WTC Thermite September 11th Summary

FDNY 9/11 NanoThermite

ARSON | OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS

https://www.ojp.gov › virtual-library › abstracts › arson-0

THE TEXT BEGINS WITH A REVIEW OF SEVERAL FAMOUS CASES OF ARSON FROM HISTORY, ... CHEMICALS SUCH AS WHITE PHOSPHORUS AND THERMITE, AND VARIOUS

https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/arson-0

Scientific review 

Firefighter Scott Schrimpe Molten North Tower Core Tower public display Table
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V_t0HxBQhYU

9/11 Museum found beyond 2,000 degrees

100 tons of molten rock and steel.

“By the way, the pictures you posted that purportedly show the basement of one of the twin WTC towers before the tower collapsed actually show nothing of the kind.” WRONG again !!

The pictures are backed up by the 9/11 Commission which reports the same locations were attacked i.e exploded as the label on the door.

 Security Control Room

B4 Security Control Room was also attacked. So every control room was attacked on 9/11.

".He got a call that three Port Authority workers were trapped in a command center on the 22nd floor. He informed a fire battalion chief that he was going up to rescue them. The chief assigned a group of firefighters, led by Lt. Andy Desperito.

The men walked up to the 22nd floor. Tabeek didn’t know that a second jet had just struck Tower 2. When they reached the 22d floor of Tower 1, Desperito and his men tunneled through the debris and opened up a path for those trapped inside.

https://www.paranynj.org/911/Memorials/unsungheroes.htm

"Another set of transmissions are from George Tabeek, a Port Authority official who ran up 22 flights of stairs with firefighters to free a group of authority security workers locked in a secret command bunker." 
https://www.timesargus.com/news/transcripts-of-9-11-wtc-calls-released/article_eb453cf0-83f2-552a-9a4b-f81a949438ea.html


James Millette never shared his chips he found with anyone. Normally that is the next step. You hand the chips over to third party or give them back to your funder. Why he  didn’t do that and why he didn't film the study like Mark Basile did for free is anyone’s guess.  Mark Basile is an example of doing the study right. 

So “There was no thermite found in the WTC dust” is not true.

Thermite and 9/11: NYPD found it, Mark Basile confirmed it and West Street had giant reactions [three videos]!

The NYPD also reported finding it.

Luciano Guerriero NYPD has a secret Ground Zero thermite report.. https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2020/12/world-trade-center-nanothermite-hta.html



Mark Basile looked at it and said it was NOT paint. So it is not paint. All your counter arguments are hogwash.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSUrhvTNjeQ

The NYPD also reported finding it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOMt_7jxHVQ

We see the reactions of thermite on West Street that night.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkGGNosZ9F0

What does the World Trade Center Concrete Embedded Guns, Stalagmites, Meteorites and the Bible all have in common?

The basement levels of the World Trade Center did not have any fire or air and yet objects ranging from the three foot stalagmites, to 9/11 meteorites to the the Bible encased in steel while active rivers of steel were shown. How is this possible?

https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2019/12/clear-evidence-of-molten-steel-at-world.html 

A Summary of Marc Powell , former Civil Engineer replies :  

“ basement levels had plenty of fire “ Prove it. Says who? Photos taken in the basement shows zero fires, not even smoke.

“fresh air from below” The basement is as far as it goes my friend. That is why it is called the basement.

“rivers of molten steel” video evidence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xdtuhr1JbQU

“Stalagmites” new York times
“A three foot stalagmite of steel, which looks for all the world like a drip candle, sits next to one of the immense steel columns that held up the north face of the tower.”

A NATION CHALLENGED: THE SITE; Below Rubble, a Tour of a Still-Burning Hell (Published 2001)
A NATION CHALLENGED: THE SITE; Below Rubble, a Tour of a Still-Burning Hell (Published 2001)“

9/11 meteorites scientific study says
“9/11 Museum Scientists determined heat levels in excess of two thousand degrees “ which means not pressed which is a stupid idea because nothing existed to do the pressing and no press side is known.

https://911truthout.blogspot.com/2015/12/911-museum-scientists-determined-heat.html

In summary 100% of your ideas are wrong. How is that possible?

“Anecdotal reports” Museums did studies and none say what you say which is not even anecdotal. Your “evidence" is rumor only and stupid..

“The “meteorites” had unburned paper in them” NO they did not! That is stupid. The videos say “carbonized paper” Did you bother to review what they said?

“layers of floors compressed”. Nope! “9/11 Museum Scientists determined heat levels in excess of two thousand degrees “ They did not say “compressed floors” which is stupid because no floors where found. You need a floor to compress a floor. Catch-22. No floors means no compressed floors.

“subway tunnel”?? No one reported an air flow in the direction of the towers. Wrong again. No one said what you just said. Not a soul.

The “stalagmite” was not tested to confirm it was steel. The guy who has the stalagmite says it is steel. I trust what he says. He even says “melted steel box beam” from North tower.

In summary, 100% of your ideas are wrong and you even dropped the fire in basement idea because it was so stupid you didn’t even bother to defend it!

Marc Powell

1h ago

They are all fanciful misrepresentations of evidence.

Dan Plesse

Just now

Nope everything is backed up with photos, videos and witnesses. You have nothing but rumor and lies.

What Do Military Explosive Demolition, Larry Silverstein and Rick Siegel all have in common?

I’ve maintained for a long time that your needn’t sever the columns or explode them — only buckle them. And of course that could be easily achieved if you pumped explosives inside the hollow box columns, and then heated up the column walls with incendiaries before you set the explosives off.

9/11 columns buckled photo do to HTA Arson
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KzbwpkZVKXki-p_uYvmJJKHkQ50YG0yp/view?usp=sharing 

I also showed you a photo of the explosions all over the top half of the building. Do you see this image?

Explosions All over the top half of South Tower

Demolition people said it was not a “controlled demolition” but a Military Explosive Demolition”
 

September 11th Military Explosive Demolition then you combine that with audio by 9/11 Eyewitness

Rick Siegel DVD was about explosion sounds.
9/11 Eyewitness is a DVD by Rick Siegel

is a DVD by Rick Siegel

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x20b20

witnesses,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0J7z8R-MOM

Hard Evidence

and

Larry Silverstein, the guy who insured the buildings for billions weeks before for terrorist attacks i.e bombs? said “ and so we went through an enormous amount of effort to find to find out what happened on 9 /11 to cause the twin towers to collapse and at the same time decide how to build a building safer and stronger and impenetrable we scoured the world for the best engineers where do you think we ended up is a country that apparently has lots of problems in making its buildings explosion proof !”If it was fire and heat that was the cause, he would have said making the building more fireproof and heat resistant.”

Explosion proof means explosives was the cause.

Benjamin Netanyahu
“democracy. Nations. Democracies don't go to war easily. And they usually debate and argue before they do. Sometimes they have to be bombed into going" 

Again explosives i.e bombs was used on 9/11. 

September 11th Coffee Table Book Idea

I would like to do a 9/11 coffee table book filled with photos about what really happened and let the pictures do the talking. 

The resolution is too high to be from the 1993 bombing.  


010915-N-7479T-503

Photo #2 Notice the name is redacted?
Why? MR. blank said "No we didn't have any luck"

Why? Because 

Otis was requiring authorization from NEADS and chances are NEADS required authorization from NORAD  but none of this was required and every Air National guard based in NY, NJ had birds already in the air and  on a mission on 9/11. 

U.S. Navy Photo by PHC (SW/DV) Eric J. Tilford

U.S. Navy Photo by PHC (SW/DV) Eric J. Tilford

Do NIST computer models match any of the 9/11 videos?

  

Do NIST computer models match any of the 9/11 videos? 

Robert McCoy

, former Architect for Many Tall Buildings Up to 44 Storie (1965-2010)

Answered June 1, 2020

First, let me state that I have designed many tall and important buildings during my career. At least 6 have employed Dynamic Analysis in the final design, the first a 34 story building in the late 60’s, and the last a 1,000,000 sf building at LAX.

Secondly, I was the Board Chair at AE9/11Truth and negotiated and signed the contract with the University of Alaska Fairbanks for the study undertaken by Dr. Hulsey. We both agreed that this would be a completely independent peer review study, no interference from AE or anyone else. UAF would not undertake the study without that being a condition. Additionally, when I was with AE, no one else even had a clue what was really involved is such a study. It was just “A good idea” to do it was the general consensuses. Dr. Hulsey and I are still in contact but our only discussions have related to how was it going. I am an Architect, not an Engineer.

Third, the final report, peer reviewed, was published a few months ago along with all the supporting data and misc other studies connected with his work. And that work was based upon over 2,000 sheets of Shop Fabrication Drawings prepared by Frangle Steel Fabricators and Erectors. These are the drawings from which Building #7 was built. The original steel design drawings were also available for review. All of the above is on line for public review.

Fourth, the analysis by fire was considered and is discussed in the report. Additionally, all reasonable scenarios were also analyzed in order to simulate what was captured on the videos we have all watched. This included studies of the building after it was damaged by debris from Buildings #1 and #2. Ultimately the only scenario that worked, or resembled what we have all seen, involved removing the interior core columns followed shortly 

FROM NIST Cut Steal Beam 

FROM NIST Green lights