Beverly Ekert was her name and I have no reason to believe she was controlled opposition. But, I will watch Flight 3407. Many have been murdered for asking "Columbo"-like questions. Check out Minnesota's US Senator Paul Wellstone and NYCHA guy Barry Jennings....heck Demolition expert Danny Jowenko for that matter. Just because we don't have definitive answers to all of our important questions, it doesn't mean that the proven evidence we do have is automatically negated. Thanks marlbearl1, you may be more important to America than you think.
911TruthNOW I get that you want to find fault with the system and you probably distrust the government deeply with good cause.
But you have to admit, the absence of 7500 codes is certainly plausible. Both from the pilots POV and from ATC. It all happened so fast and controllers weren't prepared for an attack of such magnitude from multiple aircraft across multiple sectors.
No smoking gun there I'm afraid
It all happened so fast? Flight 11 started its right turn at NEADS HQ 8:14 A.M and flew until 8:46 passing targets 1. NEADS HQ and 2. Indian Point and other Air National Guard bases while on three radar scopes RIV, REM and GIB.. Most likely had an beacon assignment 14XX and 7500 hijack highlights across both FAA and NORAD radar scopes.. No smoking gun? I think not..
Smoking Guns 9 11 By Air Chapter 1 2017
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2017/09/9-11-contracting-plane-videos.html
7500 code from the ATC at the ground level did happen on 9/11 but never became official dogma and became cover up 1 of 200 + and counting.... ATC did report the brighter then normal radar blip but no one knows ATC can light up a target on radar in 2017 or knows what that means..Flight 11 also flew directly at NEADS headquarters at Rome NY. The area was packed with air force and air national guard fighter bases with a beacon something like 1422 but and was lost and flying in the wrong direction until U-turn took it down the Hudson River and over Indian Point. Flight 11 could have taken out NEADS HQ, Indian Point but picked a 208 ft wide North Tower with 14,000 people inside at 8:46 A.M or around 127 per floorhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftEM7sH5kuU . Also the phone numbers used on 9/11 904-555-0004 were never officially registered by the 555 administration therefore technically the 904-555-0004 phone calls were impossible both if used on the ground or at 40,000 feet in the air.. 7500 codes was forced on KAL 085 for a shoot down and Canadian gave the go ahead but someone didn't want to kill 200 people which a normal passenger load and not low numbers of 11, 175, 93 or 77.. No serials were found for any four plane on 9/11 and NTSB was never given the debris for an investigation.. Videos of Flight 175 has fake building inputs below the plane and fake inputs were put on radar for war game reasons naturally.. Hijack procedures changes were made in June 2001.. and whenever the FAA asked for help they turned down or delayed with no more question or radars RIV, REM and GIB didn't seem to help..
1. 7500 added to flight on 9/11 by force ATC audio video confession YT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlRGgJ3sCOg&t=15s
2. 904-555-0004 phone calls were impossible by 555 administration
3. NEADS September 11th: Real Decoy Planes added to battle field on 9/11
https://youtu.be/pNOTGTuIrto
4. Resolution of flight 175 was kept low by design.
https://youtu.be/yCYXlHUEG2Q
5. NEADS September 11th Real Decoy Planes
https://youtu.be/pNOTGTuIrto
9 11 We Have a DECOY Audio but no transcript
September 11th NEADS Cover up We Got a Decoy does not show up on transcripts
911-tapes We got a decoy
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/09/08/nyregion/911-tapes.html?_r=0
Edward Felt's 9-11 Ferris Wheel"As she listened to the tape later, Sandra Felt likened the noises to street-level sounds one heard when riding a Ferris wheel - many voices were audible, but none that could be picked out clearly"1. Betty Ong 904-555-00042. Amy Sweeney 904-555-00043. Barbara Olson 904-555-0004
4. Was Edward Felt phone calls 905-555-0004 as well? http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2015/04/dear-westmoreland-can-you-release.html
Thanks. 1. That first link of yours and one of the photos are found on my page 134 (3rd edition) listed as the source. Good work. 2. The phone calls are investigated here: http://letsrollforums.com//part-ii-fog-fiction-t32131.html -- to the conclusion that the planes were outfitted with new technology to specifically enable the high-altitude cell phone calls the hijack op required. See also http://letsrollforums.com//fog-fiction-and-flight-t28270p15.html 3. Not sure about the 7500 code yet. 4. Flight 11 Did Not Bark - Thanks! 5. "Why is debris a different state everytime its video taped or photographed" -- See my video "How FEMA Photoshopped 9/11" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsUSRrIXhXI 6. "Why can't employees tell the difference between flight debris?" Thanks! 7. "Why do photos of second plane on video look black and photo look normal?" The plane seems to go through a shadow then come out just before impact, when that photo was taken. If the videos/photos are fake then prove it with the 44 photos here: http://911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit_photos.html -- and 61 videos that show the plane. I've seen some interesting arguments with those unable to match the exact size/shape, but do they account for lens distortion, wing deflection and perspective exactly? You must admit, IF THEY didn't use Flight 175 as the attack plane, then THEY did it so well you have no hope of proving it... "impossible speed" notwithstanding. IF so, then it was meant to be a mindfuck; and you have accepted that impossible challenge. Sorry! Where many see a paucity of evidence, I almost see an orgy of evidence -- the N6 from the tail number for fuck's sake. It's hilarious FEMA Photoshopped that obviously staged (not planted in my opinion) fuselage evidence -- ruining it for any official use! And they got away with it until now. I can't wait to see the next FEMA FOIA when it comes out. Hope it has Baker's missing photos of the fuselage.
"IF THEY didn't use Flight 175 as the attack plane, then THEY did it so well you have no hope of proving it"
First, I would make crazy videos, example freeze frame screenshot
https://photos.app.goo.gl/3veZeer2RBtDK8Ow2
Second, I would tell the NTSB they wil never get any evidence.
Well I would say the black boxes would have proved it and the serial numbers but the FBI has never going give up their plane debris to the NTSB investigation team never!! .. Even the black box data that was read by the NTSB was taken and all investigations were shut down.. The FBI said they "don't know were they are"?? .. Its a "Pull it" statement for 9/11 planes . Did you miss this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxfSvt-hSmM
More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZUmXptNgwA
I can't see your photobucket links.. I don't think anyone can.. try Google photos..relink and redo the PDF..
http://photobucket.com/gallery/user/911conspiracytv/media/bWVkaWFJZDozNzkxNjk2NQ==/?ref= can you see this photo?
http://letsrollforums.com//part-ii-fog-fiction-t32131p2.html does NOT address that fact that all 555 numbers are all administered at one location and they told me over the phone that number was never activated.. Go figure..
You didn't respond to the different levels of speeds but also the "black out happens at DIFFERENT points of time.. I believe.. That's a large blow to your archive of video witnesses.. right? Take a look and run at .25 speed and take some freeze frames. I could be wrong.. But if I am right. Then what?
9 11 Contracting Plane Videos, does this mean they are all edited and witnesses should be used?
https://youtu.be/7v0S16b2CzE
If you think this comparison proves something, I recommend you do a more in-depth analysis and forget the speck on/in the camera lens. Make the videos the same speed and take screenshots to compare the same moments in time. Make the plane the same size, which will show how bad quality the Holly Bine video is... but I think then you will be able to see the plane goes into shadow and comes out before hitting the tower... in both videos. (Robert Clark's photo seems to be a reflection off the fairing.)
the speck looks just like the the other on the FEMA photo here: https://photos.app.goo.gl/EdEUFGsX59A8wrHs2
The specks are starting to ADD up in photos and videos.. No witnesses however..which is problem.
With Holly Bine I use the building as the standard of measurement for when the plane goes dark so the speed other issues are not the issue..however did I find other problems during this investigation. Brown marker edits inputs inserts for Parker video and photos with white mark at the pod location.. These problems have not been addressed..
4 comments:
If you think this comparison proves something, I recommend you do a more in-depth analysis and forget the speck on/in the camera lens. Make the videos the same speed and take screenshots to compare the same moments in time. Make the plane the same size, which will show how bad quality the Holly Bine video is... but I think then you will be able to see the plane goes into shadow and comes out before hitting the tower... in both videos. (Robert Clark's photo seems to be a reflection off the fairing.)
the speck looks just like the the other on the FEMA photo here:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/EdEUFGsX59A8wrHs2
The specks are starting to ADD up in photos and videos.. No witnesses however..which is problem.
With Holly Bine
I use the building as the standard of measurement for when the plane goes dark so the speed other issues are not the issue..however did I find other problems during this investigation. Brown marker edits inputs inserts for Parker video and photos with white mark at the pod location.. These problems have not been addressed..
Post a Comment