 |
| backgrounds of "9/11 Wargames Vigilant Warrior Drone Version 3" |
Matt Bowman The desperation of troofers continues to astound me. They so desperately WANT it to be true and will point at literally anything they don't understand as evidence.
I can take two photos seconds apart with the same camera on slightly different settings and achieve this effect.
The mind boggles as to what motivates these people.
Dan Plesse Matt Bowman Who changed the settings and why didn't they change it back? CNN cut OUT the plane flying in the background. Hence the circle.
Doctored by Jeffrey Herr Again!
http://s1222.photobucket.com/.../DoctorbyJeffreyHerrAgain...
s1222.photobucket.comDoctored by Jeffrey Herr Again! Photo coloring flight 11 scheme scam- Matt Bowman The settings were not changed, you are looking at two different cameras. even if there were changed that wouldn't be evidence for anything other than the existance of video editing techniques.
This is a big red herring. - Dan Plesse Matt Bowman I asked you why didn't they correct the mistake. Why was it allowed to go on? No answer?
2. Do you see the point of the circle?
CNN was doing fast cutting that day too and managed to cut out the plane in the circle. Do you have an answer for that or more shilling for the criminals?
Photo doctoring evidence
http://investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com/.../911-anti...
investigatesandyhook.blogspot.com
Update:
I was looking at Channel 2 news today around 8-9:00 A.M and sure enough, shitty sky.
Vanessa Murdock said something about why the video looks shitty even though its pretty much sunny and blue skies. She said "Sun Filtered" or "filtered" something.
This information puts a big damper on things.
5:15 pm shot
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/video/10121947-evening-weather-for-may-3/
6:15 shot
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/video/10121529-morning-weather-53-fair-skies-warm/
I can't find the shot I saw however.
1 comment:
The sky being different colors in different shots isn't evidence of anything. Just another red herring man.
Post a Comment