“No one said to mix the photos with the confessions.”
So the confessions are irrelevant when looking at what occurred that day? I’ll ask again - how would nano thermite being present on the planes fit with the narrative? Where is the evidence for nano thermite being present on the planes?
“So the confessions are irrelevant when looking at what occurred that day?”
No one said insider 9/11 confession was irrelevant!
Why do you keep drawing strange conclusions then you blame me for being incoherent. Stop being incoherent in the first place.
“Where is the evidence for nano thermite being present on the planes?” Confession are evidence. So there you have it.
“such as explosives being planted in a core yet seeing a external column collapse”
NOT SEEING external column damage .. Columns look fine. Inside could have missing elements.
external columns seem to be blown outward.
b) One student on 1010 WINS. Reported a demolition millions heard it
WTC 7 Early Explosion 1010 WINS Witness Daryl to Demolition 6 PM
WTC South Tower Fireball
So your argument is Videos, photo witnesses
“i just can’t find any articles, videos or anything else mentioning them’” What a shock. You can’t find anything?
A military demo means that there is no specific placement - that’s what implosion world refers to when it uses the phrase.
And your ‘fireball’ photos from wtc 1&2 - which were outside in collapses (where the outer sections collapsed first) the exact opposite of what would be seen if explosives wer...
Both happened then. A military explosive demolition to clean up and destroy and cover up a building implosion. A military explosive demolition might be better for clean up operation i.e World trade Center’s Operation Phoenix , Less evidence to find and 46% people blown up and gone.
SIPA ‘fireball’ 221 photo from WTC 2 South Tower was in the core not outer sections. SIPA~211.JPG
Your argument has fallen apart. Early explosions report by BBC and Barry Jennings while inside WTC 7 were shown to you and you heard them. immense firing off of explosives was recorded below however the location data is missing i.e cover up.
What happened seismic data and why is it not in a catalog?
WTC7 Early explosion sounds are perfectly valid demolition evidence as this was a early failed demolition.
WTC7 Early explosion sounds for failed demolition
Did you avoid Larry’s hand movement issue when said “pull it”. The sudden jump in excitement by him meant the job was done and his April 2000 blueprints for the tower could finally be used.
“evidence of a building being taken down” Starts with the electrical system shutting off as to not harm the system its with shorts.
WTC7 Street Lights Out **cleared for controlled demolition**
Next People say the building is about to “blow up” move it back. Not Collapse but BLOW UP!
Implosion World has said that “Controlled Demolition” is not the correct definition and they introduce a new term called “Military Explosive Demolition” which we all agree fits the visual photographic evidence i.e SIPA 221 fireball
and the still missing details which are only found in seismiccatalog tables could very well show the size of the explosions and the location which DID happen at WTC 7 earlier in the day and for no reason other then Larry had the Blue Prints for the new WTC 7 in April of 2000 and he needed new buildings
You have enough evidence, so what are going to do with it? Larry confessed to having the blueprints, having it pulled and History Channel Business has him confessing to whole thing. Naturally a copy can’t be found. Do you have a copy of the confession?
Are the still missing people still not enough evidence for explosives? Or is the body distance maps still not enough evidence that forces acted upon thousands of people to send them flying all the way to Battery Park and the Hudson River? Or what about late falling torsos reported in the record. Is that normal too?
Are the people who heard explosives i.e Hans Kunnen not reasonable enough of a person to say what it sounded like and what happened to those sounds by the way? Do we not hear them on videos i.e 911 Eyewitness Hoboken TV and what happened to the seismic location data ? Why are they generalizing? The location data should show the true exact targets of 9/11! So the exact location of these events are very important.
What engineers say is Circular reasoning i.e is when you attempt to make an argument by beginning with an assumption that what you are trying to prove is already true.. They begin without including all the evidence or blocking parts out and then say well it got hot and fell down.
They don’t see or read reports of red powder falling from tower or see that it is running like reddish river out of the tower.
“Implosion World has said that “Controlled Demolition” is not the correct definition and they introduce a new term called “Military Controlled Demolition”
Source please where implosion world states that - not a secondary link but an actual link where they state that.
The collapse at wtc7 is said to be only Possible if all support is cut simultaneously - meaning large explosions in the moments before collapse - so I’ll ask AGAIN - where is you evidence of large explosive sounds in the moments before collapse.
And Larry Silverstein never said the building was pulled - even if he did ‘pulled’ doesn’t mean and never has meant destroyed with explosives - in my link in my last reply Implosion World addresses this nonsense claim - it’s interesting again you are willing to use implosion world as a source when you feel they support your viewpoint but ignore everything worse that they state - I beleieve that is known as confirmation bias.
Is your argument really that Larry Silverstein went to the effort of being complicit in one of the most complex cover ups in history only to then confess on camera for no reason at all ?
You also never answered my question regarding the fdny being complicit - could you address that please.
“Larry Silverstein never said the building was pulled” Not only did he say that the building was pulled but his hand movements says it was exploded.
Larry Silverstein Hands Say Explosives Was used for WTC 7
“Is your argument really that Larry Silverstein went to the effort of being complicit in one of the most complex cover ups in history only to then confess on camera for no reason at all ? “
Did you avoid Larry’s hand movement issue when said “pull it”. The sudden jump in excitement by him meant the job was done and his April 2000 blueprints for the tower could finally be used.
“evidence of a building being taken down” Starts with the electrical system shutting off as to not harm the system its with shorts.
WTC7 Street Lights Out **cleared for controlled demolition**
Next People say the building is about to “blow up” move it back. Not Collapse but BLOW UP!
Why do you keep drawing strange conclusions then you blame me for being incoherent. Stop being incoherent in the first place.