons.org/
FLIGHT 93 PRIMARY RADAR RETURN AFTER CRASH PATH
 |
FLIGHT 93 PRIMARY RADAR RETURN AFTER CRASH PATH |
"Jarrah dialed in the VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) frequency for the VOR navigational aid at Reagan National Airport at 09:55:11 to direct the plane toward Washington, D.C."
Not only did Flight 93 adjust its destination via VOR but it also was recorded as landed! We can assume or at least
hope that the landing part is not a verified by rather an estimate, but you never know, right.
 |
| How did people on the ground know about the flight 93 flight plan change? |
"Soon, someone at the controls of Flight 93 filed a new flight plan, listing Reagan National Airport in Washington as the destination."
Is this even possible, or is this a case for Remote Control?
https://www.latimes.com/
In a Newark, New Jersey hotel room, Ziad Jarrah, places five telephone calls to Lebanon (his home country), one call to France, and one call to his girlfriend, Aysel Senguen, in Germany.4 In this brief call, he tells Senguen that he loves her.5 Jarrah and three male companions check out of the Days Inn at approximately 6:48 am6 and head to Newark International Airport to board United Airlines Flight 93.
Until 8:00 am: Passengers relay changes in travel plans
At least ten of the passengers and crew on Flight 93 had planned to take later or earlier flights or found themselves on Flight 93 due to schedule changes.19 One of these, passenger Lauren Grandcolas, phones her husband in San Rafael, California and leaves a message saying that she will arrive home an hour earlier than expected. She had been scheduled for United Airlines Flight 91, but her car service arrived at the airport early, allowing her to take Flight 93 instead. “Hey, I just want to let you know I’m on the eight o’clock instead of the 9:20,” Lauren told her husband.20
8:42 am: Flight 93 takes off 25 minutes late
Air traffic is typically heavy at the Newark Airport, causing delays on the runway. When United Airlines Flight 93 finally takes off, it is running about 25 minutes late.26
8:42-8:46 am: A second plane is hijacked
9:22 am: United Airlines transmits message from first officer’s wife
United Airlines sends a text message to First Officer Leroy Homer at the request of his wife, who is concerned about him after learning about the attacks on the World Trade Center.43
In a Newark, New Jersey hotel room, Ziad Jarrah, places five telephone calls to Lebanon (his home country), one call to France, and one call to his girlfriend, Aysel Senguen, in Germany.4 In this brief call, he tells Senguen that he loves her.5 Jarrah and three male companions check out of the Days Inn at approximately 6:48 am6 and head to Newark International Airport to board United Airlines Flight 93.
Until 8:00 am: Passengers relay changes in travel plans
At least ten of the passengers and crew on Flight 93 had planned to take later or earlier flights or found themselves on Flight 93 due to schedule changes.19 One of these, passenger Lauren Grandcolas, phones her husband in San Rafael, California and leaves a message saying that she will arrive home an hour earlier than expected. She had been scheduled for United Airlines Flight 91, but her car service arrived at the airport early, allowing her to take Flight 93 instead. “Hey, I just want to let you know I’m on the eight o’clock instead of the 9:20,” Lauren told her husband.20
8:42 am: Flight 93 takes off 25 minutes late
Air traffic is typically heavy at the Newark Airport, causing delays on the runway. When United Airlines Flight 93 finally takes off, it is running about 25 minutes late.26
8:42-8:46 am: A second plane is hijacked
 |
| Every success launched another flight or two flights on 9/11 |
United Airlines sends a text message to First Officer Leroy Homer at the request of his wife, who is concerned about him after learning about the attacks on the World Trade Center.43
What did the wife say and what was his response. Did he say that the cockpit was locked and
he was fine? Was the crash axe taken off the side panel? Was any of the crash axes found for any
of the 9/11 hijacked flights?
9:26 am: Flight 93 pilot asks United for confirmation of warning message
Flight 93 pilot, Jason Dahl, responds to the Ballinger warning he received at 9:24: “ED CON9:28 am: Cleveland Center hears struggle as Flight 93 is hijacked.
Was the "warning message" was actually a recording of a fake struggle for Flight 93 which the pilot is confused about. Jason Dahl has no idea that someone hijacked the radio transmissions and
selling the fake 9/11 situation to Air Traffic Controllers. If I am reading this correctly that is or
was the warning message just so happens to be sent at the same time as the recorded conflict?
What did Jason Dahl, say in responds to the Ballinger "warning" i.e fake recording is the question?
https://www.nps.gov/flni/learn/historyculture/september-11-2001-timeline.htm
Its possible that "Jason Dahl, response" was the struggle for Flight 93 or was it? If so Jason Dahl
never did respond to Ballinger because how can you say a response back to Ballinger was the
recording of the struggle because that is NOT a response.
It seems like the pilots wife was all the early warning they needs for a proper defense
of the cockpit. What does "First Officer Leroy Homer Wife Melodie Homer say she said to him?
"I just said, 'Send the message and say I'm glad he's OK,' " she recalled.
How does she know he's OK? lame.. She had a chance to change things. A good warning
messages and details about the events of hijackings was all she need to convey.
She don't feel bad about it and no second guessing her lame message. However if United was
sending messages why didn't they better inform the pilots?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeRoy_Homer_Jr.
9:32 am: Hijacker’s announcement heard by Cleveland Center and other pilots An out-of-breath hijacker, probably Jarrah, makes this announcement which was heard and recorded by Air Traffic Control: “Ladies and Gentlemen: Here the captain, please sit down keep remaining sitting. We have a bomb on board. So, sit.” Jarrah then programmed the plane’s autopilot to turn the aircraft around and head east.52 The cockpit voice recorder also captures the voice of a woman, most likely a flight attendant, who is held captive in the cockpit. Based on this overheard transmission, Cleveland Center reports to the Herndon Command Center (FAA) that Flight 93 may have a bomb on board.53
Jarrah makes the same mistake as flight 11's Atta and starts making public announcements over the air.
How many "mistakes" does it take to make to turn a "mistake" into a planned controlled intended pattern? Someone wanted the hijackings to be clear to everyone while at the same time masking the
mistakes as mistakes.
“We just, ah, we didn’t get it clear . . . Is that United Ninety Three calling?”
ATC makes the same mistake as Flight 11 and suddenly can't hear the transmissions.
“shockingly calm.” flight attendants start making calls to the wrong phone number outside predefined protocols just like Flight 11 and contently low flying flight enables cell phones to be made
which the FBI hijacks for their their "investigation" and is never made public.
9:58:55 am: Cockpit Voice Recorder captures English-speaking voices:
The cockpit voice recorder captures the voice of a native English-speaking male: “In the cockpit! In the cockpit!”
They somehow don't know who this is? They don't say unidentified English speaking voices.
A native English-speaking male voice or voices says, “Stop him” and “Let’s get Them"
They are trying to sell the idea that the mic is left on and the passengers are heard. Is this even possible?
Can someone test this idea out?
Was the cockpit voice recorder released to the public because Aysel Senguen
could then say that is NOT Jarrah so the cockpit voice recorder will forever remain
hidden to cover up the true crime of 9/11.
No comments:
Post a Comment