The Pros and Cons of Judy Wood
I'd
like to get people's opinions about Dr. Judy Wood's theory of directed
energy being responsible for WTC buildings rather than
thermite/thermate.
Norma Rae Imo, they an advanced weapon to turn most of the internal guts to dust. Otherwise, one would expect a tall pile in the middle consisting of the core columns. There were 47 core columns per floor. Multiply that by 110, that makes 5170 core columns. The concrete floors would have crushed further down and we would see a visible pileup in the middle. It simply wasn't there.
Was it DEW? I don't know. It seems very plausible that it was something with frequencies that we couldn't see that caused the demise. It's hard to say exactly what they used since we aren't privy to all their top secret technologies.
As far as Thermite, I do believe that they used redundancy in their execution. I think the thermite or some explosive/squibs ensured that the collapse would occur vertically.
Dan Plesse The problem is Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory refuses the release their location and depth data and because the top tier 9/11 snakes colluded with the criminals, 99.9% 9/11 Truth Sheep also have no idea what data is missing or what the problem is. Dr. Judy Wood's theory maybe sound but she never bothered to look at samples or write a scientific paper or show evidence beyond making general statements. The same general statements appeared on National Television and she believes that these National News reports strengthens her argument. If the news organizations never said anything, Dr. Judy Wood wouldn't be around at all.
Judy Wood Pro's
1. Stairwell B
2. Reminder of the News
A. dustified objects
1. New York State Museum online version
"No recognizable desks, file cabinets, chairs or computer terminals for the many
thousands of workers employed in the twin towers (WTC 7, WTC 3,4,5,6? ) were ever
found!!!
B. burned car photos
C. PATRICIA ONDROVIC's eyewitness account of anomalies such as spontaneous, combustion
3. Hurricane Erin 2001
Judy Wood Con's
1. Seek and destroy Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth at all costs
A. No HTA Arson or heat
1. No history HTA Arson by insurance carriers using thermite
a. Erik Larson, "High-Heat Arson Fires Swiftly Raze Buildings But Leave Few
Clues," Wall Street Journal, October 7, 1993, A1.
b. Unsolved Mysteries' TVshow 'King of Arsonist"
c. Windsor Tower Madrid WAS HTA Arson
B. No Explosions
1. 7060 Page New York Times Oral History word count
2. Don't do hard science. Dust and samples. Air reports.
3. random creation of thermite theory
4. Pancake theory to explain rock formations.
5. Never shows contradictory evidence.
6. unknown undefined source
A. 9/11 Scientist Sergei Dudarev, : "Unusual Magnetic Forces" caused the collapse
B. Dean Warwick 9/11 Space Beam
7 . Earth's magnetic field “dip” on September 11, 2001?
Judy Wood NIST Agreement list
1. Seismic activity was from non dustified objects
2. Rock formations was from falling non dustified objects
- Dan Plesse Tracy Blevins I still have not seen your 9/11 Samples. I know about bi layered dust meat ball. I need to other examples of slag to compare.
Here is my example again. ...See More
investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com
World Trade Center 9/11 Sample: A closer look "Slag is produced from other high ...See More
Tracy Blevins I have given you the images that I'm prepared to give you. In the future, I will have better images.- Dan Plesse My sample shattered on impact because gas pressure was inside the object still. The top half is still missing.
I should reurn and continue to look but it could have turned back into dust or something.
Still zero interests from the truth movement at looking at these samples.2 mins · Like
- Tracy Blevins Isn't that interesting? Early on, everyone was desperate for the dust. After the thermite theory came out, everyone now thinks they already know what happened, so the inquiry basically stopped.
- Dan Plesse It could be some form of strange conditioning which everyone seems to be effected by and thus everyone turns into a broken record of some kind.
Dan Plesse Atahan Ganduu Why don't you form you own option? For now on I am NOT going to reply to Judy Wood concepts. She also uses compression theory for the rock formations for when the building does hit the ground so she uses whatever she feels like. She knows that parts seismic data are missing and so do you and time elements were faked. For all the belief in fake evidence why do Wood's followers believe in seismic data so much? Why did NIST report talk about the seismic data? Why do so many 9/11 not know about the missing seismic data?
Wood's and the official theory agree on too many points and her followers borrow too many debunked concepts i.e body part were flowing in around buildings with the dust.
Outstanding 9/11 Questions List
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/.../outstanding...
Atahan Ganduu Discussing the pros and cons of researchers is a distraction away from discussing evidence of what happened on 9-11- Dan Plesse Atahan Ganduu The Pro Cons discusses the evidence and in context of who believes what, when and why. Because Woods agrees too much with NIST via 1. Both don't use results from Dr. Cahill 2. No explosion witnesses 3. HTA arson evidence is normal or does not exist and only plays with photos and never sight sources i.e PATRICIA ONDROVIC's eyewitness account of anomalies such as spontaneous, combustion I would not keep sighting her work mindlessly like a drone. That my friend is a waste of time. You seem to be worst offender on facebook, so can you please stop. Thanks!2 mins · Edited · Like
- Dan Plesse Notice she does not have an outstanding issues list! Why is that? Email her that question.
- Dan Plesse Who? I don't need a who. You need to be slave or drone for some reason. Please stop being a slave/drone of Woods.
No comments:
Post a Comment