Sunday, March 14, 2021

The 9/11 Report on 9/11 Scumbags

Should be called: Inside Cover Up   

Scumbag Cover up in chief  was Thomas H. Kean the whole time!



The commission the uncensored history seems censored


How could any calls on 9/11 be bogus? 




Stand down deleted and a Bogus Phone Call?

Military conflict context (deleted from wiki)


Whoever marketed the term "9/11 debunker" did a great job with with scamming the public and selling the term and the idea. I wonder who first started up with that idea? Hats off to evil. I think someone should come forward and identify themselves. However for the American and the rest of the still thinking people of the world the new refence point will be designated as the " 9/11 scumbags".  

The good news is some scrambling did take place, however the wasn't scrambling jet
at Otis AFB. All the scrambling efforts were misplaced scumbag cover up bullshit.  

The real story was Otis indirectly through CAPE2 said OTIS requests NEADS authorization. Then after that issue, we have "The national operations manager has a request to clarify, that we were able to permit military and law enforcement aircraft to fly. ". So 9/11 fighters have to deal both  1. NEADS authorization 2. then wait for authorization again after national ground stop. 3. The war games were never ended and audio tape proves the military was laughing all throughout  9/11. 


 

So who are the scumbags? Is it the military laughing away or Otis or was it the "national operations manager" ? 


At 10:17 the FBI hand written notes say "aircraft down". It would be interesting if flight 93 or flight 77 primary radar actually went dark during this time.  We know both planes went dark. 



Dick Chaney says lets stay put


An Amazing Coincidence source 

June 22, 2006, when "Hannity & Colmes" (on the FOX/RNC Channel)
"I point you to Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta's testimony before the 9/11 Commission. Mineta said he had encountered Vice President Cheney in a bunker in Washington, DC, at 9:20 AM, on the day of the attacks [forty-three minutes earlier than Cheney said he had arrived]. Every few seconds a young man would come into the room and say, 'Sir, it's 50 miles out. Sir, it's 40 miles out. Sir, it's 30 miles out,' and so on. Finally the young man asked the Vice President, 'Sir, do the orders still stand?' Cheney replied gruffly, 'Of course, the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'

The very next morning, less than twelve hours after his 9/11 testimony had been unexpectedly "exposed" to the FOX faithful, Norman Mineta resigned as Secretary of Transportation!! 

Another amazing coincidence and never heard of before 05/23/2003 story is Lynn Spencer and her spontaneous and random decision to change UAL flight 93 flight plan to help manufacture a new story about how Norman Mineta was confused on 9/11 and what he really meant was flight 93 i.e the ghost ship idea was the plane that Norman Mineta was actually talking about and not really flight 77. I wonder why it makes a difference which plane it was? Anyway, Flight Explorer does NOT support any of this new crazy made story after 5/23/03 the 9/11 Scumbags make up . NOT One one bit of it is true. So who was the " controller in Washington, unaware that the flight had crashed, was calling position reports for the coast track of United 93 to the White House"? Somehow the 9/11 Scumbags manage to create duplicate Air Traffic control managers who are will to say anything. Those duplicate and fraudulent ATC have so far been exposed but so far these stories about duplicate Air Traffic control by 9/11 Truth and so have been gone unnoticed by the public. 

9/11 Air Traffic Control Duplicates  (191 views go truth movement! go! )




New Flight Plan Causes False Reports of Plane Approaching Washington - According to author Lynn Spencer  

Touching History but this was printing in 2008  

5-23-03 

Mineta 9/11 Testimoney plenty of time to create a cover story. 

 

the new flight plan creates a “coast track” of Flight 93 on the traffic situation displays at air traffic control facilities. “A coast track,” Spencer will write, “differs from a radar track in that it is not supported by radar returns but rather by a computer-generated, projected course for the flight. Although this track did not appear on controller radar screens, its presence on their [traffic situation displays] allowed Washington controllers to monitor the flight’s progression toward Washington.” According to Spencer, the presence of this coast track leads to incorrect reports of an aircraft approaching Washington in the minutes after Flight 93 crashes. She will write, “A controller in Washington, unaware that the flight had crashed, was calling position reports for the coast track of United 93 to the White House (see (Between 10:10 a.m. and 10:18 a.m.) September 11, 2001)… as well as the FBI at the Pentagon (where firefighters were evacuated and the firefight suspended in anticipation of a second impact)” (see (10:15 a.m.-10:38 a.m.) September 11, 2001). [LYNN SPENCER, 2008]

Use The National Ground Stop to include the Military response to 9/11. 
(T8 B1 ATCSCC Tape Transcript- Position 14 Fdr- Contents- Parts 1 thru 4.pdf) 



9/11  National Ground Stop Another Opportunity For more delay i.e Stand Down 

9/11 National Ground Stop Was Another Opportunity For Military Stand Down or delay 
 
The national operations manager has a request to clarify, that we were able to permit military and law enforcement aircraft to fly. 

MR.  Okay. So you're releasing  law enforcement military aircraft.
MR.  Well, we're checking with,  with, with you and make sure that it's all right to

MR. : Okay; thank you. Okay. So we'll--we have the national operations manager here at the Command Center, and we will, you know, await your work on military and law enforcement, if it's okay for 'them to go. 

MR.  We'll get right back to you. 

The military and police [inaudible] requesting permission to go airborne [inaudible]. No. They're grounded all aircraft nationwide--MR. Okay. TAC Net back to Air 

MR.  We are working on that  request. I'll get right back on it. 

MR. : FAA Tactical Net to Air Traffic Command, Herndon. 

MR. 

MR.  Air Traffic Command. I have an affirmative on that  request to release law enforcement military 

aircraft.


Timeline for AAL77 based on radar to correlate with Mineta's testimony.

9:26 - AAL77 was 50 nautical miles out from DC
9:30 - 30 nautical miles out
9:33 - 10 nautical miles out

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y

 9/11 Military Mission Step One: Redefine What Stand Down Means 2021

Notes 
Flight 93 never came within 50, 30, or 10 miles of Washington D.C.


New document supports Norman Mineta's testimony about VP Dick Cheney



source 
NARA 9-11 Commission Records Released Jan 14 2009
Source: Team 8 Box 1 T8 B1 ATCSCC Tape Transcript- Position 14 Fdr- Contents- Parts 1 thru 4.pdf



Norman Mineta must have learned from the critics that his testimony on C-span was evidence of a military stand down order, so now every time Mineta talks about 9/11 he is actually trying redefine what the phrase "stand down [order] " means and he spends time trying to change the language every time he has a chance . Only a total moron would fall for Mineta's redefinition campaign. Trolls are selling the stand down redefinition campaign like their lives depend on it and in may ways their lives DO depend on it.

UAL Flight 93 A Crack In The Blue Pill Wall : When Knowing Too Much is a problem
https://youtu.be/Sxh-abiecEk

Here are some interesting 9/11 phone bridge FAA screenshots: 
TEAM BOX 8 9/11 Commission

Here flight 93 was a local flight. 

Flight 93 took off from Pittsburgh.jpg

National Ground Stop was used as another reason for the USAF not to do anything!

9/11 Norman Mineta Stand Down 2021
https://youtu.be/s68luawXrHw

Stand down shut down order.jpg


Another file T7 B19 Key 302s Fdr- Entire Contents- FBI 302s.pdf has everything 
else. 
https://www.scribd.com/document/24392516/T7-B19-Key-302s-Fdr-Entire-Contents-FBI-302s

Bombs and only three hijackers. Fours hijackers was the official amount. 

"her attendant husband" Flight 93 had no male flight attendants  

T7 B19 Key 302s Fdr- Entire Contents- FBI 302s.pdf
Titled the "Javis Johnson Bogus Call" document 

Evidence about Javis Johnson, a phone call recipient from flight UA93 
159482737_10158208042614958_5238883897211678524_n (1).jpg
Linda Justice, of Cleveland Center made the change, but no member of the press knew about it? Sounds like a scam!

How did Linda Justice see the UA 93 with a data block (thus prompting her to enter a new flight plan for the sectors it appeared to be tracking toward) when her fellow Cleveland controller, Stacy Taylor, stated to Tom Brokaw in 2002 that she saw it drop off from radar at 10:03? When did Ms Justice first see UA 93 "tracking toward Washington" on her screen?
Hide reply
boone870
The way an air traffic controller explained it to me was UA 93's data block would go into a "coast track" after the transponder returns went away. The data block would've continued on allowing Justice and other controllers to see it and tag it.
 @911RedPill  Not sure. Also not sure how it would help get the terrorists to DCA.
@boone870 Primary radar was lost too. How is that possible. Transponder was lost at 9:40. Primary was lost at 09:52:03. Once the primary is gone the data block is gone too and your story falls apart.
@boone870 autopilot to DCA. Are you kidding me right now?

@boone870 No evidence of coast track on flight software as far as know. Does this mean the story is a scam?

I search for ZOB-UA-93-new-flight-plan-and-alert-to-ZDC.mp3 and found this page:
8. UNITED 93 and it was NOT found on that page! 
094106 UA93 lost transponder controller talks to two airplanes.mp3

At 18 seconds, ZOB advises
ZDC: "We put in a new flight plan on United 93, Hagerstown, DCA.
We did that so (?) process for you".
http://www.oredigger61.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/ZOB-UA-93-new-flight-plan-and-alert-to-ZDC.mp3

Not popular with the ladies

UA 93 "flight plan " No results 

United Airline Flight #93 Cockpit Voice Recorder Transcript

UA 93 lost on TSD at 1028 EDT

Here is a clip from the F2 Position, National TRACON (1 DCA 101-102 Tape 1-2 F2 1327-1450 UTC, as archived by NARA as part of the Commission files)  The F2 Position controlled the Andrews fighters once airborne.  As of 1028 the F2 Position knew that there was no target associated with UA 93. 1028 UA 93 not in system

The issue looks to be of primary interest, because it does appear that someone tampered with the 20-page transcript of the real time conversation that O’Brien had with ZOB Cleveland ATCs, on the morning of 9/11.

I believe that transcript offers some powerful clues about what transpired. I am attaching the file below. It’s pretty big — apologies for the size. Or you can download it at [http://www.911datasets.org/]

from 1407-1411, appears to have been deleted. It’s gone!

Could it be because O’Brien saw the unspeakable, i.e., saw a cruise missile crash at 10:06 AM — and reported this to the ATCs? This observation, had it been reported to the commission and/or made public, would have exposed the entire official 9/11 story as a HUGE lie, and at the same time would have revealed a criminal conspiracy in the act of “cleaning up” flight UAL 93, which had turned into a fiasco.

LJ, 26:10: "I changed the flight plan"
LJ 26:43: "by changing the flight plan, routing, they got where he came from, what kind of aircraft he was, I don't have to stay on the line with them ... Washington Center. So, that's why I changed the routing, but..."
27:28 Q: "help me understand what you did that became controversial?"
LJ: "Putting in Hagerstown..."

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7970544

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKaEtq4EMoY&t=63s

I am trying to figure out how the flight plan change from flight 93  was known by people on the ground.  This could mean evidence of a script and i.e knowing too much? 

Daniel M. Plesse
Erik Marette
 How did third parties on the ground know about the flight 93 flight plan change? How could anyone other then a select few know what was happening to Flight 93 data block on the FE displays?

You will be surprised: I CAN name the individual who said she did that - change the flight plan to HGR-DCA: The name is Linda Justice, Cleveland Center.
Here is her full interview with the 9/11 Commission:
Listen to the whole thing, if you are interested. The part we are here interested in comes at 25:30 minutes:
Q: "When you saw where the plane was heading, did you have an opinion of what his destination was?"
LJ, 26:10: "I changed the flight plan"
LJ 26:43: "by changing the flight plan, routing, they got where he came from, what kind of aircraft he was, I don't have to stay on the line with them ... Washington Center. So, that's why I changed the routing, but..."
27:28 Q: "help me understand what you did that became controversial?"
LJ: "Putting in Hagerstown..."

  • Daniel M. Plesse
     "From the Javis Johnson Bogus Call document
    How did people who were relatives of the passengers and or crew of flight 93 know about the flight 93 flight plan change as document Team 8 Box 1 from a "bogus call"?     .

    hhhh


    • Like
    • Reply
    • Share
    • 1d
  • Daniel M. Plesse
    Erik Marette
     You are not answering for a reason. Is it checkmate already? I was hoping another 20 years.

Posted by at 2 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Search