September 11th Chips Oxide Earthquakes and Judy Wood

Comment on Carlo Landolfi's answer to There are people who claim that the September 11 attacks were a False Flag Operation. Do such claims have any merit or evidence to support them? · View Parent

Dan Plesse

Mon

Problem #1

The only recordings on the graphs so far are explosives, because quarry blasts as you know they use explosives, right? I doubt all this quarry blast activity just so happens to be on 9/11.

Notice at #18 - #22 two-three things happen 1. the cause is dropped i.e “very weak” and the location is trimmed i.e 40.71 and 74.01

Depth is “Zero” when depth could be < 0.1 they use less then sign! NOT DETAILED

All this editing is clear signs of criminal activity!

problem #2

One problem with your data is that every earthquake should have a detailed GPS location. Since each earthquake labeled “quarry blast” does not have a accompanying GPS location signal, you can’t rule what it is unless you do have those details.. Judy is writing in “quarry blast” right? For Example 40.711??? and 74.013??? i.e  the question marks are missing details Judy didn’t provide, right?. Your data shows 40.71 -74.01 is Broadway & Cortlandt another “1″ on each data point array would have the signal placed right under the Twin towers. Notice they cropped off numbers or trimmed off location details but only for the towers. HOWEVER if you provided “40.711 and -74.013” this gives you WTC Cortlandt, New York, NY 10006, USA i.e you are basically under the towers.

problem #3

Top graph is PAL and everything is larger so 100.00 K on BRNJ graph means its smaller gain. So you wrong with the K 100.00 gain concept.

problem #4
no “quarry” exists at 40.71 -74.01 Broadway & Cortlandt St, New York, NY 10007, USA or under the Twin Towers and more details numbers would place the blast right at the World Trade Center location i.e the explosions i.e explosives and are not “quarry blasts” on 9/11. “quarry blasts” use explosives! The starting time #18 at 11:00 AM is after the trade center fell. 11:15 is BRNJ PAL 11:20 or seems edited two different times that close? . BRNJ should have been later at 11:20 and PAL should have 11:15 because its closer to WTC. So they deleted the spike on PAL. All other signals on each graph match perfectly! in time and size but ONE! Can you see that. You keep pointing to other graphs. Stop doing that.

Problem #5 No oxide was reported the USGS in their dust study.
A search of that document returned ZERO RESULTS!!

The chips however DID contain Copper Oxide. So WHY IS Judy Wood conflate the Chips with the WTC dust? Why would she do that? Can you answer that? thanks Why did Judy leave out the cause of blasts #18 - 22? and trim the GPS numbers?

Reply

Carlo Landolfi

20h ago

Problem #1

Yes, in a quarry they use explosives for sure and they use them frequently! Why not on 9/11? And what are you trying to prove, as those explosions happened after both Towers were destroyed. Do you claim they were destroying WTC7?

“Notice at #18 - #22 two-three things happen 1. the cause is dropped “very weak” and the location is trimmed i.e 40.71 and 74.01.″ I don’t understand what you’re trying to say.

If you read the NCSTAR 1–9 Vol.2 it’s all explained. The signals were too weak to be significant and to be reported precisely (depth and magnitude). (too weak for who, PAL Station?) 

problem #2

Every seismic signal registered DOES have detailed data. Those latitude and longitude and pretty precise. The data is not coming from Dr. Wood but from Columbia University and summarized on the NIST report.

Correct, the source of those (weak) signals are coming from the WTC as they are the origin/source of those (weak signals) and are happening late in the afternoon. So? What’s so strange?

problem #3

Please prove that a higher gain results in smaller seismic signal amplification. If you do so, only then I’m wrong.

problem #4

Of course no qurry exists at those coordinates, because it is the location of the WTC. Please read the table carefully. You are seeing ghosts regards to the PAL vs. BRNJ seismic charts. As a matter of fact I see other signals which are recorded by PAL but not by BRNJ and viceversa. And So what? That all depends on the earth composition, on the seismic instrumetation (if already told you the stations did not have the same sensitivity, etc) and on other complex factors. Are you a seismologist to explain it correctly for me? The signals do not match perfectly!

You say I’m referring to another seismic graph, then please provide the link to where you took the PAL vs. BRNJ graphs.

You say they edited/deleted the spikes. What for if they happened after the buildings where destroyed?

problem #5

It is true if you search the USGS fact sheet no iron oxides are found but then why did Steven Jones find iron oxides in the dust? Don’t you think it’s normal to find rust in the dust coming from the steel which made up the buildings? Check this out World Trade Center USGS environmental assessment. Here you are: iron oxide found Fe2O3- iron rust.

Reply

· Upvote

· Downvote

· Report

Dan Plesse

16m ago

WTC 7 was reported as being “ATTACKED” on the news.

What else would be “attacking” WTC 7 but explosives?

The GPS location details were trimmed enough so you can’t find out for sure. Do you have the rest GPS numbers?

Problem #2 They trimmed the GPS i,e shorten the length of GPS signal so you can’t find the exact location of the signal. i.e WTC 1 or WTC 2 WTC 6 or WTC 7

Judy wood then removed the CAUSE OF SIGNAL! with “ “very weak” in her graph.

problem #3 look at the two graphs this proves it btw

please provide the link to where you took the PAL vs. BRNJ graphs. Select 2001
LCSN Catalog Archive

Select 2001
LCSN Catalog Archive

“You say they edited/deleted the spikes.” one spike one spike
15:15 spike of BRNJ was deleted

“It is true if you search the USGS fact sheet no iron oxides are found but then why did Steven Jones find iron oxides in the dust?” HE DID FIND IT IN THE DUST. HE FOUND IT THE CHIPS !!!!! JESUS

Fe2O3 is Hematite its NOT even RED! Hematite

There are several different oxides of iron, with different fractions of oxygen. They are Fe0, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4. Rust consists mostly of Fe2O3, with additional water molecules attached. There are several forms of Fe2O3, and a common mineral composed of Fe2O3 is called hematite, which is a shiny-blackish mineral.

https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-chemical-formula-for-rust

Iron + Water + Oxygen = Rust

i.e. 4 Fe(s) + 6 H2O(l) + 3 O2(g) → 4 Fe(OH)3(s)

Then Fe(OH)3 dehydrates to produce Fe2O3.nH2O(s).

Thereby, the chemical formula for rust is Fe2O3.nH2O.

So you didn’t even get that right!

Zero

Reply

hello

Carlo Landolfi

23m ago

Oh yes, the news said it so it must be true! Sure!

The locations are not GPS but latitude and longitude and were not trimmed, cut, or anything else! I don’t have the rest because thay are complete and are the available ones provided by Columbia University and reported in the NIST report.

They couldn’t find the exactly location, so they assigned events 18–22 roughly to be at the WTC (40.71 N -74.01 E) because the signal was too weak and not recorded by all the stations. Work has to be done to determine where a signal originates and it is not easy at all!

Your seismic graph proves nothing and why did no one ever mention this to NIST? No one from the truth movement raised this alleged editing out. Is it your original discovery? I don’t even know what your trying to prove!

Again, that data is not Dr. Wood’s data, she did not remove anything! You are wasting my time and yours.

I cannot believe you are honestly doing what your doing. If your are so sure Columbia University and/or NIST edited the data then I suggest you sue them just as Dr. Wood did. Good luck!

Reply

· Upvote

· Downvote

· Report

Dan Plesse

Just now

1. Oh yes, the news said it so it must be true! Sure! BRNJ graphics back the BCC news report up which was the point! Early news reports are correct, not the news in general. You are grouping the two together. Stop doing that!

2. GPS coordinates are most commonly expressed as latitude and longitude

3. latitude and longitude numbers are trimmed and no this is NOT true “I don’t have the rest because thay are complete and are the available ones provided by Columbia University and reported in the NIST report.”

NO COMPLETE NUMBERS EXIST, PERIOD !!!!

4. Your seismic graph proves nothing. Answer not my graphs!

5. ” No one from the truth movement raised this alleged editing out. “ They don’t do much of anything. Sorry!

6. “They couldn’t find the exactly location?” really and you believe that all stations in NY could find the location. All 13 stations! FOR is 12.51.19 miles away!

AMNH 5.15 miles away
CPNY 6.15 miles away
CNY 8.37 miles away
CUNY 10.19 miles away
 FOR    12.51.19 miles away
MONJ 13.25 miles away
N61a 13.25 miles away

NIST, USGS, Judy Wood and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory couldn’t find the details with all these closer stations?

I published the third number already BTW

40.711 and 74.013

somehow you missed that. So the third number does exist. The forth number and fifth number does not exit. You are only on the second number.

Others might have forth and fifth digital latitude and longitude coordinates .

Reply